Didn't even mention Brexit.
Brent
On 12/30/2016 3:47 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
I feel like the guy in the dressing gown feeling the weirdness
https://www.facebook.com/uniladmag/videos/2524792810877096/
Kim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything
On 12/30/2016 2:52 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
On 28 Dec 2016, at 6:17 pm, Brent Meeker > wrote:
Exactly so. Once we can engineer robots to act with human like
intelligence, questions about consciousness will be seen as either
meaningless or
I feel like the guy in the dressing gown feeling the weirdness
https://www.facebook.com/uniladmag/videos/2524792810877096/
Kim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> On 28 Dec 2016, at 6:17 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> Exactly so. Once we can engineer robots to act with human like intelligence,
> questions about consciousness will be seen as either meaningless or "the
> wrong question".
>
>
Yes. This is precisely why we will
> On 30 Dec 2016, at 7:47 am, John Mikes wrote:
>
> KIM (and Brent, Telmo of course)
> what should we call " W E I R D " ???
I think "low measure" is the most meaningful synonym for me
Kim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
John Mikes:
KIM (and Brent, Telmo of course) what should we call " W E I R D " ???
Normal
0
14
false
false
false
IT
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
>
> On 30 Dec 2016, at 12:49 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 07:57:31PM +1100, Kim Jones wrote:
>>
>> I don’t think that only mature-age people think that the fact that Donald
>> Trump got elected is weird. Perhaps your theory can be ramped up
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 07:57:31PM +1100, Kim Jones wrote:
>
> I don’t think that only mature-age people think that the fact that Donald
> Trump got elected is weird. Perhaps your theory can be ramped up another
> tier: not only does the world seem weird to the elderly but the more human
>
On 12/29/2016 12:47 PM, John Mikes wrote:
KIM (and Brent, Telmo of course)
what should we call * " W E I R D "* ???
Is this an epitheton for our 'unusual'? or 'unruly'? or 'disorderly'?
I detected that the 'weirdness' (whatever you define it by) of the World
smoothened up as I got older and
On 12/29/2016 3:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Kim Jones wrote:
On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:03 pm, Telmo Menezes wrote:
If we assume the MWI, isn't it the case that we should expect the
world to become weirder as we
On 12/29/2016 2:57 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I finished reading the story, and I have to admit it is quite disturbing.
My argument against the possibility of such hells is the same as my
argument against the possibility of christian hell: if I can exist in
some conventional state C, that lasts
KIM (and Brent, Telmo of course)
what should we call * " W E I R D "* ???
Is this an epitheton for our 'unusual'? or 'unruly'? or 'disorderly'?
I detected that the 'weirdness' (whatever you define it by) of the World
smoothened up as I got older and older. I have more understanding
N O W (in my
On 29 Dec 2016, at 11:33, Telmo Menezes wrote:
It looks like the computer with the instrcution "kill the user",
I love that idea!
Your computer is not the Universal Machine Bruno.
What? Of course it is. the infinite tape is the environment. It is
not part
of the machine. Turing
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Kim Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:03 pm, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> If we assume the MWI, isn't it the case that we
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Kim Jones wrote:
>
> On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:03 pm, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> If we assume the MWI, isn't it the case that we should expect the
> world to become weirder as we get older?
>
>
>
> I don’t think that
>> to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
>>> increasingly bias the possible worlds.
>>>
>>> One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
>>> weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/2016 11:39 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Brent Meeker
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/27/2016 3:40 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016
> It looks like the computer with the instrcution "kill the user",
I love that idea!
>> Your computer is not the Universal Machine Bruno.
>
>
> What? Of course it is. the infinite tape is the environment. It is not part
> of the machine. Turing discover the universal number, that is, if phi_i is
> On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:03 pm, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> If we assume the MWI, isn't it the case that we should expect the
> world to become weirder as we get older?
I don’t think that only mature-age people think that the fact that Donald Trump
got elected is weird.
On 12/27/2016 11:39 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 12/27/2016 3:40 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Brent Meeker
wrote:
Although your evolution may be statistically
On 12/27/2016 11:34 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
Exactly so. Once we can engineer robots to act with human like
intelligence, questions about consciousness will be seen as either
meaningless or "the wrong question".
I
city accumulates, it
increasingly bias the possible worlds.
One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that
can
be directly measured, but still fun to think about.
Yes, when we die, we survive
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiogenesis
-Original Message-
From: Hans Moravec <hans.p.mora...@gmail.com>
To: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 27, 2016 7:48 pm
Subject: Re: The Weirdening
I’m on the list. Clammed up around
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/2016 3:40 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Brent Meeker
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Although your evolution may be statistically improbable, mostly at the
>>>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
> Exactly so. Once we can engineer robots to act with human like
> intelligence, questions about consciousness will be seen as either
> meaningless or "the wrong question".
I think it is very unlikely that we will
Exactly so. Once we can engineer robots to act with human like
intelligence, questions about consciousness will be seen as either
meaningless or "the wrong question".
Best wishes for your endeavor, Hans.
Brent
On 12/27/2016 4:48 PM, Hans Moravec wrote:
I’m on the list. Clammed up around
I’m on the list. Clammed up around 2000 to get on with
robot building. Someday they can answer for themselves.
Still a few decades to go, but I expect
some machines built to work around people will act as if
they have feelings, and awareness of others’ feelings.
For all practical purposes
s <te...@telmomenezes.com>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 27, 2016 6:56 pm
Subject: Re: The Weirdening
Nice, thanks Hans (and Brent)!
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Hans Moravec <hans.p.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was expecting you,
On 12/27/2016 3:40 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
Although your evolution may be statistically improbable, mostly at the
biochemical level, there's no reason that the rest of the world should show
any statistical
e. As this specificity accumulates, it
increasingly bias the possible worlds.
One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that can
be directly measured, but still fun to think about.
ific events have
>> to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
>> increasingly bias the possible worlds.
>>
>> One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
>> weirdening" would accelerate. Of course th
come weirder as we get older? My reasoning is simple: the
>>> older you are, the lower your measure, the more specific events have
>>> to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
>>> increasingly bias the possible worlds.
>>>
keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
>> increasingly bias the possible worlds.
>>
>> One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
>> weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that can
>> be directly m
reasoning is simple: the
>> older you are, the lower your measure, the more specific events have
>> to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
>> increasingly bias the possible worlds.
>>
>> One could even use a chart like the one b
worlds.
>
> One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
> weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that can
> be directly measured, but still fun to think about.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_table#/media/File:Data
possible worlds.
>
> One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
> weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that can
> be directly measured, but still fun to think about.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_table#/media/F
re" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
increasingly bias the possible worlds.
One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that can
be directly measured, but still
ates, it
>> increasingly bias the possible worlds.
>>
>> One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
>> weirdening" would accelerate. Of course this is not something that can
>> be directly measured, but still fun to think about.
>>
get older? My reasoning is simple: the
older you are, the lower your measure, the more specific events have
to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
increasingly bias the possible worlds.
One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "
are, the lower your measure, the more specific events have
to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
increasingly bias the possible worlds.
One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
weirdening" would accelerate. Of course t
com>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 27, 2016 6:04 am
Subject: The Weirdening
I take a break from the god-wars to propose an idea that I have been
thinking about. This is probably both silly and unoriginal, but here
it goes...
If we assume th
are, the lower your measure, the more specific events have
to "conspire" to keep you alive. As this specificity accumulates, it
increasingly bias the possible worlds.
One could even use a chart like the one below to predict where "the
weirdening" would accelerate. Of course t
42 matches
Mail list logo