On 14 Mar 2012, at 20:19, David Nyman wrote:
On 14 March 2012 18:32, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
He uses also bad rhetorical tricks by
attributing me intention, and seems even aggressive sometimes, or
is it an
impression?
Vous êtes ironique, je l'espère!
Gosh, you get that impression too. But John C. is still polite and
modest compared to my usual "opponents" who have never dared to meet
me once, or to answer a mail or anything.
At least John seems to defend a point and accept to converse, making
him infinitely more civil than the opponents who dismiss whatever I
found by shrugging the shoulder and looking at the sky, behind my
back, as I have been told.
I think that they have no real problem with the work, only with the
fact that I am the one having done that work, because they have been
manipulated by a bullying expert in that kind of manipulation. I have
not that feeling with John Clark, I still think he might be interested
in getting the point, but its resistance and avoidance begin to be
troubling. He still might just be a person genuinely shocked by the
problem that comp seems to put on the Aristotelian conception of
reality. This I can understand.
Note that I am prosecuting the main guy in Brussels, and some victim-
accomplices who protect him since, including in Paris. I don't expect
anything, and I am already glad the files has not been classified. I
do it for my own conscience, because there has been many victims and
almost as much suicides. Bullying, moral harassment, sexual
harassment, becomes a real plea in the academic world, in some
countries, probably a bit everywhere, with varying degrees.
The problem, a bit like the "drug prohibition affair", is the
powerful corporatist self-protection, and the connivence of the press
and media. Some people behave like untouchable mafia leaders. In a
sense, everyone become victims of their lies.
The NDAA bill will not help, in America and elsewhere. It officialize
and legalizes a tool for such kind of practice.
Well, sorry for those sad remarks, a bit meta-topical, but I was not
really ironical indeed. I am always afraid to project the behavior of
the Brussels bandits on those who resists to the 1-indeterminacy
issue, especially when they make general shoulder-shrugging-like sort
of non-argument. I thought it might still just be his idiosyncratic
manner of dialoguing. He did recognize having been wrong, once, and
not so many can do that.
Thanks to confirm the feeling that his aggressive mood was not just a
personal impression/projection.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
