Finally, a voice of reason.
I understood the original question and also thought the 'test it for
yourself' answer a bit short.
I remember desiring the same information once, and after trying Ed's method,
and quickly had a 10mb application log full of useless information before I
could turn it
Thanks, Bubba. It's what I pointed out four days ago.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
It is Exchange aware only
It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday,
(blindfold sales surge noted)
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Monday, September 09,
You want to learn? Try twiddling the logging levels and see what
happens. If I knew of a handy-dandy reference that I could pull out of
my head and give you, I'd have done it. Not having one, I merely
pointed out that you could very easily determine the answer to your
inquiry. Had you been
I suggest your skin is too thin.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002
You know, if I had directed him to that book, something I have done on
very many occasions in response to other questions, I suspect it would
have generated a similar response. Honestly, I didn't recall that
particular information being in that book. That's not to say you're
wrong, Andy, just
Give me a few days. I've made it more generic (it had hard-coded server
and domain names before) and have to test it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10Mb deletes pretty fast.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:25
Unfortunately it's rather hard to simulate/stimulate all the success and
failure conditions that might occur such that full logging can be
explored. I understand that a picture of some sort might be drawn from
it, but I question the value of the picture. Perhaps the point was that
if it's
How fast does it analyze and summarize?
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
===
-Original Message-
Can you confirm that running the client on the server is slow? IE
eliminating the network.
Cheers
Paul
Toothbrushes are like standards,
everybody wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 23:18
To: Exchange
Hi Chris
Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard
drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site)
I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores
faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the
Clearly that is what fooled him.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD.
Ed
Don't we all?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
What happens if you both an Exchange person and a SQL DBA?
*arghhh* Im confused now :-)
J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock
Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is
Do you do full text indexing. That can kill your box.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance
Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk
Yup. Did a test about six months ago[1] with a company called NDR[2][3].
The procedure they use (for NT4 Server[4]) is this:
Basic install of OS
Restore data partitions, make sure they're OK
Restore system/boot partition
*DO NOT REBOOT*
Edit necessary
This was of course, not just an Exchange recovery.
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 12:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery)
Yup. Did a test about six months
Then you have to be cruel to be kind...
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 11:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
What happens if you both an Exchange person and a SQL DBA?
*arghhh* Im
Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so it is not as
secure as an off-site tape, and I only have space for one backup. I am
putting together a case for new hardware to go to my management, so maybe I
can slip in a few removable disks without them spotting it! The answer I
Hello all,
We are looking for a tool or application that will allow us to provide
users with information about their mailboxes and any attached PST files
mailbox size
list of largest messages
find new un-read messages
old messages
The goal is to encourage users to clean up their
You must give in to the Exchange side, or become overrun with people asking
you if the mail server's down when it's not.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Kane
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Uh, no.
That was to be said more in a terrified young British Public School
student's voice.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trent Hancock
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Look,
The more cruel, the more kind. Unfortunately, you can't be so kind as to
stick heads of offensive users on pikes outside the server room.
Sometimes I wish companies would just let Exchange Admins do their jobs the
way they were trained...
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just goes to show... there are two kinds of people in the world. Those who
want to see Ed Crowley, Chris Scharff, Andy Webb, and Daniel Chenault in
pink sundresses and matching hats singing barbershop harmony... and those
who don't.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lol, thanks
Sander
SysAdmin Manager
Korbitec Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 01:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so it is not
as
wow so that's what Ill miss be not be able to go to MEC.
Guess I'll just rent The Birdcage again..
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Just goes to
way too much information for this time of day
--
From: Great Cthulhu Jones
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 07:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Just goes to show... there are two kinds of people
Storstat will work against an Exchange 5.5 mailbox (haven't tried it against
Exchange 2000 though). It comes in the BORK.
As for the PST file - I don't know of anything that will help you there.
Cheers.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Chris tanner
Reply To: [EMAIL
Go for it. Been running with Ex2k SP3 as well, with no issues.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Win2K SP3 good to go?
Has the smoke
Good place to get a few of them :
http://www.entrysecurity.com/favs.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 13:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Way OT - Websites
I'm going to be putting
Hi all,
Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A
I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in
detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done,
i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then
Yea, those Rental Car links will come in handy.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
Good place to get a few of them :
Q151427 , Q218458 , Q157363 , Q317140 , Q166184 , Q189649 , Q249023 ,
Q180140 , Q274447 , Q168683 , Q274814 , Q231604 , Q234636 , Q136934 ,
Q149706 , Q175529 , Q266208 , Q260698 , Q110582 , Q158520 , Q164130
It indicates the failure of a service startup due to the fact that one
of the
I would tend to think that WINS is more responsible for Outlook logon than DNS.
Outlook is a NetBIOS type of animal.
Have you tweaked the Provider order in the registry of your clients to match the
network protocol used on your network?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul
Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe
I can try it out this weekend.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance
Q216076
Personally, I like http://tiggercam.net (Tigger says he's developing it)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 14:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
Yea, those Rental Car links will come in handy.
No, a Dickensian.
-Original Message-
From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
Aha !
The Great One is an AGGIE ?
:-)
Trent Hancock
Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn
Q255770 , Q282073 , Q269001
This problem was encountered for the first time after a server crash
(Security Event Log full, even though the overwrite events as needed
option was active). Other crashes had never caused this Trying to access
the web site via internet resulted to the HTTP 500 -
It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder,
Secretaries where getting incredibly upset. When I tested this in the lab it
worked great, when I applied it to the live server I became a hero
Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
lmfao
-Original Message-
From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance
It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder,
Secretaries where getting incredibly upset.
Oh yeah...
http://www.wickett.net/Default.asp?Page=WNMailKeeper
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 23:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using
I don't think they're going to give up the whole file for any business
need. There's probably way more in the relevant header file than
Microsoft wants to give out. I mean...that's probably the one with the
cabal members' names in it.
*wringing hands*
;)
-Original Message-
From:
Outlook however checks hosts and DNS servers for name resolution before
switching to NetBIOS name resolution. This is of course can be changed if
required.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange
As per Microsoft: This issue can occur if you did not enter a public
folder store for the offline Address Book that it can replicate its
contents to. . See the link below for more details.
The problem is that the offline address list generator cannot generate
offline address books if an entry
OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP
machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp?
Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and
I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob:
only got
Rob,
I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of
mapi32.dll file).
Cheers
Paul
Toothbrushes are like standards,
everybody wants one but not yours.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37
To: Exchange
Thanks for your reply Andrey,
However, I was under the impression that Outlook is a winsock application
and therefore will resolve names via a hosts file and the DNS before using
WINS and NetBIOS as outlined in Q172218 and Q155048. I am not convinced it
is a name resolution issue anyway because
Here's the procedure for restoring Windows 2000 to different hardware that I
developed and tested fairly well. It was developed around Legato Networker,
but should work for any sort of backup/restore.
Windows 2000 Server Recovery to Different Hardware
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 This document describes
You may want to check their RPC binding order if you haven't done so.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q163576;
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
When you cut paste from a support site, do you mind referencing the
source? It's bad form, otherwise.
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001source=
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 07:59 AM
Posted
When you get something from a support site, you should reference it.
And don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad
form, otherwise.
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=36source=
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Hi Michelle,
I have checked the RPC binding order and it is correctly set, this is also
backed up by the fact that on the machines that have the problem, if you
recreate the profile name resolution in the Mail Control Panel Applet takes
less than 5 seconds to resolve the name to a Exchange
When you get something from a support site, you should reference it. And
don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad form,
otherwise.
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9127source=
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Remember to apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation that has been
applied to Exchange.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
Rob,
I
I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not
related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a
nice design!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install
(cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which
ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll?
cheers
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Rob,
Usually you are running Outlook on the same PC, this has a different
Mapi32.dll and is a version that the exch admin prog does not like. So when
installing rename the Outlook one, install then make sure that the exch
admin dll is copied to the bin directory it is installed to and then
Again, I blame the American public school system for what will likely be a
lifelong handicap for the poor man.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates
A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put your speakers on though.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and
Tener...
Why does it not surprise me that you like that web site?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put
hmmm - think I might just stick with what I've done - more trouble than
it's worth. Server is being decommissioned in approx 3 weeks anyway.
thanks for the info the info tho - filed it away!
cheers
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September
I swear MS are hiding this information from me. I'm currently looking
for the feature comprison table that compares the standard and
Enterprise version of Exchange 2000. Anyone know of any pointers to
this?
Many thanks, Jason
_
you dont like it i thought it was pretty good, just the thought of some guy
speaking into a mic about his website makes me laugh.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/howtobuy/choosing/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Comparison Table for E2K standard vs Enterprise
I swear MS are hiding this
http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not
related to the PC
E2K sp3, Win2K sp3, OutlookXP
I just set up my exchange server recently, only a few users. I have had a
couple of accounts do this now thought maybe I had something misconfigured
(though I don't know how) or if it's an undocumented feature. Has anyone
seen this before?
One user logs on to
peter pan one is very good try this one http://www.realultimatepower.net/
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/
I am attempting the Ed Crowley Server Move Method. During the Exch 5.5
install on the new W2K SP3 machine, I try to join the existing Exch 5.5 SP4
/ NT4 SP6a site. It fails at the replication phase stating Exch Setup Error
c1030b11 A connection could not be made to the remote directory service.
But seriously the exception is the colonoscopy which if it detects and
removes polyps can SAVE your life.
Mine was painless, fell asleep listening to Beatles, awoke in a fine fettle
with 6 polyps gone .. good for 5 years
till the next one.
Fenton
* www.kathmandukids.org - saving one
hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that
this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it
does sound like this might be the case.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09,
I am trying to determine the size of mailboxes in Exch. 5.5, SP4 using a
CDO script with the following lines:
Mailbox_size = HE08001E 'Code for mailbox size in bytes
UserSize =
Round((objUserSession.Infostores.Item(intCounter).Fields(Mailbox_Size)) /
1024 / 1024)
This returns the mailbox size
If your Domain is mixed-mode Active Directory, you could upgrade the
Exchange server operating system to Windows 2000, and demote it as part of
the upgrade. The only thing you should run into is that you'll have to
re-enter the Exchange service account password on the service properties
when the
Hi, folks:
E2k SP2 on W2k SP2, one SG, one DB, mixed mode.
Server functions as a Connector server to other 5.5 remote sites with
several X.400 connectors and one SMTP and RGC connectors.
For the past several weeks, this server's .STM database file has grown
much larger than its accompanying
Microsoft says it isn't possible
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q196533), but is
there any way to search multiple public folders? We're using Outlook 2000
and XP with Exchange 5.5. Thanks,
Daniel
_
List
Then take TS out of the equation, and figure out how to get them access
straight to the Exchange server. VPN, dude.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:01 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation:
Dear All,
I got a problem like this: Our server is a dual Pentium III 500 Mhz,
with currently having 1 GB of Ram (I just added a 512 MB ram). The hard
drive is a 9GB X 3 with RAID 5, and right now from totally 18 GB total
capacity, only 1.5 GB left. The server is running Windows 2000 Advanced
Good morning,
I was looking for a bit of help with determining Exchange mailboxes using CDO. The
lines of code in question are as follows:
Mailbox_Size = HE08001E
UserSize = Round((objUserSess.Infostores.Item(intCounter).Fields(Mailbox_Size)) / 1024
/ 1024)
This works fine for all mailboxes
If the business drives the need to send large attachments around, it may
be worth looking into a tool that works with the server to ZIP compress
attachments automatically on their way out. Users tend to use email as
a file transfer mechanism because it's all they're familiar with, and
there are
Has anybody come across the following problem:
A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple
of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes
to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and
the message goes
Sounds like expected behavior to me. The STM file is storing all your
non-MAPI stuff. Since this server is a connector server as you
described, I wouldn't expect much growth of the EDB at all.
-Original Message-
From: JPC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 09,
Are you going to keep posting this question until your IMC explodes?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, September 08, 2002 01:21 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook
Network connectivity and name resolution (WINS or LMHOSTS DNS) is your
starting point.
-Original Message-
From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 09:04 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Clients can't connect to Microsoft
Andy Webb answered this question very succinctly 11.5 hours ago.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 06:46 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook
There .stm file being larger than the .edb file is not necessarily
indicative of a problem.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: JPC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:27 PM
To: Exchange
Tom... Notice the sent date.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Andy Webb answered this question very
Guess I'll have to look it up :)
Get the InfoStore.oft from wickett.net. All the code you could ever
want for this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Help
I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding the
profile, it worked fine.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sent emails hang in Outbox
Has anybody come
Oh. In that case:
Wait a few days. In the future, which is so bright I gotta wear shades,
Andy Webb will answer this question very succinctly.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:19 AM
Posted To: MSExchange
Reverse the search order of Tom's suggestion (DNS, LMHOSTS, then WINS) and
you have my vote for the solution. Outlook uses DNS name resolution first
(which can be circumvented by using a HOSTS or LMHOSTS file), then goes to
WINS after that times out.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Tom
Dave,
Thanks, I will give that a go.
Didy
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding
one thing to mention is to completely rename the profile...don't use the
same old name..
dave
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
Dave,
Thanks,
Q240145
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Flush committed logs
Is there a way to flush committed logs in Exchange ?
Normally when my backup runs, it automaticall flushes the logs.
After a company has moved and installed Exchange 2000, not including any of
the migration, upgrade or installation problems. What are the most common
problems you Exchange Admins have to deal with. With 5.5, IS store failure
and having a good knowledge of disaster recovery are top on my list. Any
www.bluesforbuddha.com/ninjas/
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:57 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Way OT - Websites
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
peter pan one is very good try this
I killed the nija master.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites
www.bluesforbuddha.com/ninjas/
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
Yeah we looked into the cache and it is enabled with size of 32k.. good point though.
I've so far checked all the SAN settings and it seems fine.
Ugh.. I guess I'll move the public folder to a different store on a different mirror
set. See if that helps..
-Original Message-
Hello all,
If I delete a 396mb public folder will this free up
396mb on my hard drive.
Thanks
Rich
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
When you delete a bunch of emails, what happens to the space on the private
store. Same rules apply to Public Store.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: public folder
Hello all,
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
