Hi Bruno Marchal
According to the Bible, belief is a product of faith or trust, and that trust
does not come from you, it is a gift from God. We have nothing to do with it,
at least that isa what we Lutherns believe.
Roger , rclo...@verizon.net
8/20/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy and all
The logic of an Agenda is purposeful or goal-oriented, what Aristotle
called final causation. where an object is PULLED forward by a goal.
By what should be.
This is the opposite of efficient causation, as in determinism,
in which objects are PUSHED forward.
Hi Stephen P. King
Mereology is part and parcel of Leibniz's system, to use a limp pun.
1) Although unproven, but because God is good while the world is contingent
(imperfect, misfitting),
Leibniz, like Augustine and Paul, believed that things as a whole work for
good, but unfortunately not
Hi Stephen P. King
The modal logic needs to aim purposefully toward the best possible solution.
And contain absolute as well as contingent truths. Thus there must be
some sort of mereology involved in the modalities. Maybe a new type of copula
insuring this situation to hold ?
Roger ,
Hi Stephen P. King
Ah so. I can point leibniz's critics to Godel.
And to the contingency of the world. What did you expect ?
A rose garden ?
Leibniz sort of sensed Godel's theorem by his recognition that while things
must be perfect in Heaven,
down here things were contingent, iffy,
Hi meekerdb
All's well in Heaven, but down here on earth things are a little messier.
Heaven is what should be, down here is what is.
This conflict earns preachers a nice life.
The Christian solution to this dilemma is that God solved it a long
time ago by allowing his son to be crucified and
In evolutionary terms, is and ougth reflect the double nature of a social
being which has not lost is individuality, as individual and as a member of
a bigger whole. Both are in tension. The social whole is also in our
instinctive individual nature,and appear to the conscious trough intuitions
and
Hi Roger,
That's just too trivial as a solution, although nothing finally is: the
attractor of dynamical systems and phase space are fascinating, although I
fail to see how the discussion advances through them.
There is something difficult about power/control, even speaking restricting
to
Roger,
Divine selection and natural selection are sourced,
however at differing levels of information integration,
in the universal CYM monad subspace.
Belief can also be a product of science.
I believe science.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Roger rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi
Wiki: Mereology has been axiomatized in various ways as applications
of predicate
logic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_logic to formal
ontologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_ontology,
of which mereology is an important part. A common element of such
axiomatizations is the assumption,
My belief based on string theory is that monad logic gets applied to
produce the best possible world at the level of quantum particle
interactions where the best of several quantum states is chosen in every
interaction in the universe by the ,monads.
Richard Ruquist PhD
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at
Hi Roger,
On 8/20/2012 6:48 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Mereology is part and parcel of Leibniz's system, to use a limp pun.
I like puns! They show us that existence does not just have one
side/form/pattern/perspective...
1) Although unproven, but because God is good while the
On 8/20/2012 6:54 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
The modal logic needs to aim purposefully toward the best possible
solution.
Hi Roger,
But the best possible can only be defined infinitely (and thus
impossible to know) or finitely in a error-prone or approximate way.
And contain
On 8/20/2012 7:04 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Ah so. I can point leibniz's critics to Godel.
And to the contingency of the world. What did you expect ?
A rose garden ?
Leibniz sort of sensed Godel's theorem by his recognition that while
things must be perfect in Heaven,
down here
On 8/20/2012 11:36 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Wiki: Mereology has been axiomatized in various ways as applications
of predicate logic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_logic to
formal ontology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_ontology, of
which mereology is an important part. A common
On 19 Aug 2012, at 17:22, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 18 Aug 2012, at 17:19, Roger wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Yes, you can square the square root of any number to test its
accuracy,
but there are a variety of algorithms used to calculate pi.
Hi Stephan,
I do not think that string theory requires a fixed background.
Otherwise string theory could not be a prospective ToE.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/20/2012 11:36 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Wiki: Mereology has been
I have listened to Philosophy of Science: Bolinda Beginner Guides by
Geoffrey Gorham. The author has mentioned about a new discipline,
neurolaw and I believe that could be useful for the ongoing discussion
on the free will.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurolaw
Neurolaw is an emerging field
On 8/20/2012 1:40 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I do not think that string theory requires a fixed background.
Otherwise string theory could not be a prospective ToE.
Richard
Hi Richard,
I had the very same reaction, but research it for yourself. Look at
the literature, the
Hi Bruno and Stephen
I want to inform you that you are wrong in all of your writings.
Please understand how very incorrect you are about everything you
post! Why are you so wrong.
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
On 8/20/2012 5:16 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Bruno and Stephen
I want to inform you that you are wrong in all of your writings.
Please understand how very incorrect you are about everything you
post! Why are you so wrong.
Roger
I glad Roger cleared that up. :-)
Brent
Shut up he explained.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:30 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/31/2012 10:48 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The problem is to explain also why the entropy of the early universe was
so low. If you just accept that this is the case and also don't bother
about the very distant
22 matches
Mail list logo
