Do traversable wormholes only lead to violations of no-cloning if they
allow for closed timelike curves, as discussed at
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/time-travel-via-wormhole-breaks-the-rules-of-quantum-mechanics
? If so, maybe there is the possibility that traversable wormholes wo
On 30-01-2022 14:29, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 6:15 AM Lawrence Crowell
wrote:
_> Whether we develop an AI that surpasses us and continues is
rather speculative._
I don't think it's speculative at all, in fact I think it's
inevitable. The entire human genome only contains 750
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 6:15 AM Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
*> Whether we develop an AI that surpasses us and continues is rather
> speculative.*
I don't think it's speculative at all, in fact I think it's inevitable. The
entire human genome only contains 750 Mega
On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 7:36:04 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:52 AM Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> > These things are not likely. Traversable wormholes require severe
>> violations of known physics, from no-cloning rule in quantum mechanics to
>> the basi
and better scopes round the solar system.
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
Sent: Fri, Jan 28, 2022 8:35 am
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:52 AM Lawrence Crowell
wrote:
> These things are not li
...@aol.com
Cc: everything-list@googlegroups.com ;
meekerbr...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed, Jan 26, 2022 12:51 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:33 AM wrote:
> Very good, JC, so Hastelloy might be the ticket for a a fission revival?
It's not the ticket but it
Well, of course you could be correct in your view on our extinction, and who am
I to instruct you otherwise? I'd look for a fusion of species tween machine
intel plus ourselves. Sort of like a crab adding a snail shell to it's shell.
The machinery adds us for emotional enrichment. Need not be h
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:52 AM Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> These things are not likely. Traversable wormholes require severe
> violations of known physics, from no-cloning rule in quantum mechanics to
> the basic principles of thermodynamics.
What about a One-W
These things are not likely. Traversable wormholes require severe
violations of known physics, from no-cloning rule in quantum mechanics to
the basic principles of thermodynamics. These ideas of Kardashev
civilizations are science fiction-fantasies. These things will not happen.
certainly not t
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:33 AM wrote:
*> Very good, JC, so Hastelloy might be the ticket for a a fission revival?*
>
It's not the ticket but it's probably part of the ticket.
> * > MSR, because of its potential has been spoken of eclipsing the
> possibility of fusion as a very long term fix
ything List
Cc: meekerbr...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 25, 2022 6:54 am
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 6:50 PM spudboy100 via Everything List
wrote:
> I quibble as I always must, over the safety and economics of corrosion be it
> sodium chloride or s
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 6:50 PM spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
* > I quibble as I always must, over the safety and economics of corrosion
> be it sodium chloride or sodium fluoride. Seems still unresolved regarding
> corrosion.*
>
Degradation of the meta
c: spudboy...@aol.com
Sent: Fri, Jan 21, 2022 4:26 am
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:35:46AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:59 PM wrote:
>
>
> > For solar you also are presuming, because I have this analysis that
>
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 07:08:29AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 3:07 AM Russell Standish
> wrote:
>
>
> >> even with your frugal ways solar cells aren't enough to make you
> energ independent, you still have to hook up with the power company.
>
>
>
>
On 1/22/2022 4:08 AM, John Clark wrote:
I know from personal experience that if it wasn't for Willis Carrier's
invention of the air conditioner there is no way Florida would be the
third most populous of the 50 states, even in mid winter it's not
unusual for the temperature to be in the upper
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 3:07 AM Russell Standish
wrote:
>> even with your frugal ways solar cells aren't enough to make you energ
>> independent, you still have to hook up with the power company.
>
>
> *> Of course. We'd need a battery as well. But that's not the point.*
I think it is the point
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:29:55AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 4:26 AM Russell Standish
> wrote:
>
>
> > We have solar panels on half our roof (the difficult half, because of
> aesthetics, we didn't want to cover the western half that faces the
> street). So a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 4:26 AM Russell Standish
wrote:
>
* > **We have solar panels on half our **roof (the difficult half, because
> of aesthetics, we didn't want to **cover the western half that faces the
> street). So about 16kW of **installed capacity. Average production year
> round is abou
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:35:46AM -0500, John Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:59 PM wrote:
>
>
> > For solar you also are presuming, because I have this analysis that
> counters your assertion of dilute power, thus being insufficient. Kindly
> refute.
> https://news.c
On 1/19/2022 4:35 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:59 PM wrote:
> /For solar you also are presuming, because I have this analysis
that counters your assertion of dilute power, thus being
insufficient. Kindly refute. /
https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/10/0
On 1/19/2022 4:07 AM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 12:51:34 AM UTC-6 meeke...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 1/17/2022 10:22 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
I will leave this for the aerospace engineers. Back to newtonian
basics, we need thrust, a
If you do your slingshoting well and maybe use a black hole or two, your
Jupiter scale matrioshka can go really fast.
https://www.space.com/halo-drive-black-holes-galaxy-travel.html
Also as suprise no-one, solar sailing is faster around more luminous stars.
Also in the same article, bouncing sails
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:59 PM wrote:
> > *For solar you also are presuming, because I have this analysis that
> counters your assertion of dilute power, thus being insufficient. Kindly
> refute. *
>
> https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/10/08/a-new-global-study-refines-estimates-of-rooftop
n Clark
To: spudboy...@aol.com
Cc: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30 AM wrote:
> /when the automation monster strike/[...]
On the day the automation monster strikes your strict opposition to
a
rk
To: spudboy...@aol.com
Cc: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30 AM wrote:
> when the automation monster strike [...]
On the day the automation monster strikes your strict opposition to any
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:49 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
*> The evolution of robots will be to robots that want to build more
> robots.*
It's impossible to predict what something will evolve into although it is
possible to predict what something will not evolve into, and a super
intelligent computer
On 1/18/2022 10:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30 AM wrote:
> /when the automation monster strike/[...]
On the day the automation monster strikes your strict opposition to
any form of socialism or welfare will need to be modified; and that
day seems to be coming m
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30 AM wrote:
> *when the automation monster strike* [...]
On the day the automation monster strikes your strict opposition to any
form of socialism or welfare will need to be modified; and that day seems
to be coming much sooner than I thought it would, that's why I
t
Sent: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 6:21 am
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:22 AM wrote:
> My suspicion is the motivator [for space mining ] as such will be money sorry
> to say!
Why are you sorry to say that? Money is my friend, I like money, nearly
everybody
st at Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
eex
-Original Message-
> From: John Clark
> To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 4:18 pm
> Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:23 P
Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis
o0s
.
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:23 PM spudboy100 via Everything List
wrot
nable. I
am not wedded to any one technology, just one that will work to specification.
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:23 P
My expectation is that wormhole travel is a thing better achieved by a
Kardashev 2 civilization. The grandchildren's work at intercepting a large
factor of the emitted solar photons. Oh, those crazy grandkids! The figure that
I sporadically arrive at is some 40-50 thousand years from now. Sinc
d in the early 1960s
too.
John K ClarkSee what's on my new list at Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
o0s
.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Clark
> To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 4:18
Sabine Hossenfelder's video is about the warp drive, based on the
Alcubierre warp solution of the Einstein field equations. Her conclusions
are more or less on the mark I think. A sub-luminal (slower than light)
warp drive could work. Even with negative mass-energy if the moduli for
these field
but mining the Belt seems
> more sustainable. I am not wedded to any one technology, just one that will
> work to specification.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Clark
> To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 4:18 pm
> Su
mining the Belt seems more sustainable. I
am not wedded to any one technology, just one that will work to specification.
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Sun
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:23 PM spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
*> This surely can't be done anytime soon. My suspicion is that new
> discoveries of profound impact will wait until we can build better
> equipment, as Freeman Dyson state long ago.*
>
I wro
ooglegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 2:20 pm
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
No, a fusion rocket is much more technologically difficult than a fusion power
plant. The power plant can be very large and heavy. The power plant just need
to produce heat; the rocket needs to direct
ysics? No, but it does open
the opportunity of learning of new phenomena. This can only change the big
picture.
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2022 5:49 am
Subject: Re: A gravitational wave rocket
On Sat, Jan
No, a fusion rocket is much more technologically difficult than a fusion
power plant. The power plant can be very large and heavy. The power
plant just need to produce heat; the rocket needs to direct the fusion
products.
Brent
On 1/15/2022 8:55 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
So
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:55 PM spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
*> So earlier today I watched Sabine hassenfelder the physicist from
> Germany indicate that any kind of wormhole travel or FTL is strictly
> unlikely.*
>
I'd say practical wormhole travel,
So earlier today I watched Sabine hassenfelder the physicist from Germany
indicate that any kind of wormhole travel or FTL is strictly unlikely. What I'd
like to ask is, whether all the work that's done today for creating commercial
nuclear fusion is more or less likely, than using the same tec
It is possible for a binary star system to interact with a third star so
there is an exchange. We do normally expect binary star systems to have
similarly oriented angular momenta.
This is an interesting result. To compute this would have been tough. This
is a case of a Robinson-Trautman t
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:37 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
* > Kudos to whomever did the calculation for this. But I would have
> thought that most collisions would be misaligned in both spin axes and
> impact plane. The Sun's spin axis isn't aligned with the Milky Way's axis
> of rotation, so I had a
Kudos to whomever did the calculation for this. But I would have
thought that most collisions would be misaligned in both spin axes and
impact plane. The Sun's spin axis isn't aligned with the Milky Way's
axis of rotation, so I had assumed most stars have randomly directed
spin axes.
Brent
For the first time a sort of gravitational wave rocket has been found. By
re-examining the data from the LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave
observatories researchers report on January 6 they have detected the merger
of 34 and 29 solar mass Black Holes that resulted in a Black Hole of about
62 solar
47 matches
Mail list logo