On 14 Mar 2012, at 19:35, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/14/2012 10:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I never localize consciousness. Only persons. And yes, it is pretty
obvious that person can locate themselves in a local relative way,
like saying that yesterday I was in Tokyo, today in I am in
Helsin
On 14 Mar 2012, at 19:41, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/14/2012 10:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Wow! OK then, we progress. I am glad that you agree that you will
see something. That was unclear.
But do you agree that you do know something, or at least that you
can have "great" expectations, given
On 14 Mar 2012, at 20:19, David Nyman wrote:
On 14 March 2012 18:32, Bruno Marchal wrote:
He uses also bad rhetorical tricks by
attributing me intention, and seems even aggressive sometimes, or
is it an
impression?
Vous êtes ironique, je l'espère!
Gosh, you get that impression too. Bu
On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:34, John Mikes wrote:
Craig and Brent:
"Free Will" is not a matter of faith. One does not "believe "IN" it,
or not".
(Of course this is a position in my (agnostic) worldview - my
'belief' ha ha).
In "pure ideal science" there is no act of faith, except in the
ratio
On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:41, John Mikes wrote:
Brent and Bruno:
you both have statements in this endless discussion about processing
ideas of quantum computers.
I would be happy to read about ONE that works, not a s a
potentiality, but as a real tool, the function of which is
understood and
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
this engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute
equilibria, and see what happens.
I take Denbig
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25:01PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
> >On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> >>
> >>Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
> >>this engineers who develop engi
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> You learn that you cannot predict your future subjective experience in
> all circumstances.
>
Yes, but tell me something new that everybody didn't already know.
>> You say the consciousness or the one view of the two view of the 3 view
>> or whatever the hell you call it
On 3/15/2012 10:57 PM, John Clark wrote:
> if you deny the 1-indeterminacy,
I see no difference from this "1-indeterminacy" thing of yours and plain old fashioned
indeterminacy, either way you can't always know what you will see until you see it and
you can't always know what you will do
9 matches
Mail list logo
