Since you can't change the role of an NT4 server from DC to member server,
if you really want to do this you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then
run DCPROMO to demote it to a member server. However I agree with Ed's
comments. It would seem a lot easier to me to build a new Exchange 5.5
server
There is so much documentation available that I'm surprised that you haven't
found it. Start at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/deploy/de
fault.asp
-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2003 10:28
To:
Hello list,
On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up
connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails
work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails
sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be
sent out nor can be received even after I choose the
Possibly because if you do change the name and don't perform a side-by-side
migration (where the other server is still available), outlook will break
and wont be able to resolve mailboxes without having to recreate all the
outlook profiles.
They may also have applications that rely on the name of
Your second reason is easily fixable via DNS or even WINS, if necessary.
For the others, the FAQ details a proven method to avoid any and all issues
with moving to a new Exchange server. I find too many people want to keep
the same name without having a truly valid reason for doing it.
What is the error message(s) you are receiving ?
-Original Message-
From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello list,
On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up
connection to the server, all
Using Ed's Move Server Method is the easiest, safest way to do this.
If there are applications that rely on the name of Exch Server and you can't
change that within that application, it may be time to dump said app.
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Corbett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
There is no error message, the status of 'checking and
sending messages' goes forever and there is nothing
happening.
BOYZ
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200
Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What is the error message(s) you are receiving ?
-Original Message-
From: The BOYZ
What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port 25 and 110 ?
-Original Message-
From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33
To: Exchange Discussions
There is no error message, the status of 'checking and
sending messages'
with port 25, I get:
MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready
With port 110:
MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready
BOYZ
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:35 +0200
Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on
port 25 and 110 ?
Try to log in to the POP3 server with telnet and list the messages
-Original Message-
From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
with port 25, I get:
MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready
I have several clients that I vpn and/or terminal service into for
remote administration. I VPN into either a Small Business Server 2000
with ISA or a ISA box with the exchange 2k behind it. Any email
originating from these clients sent to me or anyone in my organization
seems to have at least
Hello All.
Is there a way to change the default for the Show Time As in the calendar
when making an appointment? Right now it comes up by default as Busy. Want
to change the default to Free.
Thanks for any help.
Samantha
_
List
You must stop all your Exchange services every night before doing your
backup, then, right?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM
Posted To: Exchange
That's a client side setting, so dig around at http://www.slipstick.com for
an answer..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL
The Retrospect Exchange Agent does not require that.
It is made to do online backups
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
Sorry, I always forget to mention the version. It is E2K with all the
service packs.
Scripting isn't my strong suit. I really miss the ability to select
multiple users and make changes like this.
Oh well,
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax:
Then it isn't a flat-file backup any more. As soon as you use the agent
for Exchange, it is a Full Online backup. A Flat-file backup would be
considered an Offline backup when nothing is being written to the
databases (thus the files are not open and are flat).
Sounds like it is working fine
Windows Server 2003 I believe allows you the ability to do this. No
help for your current predicament, but something to look forward to.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
Boyz [do any of you have a real name?]
Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing access via the
internet?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search
function.
I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted
by a third party but use Exchange locally. We do not have IMS running on
Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for
Actually, the trouble began when I applied the hotfixes listed below.
Upon further conversation, I removed these hot fixes.
And now, the problems I am seeing are:
When outlook is launched, AFTER it looks like it is ready to go, (You
can see your folders
What does the NDR say?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Internet Email
Subject: Internet Email
This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search
function.
I
Network? Antivirus software? Name resolution? Build a clean W2K machine with
just Outlook installed and see what happens.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2003 14:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient update service
Actually, the
Oh... Both services in the same profile? Not a supported config in that
version. Upgrade to Outlook 2002, it supports that config, or install an
IMS which is much simpler.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM
I'm a simpleton..
but from your description it sounds to me like you have each and every
client workstation pop'ing their mail from your third party...
We do not have IMS
running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet
email for years.
maybe your third party updated/changed
I guess that you are using Outlook to connect to Exchange. What client are
you using for Internet email?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2003 13:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet Email
This is the first time I've posted
I guess I'll install an IMS. I know the config isn't supported by MS but
it has worked for years so I thought I'd see if anyone had the same
problem. Thanks for your help!!!
Rob
_
List posting FAQ:
Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our
company where people need to mail files to each other
on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of
500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better.
We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do
not want to block them. If one user
I'd look into some kind of web-based file storage solution. I'm planning on
implementing something similar this summer. I'll allow faculty to logon,
upload a file, and designate who can access it.
While Public Folders isn't the best way, it's better than individual copies
of the attachments in
Doesn't work like that...SIS
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: attachement overload
Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our
company where people need to mail files to
SIS in Ex5.5? For some reason I thought that was only on E2K and above.
Cool.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:24 AM
SIS=single instance storage, that is your 5mb file sent to 5 users on the
SAME server will only consume 5mb. Everyone gets a pointer to the same
message in the store.
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
One of our vendors received an email infected with BugBear virus coming from
an address from our domain.
However it's a bogus address. After checking out the header and the path, I
found the sender's IP address
and found out that it's running QMQP on port 628.
I found a link through Google that it
Well folks,
In the end I did not find happiness in this problem through Microsoft.
However, we were able to hack together a solution using:
* OpenSSL
* PHPki certificate management software (check Sourceforge for details)
* An ordinary gentleman's handkerchief and 12 milligrams of sodium
Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to
allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log
reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand
is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1
to
Your home firewall is not going to have a Public IP of 192.168.0.1, now
is it?
Try adding the Public IP of your firewall instead of your internal IP.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it is 01 - 0.5 , with internal DNS, why would that matter? It is the
router to internal mail server. It isn't going public.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where to look to allow
How about telling them not to send attachments that large anyway?
I'm assuming you have a file server? Create group shares and have them send
the link to the file via e-mail.
How hard is that?
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11,
I see. You didn't specify that this is in your home. I mistakenly
assumed that the mail server was at your company and you were trying to
send e-mail from your home to your work.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett
Actually, yes.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange
Does anyone know of a good study/reference resource for advanced AD? It
can be in print/online whatever. I'm looking for something beyond a
AD-101 type book that covers details such as using LDP, ASDI Edit, etc
as well as the intricacies of replication, extended attributes and other
features.
Does anyone know of a good study/reference resource for
advanced AD? It can be in print/online whatever. I'm looking
for something beyond a AD-101 type book that covers details
such as using LDP, ASDI Edit, etc as well as the intricacies
of replication, extended attributes and other
Here also.
We went round and round, and I finally took the attitude, I can tell
you what are the pros and cons, and my recommendation. However, you do
pay me, so I will do as you ask. Ultimately, the PHB decided to allow
OOF to the internet.
When I went on vacation for two weeks, guess what I
Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included
all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info.
I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes
and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some
hotfixes)
Hi all,
The number of transaction logs being created on one of my Exchange servers(E2k sp3)
has increased quite a bit recently. For this
installation, the total trans log size was under 1 gig every day until a few weeks
back and now is between 4-5 gig.
MSFT KB talks about the possible
Roger has posted a nice collection of books on AD at
http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=booksfile=indexreq=
view_subcatsid=7min=0orderby=titleAshow=8 (url will probably wrap)
I've had good luck with Alistair Lowe-Norris' book, but mainly use it as a
scripting reference.
Hunter
Apply SP4
Run Performance Optimizer.
Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in Tools/Options.
This only effects one user?
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: Outlook slow
Mail Loop?
- Original Message -
From: George, Reju [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:44 PM
Subject: E2k trans logs #s increasing rapidly
Hi all,
The number of transaction logs being created on one of my Exchange
servers(E2k sp3)
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587.
When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only
one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a
notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it?
Man that
Let me clarify a little. We have sender notification off. We have
recipient on. All recipients received the message notification and not just
the users on Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:17 PM
Exchange 2000 SP3 Post SP3
Windows 2000 SP4
IE6.0 Sp1
I am in a mixed environment of 5.5 and 2000 servers but my mailbox is on
Exchange 2000. Why do I get this error when I use OWA? Anyone else getting
this?
_
List posting FAQ:
Do you still have the old server on and all the services running?
Do you have Cloudmark configured to check ALL inboxes or have you got it
configured to only scan the primary mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:07 PM
To:
This have any bearing on your situation?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329121
Dynamic Update Not Successful During Windows Server 2003 Setup and 12029
Error Is Added to Setuperr.log
(I know it's the wrong O/S, but with as little info as you gave us, I
thought I'd give
I would have given more info if I had more to give. When you access your
mailbox via the http://server/exchange link i.e. OWA 2000 it opens up just
fine with no errors but when you click on the Folders Icon the Unknown
Error 12029 window pops up. You click ok and then your fine. I am going
to
Sorry Rick...wasn't trying to be combative...
So there's nothing in the client logs or the Exchange logs either?
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029
I would have
Is URLScan installed?
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029
I would have given more info if I had more to give. When you access your
mailbox via the
Planning to run SP4 asap. It is only the one user though so I am not doing
it until the weekend. Other users with Office XP had noticed the little
message box but the delays were slight (under a couple of seconds or so) and
for them the registry change fixed it right up.
IM Messaging thingy huh?
Yes, still have the old server up and services running. But have finished
everything else for the move.
He had Cloudmark configured to check all inboxes. And there was no
difference from changing it to not scan anything automatically.
Ronni
*
Don't count the
59 matches
Mail list logo
