ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's
being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
Yes. Email headers are
Thanks Amy,
I'll check that artical out today.
--
From: ExchangeAdminList[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 13 August 2002 22:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN
Have a look at Q163576. We have
Hi Chris,
He can ping by name.
--
From: Chris Scharff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 13 August 2002 21:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and PPTP + VPN
So he can't ping by name then? Sounds like a netbios
This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam
filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was
that other people decide for you what is spam.
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August
E2K, OL2K
Quick straw poll. What is the accepted wisdom for creating distibution lists which
involve external contacts outside of your organisation? Ie. You want to roll out the
following distirbution list to some, many or all of your users within your
organisation:
Somebody who works here
I don't know if its any help, but the default install of Windows 2000 Server SP2
(International English) with a default install of Exchange 2000 Server SP2
(International English) results in OWA correctly displaying Danish, Swedish and
Norwegian special characters. You do not need the
Wha't are you go'ing o'n about'?
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC early registration
Naah, the spelling doesn't look like Kevin's work. The
apostrophe abuse[1]
Running Front-End / Back-End servers setup E2k Sp2. Noticed that in my smtp
queues that it appears that messages
that are awaiting local delivery are actually messages for users that have
mail forwarded offsite. Anyone run into this before
and how to correct.
Ron
What about the aditional overhead (cost) of Windows 2000 server as he
will need an AD. I would say rather stick with NT4.0 and Exchange 5.5
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 05:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
We have a mixed E2k/E5.5 org with several Exchange 5.5
sites in this org and one mixed site.
All E5.5 servers in 1 NT4 domain and all E2k servers in a
W2k domain. Two way trusts and all permissions exist as
they should.
We have set up two way CA's from each Exchange site to AD.
When we try
Hi all.
I have restored an Exchange 2000 PF store to an alternate server. No problems with the
restoration process itself - the store mounted fine.
However the alternate server is in a different active directory. That active directory
does not have these public folders in the Microsoft
CDO/MAPI anonymous logon to Exchange server works for Exchange 5.5 but not
for Exchange 2000 (E2K), see below:
strProfileInfo =
/o=Organisation/ou=Site/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=ServerName vbLf vbLf
anon
cdoSession.Logon , , False, True, , True, strProfileInfo
Where the profile info is
I heard Exchange could not efficiently take advantage of more than 4GB of RAM.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
Win2k Server is
Also if you want to do clustering or load balancing, you need to have Win2K Advanced
Server
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server
The MS Exchange 2000 Internals: Quick Tuning Guide
(http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtech
nol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/optimize/exchtune.asp) says to use the
/3GB switch on servers with 1GB of RAM (or more). Pierre Bijaoui says the
same thing in his
Anonymous messages? RFC821 www.faqs.org
Might be an open relay? Test it.
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article;
sid=156 (link wrap)
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/13/2002 11:50 AM
Subject: Anonymous messages in
So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software..
Gimme the good bad.
My sole criterion in this request is that you have some experience with the
software you mention.
_
List posting FAQ:
Hi there
This brings up a question I have along the same topic
I see a few hundred of these on a daily basis. I can't tell you the topics
because we're in mixed company. I always go in and delete them, thinking
that these will take up resources trying to send out mail that will never be
Gosh, I et me a fish taco last night.
(didn't get her name, though..)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC early registration
Ill be the one selling Fish Tacos in front
This is where I heard it:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KSP2_Cluster.asp
Memory Limitations
Exchange 2000 Server works well with the /3GB switch.
Note Exchange 2000 Server requires that the /3GB switch be used in conjunction with
Windows 2000 Advanced Server and
If all you want to do is make sure the public folders live SOMEWHERE,
then you can import the recovered folders to PST and then import them
into your production AD.
If you want them to go to their original homes, well, you may have to
wrestle with the Exchange 2000 version of Pfadmin.
If
there are those things best left to inner monologue.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC early registration
Gosh, I et me a fish taco last night.
(didn't get her name,
Hi all,
I am planning a migration from 5.5 to an existing 2k/AD server because
of an office relocation. 2 different sites which are not connected but
same domain (kind of... Under NT the domain is called mydomain and
under SBS2k it is mydomain.co.uk).
I've read up on the WP and also related
Not to mention that it is a *CLIENT* add-on. Who wants to enroll a
client anti-SPAM product if I have a corporate messaging infrastructure
in place which is supposed to handle this long before it is supposed to
actually drop into the users mailbox.
You mean because it is free? Well, just monitor
This was my original plan (similar to single mailbox restore):
1. Restore PF store from tape to alternate server
2. Mount the restored store
3. Connect with Outlook to the alternate server and export the PFs to PST
4. Import PST into the production server
However the alternate Exchange server
TKCSales?
Aren't you the kite people based in Bath?
Advertising for a general techie bod a while back?
I thought of applying, but you weren't paying enough!
Cheers
GWG
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 09:13
To: Exchange
What's the deal?
-Original Message-
From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Somewhere a box needs kicking...
Anyone else having trouble with this list? Over the last 24 hours, I'm
seeing sporadic message
Hi Missy
Thanks for your insight and advice!
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC issues
There's no problem letting them simply time out. Depends on how you want
What's your Exchange admin say?
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Somewhere a box needs kicking...
I know, having similar problems myself. Not sure why, thought it might be
me
My philosophy is whack 'em, but don't go to the bother of getting someone else to
whack 'em while you're on vacation.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC issues
Hi
Good morning,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4
A small part of our organization is moving to their own mail server. They
don't like the way we restrict our Exchange/Outlook system.
What they want is to have all of the mail that is coming in for these twenty
users to be forwarded to the new domain.
Based on what you have said here I believe your solution is to go into your
IMS and look at the Internet Mail tab and click on Advanced.
Nate
--
From: Mitchell Mike
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:02
To: Exchange Discussions
If I turn off the automatic replies to the Internet, will this allow the
forwarding of eMAILs to
the Outside world?
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil
Based on
I saw this at a company I was consulting for once and it turned out that
they were allowing open relay and the messages were SPAM messages being
relayed through the server. You may want to double-check some of the
messages
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL
and the prize goes to you!
yup, that's us and I took the job - I'm just a cheap tart!
-Original Message-
From: Gary Wilson-Garner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 16:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
TKCSales?
Aren't you the kite people based in
You want to make sure the Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet is NOT
selected. This will allow mail forwarded by rules or Alternate Recipient
addressing to occur.
--
From: Mitchell Mike
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:21
Has anyone on the list tried to use Apache or MS ISA server to proxy http
(and https) from a DMZ back into an E2K front end server? If so how did it
work out? Inquiring minds want to know!
_
List posting FAQ:
Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as they had hoped?
Anyone one of the first 1000 to get a DVD?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:55 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: MEC early
We are running 2 domains (NT 4.0 domain and a Windows 2000 Active
Directory). We have duplicate accounts for each person on each domain
(I know we are working on fixing this). Our Domain Controller was also
the Exchange 2000 Server. Users were able to log on to the Exchange
server without
I am.. It will be interesting to see what is on it.. .
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC early registration
Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as
Hi
My customr has journaling enable.
And all email a redirected to a Public Folder
For now only incoming eMail are achived.. No outgoing mails to
internal or external eMail are archived...
Does anyone have experienced that ?
JF
Thanks for all of your help. I have connected as required.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forwarding MAil
You want to make sure the Disable Automatic Replies to the
If you're a Technet subscriber, the latest box of cds that arrived
contains a promotional code to type in at the registration website,
which will get you the free DVD also.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:43 AM
Ok, I have figured it out if anyone is interested.
There are two ways of making it work.
After you restore PUB1.EDB and PUB1.STM to an alternate server and mount the PF store,
al the public folders will show up in Exchange System Manager. But you won't see them
in Outlook yet. To make the
Hi,
Exchange 2000 SP3, Windows 2000 SP3
Situation: Today I started my first Exchange 2000 installation.
Problem: Only the account I used to install Exk2 have a mailbox.
Question from a beginner: Where are the mailboxes for the others 400 users?
I don't want to send message only to myself
Manuel,
I assume you installed Exchange using the default administrator account,
in which case that address by default receives a mailbox. To give the
other users within Active Directory mailboxes you can 'mailbox enable
them' by running the Users and Computers MMC (available from the
Thanks for your answer , Jason
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jason Kane
Enviado el: miercoles, 14 de agosto de 2002 20:22
Para: Exchange Discussions
Asunto: RE: First installation, first problem
Manuel,
I assume you installed Exchange
I have the exact same problem. I have tried connecting using 3 different
computers but all have the same issue with Outlook hanging. I am also using
a high speed DSL connection at home. I have enquired about other users, some
even using AOL to connect via VPN , and they have no problems
I'm trying to find a profile generation tool that would add additional
mailboxes. I came across a tool called createprf.exe which would allow me to
add additional mailboxes but it seems like it will only allow me to add ONE
additional mailbox. Is that correct or am I missing something ?
I'm using
I wouldn't recommend installing this currently if you have plans to. There is a
serious bug that is causing none of the mail to be picked up from your outlook clients
until you restart the IS. This happens every few hours now when it was just twice a
day last week. We are all scratching our
One question more:
Now, when I tried to connect to Exchange Server from Outlook I receive the
next message:
Is not possible to open the electronic mail folders, you don't have
permissions to start the session. (It happens with all the accounts except
the administrator).
Before start the
How exactly does the Exchange server pick up mail from Outlook clients?
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 SP3
I wouldn't recommend installing this currently if
Have a very small installation wanting to migrate their novell/groupwise 6.0
data to exchange 2000. I'm looking through the materials on MS's site now
but was wondering if there are any big show stoppers that folks here have
run into. Any advise from experience doing this migration?
Thx for
We went through a GW5 to E2K migration a little over a year ago for about
100 mailboxes. In general, things went very smoothly and our users have been
very happy. Some things we encountered:
1. Reminder Notes do not come across at all.
2. Messages that had been forwarded many times got
Greetings
1 forest
2 domains (just 1 DC in each W2K-AD domain) W2k+SP3+native mode
1 exchange2000 in 1st domain + SP3 + native mode
We are trying to install MSx2000 in the 2nd domain, we did not run setup
/forestprep in this second domain beacuse we already did it in the 1st
domain, we got an
Hi All,
Can somebody explain to me how the three interact. I have been reading up
on some postings and would like some clarification as to how they are
interrelated.
We have 2 Domain Controllers(DCs), A and B and Exchange as a member
server. A is setup as the Global Catalog. We added a third
If I understand you correctly, you're trying to move mailboxes from 5.5 sites to an
exchange 2000 server in a different site...If so, you can't do that.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
When an Outlook profile is created it connects to a DC that is a GC. Once
you removed the original DC, which was a GC, the profile stops responding.
Recreate the users profile and you should be ok.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
Subject: Split 1 5.5 Org into 2 E2K Orgs
I am planning a project to split an existing Exchange 5.5
Organization into 2 Exchange 2000 Organizations. Today
the Exchange 5.5 Org crosses 2 AD forests, with 1 site in
each forest. This is a loose relationship between
forests. Exchange 2000 will
Have you also moved the FSMO roles to the new server as well ? Otherwise
your system will not know the full topology of the AD.
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
60 matches
Mail list logo
