Hi,
Probably an easy one. Where is the option to allow or deny this OOO in
exch 2000.
Thx!
Byron
MarketTools(r)
Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings.
_
List posting FAQ:
of the message contains any string of an
otherwise bogus URL request (e.g. .. which is part of the request for
Code Red and
Nimda) then it will be denied with a 404.
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Exchange
Am seeing this error occasionally on a new exchange 2000 owa server (All
2000 mailbox and owa 2000 servers are sp3). One example was a
relatively small zip file, another an .htm file. Doesn't happen on all
attachments, but is consistent with the message, that is it never works
when accessing w/
More info:
* OWA 2000 server is a front-end setup
* OWA 2000 server using latest iis lockdown and url scan w/ standard owa
template.
Appreciate any pointers.
byron
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I know this has caused havoc on e-mail
I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still
frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on
how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000,
outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past?
How do others
with OOO is small. However, consider the
following:
Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France until
the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any
Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If you are a
spammer, then you've hit
-webadmin.html
Or did you mean galmod32 from the resource kit?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is there a product out there that will allow you
Your AD zone/internal dns servers should ideally not be serving public
recursive lookups. Big security issues there.
Setup your public zones (redundant) on a separate machine(s) outside the
firewall somewhere, or have your isp host them.
Have your internal name servers forward lookups to your
Does the vpn work in general from behind the firewall? Do other protocols
like icmp work? Is the vpn site-to-site or client-gateway?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN
or what
to do i would appreciate it.
thanks
rich
ps sorry for hijacking this thread.
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:byron;markettools.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Does the vpn work in general from
Yes. I think it's included with the next ver of exch. I understand that
they also optimized the super chatty mapi communication somewhat.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
This is a correct explanation of the issue. Name resolution could have been
ruled out by the info originally provided.
Jpc- I've seen this often. don't know about alcatel, but some vpn clients
allow a mtu config option in the client software which is helpful to limit
tcp payload per packet.
My opinion: this is one of those white-board type questions.
3 free cents: As a high-level process I'd work my way through this issue
figuring out what I could rely on based on how things were working before
any changes, and at what incremental point during the changes did things
begin to
Try lowering the mtu on the linksys or the alcatel. Search google for
details.
-Original Message-
From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VPN breaks Outlook
Hi, folks:
Mixed mode, currently migrating users from
Send me the pix config
byron
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:jdubyn;optonline.net]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ
Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using
There's no maybe about it - it just is what it is. It won't work.
Great books your company makes btw! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
I was
What is the limit set to? The answer may help.
Also, I'd consider setting up a separate mail relay for the java app.
Something to consider.
-Original Message-
From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 12:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
Have a very small installation wanting to migrate their novell/groupwise 6.0
data to exchange 2000. I'm looking through the materials on MS's site now
but was wondering if there are any big show stoppers that folks here have
run into. Any advise from experience doing this migration?
Thx for
hey eric. try specify by host:
ip 210.0.0.0.0
mask255.0.0.0
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5
Got it, I know pretty much how to block whatever,
if your isp blocks inbound access to port 80 run your web on a different
port, or upgrade isp services.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
No
-Original Message-
i think you've got your hands full already with security issues. why in the
world would you consider this. the good news is, with that new netcat
listener remote admin will be easier ;)
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002
do you feel sorry for his employer because; 1. he doesn't know what a http
word wrap is or 2. it wasn't included in the testing material for his
mcse+i?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange
what part is unclear?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-003
What does this mean?
- John Q
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone
point of clarity: the web client doesn't actually use port 80 but will use
3389 as well - check out the tsac docs for details. i recall that the high
encryp option is 128bit.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To:
of kernal mode vs. user mode calls - especially if you open up port 80.
audit the security logs carefully and use strong passwords (repeat that a
few times). good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange
fwiw- so has my 3870 :(
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Frank Miller has answered my question...I am running PocketPC 2000.
PocketPC 2002
just spoke with them on this. Was informed that they're currently analyzing
the issue in QA and with the scan engine vendors. I'd check back with them
in the next day or so on next steps.
byron
markettools
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Hey Ed, if you, Chris, Sue, Ben and others are interested in a hardcopy
publishing project I'm sure you'd have an immediate market demand! Just
in case you needed another part-time job huhhh ;)
cheers-byron
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
i would choose an ICSA certified ipsec solution. http://www.trusecure.com/
I understand that Microsoft ISA can serve as a vpn terminator for external
clients using l2tp/ipsec as well gateway to gateway implementations with
other ISA servers. However, I've never used isa in this capacity.
has anyone been able to expose permon data to snmp for exch 5.5 running on
win 2k? what do i need to do to get this running.
thx.byron
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
run
into.
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
has anyone been able to expose permon data to snmp for exch 5.5 running on
win 2k? what do i need to do
you've not accounted for the transaction logs. full nightly backups will
take care of your needs.
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
I have read it and
have them confirm they can resolve at connect to your smtprelay on port 25.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't send to our Domain
I received this, quoted portion, via
some general best practices
* disable unneeded services/daemons
* place the system behind a stateful firewall - allowing only the
application access you require for the list-serv. Don't permit netbios,
nfs, rpc, ftp, or tftp accross inbound or outbound.
* stay up2date on all os and
on the dmz smtp server set the remote domain to forward mail to the internal
IP ADDRESS of the internal server. don't use hostnames if at all possible.
is the mail still in queue on the dmx smtp server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
nope. so far so good, we implemeted late last night.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New OWA patch (MS01-057): Anyone load it yet?
Does the patch require a reboot
yes. do you have a rule that is catching gone_A and pulling the frames off
the wire?
-Original Message-
From: Koos Jacobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
Don't you guys use an Intrusion
hey Brian-
i can say that Antigen's file filter *.vbs will also catch *.jpg.vbs.
perhaps you're seeing some CLSIDs, which are attachments that end with a
CLSID file extension, but do not show the actual full extension of the file
when saved and viewed with Windows Explorer. CLSIDs can circumvent
on the owa server.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owaguide.d
oc
good luck-
byron
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA design implementation
I tend to agree with Roger. Just to give you peace of mind, if you can
manage the switch, check to see if you run across any FCS or align errors,
or large amounts of small frames called runts on the ports that connect to
the exchange server. This would be indicative of a duplex mismatch or a
yes, but would be a good idea to apply limits at the IMS to better utilize
your network bandwidth. Perhaps even an e-mail policy for users outlining
why this is a bad idea - prior to their pushing send.
byron
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL
I'd create a VPN over your existing public network.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
I am not very familiar with RAS. Do you know whether RAS
why?
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outgoing mail not working
Adriaan Van Huissteden
Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660
how do you like your tea?
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Restore
Can you backup and Restore individual Mailboxes on Exchange Server 2K?
Thanks
Adriaan Van
I've found that that all of the major virus vendors do a pretty good job at
notifications and updates (I think this much is in the fAQ). I've also
found that using 2 or more different vendors somewhere in your detection
path helps to minimize your exposure should one vendor be slow addressing a
On that thought - Is anyone here using mailEssentials?
We are still getting pounded with Sircam also and are considering using this
mailEssentials on our win2k smtp server in the dmz to filter mail before
getting to Antigen on our smtp connector. The goal is to better filter mail
of spamming,
yeah, part of me thinks it may be over-engineering the system, but based on
my efforts Antigen can't filter based on data body content, nor by e-mail
address or domain name. this is important for us.
No question, Antigen kicks butt in Virus protection.
byron
-Original Message-
From:
try lsoft lsmtp. it's pretty cheap and more targeted to what you're wanting
to do.
byron
-Original Message-
From: Brent Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass Email server
How can I configure Exchange to be
Hanji San,
i bet dinner of your choice in San Francisco that you've never heard a
profound discussion surrounding the value of installing a mapi client on an
exchange server. further, even ms says the legacy app is supplied as is
with no product support... clue.get! why go out of your way to
nope, I'm sticking with the tried and true Windows for workgroups and ms
mail. it's great! :)
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 6:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
Has anyone used
Just FYI, for those using smtp fixup with a PIX firewall. Just released
from Cisco-
Byron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Cisco Secure PIX Firewall SMTP Filtering Vulnerability
=
Version 1.0
For Public Release 2001
this represents a significant revenue center for MS. I think you're off on
this one.
Byron
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K
I'd be interested in seeing actual load simulations and the associated
performance of a 50,000 user loaded IBM 9672-X27 with collaboration
applications on par w/ Exchange. I'd also like to see an Intel based
clustered solution with a SAN factored in as an alternate solution. It may
make the
i hear ya... try telling that to joshua :)
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent!
Future attacks remind me of the movie War Games No one AT ALL wins
or
this is outlined in the FAQ pretty well
-Original Message-
From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: URGENT to Upgrade
Hi all,
I have Exchange srver 5.5 Sp4 on WINDOWSNT 4.0 (Back office 4.5), NOW we are
shifting
it complete!
later.byron
Byron Kennedy
MarketTools Inc.
___
MarketTools is the leading application service provider (ASP) of web-based
market research tools. MarketTools provides business tools to build and
deploy sophisticated surveys, gather responses and report
yes
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Manage 5.5 from Win 2K Workstation
Hello All,
Can you install a Management console on WIN2k to manage Exchange 5.5
on
check the FAQ on this one. there's a ton of material. you need to prevent
relaying on your Internet smtp server.
byron
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Open Relay Black list
I'm with ya totally! So it's like hearin: (drum-n-base) , POWER (to
the stupid exchange admin) PEOPLE YALL!!! circa PE, late 80's - cool,
now i got that song stuck in my head... too many beers... must go to
sleep.. thump- /byron
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker
Hi Clint,
Given your situation and the complexity of your environment, I'd honestly go
ahead and give MS PSS a call (FAQ). They'll be able to provide you the best
support and it's well worth $200 or so.
good luck. Byron
-Original Message-
From: Clint CHN. Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL
no i think that's the Homer Simpson while eating sound :)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at
it's a form Japanese poetry that came from the Waka - made famous in the 12
century by Dogen Roshi who brought zen Buddhism from china to nihon (Japan).
do a search for haiku, waka and dogen and you'll get some great info.
-Original Message-
From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL
Hey Mike,
I actually think you pose a very valid question and think this functionality
would be useful for users (and is not a behavioral issue - though there are
many out there :)). However, Exchange/Outlook doesn't offer this
out_of_the_box so like someone mentioned earlier you should check
I've run into this as well. you need to disable the 8-bit mime ext from
being announced on the IIS 5.0 smtp server.
check this out:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q262/1/68.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=t
echFR=0qry=8bitmimernk=1src=DHCS_MSPSS_tech_SRCHSPR=IIS50
-Original Message-
leaseable - secure space in co-location facility such as exodus.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange installed on BDC
What's a colo cage?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech
interesting. alternatively, you could clearly explain to them what the issue
is, encourage them to read a book and grow from the mistake.
why did they use poor judgment and make a dumb mistake? Good question. who
put them in that environment? Sounds like a great opportunity for a best
Sorry, I'm not understanding completely, is this just one host (domain) or
is it many domains? If it's just one or two then the problem is probably
remote. can you connect to their mailer on port 25 as specified in DNS?
tracert should not be relied upon as they may be filtering icmp ttl
But Ed wouldn't a VPN require transport or tunnel peering? This probably
wouldn't be realistic from all locations. If all sessions are from
administrable hosts then I'd agree that a vpn would be ideal. Maybe i'm
missing something. more info would help.
Rob, either way, given the cost and
69 matches
Mail list logo
