Hi Bruno Marchal
Responses at ==
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/3/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
I think so (except perhaps on Jesus, but we can come back on this later ... I
don't think it is so important, now)
== T
Hi Craig Weinberg
My responses as
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/3/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-02, 15:54:01
Sub
On 03 Oct 2012, at 13:05, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Responses at ==
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/3/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
I think so (except perhaps on Jesus, but we can come back on this
later ... I don't think it is s
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > how can reason be completely different from evolution if reason itself
> is a consequence of nothing but evolution.
>
Random mutation can wire together a small number of cells such that if
there is a sudden change in the light levels in t
On 02 Oct 2012, at 19:48, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 Craig Weinberg wrote:
> Any meta-molecular system is going to be complex compared to a
molecular system,
That's what "meta" means, and a very big thing is larger than a big
thing.
Once a theory is rich enough (like the
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 12:35:11 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>> > how can reason be completely different from evolution if reason itself
>> is a consequence of nothing but evolution.
>>
>
> Random mutation can wire together a
On 10/3/2012 4:20 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Stephen:
are you compofrtable to imagine yourSELF and the warehouse of your
MEMORIES - /*_all excluding any relations to your body_*/?
Then what? I think the complexity *_"WE"_* includes the part thought
of as body and bodily feelings so an abstract trans
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> 1) I understand and respect your argument here 100%.
> 2) I think that I have a better explanation
The better explanation is the simpler one. Your explanation adds
extra, unnecessary and unsupported by any evidence layers to the one
Darwin
8 matches
Mail list logo