Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-28 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 27 Jan 2010, at 19:31, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit : Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-27 Thread Brent Meeker
Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit : Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 200

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-27 Thread Mark Buda
Bruno Marchal wrote: > Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit : >> Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote: > On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: >> Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: >>> >>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.b

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-27 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit : Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm Are you OK w

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-26 Thread Mark Buda
Bruno Marchal wrote: > On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote: >>> On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: > I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm > > Are you OK with the first six steps

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-26 Thread Brent Meeker
Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Jan 2010, at 03:34, Brent Meeker wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm Okay, first question: in step 5

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-26 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 26 Jan 2010, at 03:34, Brent Meeker wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm Okay, first question: in step 5, assuming the measure

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-26 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm [mixed up question deleted] I don't understand clearly your protocol. Th

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-25 Thread Brent Meeker
Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm Okay, first question: in step 5, assuming the measure is 1/2 in the preceding steps, suppose I agree t

Re: UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-25 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm Okay, first question: in step 5, assuming the measure is 1/2 in the preceding steps, suppose I agree to be transported to Br

UDA steps 5 and 6: huh?

2010-01-24 Thread Mark Buda
Bruno Marchal wrote: > I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper: > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm Okay, first question: in step 5, assuming the measure is 1/2 in the preceding steps, suppose I agree to be transported to Brussels and the process in step 5 is performe