Ed,
I have looked into robocopy and its parameters, after testing it in a lab
environment, I realised that the directory and its subdirectories are
copied, however, the files within are missed. It really puzzles me a lot on
this one
-David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Haven't used IIS lockdown (we apply the hot fixes manually) but wouldn't be
surprised if it disables the NETBIOS ports, which means that your IIS server
will not be able to authenticate against the Exchange server. Log on to the
IIS box and make sure that you can establish a MAPI session from
backup and restore to an alternate location preserving file permissions
if you can.
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 03:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Adam,
The backup software we are using is ArcServe 6.61 for NT, can that do the
job???
-David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 4
All,
I cant remember how to do this and archives are not turning up anything on
the keywords I've searched on
How can I find out the information that performance optimiser gives you
regarding the EXISTING location of all of the exchange components, IS, PUB,
PRIV etc etc.
Someone told me
Use the Exchange Administrator - highlight the server, choose Properties
and then click the Database Paths tab.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 September 2001 09:14
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Location of Exchange
It would do the job, but even the native winnt backup program can do it.
I'm not an Arcserve fan, so I would recomend using the native backup.
Regards
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL
Dammit - didn't realise it was that easy - thanks Neil.
JJ
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Location of Exchange components without stopping
services or runn
Hey, you're not that 'boy named Sue' (Johnny Cash record if you don't know)
;-)
Cheers
Paul Hurst
Senior Email Analyst
Sony UK Ltd
Tel: 01932 816869
Fax: 01932 817038
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2001 16:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Is Exchange Admin Server Properties Database Paths what you are
looking for?
-Original Message-
From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 09:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Location of Exchange components without stopping services or
runn ing
Thanks guys, I really appreciate the input, hopefully it all goes well when
I attempt to move the files. Thanks again everyone, especially Ed and Adam.
Cheers.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Friday, September
This sounds pretty deep, can you please provide a short example of this
kinda script? I understand the dumping to text file part, but with the
adding NET SHARE to every line (which lines?) and changing it to point to
the target path has got me slightly puzzled
What is CACLS and XCACLS?
Restores will not recreate the shares.
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http:://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 09:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 4 related question.
Restore
NET SHARE (no parameters) produces a list of all the current shares. Thus we
will have a lot of lines that look like:
ADMIN$ C:\WINNT
C$ C:\
USERS C:\HOME
FREDC:\HOME\FRED$
and so on.
To remove the existing shares you need to run the NET SHARE command again,
this time with
Sounds like you've installed it into the existing site (which is a perfectly
valid thing to do).
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2001 18:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Installing Exch2k into Exch55
All,
I'm trying to
Serdar,
Did you get any results yet?
We brought our problem to the attention of Microsoft, there is a engineer
working on it right now. But so far nothing.
If i hear anything, i'll let you know.
Thanks so far.
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Yes, it is still growing, at a rate of something like 100Mb a day. The
estimates where taken after the offline desfragmentation in the Mailboxe
Resources, they are a rought estimate of the mailboxes but in the total
they have something like 5GB. The IS grown in the space of 2 weeks but i
can´t
What installation process did you use to get OWA 5.5 running on IIS5? The
way I have done this is to install a fully functional configuration on NT4
and then upgrade to W2K but this seems very longwinded. Couldn't find
anything relevant on Technet or WWW. Is there an easier method?
-Original
Ice Cream Man
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: @Company.company.com IMC problem generating SMTP address
What's an ICM?
Ed Crowley
See if you can find out which mailboxes are growing. ExAdmin Server Priv
Mailbox Resources. File Save Window Contents to CSV. Capture hourly for
a few hours and compare. Any ideas of the account the printer was sending
reports to? If the printer is trying to connect using POP3 then it would
Hi
Just install W2K (with most recent sp) and install owa on it.
There is no easier way. What problems did you encounter?
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web
From memory: built W2K, stick in Exchange EE CD, select custom, just OWA,
click install and then get message complaining about incorrect service packs
and only option is to exit. Think I didn't put SP1 on though so I might give
it another try with that. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From:
I assume the CD you are using is Select. What you need to do is copy all of
the files from CD to the local drive and rename the setup file to setup.exe
(rather than srvmax or whatever it is). There is a Q article on it
somewhere.
Tris
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley
Our organization contains cca 200 EXS 5.5 connected by IMC thru WAN.
All servers replicate directory against one central bridghead server (star
repl. topology).
After reconfiguring IMC (I add cca 200 connected sites to each server) - the
central server has overloaded.
On all servers is
Hey-- I finally gradutated from Ice Cream Boy!
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: @Company.company.com IMC
Now that you are a man, there are of course added responsibilities.
Buy me a few beers at MEC and we'll go over all the details.
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 08:37 AM
To:
Far be it from me to disagree with a Great Old One such as yourself, CJ, but
I beg to differ with you on this one. I just tested this, and adding a test
account to a group with permissions to a Public Folder (that is restricted
only to that group) resulted in me having access to that Public
I agree with Mike, ... this is a procedure we use all the time with DLs and
PFs ... sorry O great one ...
From: Mike Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
Date: Fri,
I believe the problem is not in adding people BUT removing them, even though
they are removed they still have the permissions.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison
Yesterday I loaded the latest 9/13/01 NAV definitions over the old 9/12/01
definitions on our exchange server. When our backup ran at 9:00pm last
night NAV reported (about 34 times) that it had detected the PWS.Cain.dr
virus in
C:\bork\EXCHANGE\ADMIN\INTERORG\ORGINSTALL.EXE (appartently
perfwiz -r from exchsrvr\bin gives additional info
-Original Message-
From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 09:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Location of Exchange components without stopping services
or runn ing performance optimiser
Dammit -
--- Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:14:47 -0400
Reply-to: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Administrivia - New York Red Cross needs tech
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP
Y u say that?
- Original Message -
From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: RE: TCO - Linux vs. Exchange
That's a great commercial!
I have a problem with support costing
Do you use Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Begging
1-800-YOU-DO-IT
It's URGENT!
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Ed (or somebody fool enough to try to respond), would my solution in a case
of 2 different Org would work, relaying smtp e-mail from org1 to org2 and
back?
Thank you
PS: I added them yesterday night as a new site.
-Message d'origine-
De: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: 11
Correct. Svrmax is Enterprise. Svrmin isn't. Still can't find the Q you
mention. If you have the time to find it I'd be most grateful. Error message
is:
Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related
fixes required for Outlook Web Access. Please see the Release
I am trying to write an Exhange 5.5 Event script in Exchange 2000. I have
managed to create the script, but I cannot get it to execute.
I have managed to execute it three times (usually when the server
reboots), but it has not run since (even after a reboot).
Are there any other settings that I
You will probably need to set the 'instance' to your server, Under Public
information store.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14
Aah yes. I remember running into that problem as well. Gosh, I can't
remember the Q number though.
Mahesh,
Still no response from PSS. Their original recommendation (reregistering
DLLs) didn't work. Our TAM says he escalated the case, but no calls back.
I'll post anything I find here.
S.
Yes, no.
does anyone know how, if possible at all, to change the width
of the address
book columns in Outlook 2000 ?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Had a quick look around, but I can't find the article. Have you renamed the
srvmax or srvmin (whichever one you are using) to setup.exe and then run it
yet. You should then get a warning about this version of Exchange has
'issues' with Win2k. Carry on going and it installs as good as gold.
The
You would need to add the Public Folder Instances to the server.
CONFIGURATION, SERVER, PUBLIC INFORMATION STORE, PROPERTIES, INSTANCES.
Annette Lewis-Capers
Charles Schwab Technology Innovation
415.667.9165
WARNING: All email sent to this address will be received by the Charles
Schwab.
Wicked. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 16:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
Always like replying to myself!!
Here is the article for the error you're getting:
Q245785
Hush with that jibber jabber. It doesn't work, dagnabbit.
- Original Message -
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: Begging
Do you use Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: missy
I don't understand? What exactly is this utility suppose to do and how does
it relate to Exchange? Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New MS tool URLSCAN filters
I'm starving! Where can I buy a fish taco? Can someone buy it for me? I
can't drive.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Begging
Do you use Outlook?
-Original
Dear Adam,
Thanks a lot cos I have just performed the operation and all went well.
Thanks for your advice, it really bailed me out on this one. Your a life
saver! Thanks.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian Midgley
Sent:
Can you send me pictures of you eating the taco? I'll eat the pictures;
it's almost the same.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Begging
I will buy you one.. But I will have to
I ate at both this week!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Begging
I will buy you one.. But I will have to eat it myself... The best way to
get
Exchange is running on the IIS box. I have netbios over tcp/ip enabled.
netscape 6.1 an mozilla do work.
Jim Liddil M.S.
Lab/IT Manager
Phytoceutica Inc.
(203)781-2544
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14,
All,
I've brought up a EXCH2K server inside an EXCH 5.5 Organization. Currently
I'm able to send mail from the Exchange 2K server to the Exchange 5.5
server. But not vice versa. Is there anything that I need to setup or did
i miss something?
Also, when you bring the EXCH2K server into a 5.5
Do you have the ADC setup properly?
Kevinm WLKMMAS
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger
Well this is the thing. I was unable to setup a two-way connector. For
some reason it was giving me problems. So I setup 2 one way ADC's. One
from 5.5 to 2K and one from 2k to 5.5. Will that not work? But, I do have
replication going back and forth.
Thanks,
John Bowles
Exchange
ms-chap is enabled by default in exchange. So I don't imagine this is the
problem, since I have used Netscape at home from time to time in the past.
mozilla and Netscape 6.1 work fine
Jim Liddil M.S.
Lab/IT Manager
Phytoceutica Inc.
(203)781-2544
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Did you change the LDAP port on the 5.5 server??
Kevinm WLKMMAS
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all
Have you scheduled the directory replication on BOTH SIDES of the DirRep connectors?
Perhaps your bridgehead is only requesting updates at night, but your spokes are
requesting 8 times per day (default IIRC).
Eric
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:28:46 +0200, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear DL Members,
I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail message out to
a System Distribution List, and prevent the recipients from being able to
reply to the message they receive.
I did not think that this was possible. I used the help in
Outlook 2000 and
No I haven't.
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Does everyone need to be able to send to the DL (but not reply to the
sent message)? Or just the select few?
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disable ability to reply
Dear
Restrict who can send to the DL and use a custom form with the reply and
reply to all buttons removed.
Thomas Di Nardo
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disable ability to
Add a line at the beginning of the MSG stating do not reply to this MSG as
it was sent from an administrative mail box
beyond that delivery restrictions
--steve
Dear DL Members,
I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail
message out to
a System Distribution List,
is the problem that you don't want people to reply to the big distribution
list? If that's the case, simply put it in the BCC field.
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)
Are you wishing to keep them from replying to all, replying to the sender, or both?
If you want to keep them from replying to all you can go about it a couple of ways.
First, on the Delivery Restrictions tab of the System DL, only allow yourself (and any
others necessary) to address mail to
Dear DL Members,
We have presented a couple of alternate options, such as creating a
generic mailbox to use to send the message from, so that any reply would not
go to a mailbox belonging to a human being. We even mentioned Steve Hanna's
idea of stating it at the beginning of the
Hi! Any known issues with applying this patch? - i.e. post-SP4 patch for
CDO (Q281935). We're having the same problem with recurring meetings on a
Boardroom Calendar which runs the AutoAccept script.
Also, much thanks to Brian (below) for the hint on checking for corruption
in the Calendar via
Ok ready for the flaming over this:
is there a way to set permissions so that a assigned user can update ALL
users infomation in the GAL??
Yes looked on technet NG or missed it.(did find ability for user to
update their info.. BORK)
Looked at slipstick... NG (did find ability for user to
John,
I'd go rapidly to www.exinternals.com and read up on Exchange 2000;
particularly the following paper at the moment -
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/2000/Ex2000SETUP.
doc
There are also many excellent whitepapers on other aspects of Exchange 2000.
N.B. the
My suggestion, if used, is to be used with the knowledge that there are
seldom good technological solutions for behavioral problems
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Exchange
Super! Great! That did it. Many thanks to all who helped. I really
appreciate the help.
BTW As a subscriber to this last for a couple of years, I'm glad to see that
Cthulhu has returned.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14,
Directory import.
What do you want to do?
- Original Message -
From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: GAL mod's by reg user for ALL users info
Ok ready for the flaming over this:
is there a
Couldn't you just give this user, user rights to the recipients container?
Matthew
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: GAL mod's by reg user for ALL users info
Ok ready for the
Exchange 5.5 does not support that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ihar
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 4:45 AM
There is probably something wrong with your script that causes the event
service to fail.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
A member if my IS team has left our company and for security purposes we
will change our administrative passwords, which includes accounts used for
log on locally services.
Are there any gotchas that I should look out for when changing my exchange
administrator account password? My plan is to
In exchange admin, hit F1. In the help menu, type password with out the
quotes. go to the section about site service accounts. This section will
tell you how to properly change the Site Service account password.
Additionally, there are numerous KB articles on changing Site service
passwords
yeah, you have to change the password in the properties for the services,
too.
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)
KWAR2001 website:
The IMC in xch 5.5 is configured to send mail via DNS, and on the
Connections tab, under Message Delivery, Specify by Email Domain, you enter
mycompany.com and the ip of the internal, private mail server to forward
mail to for mycompany.com (another site in this org). Will ALL mail get
forwarded
If you mean your Service Account, then there is more involved to it than
that. Search TechNet for the relevant KB articles on doing this.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From:
That's consistent with my understanding of the subject.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Winzenz
Sent:
Why do all messages from you have the underscore in the title?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: _Changing Exchange Passwords
A member
tried to keep it short and sweet.
basically I want to say have the main receptionist
be able to update all users Phone, Address, Cell #...etc.
I'd like to use the GAL entities like the address book it is.
I just want to be able to have another user other then a
admin update it and not in
I am trying to receive e-mail for the org2 domain name (xyz.com) on the org1
IMC and relay it to org2 Exchange server IMC and the reverse (org2 send
smtp messages from it's IMC to org1 IMC that send it to the internet.
Reading Robichaux's book make me think it's faisable and I would like to
know
I'd like to use the GAL entities like the address book it is.
I just want to be able to have another user other then a
admin update it and not in exch admin.
If this is what you want, then just do a directory export and let anyone
massage the data using Excel. You may need to user the
The statements you make look correct to me. Is there a question there
somewhere?
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Maybe he thinks its similar to when you put the underscore in front of a
user name and it goes to the top of the list? (hehe - just kidding of
course)
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL
The Mayor of Cleveland announced that any gas station engaged in price
gouging would be shut down.
I think the Cuyahoga County Commissioners agreed to do the same in the rest
of the County.
Sorry for your uncle, but price gouging is what it looks like to the
average citizen
-Michèle (also
I occasionally search the archives for any old responses on my questions.
The underscore make it easier for me to find them.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: _Changing Exchange
sorry if I was unclear . . . ALL the mail is getting sent to the address
specified for the mycompany.com domain regardless of it being addressed to
that domain or not. Is that the correct behavior when you set delivery via
DNS? I would think only mail for mycompany.com would go there and the rest
Actually it does that too b/c of the way I have my email sorted.
W
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: _Changing Exchange Passwords
Maybe he thinks its similar to when you
Mark,
First off, thanks for the help. Now when you go to bring the EXCH2K server
underneath the 5.5 Organization is asks you for server information rather
than asking for an Organization. So can I assume that placing an EXCH2K box
in an Exchange 5.5 org doesn't place that server as it's own
Michèle,
How did you know it was my uncle who owned a gas station? I didn't say that
in the original message... Good guess, if it was indeed a guess... Are you
spying on me? :)
$.10 per gallon increase isn't really price gouging... OTOH, those stations
on the near east side of Cleveland
Same here in Columbus, one little poe dunk exon had gas prices up to $6
a gallon yesterday in the little town i grew up in... i know they are
being sued but im not sure as to the outcome yet
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14,
Is anyone else having problems sending mail to msn.com today?
An MX lookup for msn.com returns:
cpimssmtpa12.msn.com
smtp-gw-4.msn.com
I can't seem to establish an SMTP connection to either.
_
List posting FAQ:
I've seen a bunch of messages sitting in the IMS queue awaiting delivery to
MSN.
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands
Since you say usermgr, I assume you're talking about 5.5 on NT4.
You need to go into the admin program, on the properties of the
configuration container, service account password tab, and change the
password there for one server in your site, then restart the services on
all servers after
It looks like they're having some problems. I tried telneting there a
few minutes ago and couldn't connect on either IP. Now you can access
.13, so I'd say they're working on it.
I like trying network-tools.com's email validation to quickly confirm
the problem is not on my side.
T.
Their server[s] = out of disk space.
Or so states the error messages returned from them.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:MSN
Is anyone else having
My apologies-- I think I read the original message too quickly. Mail
addressed to mycompany.com should be the only mail going there if that is
what you configured. All other mail should go to the respective host via DNS
resolution. You are saying that this is not happening? What happens if you
OK so let me get this right? there's no way to have a user with the
appropriate rights modify the GAL from their OL via the address book? (you
have got to be kidding me)
SO...I'd have to do an export of the GAL, manipulate it in say excel, then
reimport it?
which is way beyond most users that I
www.mail-resources.com server | directory mgmt
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL mod's by reg user for ALL users info
tried to keep it short and sweet.
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
