On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:02 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
This is quite simple. Markets ignore the commons, hence a free market
solution can't - or is highly unlikely - to work.
Yes, but this is circular. You're saying that the market cannot work
for things that you do not allow to be part
On 18 Nov 2013, at 00:53, LizR wrote:
If the universe exists for long enough
It has to be virtually infinite, have special homogeneity conditions,
and even in that case, I don't see how a Boltzman brain can exist a
sufficiently long time to get the deep and linear comp state capable
of
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:46 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 November 2013 22:41, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:02 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
This is quite simple. Markets ignore the commons, hence a free market
solution can't - or is
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:41 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Telmo, oil wells went down deeper than previously estimated as
feasible. Techniques are evolving.
If 2, 0r 5 pipes are inadequate in transport capacity, use more. Ask the
engineers - I also claim ignorance.
the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:23 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/17/2013 4:25 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/16/2013 11:36 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
But I certainly take your point that there is a reason the
Spinoza, Leibniz and Descartes are completely different on the relationship
between mind and matter See
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/#DesSpiLei
Spinoza was a monist, who believed that mind and matter were one.
Descartes believed that mind and matter are totally different
Leibniz
On 18 Nov 2013, at 14:41, Roger Clough wrote:
Spinoza, Leibniz and Descartes are completely different on the
relationship
between mind and matter See
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/#DesSpiLei
Spinoza was a monist, who believed that mind and matter were one.
Are you sure? It
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 18 Nov 2013, at 14:41, Roger Clough wrote:
Spinoza, Leibniz and Descartes are completely different on the relationship
between mind and matter See
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/#DesSpiLei
Spinoza was
On 18 Nov 2013, at 15:36, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 18 Nov 2013, at 14:41, Roger Clough wrote:
Spinoza, Leibniz and Descartes are completely different on the
relationship
between mind and matter See
On 11/18/2013 1:46 AM, LizR wrote:
On 18 November 2013 22:41, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:02 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com
mailto:lizj...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is quite simple. Markets ignore the commons, hence
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:13 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I can think of one thing that could dramatically not just slow but
reverse the growth of photovoltaics, removing the tax incentives and
subsidies. In effect government has been lying to the free market about the
true cost
On 11/18/2013 4:31 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
In fact, in the 90s Microsoft wasn't too happy with how the web was
suddenly exploding and out of their control. Using their monopolistic
position, they created a browser and gave it away for free, then
stalled its development. This created a tragedy
On 18 Nov 2013, at 18:13, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/18/2013 1:46 AM, LizR wrote:
On 18 November 2013 22:41, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:02 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
This is quite simple. Markets ignore the commons, hence a free
market
On 11/18/2013 4:31 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
If I tried to buy some land and start an
independent city, stormtroopers would show up at some point. Even if
I'm not harming anyone. Even if I'm totally self-reliant.
Depends on what you mean by independent city. If you just mean a place with homes
On 11/18/2013 4:43 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:23 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/17/2013 4:25 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/16/2013 11:36 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
But I certainly
2013/11/18 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/18/2013 4:43 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:23 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/17/2013 4:25 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/16/2013
On 11/18/2013 9:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:13 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I can think of one thing that could dramatically not just slow but
reverse the
growth of photovoltaics, removing the tax incentives and
On 11/18/2013 9:44 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You seem to be arguing against a straw man here. I explained why the free market can't
fix the tragedy of the commons. You haven't answered my point.
And he's so concerned with anti-government straw men that he hasn't noticed that a
market requires
Please look at this (and tweet / resend it if you agree).
http://act.350.org/sign/haiyan
Thanks! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On 18 November 2013 22:41, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:02 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
This is quite simple. Markets ignore the commons, hence a free market
solution can't - or is highly unlikely - to work.
Yes, but this is circular. You're
20 matches
Mail list logo
