If we assign admin rights to the NT accounts for the DL's, would that
require that the admins use the Exchange Admin utility to modify the
membership of the dl?
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:30 AM
To: Exchange
This of course would be easy enough to test out you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
If we assign admin rights to the NT accounts for the
rself
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
This of course would be easy enough to test out you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reason Microsoft Will have a doc comparing birds to ants.
What your Q has to do with my request
Kelly said he have documents comparing two antivirus products.
I assume he made some research on this subject in the past.
Maybe he also has a table to compare Norton to Trend.
I asked him.
Kelly is definitely not a *he*.
Did you even notice that she works for Sybari?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change
The reason Microsoft Will have a doc comparing
Kelly is a SHE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change
The reason Microsoft Will have a doc comparing birds to ants.
What your Q has to
She meant owner rights, which is the level of rights required to administer
the ownership of the list.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
lol Thanks Mark, you've cleared everything up for me.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change
The reason Microsoft Will have a doc comparing birds to ants.
It is well documented that Kelly is, in fact, a female.
And that she works for Sybari. The domain name kinda reveals that.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Mark Hanji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:04 AM
Subject: Re:
If you have a deletion retention period defined and someone POP's their mail
off the server, can you recover it? I always thought that when you pop it
removes it totally from the system and it could not be recovered.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
With DIR and DumpsterAlwaysOn, Yes you can recover the POPPED mail.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Missing Mail
If you have a deletion retention period
I don't POP, but I believe it works in much the same fashion as using a pst
in this regard. When you move mail off the server (or the mail is downloaded
to a local pst folder), it deletes it out of the inbox and it can be
recovered with the Dumpster hack enabled and DIR...
-Original
What does this have to do with missing mail?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Missing Mail
This version of Outlook Web Access only supports your
primary contact folder?
Forgot to change subject
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Missing Mail
This version of Outlook Web Access only supports your primary contact
folder?
Q257370,Q192775
You are even allowed to create a brand new message to post to the list.
Intriguing possibility, eh?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: Missing Mail
Forgot to
Hey... you promised not to tell!!!
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Missing Mail
IIRC, IceCreamBoy
Technically, the dumpster is client side, and is supported at least through
Outlook 2000. Not sure about XP, but I would assume that it is still there.
Of course, the dumpster functionality only works if you have Deleted Items
Retention enabled on the server.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange
I need to replicate two Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers in the same site through a
firewall. Checkpoint FW-1 to be precise.
I have read the archives and MSKB but cannot get it to work. Do I have to
specify the TCP/IP port for RPC traffic or does it use 102 the same as the
MTA?
Is anyone doing this and
Right. Exch 5.5 and up...
In Outlook 98 (and some of the later vers of Outlook 97 I believe), it only
works for mail type folders and not for Contacts etc...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Exchange
Craig: read the DR whitepaper
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/Disaster.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.
asp
also, some thoughts on Brick Level Backups (ie. individual mailbox backup):
The answer should be in here, too:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
also available here:
http://downloads.members.tripod.com/ladysun1969/misc/relay.tif
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:
Version 4.1
I tried adding the pre-defined services but with no joy. Works if I give it
an any rule! ;
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 Directory Replication through a firewall
What
I am using Exchange 5.5 with SP4 on NT4.0 SP6
Does anyone use the Exchange Code Autoaccept script?
If so what are the pitfalls? I have meetingrooms
being booked using the standard methode microsoft
recommends but it is not doing what I would like.
This seems like a good option but I wanted
Been running it for 3 years or so with no major problems. Occasionally have
to log into the mailbox with the /cleanfreebusy switch, but that's been
about it. I know that Lori Hunter has had some ongoing issues with it, but
she seems to be an exception [1]. Almost all the other reports I've seen
Hello.
This is weird (if there is such a thing).
We have a user who is unable to send email to a specific address. Each
time she attempts to send an email, it is returned with the message;
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message
Hello.
In my original posting, I failed to mention the obvious..Other users
within our Exchange Organization CAN send to this particular user.
Sorry for this oversight.
Bob P. Antonietti
_
List posting FAQ:
Is this person trying to send an attachment?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob P.
Antonietti
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Communications failure -Additional information
Hello.
In my
Ms. Kelly,
Nicely Put, I like your style.
David S. Pomerantz, MCT, MCSE
Network Systems Engineer
City of Hallandale Beach
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Microsoft may well be able to do so.
I take no credit for their pricing.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Sanborn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: Exchange 2K Conferencing Server
Can anyone explain why
No. But using Owner will do; don't need to be admin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
If we assign admin rights to the NT accounts for
BAA RAM EWE.
You are so lucky I like you Mr. David. Keep repeating that - it's my season
now, you know. I'm beginning to think it's time to form a virtual coven
here, even though I prefer to be solitary. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Greetings all,
I have been subscribed for over 1 year, and am trying to read the digests
as much as possible...could not find something similar to my problem.
NT40 SP6a server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, I receive periodically Event:ID 184
Source: ESE97, Description: MSExchangeIS (235) Online
Are you able to do an online backup?
-Original Message-
From: Victor Matei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Priv IS corrupted or is it not (ESE97 error -1019)?
Greetings all,
I have been subscribed for over 1 year,
To our flock be true...
As long as that coven doesnt include an oven, I'm in! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
BAA RAM EWE.
You are so
In regards to what Andy brought up...
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q188/6/46.ASP
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv IS corrupted or is it not (ESE97 error
Yeah... or what Lori said! ;)
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoAccept from Exchange Code
or set
1. Windows 2000 Server with SP2
2. Windows 2000 Professional on Desktops
I am experiencing a strange thing here at work, most of my users are
getting a Cannot Logon Locally error message when they log on. Does
anyone know what may be causing this? There is no group policy in
effect and I only
LOL!!!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TURN command
I thought your server was dead!?
-Original Message-
From: Antony Pautz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
How often does this happen and is it a different recipient each time or
always the same recipient?
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Repeating Emails
Hi all
We run an Exchange
Upgrade to E2K. Buy CommVault Galaxy for E2K. That version I believe has
an archive add-on. Then you'll also have a very good backup solution.
S.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
snicerking
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil
BraveHeart
The Lord says He can get me out of this mess, but He's pretty sure you're
We run the IBM eNetwork firewall software and the SMTP mail is passed off
directly to it - the problem only occurs for external mail.
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You are all too correct my friend! You would think some people would
actually check the help files.
Oh! Now I remember, we're here to offer FREE help. Shucks, I should have
known...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23,
On the other hand, one could use a packet analyzer to search for a
specific payload on the dest ip addr src 25. If it matches the telnet
signature then it will trigger an alert to firewall to block the
offending src for a specified time.
Tools:
SNORT - network/host based intrusion
hi all,
Iam having a problem with my SMTP Virtual Server while pushing mails to
my clients. Scenerio is, the clients which register to our site will
receive
a confirmation mail.Iam using IIS 5.0 with SMTP service direct delivery
enabled.
This process is happening since long
He has a good point - it's not that detailed if you really want to know the
inner workings. And no disrespect to Tony, but unless there's been a new
version out recently, it's also getting out-of-date.
Go to the www.exinternals.com site and print out the whitepapers that
interest you. These
Hmmm...
I guess I'm just lucky then. Then again, I already knew the interworkings
of Exchange.
Out of date??? How so???
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: good E2K book
He
There's no mention of Tener or Precht.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: good E2K book
Hmmm...
I guess I'm just lucky then. Then again, I already knew the interworkings
of
-- but don't include your current employer
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil
Hope your resume is current.
- Original
I have some strange issues with a remote exchange user. He is running OL
2000 connected to the exchange server usually, but with the option of using
Offline folders when he travels. The Exchange server is 5.5 SP4 on win2K
server.
His problem occurs when he replies to an emailsometimes. For
Looks like a corrupted message there.
How about just recreating the profile and offline folders when he is back in
the office?
-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Remote Exchange User
Yep... it does a -pretty good- job... but I would like to get more detailed
than that... I was hoping not to have to go into detail on my problems, but
rather find a book or other source that can help me... so here goes... as an
example, my exchange environment is as follows:
-E5.5 SP4 (three
ribbet
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil
Probably a consultant anyway. But just for running that without thinking
long and hard
I have seen this problem occur on our end. It involved external POP3 users
that were VERY impatient with delivery time. They would get a large email
in their inbox and before the message would transfer they would disconnect
and reconnect in a effort to get it to run faster. It caused duplicate
Come now Lori. If you really wanted to punish him, you'd turn him into
Hanji.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil
Probably a consultant
You still remember me you do care you really do
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: good E2K book
There's no mention of Tener or Precht.
-Original Message-
From: Don
Oh I get it. Nathan made a funny...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Better Version?
lol
Troll. -2 karma.
Don't need slashdot to see where this is headed. :) putting
LOL! But he wouldn't suffer. I bet Hanjii is quite happy with his own lot;
it's the rest of us who suffer!
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag
She turned me into a newt!
...Joel
PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Reader Is
Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only
in a Vague and Undetermined State.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL
AFAIK, CDO 1.21 hasn't been designed for Unicode. You need to use
Extended MAPI for this task.
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Nagi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CDO UNICODE
I am having a problem using
TDP v2.2 does support Exchange 2000. Please take a look at:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tdp_ms.html for more
information.
Regarding the TDP product itself, there were some issues in the
1.0 and 1.1 release of the product last year and were fixed with
the release 1.1.1 in January
It would have had to have been bundled before it could be unbundled.
If you don't like the pricing, look at the competition. Then you'll find
that the pricing might not be so cheap. When looking at competition,
make sure that you look at features.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Sanborn
Where in Exchange 2000 can I give someone permissions to publish a form in
the Organizational forms? Is this possible?
Thanks
Saul
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
unfortunately none of the answers have helped so far. i've been told restore
is not an option. There is no pst file in use and no POP access. it is 100%
pure exchange mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I am creating a Trouble ticket application that when the user selects a
specific request from a dropdown box, depending on what they select I want
the form that I created to automaticaly place itself in another folder
(e.g. I have three folders, A Main: Request for Service which is where the
user
Ahhh, I'll wager 3 Fosters that the sys-admin doesnt have a recovery server
or a good backup to restore from!
P.S. I just re-read the thread. You mentioned that when you ran isinteg, it
found errors. Just as an aside, do you remember what those errors were?
-Original Message-
From:
hanji.msi ?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Missing Mail
What admin tools say the mail is there?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't
Exchange admin
drill down to config then private then mailbox and go to the users name.
there it is
i've just been told that the restore is currently being done. still working
on the error that came up with isinteg as the guy that that was here when it
finished isn't in as yet.
Kind Regards
ive included only the first couple of lines the last line of each test
that had errors as there were quite a few
Starting test 2 of 23, 'Restriction Tables'
Fix: Deleting restriction table, row, and all links to fid-002D-0287981C
Fix: Deleting restriction table, row, and all links to
When you use the mailbox size utility in Outlook, what does it report the
folder sizes to be?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Dulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October
We are trying to figure out a way to migrate our Exchange 5.5
cluster server to an Exchange 2000 cluster server. Our
environment is mostly Win2k but the domain isn't native.
How many NT4 domain controllers remain?
It
looks like no matter what method we use, we will loose a lot
of
Yes. Those are the same people for whom the warning labels are placed on
EVERYTHING. Those that don't make it out of the house alive in the
morning thin the heard. Though I must admit it's not been working as
well as it did before the warning labels.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From:
FAQ - read it, learn it, love it - find it at the bottom of every email
to this list.
You might want to look at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodt
echnol/exchange/maintain/monitor/c03x2kad.asp
and
Q196927, Q147775, and Q147772.
Tom.
-Original
73 matches
Mail list logo
