Does anyone have any samples, or links, or know of any good books, that cover
creating/managing Ex2K mailboxes programatically from C++?
A Google search and looking on obvious sites has lots of samples, but they're
all in VB and are basically clones of the rather underdescribed stuff in MSDN.
We
Hi all,
Just having a read of the QUE book on Ex 5.5. I have been asked to check the
feasability of setting up public and private encryption keys for all
exchange users. I have used this with Notes before but never Exchange.
Having read the book, it looks rather complicated at first glance so I
Although I am not a C/C++ guy I found the following MSKB article which
might be helpful:
HOWTO: Create a Mail-Enabled User with CDOEXM in Visual C++:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q293339
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL
What is it that you need to know specifically Karen?
What are you looking at the ADC to perform for you?
The ADC will create new AD objects or associate current AD objects and
associate them with Exchange DS objects (users, custom recipients, public
folders etc).
Alec
In the absence of the test lab and a white board I will have a go for you
but these two recommendations are valid.
By the way this is my first go at helping this list out so bear with me...
Answers below hope they help you.
Alec
Question: 1. Should I install SP6a prior to the upgrade?
Very good answers!! Glad to have you on board and willing to share...
Thanks
Ron
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Site connectors in Ex.5.5. Ex2000
In the absence of the test lab and a
Apparently this fix has helped some:
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/oxpauiu.aspx
-Original Message-
From: Tea, Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow opening unread messages
Hi,
Just wondering if
See? Thats the messages I keep getting!
It doesnt even have any info about when the message was sent!
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: None
Subject:
Just as some additional info: Internet headers are completely blank and
messages are always about 800 bytes...
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Filipe
Somebody is bcc'ing to you
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blank messages
Just as some additional info: Internet headers are completely blank and
We're doing a design for a large enterprise. One particular business
unit (2500 people in size) has an antagonistic relationship with the
parent and is leaning towards their own W2K forest and Exchange Org.
However, the mandate from above says that there needs to be unified
messaging, which
No 'from', no 'sent date', no 'internet headers'... I doubt this is a
bcc. Has to be something else, don't you think?
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Why not have a single forest with multiple domains for the different
divisions
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync
We're doing a
Have you 'tracked' the message to see what route it took to get to your mailbox ?
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 13:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blank messages
No 'from', no 'sent
I'm getting this e-mail directly from the internet, in my ISP's Pop3
mailbox at home.
No exchange server, just outlook 2002.
Internet headers are clean. No tracking to be done...
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
I demand that this
Is the Friday of Fridays:
Beer and Fish Tacos!
Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Then I would still say it was bcc'd to you
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 13:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blank messages
I'm getting this e-mail directly from the internet, in my ISP's
Everyone,
We are running two Exchange2000 sp2 servers as an Active/Active
cluster. It appears as though messages get hung in the SMTP queues.
When I look in the Message tracking system it says:
SMTP: Message Delivered Locally to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but I know it has not been because it's not in
If it was bcc'd the internet headers and the sent date wouldn't be
clean, would they?
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone
Sent: sexta-feira, 10
I agree, Emanager is pretty good. Not to ham-fisted, I have had to retrieve
5-10 valid emails over 6 months while having a reduction of 80-90% of spam
mails.
FYI for anyone running 3.52 version of Emanager, there is a Bug
(definitely not a enhancement) that can delete your custom rules/content
Maybe it's a mail bounce
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blank messages
If it was bcc'd the internet headers and the sent date wouldn't be
clean, would they?
Filipe Joel
Good question, certainly a scenario we considered. It would appear
that this business unit is afraid that Enterprise Admins would force
policies into the child domain and they want to avoid that vulnerability.
Gotta love politics! :)
- Karen
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Julian Stone wrote:
Why
Wow I have a lot to learn then, I don't even know what a 'tcp sny' packet
is. If I have port 25 open wouldn't that imply that I'm not blocking tcp
syn packets on port 25? Would that be the difference between using the ip
permit over the tcp permit statements?
Also, should I have port 113
Just give them their very own OU and delegate privileges from there. A
second forest is a huge PITA, and a child domain actually makes the
environment more vulnerable.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Julian Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by
installing other servers :)
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Dont need to. However , you should reject 113 - dont merely drop it.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Wow I have a lot to learn then, I don't even know
Woohoo! Beer and Fish Tacos Sounds GOOOD!
Thank you for that Happy Haiku!
Regards,
Dave J. Savittiere
Doyle Land Services, Inc.
880 Commerce Road W.
New Orleans, La. 70123
Phn:(504) 818-1118
Fax:(504) 818-1129
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Rockliffe MailSite (http://www.rockliffe.com)
IPSwitch Imail (http://www.ipswitch.com)
Gordano NTMail (http://www.gordano.com)
Out of these 3, my choice would be Rockliffe Mailsite. It allows to create
custom routes, allows ETRN, pretty strong as a relay.
-Original Message-
From: matt
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could
do this?
thx
bill
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
he
Did Double-take mirror the entire Information Store in real time?
I know Octopus would choke if someone tried to mirror a very large file.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Kind ladies and gentlemen,
We have an office manager who would like to be able to send email on behalf
of the salespeople in her office. I've given her the ability to do this,
but now she is asking if it is possible for her to use the individual's
Contact list to verify names and mail
As Benjamin stated, reject sends back a TCP RST, drop simply drops and does
nothing afterwards - not good in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
Ok
Hi there
I actually ran into this problem, and here is how I found out about it and
fixed it:
See if you can print any of these emails. If you can't see them, but you
can print them out, then there is a problem with HTML emails. Here's the
kicker: Outlook pulls HTML in from IE. I had one
http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Friday afternoon fun
Sorry but this is very addictive
We have an exchange server 5.5, sp2 on an NT4 machine which also runs OWA . This has
started going wrong, users can get in, read, send, but when they try to reply to or
forward any message they get
Error.
Failed to open this item.
Your item does not exist in this folder. It may have been
Ooo fun. :)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 14:39
To:
Well, using the ADC as an interorg tool I don't believe you are going to get
PFs to replicate , nor calendar data. However, having Domain accounts in a
separate forest from where the Exchange servers exist is a supported
configuration... Then all they'd have to worry about is e-mail policies
What do the message headers say?
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Blank messages
See? That's the messages I keep getting!
It doesn't even have any info about
I got a distance of 798
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html
-Original Message-
From: Julian
this is a lab I am talking about.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes...
Getting in late. If your not or haven't done an Exchange upgrade, it is best
to
950 HA ha!!!
the simple games are always the most addictive.
jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying.
873 - but my chopper was sputtering smoke all the way - busted...
Jerzy
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 10:28:28 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
950 HA ha!!!
the simple games are always the
Thanks Tom it turned out to be the group did not have security rights to
their access list. Works now. Now I got another problem. We can connect in
house
To each domain check names and launch outlook..everything ok can see each
domains virtual public folders (when logged in as proper
Nope! Did that and (Q308319, 313908 290025) before the post. A majority of the
mailbox content was imported from Eudora. We did them a dozen of times and it appears
that only this particular mailbox is experiencing slowness.
Any idea?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
1064 but then my copter ran out of gas
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
950 HA ha!!!
the simple games are always the most addictive.
jeremy
-Original
576 ... more practise needed !
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
950 HA ha!!!
the simple games are always the most addictive.
jeremy
-Original
Did I read this right? FREE?
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz
Phil
We must beat the maker of the games 2148
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
1176 so far..
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL
1493 I gotta stop playing this thing
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
1176 so far..
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
1462...at last..something I'm good at. :)
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 15:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
1176 so far..
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
We're getting there...we've had a 1476 in the office, but the guy's
laptop was a lot slower than mine, so he's got an advantage. Managed an
808, and now my eyes are going funny staring at the screen.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 May
Ill beat that
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
We must beat the maker of the games 2148
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes, you did!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT
Where did you see that score
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
We must beat the maker of the games 2148
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE
You think it's easy flying a radio-controlled helicopter into somebody's
head. My hi-score is 2148. See if you can beat it.
Above the game
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday
Hi there
Take it from me... domains are not security zones. A domain admin from one
domain can break his E2K and negatively affect your E2K. We are currently
moving towards a single forest model with multiple domains, and I am so
sorry we are. You have no idea how much time I've spent trying
Sick Dork in charge of
our network nanny program
denies this pleasure
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
Ooo fun. :)
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
We recently installed Exchange 2000 server to upgrade from Exchange 5.5 . We
are using Swing Upgrade method . The new server seems to have joined the old
site (Exchange 5.5 SP4) . The new server also got installed Exchange Systems
Manager . Now when we try to move mailboxes from old server
Yup. Free. And it's soon going to be saving the taxpayers of Texas the
money they were spending on my annual Listserv maintenance fee.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:41 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
boo
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
Sick Dork in charge of
our network nanny program
denies this pleasure
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric
I had a the same problem a while back and it was due to the fact that the
guy who setup the AD user accounts made them mail enabled by entering an
email address. Until you delete the email address, you do not get the option
to move the mailbox and make them mailbox enabled users.
-Original
Damn! One of the AD guys has just got 2698...show off!!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
Posted At: 10 May 2002 15:59
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Friday afternoon fun
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
We're getting there...we've had a 1476 in the office, but the
I can connect to my echange 2k server on our network but not from outside
location.
Name and mail server name check names ok but then fails to open information
store.
Help!!!
_
List posting FAQ:
How are these remote users connecting?
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Importance: High
I can connect to my echange 2k server on our network but not
What does your firewall administrator say?
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:18 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Subject: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Have you checked the FAQ to see what ports need to be open? Or better yet,
are you using VPN?
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Importance: High
I just installed it and it looks great. They say on a decent machine it can
push 8,000 messages per hour. Has anyone tested it with large message
volume?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
My eyes hurt !!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 16:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
Damn! One of the AD guys has just got 2698...show off!!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
I told you it was addictive. Btw my best score 2204
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
My eyes hurt !!
-Original Message-
From: Neil
That's the way it should be.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Importance: High
I can connect to my echange 2k server on our network but not from outside
I use a public folder for the same purpose. Set it up, add questionable lists, wait
awhile and see what it catches.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL usage
I have a hidden
646 here - Just call me ROOKIE!
--
From: Tener, Richard
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
1493 I gotta stop playing this thing
-Original Message-
From: Bill
I think your best bet is to move all the salespeople's Contacts folders into Public
folders. You can mess with the permissions to get any degree of security needed to
make the owners of the Contacts lists comfortable with the change, and the Office
Manager will then be able to use the lists to
My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
646 here - Just call me ROOKIE!
--
From: Tener, Richard
Reply
Currently test server is outside firewall nothing blocked. Using outlook 2k
over internet to connect
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Have
Oops, didn't see that!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a
What exactly are you trying to test here?
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Currently test server is outside firewall nothing blocked. Using outlook
Sorry Bill, didn't read the whole question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K
Got a super easy course. 1861. Chopper still smoking...
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 11:55:09 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt
-Original Message-
Need access to exch 2000k server from separate office over the internet
using outlook
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook connects locally not remotely
What exactly are you
VPN / OWA
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook connects locally not remotely
Need access to exch 2000k server from separate office over the internet
using outlook
-Original
I see that port 113 was one of those originally set up for Exchange on my firewall --
Exch2K/W2K doesn't require it? I'm happy to reject it if not needed.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have never seen a problem rejecting this(remember reject, not drop).
Others may have different experiences.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp - UDP, TCP, or IP?
I see that
Usually only his probation officer calls him that.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mongo trust internet
Mr. David?
Oooo, I like that! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Tom
I'm trying to programmatically assign calendar proxy rights to a
Universal group in Exchange 2000. Ideally, this group would have the
ability to manipulate calendars items but would not have the ability to
view other parts of person's mailbox like the inbox. I can assign proxy
rights globally
890 What uppp
what is the worst score anyone has gotten?
anyone less then 50?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
My hand is sweating and is
I have a bunch of mailboxes that I want to move to a new recipient container
on the same server.
Can I do this?
Running 55sp4
Thank You,
Robert Williams
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363
I got a 27 but that was cause I didn't click at all
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
890 What uppp
what
Absolutely. Started out with 38. Up to 480 already.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
890 What uppp
what is the worst score anyone has
I need a private office so I can get good at this thing.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
best - 779
worst - 24 (kept hitting that first wall)
--
Sorry. You will have to keep working the drive thru window for a while
longer.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
I need a private office so I can get
You will have to export the mail out to PST files, kill and remake the
mailboxes them move the mail back in.
Exmerge is the tool of choice.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Communications without intelligence is noise;
Thanks! SP2 worked... as you knew it would!
Regards,
Dave J. Savittiere
Doyle Land Services, Inc.
880 Commerce Road W.
New Orleans, La. 70123
Phn:(504) 818-1118
Fax:(504) 818-1129
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Yeah, I started at 31 and worked up to 980 This thing is TOO addictive!
Regards,
Dave J. Savittiere
Doyle Land Services, Inc.
880 Commerce Road W.
New Orleans, La. 70123
Phn:(504) 818-1118
Fax:(504) 818-1129
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Will exmerge retain the mailbox settings? Cause I don't care about the
mail
Thank You,
Robert Williams
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002
Are you resolving the name using the IP or FQDN (I imagine the answer to
this question is yes), the client needs to be able to connect to that server
using the netbios name... So, in order of preference from worst to best...
LMHOSTS, DNS Suffix Search Order, OWA, VPN.
-Original Message-
What mailbox settings? Rules and such?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: Can you move a mailbox to a new container on the same
server?
Will exmerge retain the mailbox
Retain which mailbox settings and why do the mailboxes need to be moved?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you move a mailbox to a new container on the
same server?
Put the server's IP address and NetBIOS name in the HOSTS file on your
remote PC.
Make sure ports 135 as well as 1024 and higher are open.
You may want to force the Exchange server to only use 1024, 1025, 1026 this
way you can monitor just three (well, four) RPC ports instead of thousands.
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
