I cooked up a little program that displays the relative measure of
observer-moments as a rather unfortunate person attempts to cross a couple
bridges. It avoids one problem in that the person suffers from short-term
memory loss and so convergent observer-moments cause increased measure where
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Colvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:38 PM
Subject: RE: many worlds theory of immortality
While I'm a supporter of Tegmark's Ultimate Ensemble, I think it is by no
means clear that just because
Hi Nick,
I asked a question in a thread Quantum accident survivor some time ago
where, at least in my mind, it was concluded that we can indeed be removed
from loved ones each time we survive a situation that was clearly deadly in
most cases and that one's consciousness is nudged away from the
Thank you Bruno Jesse, this anticipatory QTI is the most awesome
interpretation of QM I've ever heard.
Is it too optimistic to think that we are being 'nudged' toward a
biotech breakthrough which will give us legitimate/objective
immortality?
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 02:34 AM,
I mean the absolutely exact same David Kwinter or Eric Cavalcanti as
was the moment before.
see below for further comment
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 01:33 PM, Eric Cavalcanti wrote:
What do you mean by *entirely equal*?
- Original Message -
From: David Kwinter [EMAIL
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 07:56 PM, Eric Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: David Kwinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I mean the absolutely exact same David Kwinter or Eric Cavalcanti as
was the moment before.
I agree that a moment from now there will be a number
On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 10:47 AM, Eric Cavalcanti wrote:
Let me stress this point: *I am, for all practical purposes,
one and only one specific configuration of atoms in a
specific universe. I could never say that ' I ' is ALL the
copies, since I NEVER experience what the other copies
On Thursday, November 6, 2003, at 01:24 AM, Alberto Gómez wrote:
But, for these mathematical descriptions to exist, it is necessary the
existence of being with a higher dimensionality and intelligence that
formulate these mathematical descriptions? That is: every mathematical
object does exist
OK, what about heat? Heat fills low pressure areas uniformly so there
could be no bubble of non-vaporizing heat for the scientist to live
in. Isn't the heat an absolute killer?
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 10:55 AM, Hal Finney wrote:
David Kwinter writes:
The concept of what makes a real
where I survived, that TO ME I will always survive
other such life/death branches?
Furthermore if I witness a crash where someone dies can I assume that
the victim will survive in their own world so far as at least one
quantum branch of survivability seems possible?
David Kwinter
good
arguments out there for QI? (not to bother you - I will research this
on my own)
Thanks
David Kwinter
.
Ancestor-simulation is a study inwards of our universe. The whole ancestor-simulation phenomenon is certainly being considered by the inhabitants of other level 1, 2, 3 4 universes who cannot defy their mathematical physics.
David Kwinter
On 6/6/03 5:31 PM, John Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED
12 matches
Mail list logo
