>
> Are you saying that you disallow lambda expression having the shape:
>
> (LAMBDA (X) F)
>
> with no occurrence of X in F?
The brackets I have used to date are not the brackets of the lambda
calculus. I think physically, not symbolically. I find the jargon really
hard to relate to.
>
> P
sorry about all the posts.
something weird going on.
>
> see below..
>
>>
>> See below, please
>> John
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Colin Geoffrey Hales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: Zuse Symposium: Is the universe a com
see below..
>
> See below, please
> John
> - Original Message -
> From: "Colin Geoffrey Hales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Zuse Symposium: Is the universe a computer? Berlin Nov 6-7
>
>
>>> Addition to my "lost and found" 1st p
See below
>
> See below, please
> John
> - Original Message -
> From: "Colin Geoffrey Hales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Zuse Symposium: Is the universe a computer? Berlin Nov 6-7
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Addition to my "lost and found"
See below
>
> See below, please
> John
> - Original Message -
> From: "Colin Geoffrey Hales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Zuse Symposium: Is the universe a computer? Berlin Nov 6-7
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Addition to my "lost and found"
Dear Stathis,
Is this not an extreme form of "Occasionalism"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occasionalism
Why does it seem that we humans perpetually imagine the possibility that
the Universe we observe requires some form of "hidden behind the curtains"
machinery to "hold it up"; I am
See below, please
John
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Geoffrey Hales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: Zuse Symposium: Is the universe a computer? Berlin Nov 6-7
>
>>
>> Addition to my "lost and found" 1st post in this topic to
>> Marc:
Le 09-nov.-06, à 13:57, 1Z a écrit :
>
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit :
>>
>>> We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first
>>> personal
>>> and third personal.
>>
>>
>> A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference?
>
>
> The difference
Le 09-nov.-06, à 14:07, 1Z a écrit :
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> Le 31-oct.-06, à 19:37, 1Z a écrit :
>>
>>> Well, I think numbers don't exist AT ALL
>>
>> I have not the slightest idea what you mean by that.
>
> If you don't understand anti-Platonism, that would certainly explain
> why you do
Le 09-nov.-06, à 13:53, 1Z a écrit :
> If you can show that subjective experience exists in Platonia,
> you can use that to show that some things will "seem" dynamical.
>
> If you can show that there a dynamic processes in Platonia,
> you can use that to show there are running computations
> an
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 31-oct.-06, à 19:37, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > Well, I think numbers don't exist AT ALL
>
> I have not the slightest idea what you mean by that.
If you don't understand anti-Platonism, that would certainly explain
why you don't argue against it.
> Your longer
> "metaphysi
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first
> > personal
> > and third personal.
>
>
> A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference?
The difference boils down to the incommuncability of certain things,
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Peter Jones (1Z) a écrit :
>
> >> Most people would not say "yes doctor" to a process that recorded
> >> their
> >> brain on a tape a left it in a filing cabinet. Yet, that is all you
> >> can
> >> get out of the timeless world of Plato's heaven (programme vs
> >> process).
Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit :
> We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first
> personal
> and third personal.
A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Le 31-oct.-06, à 19:37, 1Z a écrit :
> Well, I think numbers don't exist AT ALL
I have not the slightest idea what you mean by that. Your longer
"metaphysics" post begs many of the questions addressed in this list.
Personally: I have no theory, just an argument showing that if we take
the
Peter Jones (1Z) a écrit :
>> Most people would not say "yes doctor" to a process that recorded
>> their
>> brain on a tape a left it in a filing cabinet. Yet, that is all you
>> can
>> get out of the timeless world of Plato's heaven (programme vs
>> process).
Why? Plato's heaven is full of
16 matches
Mail list logo
