- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: Quick Quantum Question.
John M wrote:
> Breent
> your distortion of my words may come from my mindset of a
> non-IndoEuropean mothertong
John M wrote:
> Breent
> your distortion of my words may come from my mindset of a
> non-IndoEuropean mothertongue - in English.
> I wrote:
> >".../by building further levels on unfounded
> > assumptions - no matter how fit they may be > to a theory we favor... you wrote:
> >You imply that our
e the 'sc' word so frequently, but it
seems you 'favor' it.
I still owe you a reply in the Big Bang case, I am slow.
John
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Quick
Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>chris peck wrote:
> > I have a question for people here who know the issues better than me:
> >
> > I was having an argument about alleged Quantum Immortality/Quantum
>suicide
> > with some people who argue that because the 2nd law of thermodynamics
> > continues regardl
1Z: '2LT is itself statistical.'
MP: Now this is fascinating! My, rough and ready plain-English, take on
entropy is that for us, whenever we experience it, it is the expansion
of the universe writ small.
How so? Well the essential concept is that the essence of energy is
motion. In fact I like
Hello everyone
I just want to post a message of thanks for the replies you have all given
me. It really is appreciated whether for or against the proposition.
by 'eck you're a brainy lot!
thank you all very much.
Chris.
_
Rate y
Hi,
On Friday 02 March 2007 19:19:25 Brent Meeker wrote:
> That's a good point. Of course if all possible universes eventuate with
> equal probability, the 2nd law will hold because that is just what is
> assumed by it - there are a lot more ways to age than to stay young. But
> why "with equal
John Mikes wrote:
> Chris,
> I am with this list for a decade or so, and learned that this group
> accepts a negative
> position as well, not only 'hosanna' to the 'officially (here) accepted
> one. So here it
> comes:
> In my (heretic? and personal) view
> 1. universes in the Multiverse are not
chris peck wrote:
> I have a question for people here who know the issues better than me:
>
> I was having an argument about alleged Quantum Immortality/Quantum suicide
> with some people who argue that because the 2nd law of thermodynamics
> continues regardless in each universe a 'me' continu
chris peck wrote:
>
>
>I have a question for people here who know the issues better than me:
>
>I was having an argument about alleged Quantum Immortality/Quantum suicide
>with some people who argue that because the 2nd law of thermodynamics
>continues regardless in each universe a 'me' continues
Chris,
I am with this list for a decade or so, and learned that this group accepts
a negative
position as well, not only 'hosanna' to the 'officially (here) accepted one.
So here it
comes:
In my (heretic? and personal) view
1. universes in the Multiverse are not necessarily identical, indeed "all
p
On 2 Mar, 12:43, "chris peck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question for people here who know the issues better than me:
>
> I was having an argument about alleged Quantum Immortality/Quantum suicide
> with some people who argue that because the 2nd law of thermodynamics
> continues rega
On 3/2/07, chris peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a question for people here who know the issues better than me:
>
> I was having an argument about alleged Quantum Immortality/Quantum suicide
> with some people who argue that because the 2nd law of thermodynamics
> continues regardless in ea
I have a question for people here who know the issues better than me:
I was having an argument about alleged Quantum Immortality/Quantum suicide
with some people who argue that because the 2nd law of thermodynamics
continues regardless in each universe a 'me' continues within, I should
ultimat
14 matches
Mail list logo
