On Mar 10, 2:16 am, stephenk stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On Mar 9, 11:33 am, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 1:24 pm, Andrew Soltau andrewsol...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/03/11 16:14, Brent Meeker wrote: On 3/8/2011 3:14 AM, Andrew
Soltau wrote:
What I am driving at
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1103/1103.1651v1.pdf
Here we go again.
Ronald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
On 09/03/11 16:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/9/2011 5:24 AM, Andrew Soltau wrote:
On 08/03/11 16:14, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/8/2011 3:14 AM, Andrew Soltau wrote:
What I am driving at here is the same question as in the email
Comp. Granted that all possible states exist, what changes the
-Original Message-
From: ronaldheld
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:18 AM
To: Everything List
Subject: The Emergence of Consciousness in the Quantum Universe
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1103/1103.1651v1.pdf
Here we go again.
Ronald
***
Hi Ronald!
On 10 Mar 2011, at 13:47, Andrew Soltau wrote:
All the moments exist, and as Deutsch points out, as you summarise,
'The appearance of change is already explained by the fact that
there are different frames that have an implicit sequence and in
which the observers state is different', but
From: Andrew Soltau
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:47 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Movie cannot think
On 09/03/11 16:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
The appearance of change is already explained by the fact that there are
different frames that have an implicit sequence and
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 9:10 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Movie cannot think
On 10 Mar 2011, at 13:47, Andrew Soltau wrote:
All the moments exist, and as Deutsch points out, as you summarise,
'The appearance
On 3/10/2011 7:15 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
*From:* Andrew Soltau mailto:andrewsol...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:47 AM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Movie cannot think
On 09/03/11 16:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10.03.2011 01:29 1Z said the following:
On Mar 9, 7:22 pm, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
When you compare heat and molecular motion, first it would be good
to define what molecular motion is.
At the beginning, the molecules and atoms were considered as hard
spheres. At this
Thanks, David, for a reasonable post.
I admire Evgeniy for his boldness of a frontal attack against conventional
physicality's terms.
I would go a step further (is it a surprise?) like: ontology is rather a
description of a stagnant knowledge (state? even if dynamic) of *a
phase*considered in
Thanks Stephen, for the warning. I guess the onus is on the author to
not sound like a crank!
By the way, all the ligatures in your quote below displayed as a space
in my email reader, so it doubled the effect :(.
Cheers
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:27:04AM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:48 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Movie cannot think
Dear Stephen,
On 10 Mar 2011, at 16:27, Stephen Paul King wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 9:10 AM
From: Brent Meeker
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:39 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Movie cannot think
On 3/10/2011 7:15 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
From: Andrew Soltau
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:47 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re:
On 3/10/2011 6:47 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
*From:* Brent Meeker mailto:meeke...@dslextreme.com
*Sent:* Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:39 PM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Movie cannot think
On 3/10/2011 7:15 AM, Stephen Paul King
14 matches
Mail list logo
