Hi Craig Weinberg
Where today is Regressivism and Dystopianism ?
Or maybe that was just an ironic comment.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/31/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function."
- Receiving the following content -
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:45:16 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:
>
>
>
> Please excuse the word, but comp can only create zombies,
> which seem to be alive but are not actually so.
>
>
Exactly. I don't call them zombies though, because zombie implies a
negative affirmation of life. They are p
could function."
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-29, 12:02:39
Subject: Re: Re: Re: No Chinese Room Necessary
You said that you perceive. Now you mean that you reflect on yourself. And I
must believe so.
It is theoretica
You said that you perceive. Now you mean that you reflect on yourself. And
I must believe so.
It is theoretically possible to do a robot that do so as well in very
sophisticated ways.
I agree with you that robots are zombies, but some day, like in the novels
of Stanislav Lem, they may adquire p
Hi Alberto G. Corona
What functionality ?
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/29/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function."
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-29
Hi Alberto G. Corona
If I can perceive, I simply know that I can.
The problem only enters when I tell you what I perceived.
There faith matters, you can trust my word or not.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/29/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everyth
Hi Alberto G. Corona
A grizzly bear, which seemingly has no moral code (other than "when hungry,
kill and eat"), can still perceive
perfectly well enough, or else he would starve.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/29/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-29, 11:19:59
Subject: Re: Re: Re: No Chinese Room Necessary
I say nothing opposed to that. What I say is that it's functionality is
computable: It is possible to make a robot with this functionality of
aware
Before you can have a computer, you need some kind of i/o. I think this is
what comp ignores. It is my hypotheses that 'input' is afferent
phenomenology and 'output' is efferent participation in all cases, however
i/o does not automatically carry the full spectrum of possible
phenomenological q
I say nothing opposed to that. What I say is that it´s functionality is
computable: It is possible to make a robot with this functionality of
awareness, but may be not with the capability of _being_ aware
2012/8/29 Roger Clough
> Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> Awareness = I see X.
> or I am X.
> or
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Awareness = I see X.
or I am X.
or some similar statement.
There's no computer in that behavior or state of being.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/29/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function."
- Receiving
11 matches
Mail list logo
