Exchange Server and Firewalls

Hello I have a Windows NT 4 domain with two Exchange Servers 5.5. The two servers are located in two different geographical sites, and connect through a Site Connector. The Exchange servers are also domain controllers. I am configuring the firewall between the two sites (they connect through the

Backup Question?

I plan on using Windows 2000 backup to do online exchange backups to a file on a separate spindle/controller which will then be streamed to tape on a central LTO library. I'm planning on doing a full backup each night, and maybe even a differential at lunchtime (our load is pretty light and the

RE: Rehome all public folders - recommended method?

Thanks Heiko - pretty sure that's not the case, but I'll check with our SQL chap who's the only one likely to have been playing with that.. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

RE: Migration Scenario

How is this method overly burdensome for end-users. All they will have to do, if my testing has been correct, is change their Outlook profile to point at the new server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:16 PM To:

RE: Migration Scenario

You also need to think about the outlook delegates, single instance storage as well as the support calls (I don't know your IT level and numbers of users) when they can't logon. Also I think that the workload for you is probably more than the benefits (if there are any to have in reality) that a

RE: Exchange Server and Firewalls

Use a VPN for this scenario every time. - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2003 09:29 To: Exchange

Re: Exchange Server and Firewalls

I was thinking exactly the same thing. Well, that and that I wouldn't be using a site connector over the Internet. On 2/18/03 8:04, Tristan Gayford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use a VPN for this scenario every time. - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems

Re: Migration Scenario

And PF Permissions, custom permissions on folders (similar to delegate permissions Tristan mentioned), replying to old e-mails, modifying reoccurring meeting requests, synchronization of OST files, downloading of OAB files, etc. Green Field migrations are nice when you can get them, but there's a

Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003

What are the best workarounds for slow logins with roaming profiles? How does OL figure into it, if at all? Some users have PSTs in addition to Exchange Mailboxes on the server. tia _ List posting FAQ:

Event Sink Error

Exchange 2000 SP3 I am running this fine on one of my servers, but the other is not behaving well. I downloaded the Autoaccept Event Sink for Exchange 2000 made by http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/. I set it up correctly but I get this error every time I send a request to it. Any ideas?

RE: Exchange Server and Firewalls

Me? I would configure a VPN tunnel from Firewall to Firewall ..let them talk...no port worries... bill -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server and Firewalls Hello I

Calendar Problems

Good morning, OUTLOOK 98 Exchange 5.5 NT SP4 I have a user whose calendar is completely butchered. I have Exported, Deleted, RESETFOLDER, Imported the calendar several times. Each time I do this I get the same butchered calendars. After the resetfolder, the days are still highlighted as

RE: Event Sink Error

Nevermind. Permission error. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event Sink Error Exchange 2000 SP3 I am running this fine on one of my servers, but the other is not behaving well. I

RE: Calendar Problems

Command-Line Switch Purpose --- --- /CleanFreeBusy Cleans and regenerates free/busy information. /CleanfindersRemoves saved searches from the Exchange Server store. /CleanReminders Cleans and

RE: Calendar Problems

Thanks. I did do the /resetfolders as my eMAIL indicates and also the cleanfreebusy and cleanreminders... Still no go... Mike -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar

RE: Calendar Problems

I know your email says you've deleted the Calendar, but have you tried deleting it by logging on using an IMAP client, and then using Outlook with the /ResetFolders option? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Calendar Problems

Yes. I sign onto Exch32 and deleted the calendar. I then signed onto Outlook using the /resetfolder... Thanks. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Problems I know

CDO phone/fax fields problem

Please consider this working prototype of code using CDO. What it does is finding the GAL, find some mailbox, change the phone and fax number. Const CdoPR_TRANSMITABLE_DISPLAY_NAME_A = H3A20001E Const CdoPR_PRIMARY_FAX_NUMBER = H3A23001E Set cdo = CreateObject(MAPI.Session) cdo.Logon , , 0, 0, 0

RE: Calendar Problems

Isn't there a cache copy it looks at? I remember something about that. Yes. I sign onto Exch32 and deleted the calendar. I then signed onto Outlook using the /resetfolder... Thanks. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18,

Exchange2000 to a new server

MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current exchange2000 server. Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000 restore over it..to make it

Re: Exchange2000 to a new server

This has been discussed 20+ times in the last 6 months, check your archives for some excellent insight on this topic. On 2/18/03 11:14, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current

Access Users Mailbox From Local OL Client

Hello, I’ve been asked by a client running E2k to find a way to give him rights to access his employee’s mailbox without their knowledge. He suspects some corporate espionage. (Where’s Clancy when you need him? #9786;) In E55 this was simple, but in E2k, I just cannot seem to find the place to

Messages to Public Folders stuck in SMTP queue

I've got a problem with emails to public folders. Config is : mixed mode Exchange 2000 sp3 on W2k, sp3 and Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6 A few days ago an additional E2k server was added to our site. That server has since been shutdown as it is being moved to another office. The server has a

RE: Access Users Mailbox From Local OL Client

Hello again, Well while I was waiting for the post to show up on the list, I found the answer in a KB article. I should have found it sooner. Thanks anyway, Carmine -Original Message- From: Carmine Poliandro Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Migration Scenario

If we export everyone's mail to a PST and re-import onto the new server will this still cause issues with replying to old emails? I know I will lose SIS but I am only moving 150 users total. As far as PF's, they are the main reason I am looking to go this route. I have almost 3000 PF's from the

Re: Exchange2000 to a new server

Don't bother keeping the same server name. Really. Trust me. Check out the Exchange FAQs at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm for more info. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

Re: Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003

The best workaround is to remove as much stuff as possible from the profile. But that also means that you won't have all the stuff your users want. Seriously, there's no good workaround. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question

No - it seems like valid business logic. IT serves the rest of the company, not the other way around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message-

RE: Single instance storage anyway to revert?

Did you move all the mailboxes? Here is where I am going - say user1 and user2 share a message. You only move user1. On the new server only user1 is fully responsible for that message now. Or how about this: user2 deletes his copy of the message. Now user1 is fully responsible for the entire

RE: e3k FE - e2K BE

sounds normal to me. It worked the same when going from lower SP level in Exchange 2000 to a higher service pack. Front-ends are supposed to be upgraded first. But you don't see new features until you upgrade the back-end. -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D [mailto:[EMAIL

Team Folders

Is anyone successfully using Team folders with E2K and OL2002? When we migrated from EX5.5 and OL2K, part of them appear to have broke. The administration folder gives the following message: Error code: 1213: Failure to retrieve reference to current MAPI session. I get this even though I am

RE: Exchange2000 to a new server

Missy is absolutely right (and a better pool player than I am) -- it isn't worth the hassle to try and keep the same name. If your old server was Mail just make the new server NewMail, CorpMail, Mail2K, Beverly or something like that. Save yourself the headache. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr,

RE: Migration Scenario

Many of my customers believe that is overly burdensome, not to mention the stuff Chris posted as well. To each his own, I guess. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Question regarding DL's

Hi all, I have a distribution list with about 120 names in it. If I select 'File/Properties' from the menu on the DL form, there is no option to select a delivery or read receipt. Is this a design limitation, or can I set them elsewhere ? TIA. Tim DISCLAIMER: The content of this email is

RE: Exchange2000 to a new server

Always the easiest way to do this is http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm. Why do you feel you must retain the old server name? That is seldom if ever really necessary. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

Re: Migration Scenario

The problem with replying to old emails from users in the existing exchange organisation, is that exchange doesn't store the email address of the user who sent the message. Rather, it stores the DN (distinguished name) of the user who sent the message, i.e. /o=some

RE: Question regarding DL's

Hi all, I have a distribution list with about 120 names in it. If I select 'File/Properties' from the menu on the DL form, there is no option to select a delivery or read receipt. Is this a design limitation, or can I set them elsewhere ? TIA. Tim DISCLAIMER: The content of this email is

RE: Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003

Slow Outlook login is usually due to poor name resolution. Are the users in question pointed to a DNS that can resolve your Exchange host names? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From:

RE: Question regarding DL's

Delivery and read receipt is a property that applies to messages. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim John Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Migration Scenario

It very well could, yes. Messages retain the internal X.500-type addressing, and unless you take care to ensure that these addresses are preserved in the new organization, you will likely have reply problems. Just another of the reasons I cite for a green field migration being a burdensome

RE: Team Folders

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;814413 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephens, Tara Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Exchange2000 to a new server

Hi, Those steps seems to be ok if the servername will be different, in this case the server name must stay the same because this client routes their emails trhough another company and that *other* company uses the long email address to route the messages, and because the clients *wants* to keep

RE: Delegate resources

Autoaccept script for E2K: http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/ Resource Manager for E2K: http://www.swinc.com/products/erm.htm Autoaccept script for E55 (which can be made to work): http://www.exchangecode.com Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from

Re: Exchange2000 to a new server

Other than the Q article in the URL referenced below? On 2/18/03 19:16, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Those steps seems to be ok if the servername will be different, in this case the server name must stay the same because this client routes their emails

Cisco Unity?

Is anyone running Cisco Unity with Exchange 2000? Any Problems? Anything I need to look out for? We will be deploying AD/Exchange with Unity very soon. Ryan Finnesey CEO,CIO Diversified Solutions Group 72 Spring Street New York New York 10011 212-274-1465 Phone 212-274-1452 Fax 917-667-4812

RE: Exchange Server and Firewalls

Thank you all for your precious advices. I will probably go VPN as it seems the best way to do it. But just for the info, can anyone reply to me concerning the ports question: If I fix the dynamic ports range of RPC communication as per article 154596, will this apply to the dynamic ports Exchange

RE: Delegate resources

Thanks! Matt Bullock -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegate resources Autoaccept script for E2K: http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/ Resource Manager for E2K: