You made my day
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
if you do believe that, you might go to hell
anyway, if you are a jew or a liberal.
Gee, I sure do love Leibniz.
Remember, Leibniz, Monads, Monism, and Jews and liberals are bad. Oh, and
God is great and he exists and everything.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 11 Jul 2012, at 21:38, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2012 1:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
If the boson of Higgs exists, by law, it *must* be retrievable from
addition and multiplication
If comp is true and the argument that everything (arithmetical) is
realized holds.
I am not sure what
On 10.07.2012 20:38 Stephen P. King said the following:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
Hi Stephen,
Recently I have read
Karin Knorr Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge
This
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
I profoundly disagree. What was found was a curve when the raw data
was graphed in a particular way. There is no proof that this curve is
uniquely representational of some particle.
The article certainly
On 7/12/2012 3:36 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 10.07.2012 20:38 Stephen P. King said the following:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
Hi Stephen,
Recently I have read
Karin Knorr Cetina, Epistemic
On 7/12/2012 12:55 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
mailto:stephe...@charter.net wrote:
I profoundly disagree. What was found was a curve when the raw data was
graphed in
a particular way. There is no proof that this curve
On 10 Jul 2012, at 20:38, Stephen P. King wrote:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
--
Given the complexity of the experimental device, we can be sure that e
have to wait before having any reasonnable
On 10 Jul 2012, at 22:28, John Mikes wrote:
Stephen, a 'belief system' may be reassuring.
I spent a lifetime in active RD exercising conventional science,
till I lost by belief in many figments of it. It came gradually like
one's losing a religious faith: trying to THINK 'outside the box'
On 10 Jul 2012, at 23:33, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi John,
What I have been doing is exploring the soft underbelly of
physics, those sets of truths that are just assumed to be true.
For example, I have become convinced that a lot of the difficulties
in physics are due to its
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
[...]
Also, we could say that the discovery of the Higgs boson, if confirmed, is
disappointing, as it only confirms the theory, and so we learn nothing (to
think in the Deustch's manner).
This is wrong.
Of course in
On 11 Jul 2012, at 10:12, Noon Silk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
[...]
Also, we could say that the discovery of the Higgs boson, if
confirmed, is
disappointing, as it only confirms the theory, and so we learn
nothing (to
think in the
On 7/11/2012 4:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Jul 2012, at 20:38, Stephen P. King wrote:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
--
Given the complexity of the experimental device, we can be sure that e
Citeren Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net:
On 7/11/2012 4:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Jul 2012, at 20:38, Stephen P. King wrote:
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
--
Given the complexity of
A new particle has certainly been found and in the unlikely event it is not
the Higgs the response of most physicists would not be oh, no but pure
delight because then it is something unexpected and even more exotic than
the Higgs helping us find new knowledge. If 15 years from now the LHC finds
On 7/11/2012 1:50 PM, John Clark wrote:
A new particle has certainly been found and in the unlikely event it
is not the Higgs the response of most physicists would not be oh, no
but pure delight because then it is something unexpected and even more
exotic than the Higgs helping us find new
On 7/11/2012 1:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
If the boson of Higgs exists, by law, it *must* be retrievable from addition and
multiplication
If comp is true and the argument that everything (arithmetical) is realized
holds.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 7/11/2012 1:12 AM, Noon Silk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
[...]
Also, we could say that the discovery of the Higgs boson, if confirmed, is
disappointing, as it only confirms the theory, and so we learn nothing (to
think in the
On 7/11/2012 11:14 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 7/11/2012 1:50 PM, John Clark wrote:
A new particle has certainly been found and in the unlikely event it is not the Higgs
the response of most physicists would not be oh, no but pure delight because then it
is something unexpected and even more
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
--
Onward!
Stephen
Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed.
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything
Stephen, a 'belief system' may be reassuring.
I spent a lifetime in active RD exercising conventional science, till I
lost by belief in many figments of it. It came gradually like one's losing
a religious faith: trying to THINK 'outside the box' and getting nowhere.
(First reflection: I am poorly
Hi John,
What I have been doing is exploring the soft underbelly of physics,
those sets of truths that are just assumed to be true. For example, I
have become convinced that a lot of the difficulties in physics are due
to its assumption that substance is primitive. There is even an entire
22 matches
Mail list logo
