See ? You don't understand anything from what Bruno is saying. You only
spot the word "Turing", you also heard about the "Turing test", and you
shallowly concluded that that is what Bruno is talking about. No. He is
talking about all kinds of weird stuff, like numbers that are alive.
But of
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 6:07 AM 'Cosmin Visan' <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> *No. You don't understand how telepathy and consciousness generally
> works.*
>
I never demanded you explain how telepathy works I just want you to show
that there is something about telepathy than needs
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:36:39PM -0700, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
wrote:
>
> On 5/25/2019 8:12 AM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
[...]
> >researchers should train their methodolody on something that should be
> >much easier, like, say, proving existence of romantic love? In a lab,
> >with
Endless experiments of what you suggest about
unification/telepathy/precognition/etc. together/separate/etc. has been
tested and tested and tested, under all sorts of circumstances under all
conditions thinkable. My father was a lifelong believer things like
telepathy and failure to confirm
You are smarter than all of us, Cosmin!
On 5/26/2019 6:48 AM, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List wrote:
See ? You don't understand anything from what Bruno is saying. You
only spot the word "Turing", you also heard about the "Turing test",
and you shallowly concluded that that is what Bruno is
On Sunday, May 26, 2019 at 12:13:39 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 23 May 2019, at 08:47, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at 9:30:04 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/2019 11:33 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at
> On 23 May 2019, at 01:14, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 03:14:43PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> 2147 Breaking News:
>> Alfred has used a very cheap teleportation device to go on Mars. He seemed
>> OK and claimed he has not changed, but his wife believes he lost
It is ironic that Alan Turing himself thought that actual computing in the
universe included (to a large extent) non-Turing computing (where "Turing"
here means what became the standard definition as being carried out by the
commonly-defined "Turing machine"). That "computing" became
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 9:20 PM howardmarks wrote:
> > in James Randi's case, he was saddened by the amount of fraud done on
> innocent people who called themselves "psychic," telepathic," able to "talk
> with the dead" and so forth.
>
And Houdini did much the same thing a century ago.
> On 23 May 2019, at 08:47, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at 9:30:04 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/2019 11:33 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at 6:51:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/2019 2:57 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
When one observes a real phenomenon, then one can create (again
falsifiable) theories to explain the phenomenon. Telepathy is not such.
On 5/26/2019 3:59 PM, howardmarks wrote:
Endless experiments of what you suggest about
unification/telepathy/precognition/etc. together/separate/etc. has
> On 23 May 2019, at 05:30, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/22/2019 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 21 May 2019, at 20:59, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/21/2019 2:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 3) I don't even know
Haha! Yes, indeed!
In Florida and telephone, I had the privilege of talking to Randi, and
the "light" of truth and justice illuminating his person was marvelous!
He & Houdini had a lot in common - truth-seeking, and used their skills
as master magicians to spot deceit. Of course, it helped
What ? You didn't realize this yet ? See ? This is why theories are lacking
(for telepathy, and consciousness generally), because people simply fail to
see some elements of phenomenology. If people fail to see that
consciousness is unified, they will search explanations for telepathy in
terms
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 08:20:42PM -0500, howardmarks wrote:
> Well, in James Randi's case, he was saddened by the amount of fraud
> done on innocent people who called themselves "psychic,"
[...]
I wandered around the website a bit. Interesting place and they seem
sincere, from what I could
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:30 AM Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> Nobody knows the answer to the "hard problem of consciousness" because
>> nobody knows exactly what the question is or what criteria is to be used to
>> determine if its been successfully answered.
>
>
> > *So you don’t understand it.*
>
On 5/26/2019 9:28 AM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:36:39PM -0700, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
wrote:
On 5/25/2019 8:12 AM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
[...]
researchers should train their methodolody on something that should be
much easier, like, say, proving existence of
17 matches
Mail list logo
