On 10 Jan 2009, at 02:26, Kim Jones wrote:
On 10/01/2009, at 5:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I admire too. Kim is courageous.
Well, for the tenacity we will see :)
Gee thanks Doctor! I'll try not disappoint you. At the moment I am
devoting an egregious amount of time to searching for
Brent,
there are misunderstood phenomena and epistemologically underdeveloped
explanations over the past 10,000 years - plus conclusion (upon
conlusions)^n - quantizations with and without zero (14th c. AD) to develop
in our conventional scientific view the figment Bruno puts into - called
The
Hi John,
I decided so many times not to reflect to the esoteric sci-fi
assumptions (thought experiments?) on this list - about situations
beyond common sense, their use as templates for consequences.
It is as you wish, but it is my way to question the humans, through UDA.
Then the
Brent wrote:
...But the EPR experiments show that this can only hold if the influence of
the rest of the world is non-local
(i.e. faster than light) and hence inconsistent with relativity...
EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point. How can
one use such artifact as
John, Brent,
John said:
EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point.
How can one use such artifact as 'evidence' that shows...?
Aspect Et Al tested it ages ago, see for instance here:
http://www-ece.rice.edu/~kono/ELEC565/Aspect_Nature.pdf
Brent said:
But the EPR
On 10/01/2009, at 5:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I admire too. Kim is courageous.
Well, for the tenacity we will see :)
Gee thanks Doctor! I'll try not disappoint you. At the moment I am
devoting an egregious amount of time to searching for employment as my
ability to sit and cogitate
John Mikes wrote:
Brent wrote:
...But the EPR experiments show that this can only hold if the
influence of the rest of the world is non-local
(i.e. faster than light) and hence inconsistent with relativity...
EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point. How
Dear Bruno,
I decided so many times not to reflect to the esoteric sci-fi assumptions
(thought experiments?) on this list - about situations beyond common sense,
their use as templates for consequences.
Now, however, I can't control my 'mouse' - in random and probabilistics.
*
Bruno quotes in
John Mikes wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I decided so many times not to reflect to the esoteric sci-fi
assumptions (thought experiments?) on this list - about situations
beyond common sense, their use as templates for consequences.
Now, however, I can't control my 'mouse' - in random and
On 03 Jan 2009, at 12:59, Kim Jones wrote:
Bruno,
In this step, one of me experiences (or actually does not experience)
the delay prior to reconstitution. In Step 2, it was proven to me that
I cannot know that any extra time (other than the 4 minutes necessary
transmission interval) has
10 matches
Mail list logo
