Kelley, Jason said :
We are planning to deploy public folders in our local site but we also
want to expand to our remote sites which include users who are overseas.
I'm curious as to how people organize their public folder hierarchy and
how they determine where a public folder is homed.On
Hi,
How do I configure a mailbox to be the 'postmaster' mailbox (ie. Any
e-mail destined to one of the local domains where the user is not found
is sent to mailbox A.)
I found Q324021, but looks complex, prone to errors, and (I think) will
need to be modified anytime we add/remove local domains
Of course it is logged in the transaction log, but I know of no way to
make any use of that fact.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course it is logged in the transaction log, but I know of no way to
make any use of that fact.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course it is logged in the transaction log, but I know of no way to
make any use of that fact.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course it is logged in the transaction log, but I know of no way to
make any use of that fact.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to everyone for their thoughts,
Jon
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Smtp virtual server delivery messages copy of NDR to this mailbox:
[whatever]
If you want it more sophisticated than that, set up a freeware post
office (mercury on win32, qmail, sendmail, whatever) and create a
catchall on that box. On the same page of your smtp vs properties,
choose
Hi all,
Does anyone know if their are any problems with the list I have not received
mail for the last two days. Does anyone know a mail address of the
administrators to make sure they are not receiving any NDR's from my mail
address.
Please send a mail directly to me email address if you
Ed,
Are you repeating yourself again ;-) (that's 4 I've counted) or are you just
getting your own back on the people that post there question more than
once!!
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
I hadnt gotten any for the last few days either.
I re-subbed under another address this AM, and now it seems the $deities of
swynk have allowed me back into the sandbox.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:31 AM
To:
All of the sudden it just turned on. This is the first message I have
received in days
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is the list okay
Hi all,
Does anyone know if their are
Boy, it's nice to get you guys back, I was getting lonesome without any mail
for the last couple of days.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is the list okay
All of the
Yepp same here everything has come back to life it affected the Exchange
list and the NT list, weird!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September 2002 14:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is the list okay
All of the sudden it
A shuckskicks dirt
-Original Message-
From: Dunn, Nancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 6:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is the list okay
Boy, it's nice to get you guys back, I was getting lonesome without any mail
for the last couple
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are
moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running
blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are
receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are
Ed..thanks.
SO I will read into this that...It is logged as you say in the transaction
log...but in fact this is an exchange system log thus it is not say a
traditional log in the sense that an administrator type could notlook
through it and devire information about what was going on
thanks
Why would your users be running Blackice on the desktop? Or do they all have
their
own internet connection?
--
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 20 September 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
I've heard nothing good about black ice. Most people I know run zone alarm.
What changes when you turn black ice off?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: UDP port
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
-Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head
out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
To the actual conference, or who will be in the Anaheim area for drinking
and socializing?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is
I'll be there. Yeah!!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Superior Access
Either, or.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
To the actual conference, or who will be in the Anaheim area for drinking
and socializing?
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
sounds like a name resolving issue to me. check the blackice logs whether the traffic
originates from UDP 53. My guess is that you have DNS running on your Windows2000
server, which you hadn't under NT.
What's the point of running PFs in the net if you have a firewall protecting your
Klez. Someone who is infected with it has his name in their address book.
When Klez sends the virus, it grabs a name from the address book and then
uses it as the FROM
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:11 PM
To:
I'll be there...for conference and socializing!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information
Slow down MacGyver. Lets not go worst case scenario on him just yet.
While this is always possible, the most likely reason is Klez. I see this
every day [1]
[1] No open relay jokes Andy
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19,
Man, I hate Klez. It's a spammer's dream infection. This worm has
facilitated the unfettered broadcast of addresses about the countryside
better than a tornado in a trailer park.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:36
www.antivirus.com Read up on Klez, then worry if you'd like. It's certainly
not an Exchange security breach.
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Security
Read RFC2821 and RFC2822.
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Security Breach
What do you mean by someone else's machine or someone used my
boss's
www.mail-resources.com | web links | server | directory management
-Original Message-
From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
We need to add a large
CSVDE
LDIFDE
-Original Message-
From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
We need to add a large number of names to the Active Directory for people
who do not
What about Microsoft Meta Services (MMS) if the other systems have a LDAP
directory store.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September 2002 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
CSVDE
LDIFDE
There's a conference there as well - better turn up to it, then!
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September
Isn't under my control. Each college has their own policies.
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Why would your users be
At $vbc I organized them through dictatorial decree.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Tijuana is only 4 hours away!
See Ya There!
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
There's a conference there as well - better turn up to it, then!
I was told by the Tijuana police to never come back
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
Tijuana is only 4 hours away!
See Ya There!
Brian
-Original
I always use a script to create accounts using a combination of ADSI and
CDOEXM. And I populate the msExchAccountControl property in the
process. With one little script, you can even go back to using your old
CSV file format for creating things.
There's a perl sample at
Not to mention using perl as well if you like (this the method we
prefer).
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It all started with a lie - Q313819
I always use a script to
I'll be there.
(which doesn't really answer anything.)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information
Are we talking about the right attribute here?
msExchUserAccountControl is documented and controls locking out the account
until the Recipient Update Service has populated the mail address attributes.
The LDIFDE problem, discussed in Q324353, is that this method does not set the
UDP ports 1923, 1068, 1087. Looks as if it might be random ports. We don't
have DNS service enabled on the 2000 server.
-Original Message-
From: Mikko Pludra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AW: UDP port probe
Slow down.,.. don't get all worried about it.
Read the implications of the klez family of viruses. explain it to your
boss.
your new slow down...
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:23 AM
To:
um, i /did/ mention using perl. it's absolutely my preference too.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
-- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 --
Or, you could just use Perl.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It all started with a lie - Q313819
um, i /did/ mention using perl. it's absolutely my preference too.
programming ideas
as if from the great beyond
straight to my laptop
sorry to have forgotten the haiku in my initial post.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
--
Hello,
I am using Exmerge for the first time with Exchange 2000.
I exported some mailboxes to PSTs and copied the files to my new server. On
the new server, I run exmerge and try to import them (into new mailboxes that
have not yet been logged in to). However, I get some errors. Below is from
wouldn't happen to be moving from E55 to E2K would you?
Q323671
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exmerge fails on import
Hello,
I am using Exmerge for the first time
I am looking at adding PKI functionality to my network and am curious as to anyone
else's experience with the performance impact of it in a production environment. When
I added a CA to my lab, suddenly all of my servers were grabbing certs off of it, and
presumably using them. I would
Hi,
No -- Just one 2000 server to another. Both are Windows 2000 servers, however
the server I exported from is at SP2, and the new server which the imports are
failing is at SP3.
AW
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
wouldn't happen to be moving from E55 to E2K would you?
Q323671
What's the exact error message you are seeing?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward with relay protection?
Pretty basic, no relay via routing tab and clients
IIRC OS doesn't matter, but Exchange version and SP/hotfix do.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Recovery
In the past I have I have used server to restore a
I think I used LDIFDE to create mail-enabled user accounts... I haven't heard
complaints from them but I am not sure if they are using PFs.
I also have created a lot of users with CSVDE and everything seems to be OK there.
Actually CSVDE is my preferred method for CREATING users and I have
Does the cause related in Q323671 apply anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Hi,
No -- Just one 2000 server to another. Both
I think you have to sign some kind of pact with Microsoft in order to get your hands
on Metadirectory Services. That's what I read on the MMS website.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today?
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Test
Test - is the list just quiet today
You can also use Perl via LDAPS to do this (even a script running on a
Linux box).
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
I think you
No, I just checked and the PSTs are not read-only.
AW
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
Does the cause related in Q323671 apply anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's a free product, but you must be trained in it's use, otherwise you
can cause havoc or even worse...
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September 2002 19:43 pm
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools for
What version of Outlook is installed on the box doing the import?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
No, I just checked and the PSTs are
Outlook Express...
OK Now I am thinking I might need Outlook 2000? Wasn't there a thread in this
list a week or so ago which discussed not installing Outlook onto the Exchange
server itself? Or am I dreaming things?
So if I install OL 2000 you reckon it will work?
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you
Well, it certainly won't work without it. ;0 Outlook and exmerge could also
be installed on a non-exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails
I seem to remember for exch55 that installing any version of OL on the exch
server = BAD...unless if you really had too... you installed OL first then
installed exch..
It was something about OL over writting the mapi32.dll? of the exch server
with the OL version or something like that.
2 cents
Its true for E2k as well. Theres a Technet article floating around somewhere
about it. It can be done but YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
I
We are running Exchange 2000 sp2 across the board internally. Our users
(Outlook 2000) interact w/ an external organization that's running
Exchange 5.5 (not sure what sp rev.). When meeting requests are made by
the user on Exchange 2000 server the request is received by the Exchange
5.5
Oh great I alrady installed it before I read this.
Also, I tried to Exmerge again and it failed.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
Its true for E2k as well. Theres a Technet article floating around somewhere
about it. It can be done but YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott,
Is there any kind of maintenance that should be done periodically on an
Exch2K Badmail folder? I have 128,000+ files in there - I think its
about 600MB.
Jeff Hague
_
List posting FAQ:
Maintenance as in deleting them? :)
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Badmail folder
Is there any kind of maintenance that should be done periodically on an
Exch2K Badmail folder?
If I am not mistaken you need to revert back to the old MAPI32.dll
- Original Message -
From: Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Oh great I alrady installed it
I'll be there!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information
Something like that. Does Exchange handle that periodically or will it
eventually fill up my drive?
Jeff Hague
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Badmail folder
Maintenance as in
Post a question, don't send just a test..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test
Test - is the list just quiet today
Me To!
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
I'll be there!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent:
Server has reported a Error. Reported status is: Queues - Error
Drives - Unknown Services - OK Memory - Unknown CPU - Unknown
Where does this originate from, and how do I fix it? Thanks...
-Todd
_
List posting FAQ:
The item is being converted to plain text en route, the solution would be
for it not to be converted... The problem might exist on your side if you've
specified that mail to this domain be sent in plain text only. Or the user
may have an option set to send to this recipient in plain text. You
Is the list up Mr. List monitor?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Post a question, don't send just a test..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Did you configure a mapi profile in Outlook prior to running exmerge?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Oh great I alrady installed it
Currently the Conferencing server bundled with Exchange -2k use NetMeeting for
conferencing. I was wondering if there is any third party software available which can
be put on top of the exchange conferencing server to make it independent of
NetMeeting and instead use just Web Browser and
you can write a batch file to zip up old badmails
or you can write a batch file to delete old badmails
or you can write a batch file to do both
But I wish there was a NUL type of threatment for that sucker
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
don't look at it :)
-Original Message-
From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: errors?
Server has reported a Error. Reported status is: Queues - Error
Drives - Unknown Services - OK Memory - Unknown CPU -
http://www.fvc.com/products/ctmExchange.htm
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Conferencing Server
Currently the Conferencing server bundled with Exchange -2k use
It's free, but shipping and handling comes to about $30,000.
You have to sign up for X hours of consulting to get the product.
What you end up with is a proprietary database (that's going to be retired
soon) and a proprietary scripting engine. You have to write your own scripts
to sync to other
Load balancing and /or redundancy ?
-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Any benefits to multiple NICs in Ex5.5?
Scenario:
NT 4.0 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4
10/100 NIC
ATM
How many OSs and SPs to the center of a tootsie roll pop?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Post a question, don't send just a test..
-Original Message-
From:
Im not sure if that would work with a pager.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
If it's hidden you can send it a message with delivery receipt.
Test?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 15:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange - Notes dirsync issue
test
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL
Would that work with a Blackberry? I never tried that...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 21:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
Im not sure if that would work
Message received.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
Kishore
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 08:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Exchange 2000 : IM problem
I wonder my messages are going to the list
Received loud and clear.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 08:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is the list okay
Hi all,
Does anyone know if their are any problems with the list I have
90 matches
Mail list logo
