Alberto,
I agree with what you say below.
In fact evolution needs arguably to presuppose computationalism.
Computationalism explains that we have to extend the idea of evolution
to the origin and development of the physical objects and laws, which
will be used "later" by evolution. The laws
http://nocorrecto.blogspot.com.es/2011/11/why-women-like-bags-and-shoes-but-only.html
2013/12/11, Alberto G. Corona :
> Not a bad achievement.
>
> Instead, the hypothesis that the living beings compute in order to
> solve evolutionary pressures is closer to the Plato world of ideas, Or
> specifica
Not a bad achievement.
Instead, the hypothesis that the living beings compute in order to
solve evolutionary pressures is closer to the Plato world of ideas, Or
specifically, the Plato-Aristotle syntesis of Thomas Aquinas. and also
closer to dig knowledge for living, that it , at last, the purpose
On 10 Dec 2013, at 23:38, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.
You are welcome.
But for what refer to the questions i
asked, I find that my initial assumptions are broadly correct. I find
the platonism of the UDA very different from the Platonism of Plato.
It is more p
Thanks for the clarification. But for what refer to the questions i
asked, I find that my initial assumptions are broadly correct. I find
the platonism of the UDA very different from the Platonism of Plato.
despite the merits that the hypothesis of mechanism may have to
clarify other questions.
2
On 10 Dec 2013, at 12:15, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/12/10 Bruno Marchal
On 10 Dec 2013, at 10:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It seems to me that your invocation of platonism is wrong. For Plato
the reality is a shadow of the perfect world of ideas, universals
that we can "remember"
2013/12/10 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 10 Dec 2013, at 10:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> It seems to me that your invocation of platonism is wrong. For Plato the
>> reality is a shadow of the perfect world of ideas, universals that we can
>> "remember" by anamnesis.
>>
>
> OK.
>
>
>
>
>> But for you
On 10 Dec 2013, at 10:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It seems to me that your invocation of platonism is wrong. For Plato
the reality is a shadow of the perfect world of ideas, universals
that we can "remember" by anamnesis.
OK.
But for you reality is a partial dream,
Not at all.
Only
It seems to me that your invocation of platonism is wrong. For Plato the
reality is a shadow of the perfect world of ideas, universals that we can
"remember" by anamnesis.
But for you reality is a partial dream, but coherent or "robust" product of
the aleatory Dovetailer Machine, and sometimes we
9 matches
Mail list logo
