On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 smitra smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
You can just define personal identity as a single observer moment, which
includes any memories of the outcomes of the duplication experiments, so
the string of the W's and M'should be included in the definition of
you.
OK.
But
Leibniz' note on his Dialogs:
When God calculates and thinks things through, the world is made.
Cum Deus calculat et cogitationem exercet, mundus fit.
I have found it in M. Heller, Ultimate Explanations of the Universe.
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 1:41:51 PM UTC+10, chris peck wrote:
@ Pierz
If he refuses to
acknowledge MWI as a valid account due to his pronoun concerns, then
fine, maybe he should publish a refutation of Everett to that
effect.
but isn't John's point that pro-nouns do not
On 06 Aug 2015, at 19:23, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
the nuance is not in the name or in the pronouns, but in
the 1p/3p difference, or in the 1-1p/3-1p difference.
In a world with people duplicating machines what
On 06 Aug 2015, at 19:38, smitra wrote:
You can just define personal identity as a single observer moment,
That is dangerous talk, but i see what you mean.
which includes any memories of the outcomes of the duplication
experiments, so the string of the W's and M'should be included
in
On 07 Aug 2015, at 02:59, Pierz wrote:
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 8:06:31 PM UTC+10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Aug 2015, at 02:39, Pierz wrote:
Mein Gott, this argument reminds me of the fire in Siberia that
started burning in the Holocene and is still going. Why do you keep
taking
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Pierz pier...@gmail.com wrote:
My point isn't that MWI is true. My point is you understand it and how it
leads to the appearance of indeterminacy in a completely determined system.
Indeterminacy is a 1-p illusion
It's either an illusion or it is
On 07 Aug 2015, at 05:54, Samiya Illias wrote:
Bruno,
I'm reading R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz. In the Introduction to A Study
of Numbers, they quote his last words. It reminds me of your salvia
beings. Thought the attached might be of interest to you.
Regards,
Samiya
Nice quote Samya.
I
On 07-Aug-2015, at 9:46 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 07 Aug 2015, at 05:54, Samiya Illias wrote:
Bruno,
I'm reading R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz. In the Introduction to A Study of
Numbers, they quote his last words. It reminds me of your salvia beings.
Thought the
9 matches
Mail list logo
