Well, this probably won't be quite as technical as you want... but it is
what I have experienced.
Lotus notes - No decent support in the channel (premium support) - core
product has not been substancially updated in years, but has an update
every month... requires a heafty subscrition fee.
Have installed about 4 so far, and have no issues with SP4 except on a
Compaq Proliant 3000... which I think may have just been the age of the
machine (Runnning SBS 2000, and lost it RAID config - backup was still
good, all is well)
Missy,
I would agree with you as the Exchange server would not update the NT
account permission on the IS until the 2 hour replication cycle has initiate
(unless of course you have change the reg entry down to 5min or something).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one
Microsoft Exchange engineers are a dime a dozen
Good ones are difficult to find and even more difficult to pry away from
their current employer. After interviewing Exchange admins over the last
few years I've found that most people that put Exchange experience on their
resume have added or
There is a whole mailing list of these dime-a-dozens :)
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Notes vs. Exchange
Microsoft Exchange engineers are a dime a dozen
Good ones are
Yeah, but you don't got no 31337 hacker name in your email address, d00d!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Notes vs. Exchange
Microsoft Exchange engineers are a dime a
Just to be sure, RTM is the finished product, but just not ready to be
released for Volume Licensing?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
We did an in-place upgrade of our Exchange 2000 server to Exchange 2003
everything came up fine. Then we upgraded the OS to Windows 2003 and now we
can't get the Exchange 2003 server to connect to the domain. Has anyone
experienced this behavior? I'm stumped.
Dot Harris
William Blair Company
Or call any of the more popular Anti-virus software suite companies
who will be happy to sell you products necessary for an Exchange
environment
Fenton Wilson
MCSE MCP I learned all I needed from Jack Kerouac's On The Road when I was
in high school
I'm attempting to convince my management
When I select the To... and then change from global to the public folder I created
called distributors with the contacts imported into it. I don't see these on other
machines, only on the server that has the outlook client on it. I can browse down to
the public folders and get to the public
What if you re-do the Exchange 2003 installation?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003
We did an in-place upgrade of our Exchange 2000 server to
A few event IDs or such might be a little easier for us to help you out.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003
What if you re-do the
I'm getting Event ID 63.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003
A few event IDs or such might be a little easier for us to help you out.
Thanks.
Before I start, let me state that I am not complaining. I love where I work, and I am
damn glad to have a job in these times
One of the things to consider in today tech field though is the fact that more and
more employers are refusing to hire people for specific tasks in an IT environment.
To be more specific, when attempting to join the domain. I'm getting the
error:
The following error occurred attempting to join the domain domain name.
Access denied.
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
But Windows 2003 mentions there is no more security vulnerability for
running DHCP on domain controller.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2003 4:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DNS DHCP
Sounds like a DNS/WINS setting. Take a look and make sure that the Exchange
server is looking at the correct DNS/WINS servers for the domain you are
trying join.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Exchange
So it was already a member of the domain? Why is it trying to join the
domain again?
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003
Sounds like a DNS/WINS
Hi all.
All of a sudden we are not able to create new public folders in ESM.
When I right-click on the root or on an existing folder, all the other
choices are there but New Folder is missing.
This is even when I go to the server's console and log in with the
account that was used to install
PFDAVADMIN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco
Posted At: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:19 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Zombie ACL's
Subject: Zombie ACL's
We're getting this kind of warning on 3 of our E2K
Ok - dime a dozen... not exactally the best wording for what I was trying
to get across -
I work for a var, and even though we are a small shop, over half of our
engineers are pretty good in any Exchange situation, but not only do we
not have anyone with any good skills in Notes, but I know our
Anybody trying to work with this yet? Please email offlist.
Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, at 9:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or call any of the more popular Anti-virus software suite companies who
will be happy to sell you products necessary for an Exchange
environment
I imagine most people running Notes still have MS-Windows on the desktop,
and thus
For some strange reason when we try to schedule appts we can only see 1 month of
information.
I have set the Free/Busy to 6 months, ran outlook /cleanfreebusy but to no avail.
We are running Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000.
I am not getting any errors at all, it just is not publishing data
And Notes itself is virus-proof?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Notes vs. Exchange
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, at 9:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or call any of the more
Sure it is. Which is why both Sybari and Trend Micro write AV packages for
it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd be interested in hearing about it as well...
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4
Anybody trying to work with this yet? Please email offlist.
Thanks.
I could scan the archives for some of the questions asked here and prove you
wrong, but I'd rather go drink a beer.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Notes vs. Exchange
There
Hello All,
First, wanted to say that you guys have always been a great help in the
past. I have a simple, but probably dumb question. I need some ammo though
before I get back to one of my employees about what he's doing. Can someone
just verify what I'm saying...
It is not possible to
If he is using Veritas he needs the Exchange Agent to do an online
backup.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
Hello All,
First, wanted to say
I guess just to be 100% sure. Trust but verify kind of deal.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Notes vs. Exchange
Sure it is. Which is why both Sybari and Trend Micro write
You have to add the public folder to the Outlook Address Book at any Outlook
client where you want to use it that way.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Yes, that is the way it's supposed to work.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:29 AM
To:
If you want to see how much space you have left in the database then have a
look in the application event log for 1221.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 16:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
First, you have to make sure that every client has the Outlook Address Book
added to the Outlook profile.
Second, you have to go to the properties of the PF in question, go to the
Outlook Address Book tab and check the Show this folder as an e-mail
address book option.
-Original Message-
But can the DB re-use that space for new storage without an offline defrag?
- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
If you want to see how much
in other words, if the event 1221 from this morning says the private store
has 6277 mb free and I have 600 mb free on disk then I have roughly 7 gb
free space to work with?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
It is quite possible to do a backup of Exchange 5.5 WITHOUT stopping the
services. You either use NTBackup, or use a 3rd party backup utility
with an Exchange Agent. If you decide to not use either of those 2
methods, you sure as heck better stop the Exchange services first,
otherwise you will
Yes. The Database will re-use the Whitespace before it grows the actual
priv.edb in size any more. At least that is how it is supposed to work.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
Oh, the backup won't cause any problems. Not that it would be of any use...
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent:
Yepp that is correct.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 17:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
in other words, if the event 1221 from this morning says the private store
has 6277 mb free and I have 600 mb free
Well, actually we are running veritas with the exchange agent, only thing is
that the PRIV.EDB file is skipped. I thought that in order to backup the
PRIV.EDB file you have to stop the exchange services?
Any ideas?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want to back up that *file*, then yes you would have to close whatever
software is keeping the file open.
If you want to back up Exchange, however, use an Exchange-aware backup
solution like NTBACKUP and the services remain running and functional during
the backup.
-Original
Have you read these Q articles?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;184535
XADM: Removing a Site from an Organization - You will be unable to delete a
Site container using the Microsoft Exchange Server Administrator program. If
you highlight the object and click the Edit menu,
No, you don't have to stop the services.
Please clarify how you are using veritas; i.e. are you looking on the
relevant drive and ticking priv.edb as a file to backup? If so, this won't
work, you need to tick 'Microsoft Exchange Information Store' in the veritas
directory tree. If this doesn't
If you are using the Exchange aware agent you wouldn't be aware that it was
backing up the priv.edb, pub.edb or even dir.edb, you would just select
Exchange Information Store and Exchange Directory store. Sounds to me you
are still using the file system part of Backup Exec to try and backup the
The Exchange Agent backs up the Information Store. You should be backing
that up. It's a separate object. And you should be excluding the
C:\Exchsrvr\*data (note wildcard) directories from your file backup. If
you're running Exchange 200x, you should also exclude the mailroot directory
and the
Lest you forget, speaking in relative terms, the most destructive virus/worm
in history propagated across Unix machines.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
We are ticking off the option for the Information Store, but have now
modified the job to backup the PRIV.EDB as well. Only reason we're doing
this is because we would like to have the actual PRIV.EDB in a backup media
for access by one of our 3rd party applications that can access the
PRIV.EDB,
yes, but, this is the one and only server in the site, and once it is gone
the site is. I didnt find anything that specifically addresses the *last*
(but also the first! hee hee) server in the site, leaving the site up w/no
servers, etc . . .
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H
You aren't doing the backup correct then. You do NOT want to select the
File from the backup job. In Backup Exec, when you browse your list of
servers selections in the backup job, under your Exchange server, you
will see the hard disks and also there should be an added entry for
Microsoft
That is not possible you can't do a file backup of the databases files they
are locked open unless you stop the IS. What app are you trying to use to
read the edb files is it Ontrack's Power Tools?
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30
No, you can't do that, if you want to copy priv.edb on it's own you have to
stop the services.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 17:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
We are ticking off
You'll have to stop the services then. What's the utility that is pulling
from the PRIV? You can get messages and mailboxes pulled from the Exchange
stores using standard supported utilities like EXMERGE.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
You cannot backup up the actual priv.edb file unless the services are
stopped. Period. As explained before, it is because the database is an
open file. Since it is open and in use, it cannot be locked by the
backup program, therefore, it is skipped.
Unless there is some immense value in
Hmmm...
I would think that if you had read and actually followed all of the Q's
posted in the first message (primarily the first one about removing the site
from the org) and you read and follow all the instructions in this new one
below, that all your questions should be answered.
Right in that case the latest version of PowerTools is able to read the
backup tape and get the priv.edb file directly from the Online Backup. Note
I wrote online backup not offline backup. I don't know how this works as
well use Netbackup but that is the way it is supposed to work, if not then
Better to restore the Exchange Information Store to your recovery server
from your Exchange-aware backup, and run the utility there. Not only will
you have a transactionally accurate store that will actually mount, you can
use that opportunity to practice your disaster recovery skills.
Ed
This powertools sounds interesting. When it reads the online backup from the
tape does it need to read the whole thing or can it locate a mailbox,
message etc on the tape and extract it? I tried to find out on the website
but it's not exactly clear as to whether you can do this...
We've had to do
You have to copy the whole edb to hard disk first.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
This powertools sounds interesting. When it reads the
It would be nice but don't cross your fingers. The current version of
PowerTools has limited use, if you can successfully restore the Exchange
server from an online backup and it is consistent then you can mount it and
just go into the database with Outlook or Exmerge. The reason to use
PowerTools
I agree with Michael, the documentation is not clear but I am sure it just
eases the process of copying the information from tape to hard drive.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 18:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto
It's kinda cool actually. Could use some more work and they do have a new
version coming out soon. The utility is installed onto the server/WS that
has the tape drives mounted. You then mount your Exchange backup tape that
has the IS on it. The tool scans the tape, finds the IS, and tells you
Hello All.
Little Background:
Last week, Exchange 5.5 server went ka-poot early in the day and I was
unable to recover the IS. We ended up losing 11 hours of data that was not
on a backup tape. A key member of the management team has had the stance in
the past that email is best-effort. I knew
Yup,
You're right paul.always good to stick to the old rules.
Thanks for the input guys..
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
It
Could you tell us a little bit about what you have now?
Like what brand of hardware, model, and your current configuration?
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: High Availability
How about Exchange 2003 with Volume Shadowing on a SAN. Not seen it in
practise but I thought this was one of the strong selling points of E2K3.
Anyone had any experience?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 18:14
To: Exchange
Thanks for the reply.
What I have now is:
One Server - Compaq ML530
Dual CPU
2GB RAM
3 drives at 36.4 each - RAID 5
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
1000 Mailboxes
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:14 PM
To:
That's a pretty nice server. That's what I have.
First off, I would look at Exchange 2003 rather than 2000. Its high
availability features are MUCH MUCH better than they were in past versions.
So, what are your options? Well, Exchange doesn't mirror, so forget that.
You could always go with
Being able to take snapshot backups and restores is going to be sweet. Is
there anything out there that supports it yet?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Availability
I thought the presentations at TechEd indicated BackupExec supported
that? Yup - BE 9.0 gives you several choices for Advanced Open File
including Microsoft's Volume Shadow Copy Service. I'll have to dig up
that ppt again.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
Ill have to look. I thought they were not ready yet.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
I thought the presentations at TechEd indicated BackupExec
Cool keep the info coming, if you find the PPT would you be prepared to mail
it? VSS for Exchange 2003 would be a life saver. It has become such an issue
here that we are looking at other mail solutions and no it is not Notes but
a solution from a large database organisation ;o)
Paul
Sure. Just leave your ugly boyfriend at home this time.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: High Availability Exchange 2000
How about we meet at the malt shop afterwards, do our hair
How about we meet at the malt shop afterwards, do our hair and listen to
some 45s?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
That's a
sure
but I wont ask why only 3 drives for such a killer box which per the one Im
getting for my new sql app has 12 slot's avalable.. more spindles more
speed...
45's..start the wayback machine insert 8 track...next floor 78's.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
It is not all it is cracked up to be. The VSS support in BE9, build 4454
(the only one that supports it), is very unreliable. Sometimes it works,
sometimes it does not. Especially with a Win2k3 domain controller. Does
not cause any damage, just does not always query the writer properly and
Start small. First change your drive array. For a 1,000-user server you
should have:
C: RAID-1 (2 drives) OS and binaries
D: RAID-1 (2 drives) Exchange transaction logs (only)
E: RAID-5 (3+ drives; recommend maybe 5) Exchange database files
By separating the logs from the OS, if you
You might also want to check out LEGATO Co-StandbyServer AAdvanced for
Microsoft Exchange - we have had pretty good success with this, and even
though it does require a second server and the software, it is a much more
economical way to go over most SAN type solutions.
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000)
The flagging of a message has stopped working. You can flag a message and
set a reminder as many times a you want, but the reminder message never
appears.
We have rerun the cleanreminders switch but nothing happens. Reminders for
tasks and meeting appear
I have done this and all is working now. Thanks for all of the help you have saved me
a lot of headaches.
Thanks Again
MH
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Secondary Address Book
I am setting up a test environment using Microsoft's Beta of Virtual Server.
I am having trouble getting Exchange to install correctly. Has anyone
played with VS and managed to get E2K up and running?
Will Grever
_
List posting
You mean what used to be called Vinca?
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
You might also want to check out LEGATO Co-StandbyServer AAdvanced for
Running Veritas Version 8.60, Rev 3808 against Exchange 5.5 SP4/Win2k SP2.
Due to the loss of people within the company, I am having to start learning
some of the BU stuff. Before, I have just let our BU guy configure it all.
I THINK I know what the settings should be, based on what I have read
yes.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange
Maybe so
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
no
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
no
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
yes.
_
List posting FAQ:
no? Let me find out what it was called previously.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To
In the properties of the backup job, our BU Admin has the Database
and Logs (Flush committed logs)
You have that set to full right? Not copy or differential?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Wednesday, July 30,
In 1999 Legato aquired Vinca corp.
so yes.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
Dude...select the option from the web interface that appends the rest of the
message thread to your reply, so that people know what the heck question you
are responding to.
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange
From the main Backup Exec console, under the Tools / Options / Set
Application Defaults property page / Exchange tab, the same backup method
is
selected. However, under the Restore section, we have 1) No loss
restore,
2) Restore public folder and 3) Restore Private Mailboxes options all
Copy and Diff backups do not flush the logs so you wont see the (Flush
committed logs) thing in the dialog box unless you are doing a full or
incremental backup.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
hmmm... will do. Did not realize I needed to do that. My appologies.
Dude...select the option from the web interface that appends the rest of the
message thread to your reply, so that people know what the heck question you
are responding to.
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz
I have gotten both Exchange 2000 and Exchange 2003 to work therein. I don't
recall having to do anything special.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Ah right (puts foot in mouth)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Veritas BE Settings (Was: Auto Accept Utility stopped
working)
Copy and Diff backups
Do you recall if you had the exchange VMs as domain controllers?
I may be having DNS issues between my VMs. Even though forestprep and
domainprep went without any errors, the SA can not find the global catalog
server.
Will
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have ours set to run a FULL backup-to-disk on Fridays to a seperate
storage server (map a drive) and we use incrementals monday to thursday for
just the Exchange data (store, logs, priv pub .edb's. Exchange agent is
installed. We also run twice weekly and monthly COPY backups to tape (4
week
They were member servers because the scenario we had worked used a Windows
2003 domain and we started with Exchange 2000, so we couldn't install it on
the DC. We later upgraded the Exchange 2000 servers to Exchange 2003
without incident. We had five virtual machines, including two domain
Incrementals only back up log files. If you were to try to restore from a
full and a series of incrementals, you could wait a long time for recovery
to complete because of the number of log files you would have to replay.
Consider that when you reevaluate your strategy. You might test how long
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
