Bruno:
thanks for the TITLE of your post including the * N O * .
John Mikes
(*Subject:* Re: Can the physical brain possibly store our memories ? No.)
)
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Dec 2012, at 12:16, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
1
On 26 Dec 2012, at 19:26, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
information is not abstract, it's physical and is deeply involved
with both energy and entropy.
You confuse some notion of physical information with the
mathematical
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-21, 13:25:36
Subject: Re: Can the physical brain possibly store our memories ? No.
On 20 Dec 2012, at 19:01, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
A simpler way to make my point is the axiom
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
Why do the natural numbers exist?
A better question is do the natural numbers need a reason to exist? I don't
know the answer to that but my hunch is no.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
information is not abstract, it's physical and is deeply involved with
both energy and entropy.
You confuse some notion of physical information with the mathematical
notion(s).
I am not confused and it is a fact that
is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-21, 13:25:36
Subject: Re: Can the physical brain possibly store our memories ? No.
On 20 Dec 2012, at 19:01, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
A simpler
looking for one with limits.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/22/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-21, 13:25:36
Subject: Re: Can the physical brain
: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-21, 13:25:36
Subject: Re: Can the physical brain possibly store our memories ? No.
On 20 Dec 2012, at 19:01, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
A simpler way to make my point is the axiom
that no information can be stand alone, it must
have context to give it meaning
On 21 Dec 2012, at 22:17, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
wrote:
The infinite set of natural numbers is not stored on anything,
Which causes no problem because there is not a infinite number of
anything in the observable universe,
Hi Bruno,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
The infinite set of natural numbers is not stored on anything,
Which causes no problem because there is not a infinite number of anything
in the observable universe, probably not even points in space.
On 20 Dec 2012, at 19:01, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
A simpler way to make my point is the axiom
that no information can be stand alone, it must
have context to give it meaning.
The information needs a universal machine to interpret it.
Universal machines needs also a universal machine to be
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
The infinite set of natural numbers is not stored on anything,
Which causes no problem because there is not a infinite number of anything
in the observable universe, probably not even points in space.
no information can
On 12/20/2012 1:01 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
A simpler way to make my point is the axiom
that no information can be stand alone, it must
have context to give it meaning. But that context can not be
stored alone, it in turn must have context.
And so forth. Thus one bit of information
cannot
13 matches
Mail list logo
