Thanks for all your help on this.
David
--
From: Bryan King[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 08 November 2002 19:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 4 resolution
Or use GETMAC from the NTRESKIT like this:
for /f
Actually, it does, at least in my testing.
Trying to restore an Ex5.5 SP4 database originally backed up on NT4 SP6a to
a Win2k SP2 box with Ex5.5 SP4 reported different database versions. IIRC, I
had to run ESEUTIL to bring the database back to the correct version.
That's what I thought as well - but that's a bit harder to script, IMO.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Potentially. However, you're not blessed with Bellsouth. The deregulation
rules specify copper lines have to be deregulated, so they ran fibre to each
neighborhoods. Since most of metro Atlanta is connected via slicks or
significantly backhauled to central offices, that puts them in the unique
Talk about insanity.
--
From: Ed Crowley
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2002 10:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
Reason number 7,531 why the EU is doomed.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me. But bad
things tend to happen every time they do. Like users infecting themselves with a new
virus.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Sunday,
Thank You Jeff. It is functioning properly now.
Is the 2.1 upgrade worth doing?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:jbeckham;allfiguredout.com]
Posted At: Saturday, November 09, 2002 5:33 PM
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: AutoDL
Subject: RE: AutoDL
A *GC*? I would have thought the next step would be to point it to an E2K
server.
I'll try it today and see if it works helps.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
You need to point it to something that has a directory on it. In AD/E2K, the
directory is on the GC's.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
A *GC*? I
I guess the OWA client probably uses DSProxy, so pointing it to an E2K
server would likely work as well. I might have been trying to overthink the
issue.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange
Originally that's what I thought to, but I can't remember what OWA uses for
lookups.. if it is using MAPI, then it ought to be redirected for its
lookups, if it's using LDAP then it ought to point to a GC... I think.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams
Ah - good point. IIRC, OWA 5.5 uses MAPI.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
Originally that's what I thought to, but I can't remember what OWA
Is email retention legally required for a certain period of time now?
We don't currently have a policy for email retention - we keep monthly
backups for 1 year. The only information that I can find (and I may not
be looking in the right places) says that retention is based on your
company's
I've got a Perl CGI program that lets users manage DLs they own (and have
permissions to). It's fairly simple, really, it just lets them add and
delete users from a DL, and change the OOF to sender flag as well.
It's yours if you want it...
For those that are wondering why, our user domain is in
Have them ask your corporate lawyers, and see what they say. They're far
more qualified to ruin your life, er, dictate retention policy than we are.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Please send forth this fabulous application.. :-)
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
I've got a Perl CGI program that lets users manage DLs they own (and
Because our Internet hosting provider says they can't give us a setup where
we can make OWA2K work (at least in a supported configuration).
We are evaluating our options, and hope to have a solution for OWA2K over
the Internet in six months or so. Until then, we need to keep the existing
OWA 5.5,
It depends on what types of business are being conducted via e-mail. If, for
example, your human resources department uses e-mail to communicate about
hirings and firings, then certain Federal age discrimination statutes might
apply to those communications and your company would be obligated to
One thing that wasn't clear in the docs... If the SQL server and the Web
server are not the same box, on which server do the COM objects get
installed?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:jbeckham;allfiguredout.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 6:33 PM
To: Exchange
You're gonna be around that long Ed? I figured you'd be retiring in about 5
years!
;0) (g, dr)
Jim Blunt
E-mail Admin
Network Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
Office: 372-9188
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, November 09,
Hello all,
I have been troubleshooting for two weeks. Sorry this is long but I wanted
to give you all details.
This is a problem only with a specific domain syntaph.com
When internal people using their outlook send mail to syntaph.com it doesn't
go through.
SyntaPharma.com and Syntaph.com were on
Sounds a little like he is sending the mail in text AND html.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com]
Sent: 7. marraskuuta 2002 19:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email sent
Does any know why this would happen?
A guy at my office sends out an
I have a FE/BE topology.
I have searched google and premier.microsoft.com and the only answer I
can find is either the IS isn't mounted on the back-end server (it is)
or the front-end server cannot contact the back-end server, use telnet
to test (it can). The error I get is http 503 service
Before I even start looking, this one is caused by having misspelled
syntaph.com. They forgot the A in syntAph.
-tom
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: outlook test
Sent: 11/8/2002 9:43 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be
I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items.
Is there a way to get this item back from the database?
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
(858) 278-8400 EXT. 250
www.jetproducts.com
If you're following the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method described in the
FAQ; absolutely.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty
Only if you have deleted items retention turned on that the server hosting that user's
mailbox.
Or contact the person he sent the email to.
Or, restore.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Exchange
Depending on the version of Outlook and how you have Deleted Items
Retention configured, yes.
Go to the deleted items folder, then TOOLS/Recover Deleted Items.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
Do you have Deleted Item Retention turned on? If so check Tools | Deleted
Items Retention...
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen
Well, you mentioned that you had checked technet, have you found these two
articles?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;280132;
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;155831
These articles give a good overview of all the ports involved. I know
there was a
First, ask your corporate lawyers their opinion on this topic.
Second, regardless of the answer, consider an email archival system. Why?
Because the amount of business knowledge that flows through a corporate
email system is staggering. Keeping this mail on your servers is not a
good solution.
Why in the world would you not make this a seamless service? To not do so
effectively ruins any advantages of going this route (splitting mailboxes
between Exchange and POP/IMAP systems depending on level of service
required)
And besides, it is a cakewalk to do in Exchange or go buy yourself the
Well, I noticed them but ruled them out quickly as we have no firewalls
or port resttrictions in place between these sites. I used Ciscoworks to
verify that. Thanks for the answer though. :-)
Any other ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com]
Sent:
We are on Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:DNicholson;rapidapp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
Depending on the version of Outlook and how you have Deleted Items
Retention
Have you set up Deleted Items retention on the server? Or, to reiterate what Chris
said: if you've followed the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method, you're okay.
If you have not - you're pretty much stuck. If you've got good backups, you can do a
restore to another server, play back the logs, and
Ok. Go try it, and report back. If you don't have it configured, the
option won't even show up, I believe.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen
Just because it is technically possible do so, does not make it economically
desirable to do so.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Why in the world would you not make this a seamless
Hi everyone.
I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is
slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried
the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of
threads and its still not under control. Is there anything
If you change the OS between the backup and restore, you usually need to
defragment the database so that it reindexes for the new OS.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Posted At: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:14 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
What is this connector used for? It obviously has something to do with our
Exchange 2000 server in our Exchange 5.5 site but the schedule is set to
never.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Isn't it great!
All that memory sitting there doing nothing otherwise. At least some
application is smart enough to take advantage of it.
By the way, how much memory has your server?
Exchange will utilize the lesser of:
- all the RAM
- all the memory it needs.
It will concede memory to
what version of exchange are you running 5.5 or 2000 ?
-Original Message-
From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern;baldhead.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 09:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory
Hi everyone.
I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the
This may help you understand what it is used for.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;272314
- Original Message -
From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: ADNAutoDRC
What
Amazing Ed. You write a political bomb and it gets posted. I write a slam
of legal retention requirements and policies and Swynk bounces it as
objectionable content.
This list does some amazingly funny things at times.
Had any consulting jobs on the continent lately? ;-)
-Original
dynamic buffet...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Isn't it great!
All that memory sitting there doing nothing otherwise.
Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't boot
up. Right now it has 391MBS but I'll try to get it higher. WIll it
eventually crap out the system?
_
List posting FAQ:
2000 just tried to upgrade the memory to a GB but the machine wouldn't
boot so I'm back down to 400
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I think you have bigger issues if the server will not take a memory upgrade.
Also do not cut threads short.
- Original Message -
From: Johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:52 PM
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
2000
Is this a Johnny joke?
- Original Message -
From: Johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:51 PM
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Well, I just tried putting in to 512 sticks but my computer wouldn't boot
up. Right now
What is store.exe running at?
If it is overusing virtual memory, it will be slow, but should not crap
out. It is not likely a leak, but rather performance optimization.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny
Sent:
A Johnny joke?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is this a Johnny joke?
- Original Message -
From: Johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
You didn't buy all that memory to have it sit unused, now did you?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
Don't use faulty memory.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Johnny
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:53 PM
Yes, that's how it works. Does this present a problem? Or do you want the
machine to have memory it's not using?
-Original Message-
From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern;baldhead.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory
Hi
The SEC has guidelines but those mostly apply to financial institutions. If
your company is publicly traded there may be some guidelines. This question
is best passed through your legal department first.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:Tara.Stephens;carters.com]
Sent:
I don't think too many companies really end up saving any money
outsourcing. And how many of the hosting companies' failures were
seamless to their customers?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Monday, November
Who knows? I'd love to retire today. If I can only convince my wife to
work full-time!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some of us have no choice. Or are you referring to your server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Don't use faulty memory.
Ed Crowley
Having spent 17 long years in the utility industry, I can tell you that
few suppliers are really interested in selling to residential customers.
They want the big boys. I kind of figure that government-owned gas and
electric utilities might be inevitable for those not already that way.
Ed
Sure, lots harder; two oFile.WriteLine statements instead of one!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger
I was referring to DIMMs. I'll leave it up to you whether to infer
anything personal in this comment.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speak to me offline. :o)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Who knows? I'd love to retire today. If I can only convince my wife
Okay, thanks for your input.
Regards,
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: field is empty
That's not what it means or what he said.
-Original Message-
Ed Woodrick took a few, but I don't know of anyone else who did (anyone?). Perhaps if
we do it again we should make sure to get mug shots of everyone. :)
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.
65 matches
Mail list logo
