On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:24 PM, alexalex wrote:
> Taking the qunatum immortality argument as a fact what do you think
> about the following implication?
>
> If you'll be conscious only in those universes where you'll keep on
> living then most surely you'll watch all your brothers and sisters,
>
On May 20, 1:15 am, meekerdb wrote:
> "You" only split when some quantum event gets amplified to make a
> macroscopic, i.e.
> quasi-classical, difference. Otherwise "Craig Weinberg" is a somewhat fuzzy
> operator
> projecting onto a lot of slight different, but classically equivalent,
> subspa
"You" only split when some quantum event gets amplified to make a macroscopic, i.e.
quasi-classical, difference. Otherwise "Craig Weinberg" is a somewhat fuzzy operator
projecting onto a lot of slight different, but classically equivalent, subspaces. When
the "Craig Weinberg" on that subspace
Wouldn't it also sort of mean that you can't die in your sleep? Why do
we keep waking up in the same life when we could just as easily jump
to a different one? What if the experience of being completely asleep
continued forever without you ever knowing whether or not you had
survived your friends a
On 5/19/2012 1:24 AM, alexalex wrote:
Taking the qunatum immortality argument as a fact what do you think
about the following implication?
If you'll be conscious only in those universes where you'll keep on
living then most surely you'll watch all your brothers and sisters,
friends and foes DIE
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
> On 5/19/2012 2:19 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> One way I see of 'escaping' quantum immortality is to assume elements of
> the simulation argument ( http://www.simulation-argument.com/ ) are
> correct. The simulation argument suppo
On 5/19/2012 2:19 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Alex,
One way I see of 'escaping' quantum immortality is to assume elements
of the simulation argument ( http://www.simulation-argument.com/ ) are
correct. The simulation argument supposes that the computational
capacity of civilizations eventually re
Alex,
One way I see of 'escaping' quantum immortality is to assume elements of
the simulation argument ( http://www.simulation-argument.com/ ) are
correct. The simulation argument supposes that the computational capacity
of civilizations eventually reaches the point where they can run minds on
th
On 19 May 2012, at 10:24, alexalex wrote:
Taking the qunatum immortality argument as a fact what do you think
about the following implication?
If you'll be conscious only in those universes where you'll keep on
living then most surely you'll watch all your brothers and sisters,
friends and fo
9 matches
Mail list logo
