Is this Robert Strong's script? It's never really been a supported
script and is even less so under E2K.[1] There are a couple of
alternatives for E2K... I'm going to install ERM for my users
(http://www.swinc.com/erm/) during our next outage window.
[1] Are all of the conference rooms on the
to install ERM?
Thanks,
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoAccept Script
If you telnet to port 110 on the localhost where your mailbox resides
can you connect? To the netbios name? To the IP? Is mail.dfg.com a FE
server for your 5.5 environment or the mailbox server itself (i.e.
Should you expect it to be listening)?
-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony
Sounds like a DNS issue.
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:48 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exch2k mail routing inside a routing group problem
Subject: Exch2k mail routing inside a routing group problem
Hi
I have
The closest GC registry setting does indeed make sure Outlook 2002 is
talking to the GC you'd like it to. In general that's an excellent idea.
Unfortunately the original poster had the idea of forcing the client to
only use DSAccess. Once that's been forced, the client is not talking to
a GC,
pinging from both sides it gives the FQDN from each
side. Any idea on how to do further troubleshooting Thanks
Regards
Santhosh.H
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:56 PM
It's stored in AD. Permissions on AD objects can be viewed through
ADSIEdit.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mailbox rights security
Subject: Mailbox rights security
Hi,
In Exchange
Check the FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Sunday, June 29, 2003 6:07 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: how to find Exchange 2000 edition
Subject: how to find Exchange 2000 edition
Hi
I have installed exchange 2000 and would like
Those aren't holes. One can legitimately accept mail for those addresses
and as long as it isn't relayed to the final destination the server is
relay secure. The designers of those tests have implemented their
testing criteria improperly.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL
Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: DL for internal use only
Subject: DL for internal use only
Is there a way under
I experienced this issue where there was a mailbox associated with a
disabled user account object... Is that the case here?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Recipient Policy
the SMTP address?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL for internal use only
Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: BW Brandt Ward (5320
?
Thanks
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL for internal use only
Yes, but it makes upgrading to E2K a bit more problematic.
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart
]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Policy
I experienced this issue where there was a mailbox associated with a
disabled user account object... Is that the case here
It's actually due to a post sp3 hotfix, I think there's a Q article on
it (which I believe says basically, uninstall the hotfix in question if
it's a problem).
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:03 AM
Posted To: swynk
Never experienced that.
-Original Message-
From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Changing Mailbox name
Subject: RE: Changing Mailbox name
Does anyone know if having a directory name in 5.5/2000, that
That ought to work just dandy.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:22 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Access Exchange 2000 from an external domain
Subject: Access Exchange 2000 from an external domain
Good morning all !
For the inbox, is this in an additional mailbox added to your profile?
If so, the item(s) in question are marked as private... it's a feature.
For the calendar, view | by category usually works for me.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
Heretic!
-Original Message-
From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:14 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Access Exchange 2000 from an external domain
Subject: RE: Access Exchange 2000 from an external domain
Try it. That way you'll know whether
I think you accidentally hit the X instead of the restore button.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:03 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Restoring Mail to a Public Folder
Subject: Restoring Mail to a Public Folder
Using a 3rd party gateway as Andrey suggested or upgrading to E2K and
writing a quick event sink seem to meet the desired objective.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:27 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Changing the
That way sounds good to me.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:10 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Changing Mailbox name
Subject: Changing Mailbox name
I have a user that has gotten married, and her
You're -4 GMT.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:34 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date??
W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server.
I setup
A fax address is a valid electronic address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:50 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Duplicate Entries listed in Address Book...
Subject: RE: Duplicate Entries listed in Address Book...
They're not duplicate entries.. One entry is for the e-mail address, the
other is for the fax address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:04 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Duplicate Entries listed in Address
Several 3rd party vendors have such tools.
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 12:41 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Tool For Attachments in Either Pub or Priv Store
Subject: Tool For Attachments in Either Pub or Priv
www.cdolive.com has script samples for an anonymous PF. Seems to meet
the overall requirements, if not specific ones
-Original Message-
From: Reyes Balderas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:32 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Creating a restricted e-mail
http://victori.hypermart.net/rpm.html
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:31 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Multiple domains.
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Is there a way of configuring it so that your bounces do not
Was domainprep run in the parent domain? Does the user's mailbox get
stamped with the appropriate attributes by the RUS?
-Original Message-
From: chuck robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:46 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mailbox enabled users in
I believe the InterOrg tool from Microsoft replicates free/busy data.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:59 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Replicating Public folder
Subject: Replicating Public folder
Hi,
How do I
Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I
think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably
better for companies with
It's a feature. www.slipstick.com might list some 3rd party products
which allowed one to do this.
-Original Message-
From: Halliday S (ISeLS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching Public Folders
Subject: Searching
Can I avoid the question as asked and recommend E2K3 and OMA?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA and Palms
Subject: RE: OWA and Palms
I honestly don't know how the browser on the
Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: OWA Public folders
Hi all,
I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This
-
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more
There's really no 'right' answer to this question IMO. At $vbc we didn't
send notifications to the sender, but we did to the intended recipient.
At other companies we did the opposite and at 1 we notified everyone and
their monkey.
Horses for courses I guess.
-Original Message-
From:
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders
Chris, is there no workaround?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders
Upgrade to E2K/E2K3
If the user is working offline consistently and synchronizing
periodically, I don't see why you'd have an issue. I've set up large
numbers of users to work this way in the past. While Outlook 11 does
offer some enhancements, working offline with an OST is a pretty common
scenario.
-Original
FWIW, I disagree. :*
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Change FQDN in Ex55
Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself.
I think MS was recommending
I don't believe you want to join the existing site if the server name
and IP address are the same... You want to create a new org and site
with the exact same name (spelling and case) for each.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren Mr DAC 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
You're using a Pix with the SMTP fixup protocol (blech) so not able to
test it... But if you've set a limit on the connector of 2MB, user
specified limits will not override. 2MB seems a tad bit onerous.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
On the IMS you can specify routing by domain... For the domain(s) in
question you would specify an IP address which the VPN link would know
how to route to the appropriate endpoint. We did this several times with
customers when I worked for $vbc.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude
Actually, there is a kick ass product from MessageWare
(www.messageware.com) that I'm seriously considering implementing in my
environment which does that and more. Unfortunately I don't see it on
their site yet (brand new, saw a demo of it at TechEd) or the name of
it... AttachMate for OWA?
I've seen similar behavior with a corrupt OST file.. Perhaps that is
what is happening here?
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:17 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Messages supposedly not being deleted
Subject: Messages
I hear MVPs are overrated.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP
This product doesn't exactly meet your design goals out of the box
(AFAIK), but it's still quite interesting for both the scenario you
describe as well as internal consolidation of attachment storage.
http://www.attachstore.com/
http://www.attachstore.com/products/exchange.shtml
-Original
Do you take down GCs routinely then?
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:11 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Global Catalog and EX2K
Subject: Global Catalog and EX2K
Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once
Check the SMTP protocol logs at the exit point to your domain... Verify
the data is correct when it leaves your environment. If you can do this,
then start looking to them for issues...
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05,
That solves a problem, but potentially introduces additional interesting
ones such as clients talking to DS Access across a WAN instead of a
GC sitting in the same building with them.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003
Not sure I know enough about your environment to speak definitively to
your scenario, though I've seen similar things done with great success.
I will however offer this bit of advice, more GCs = Good. With 2 GCs for
Exchange, failure of 1 puts entirely too much stress on the remaining
server for
For a group mailbox, use a mailbox and assign the group permissions to
it.
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:00 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mailbox Group
Subject: Mailbox Group
I'm needing to setup a support
Yes. It's used to communicate with 5.5 servers in the site among other
things.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:47 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Message Transfer Agent
Subject: Message Transfer Agent
Hi,
Is MTA is use
KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at.
www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in
the web links | server | archival section I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM
.
-Original Message-
From: suriya suriya suriya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: RE: Deleting Global address book
Subject: Re: RE: Deleting Global address book
All receipents of those unused servers.
On Fri, 23 May 2003 Chris
On the POP3 virtual server properties what message format is specified?
-Original Message-
From: Diane Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, May 30, 2003 6:56 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Outlook - Pop3 - Meeting Request problems
Subject: Outlook - Pop3 - Meeting
You're still an open relay. Did you restart the IMS after making the
changes described in the article?
Describe your settings on this tab as well in detail:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Files/04/7696/Screen_04.gif
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
you try again?
Skip Taylor, MCSE
Network Administrator
Jordan, Jones, and Goulding
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussion
Subject: RE: Open Relay Help
You're still an open relay. Did you restart
Secondary Mx records is one of the services we provide to our customers,
so I've been through this a lot. :) The typical secondary Mx record
falls into one of the two following categories:
1. A secondary entrance into your existing mail network. Offices in NY
and LA, an Mx record which points to
One last reminder... RSVP soon if you plan to attend.
-Original Message-
Please pardon the non-technical nature of the following announcement:
Windows .Net is teaming up with MessageOne to sponsor the List Party
at next month's TechEd 2003 in Dallas. The List Party will take over the
I believe this may be one of those situations in which Ed's Maxim
applies.
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
- Ed Crowley
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, James A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:33 AM
Posted To: swynk
The recipient's mail server is set to reject mail from you based on your
originating IP/DNS name. Apparently they don't like you...
-Original Message-
From: Todd Bentley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:56 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 5.7.1 denials to
: FW: 5.7.1 denials to common recipient
Then why are they getting rejections when sending to me. I am not
denying any ip/dns. I like them.
Todd L. Bentley Director
Allarus Technology Management
350 Fifth Ave 57th Floor
New York, NY 10118
www.allarus.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris
of 15GB and stop exchange???
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
I've set the prohibit receive limit for my users to be 4x $large_num
SND/RCV message
thanks! chris
bill
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
1. no send/receive limit is probably a bad idea. If one user got
mailbombed
-Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
ok I get the second idea...but Im not clear on the mail loop
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
I use it to stop
Sounds about right.. 'on behalf of' is really an Exchange-ism which
doesn't have a direct parallel per se in the relevant RFCs AFAIK.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:28 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Send on Behalf
http://tinyurl.com/8xhw
On 4/6/03 17:31, Biesecker, Noel E. IT1(SW) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got the following error from my Norton Antivirus for Exchange today. Does
anyone know what this means or what I need to do?
NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error.
VAPI read stream function returned
You *want* users to send them all the time?
On 4/4/03 7:16, Wood, Harriet[CCS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We run exchange 5.5 and are moving clients to Outlook XP. Is it possible to
prevent users from setting the option to not send read receipts?
Harriet
Use a mail enabled universal security group.
On 4/4/03 9:51, Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange 2k SP3
AD mixed mode
Outlook 2k clients running on NT
I had a request from a manager to be able to view his subordinate's
calendars, so I created a global security group to which
Either you've failed to properly edit the registry or your organization uses
the Outlook security form which overrides and client settings. Verify the
registry settings, or use Ken Slovak's add-in which sets the correct
registry setting. If you still can't access them in Outlook (which is
probably
lol
On 4/2/03 23:01, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear your complex question.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Diagnosing the cause of the server lockups should be done using perfmon
looking at things like CPU utilization, RPC requests and disk I/O as a first
line of troubleshooting.
On 4/3/03 7:34, Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? How does that solve the problem I have today? I only have 150
What's the problem that you are trying to solve by using this script?
On 4/3/03 8:11, Weatherly, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me help out a bit more by saying
I am trying to write a script that will:
Connect to VPN
Open outlook
Perform send/receive
Close outlook
Disconnect from VPN
.
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches
What's the problem that you
am using KiX
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches
So you're
Try reducing the maximum number of connections the SMTP connectors being
used have to work with and dedicating specific connectors to the task. The
IIS SMTP service is quite efficient and if given enough connections could
easily consume a significant portion of ones bandwidth.
A peer of mine
Have him create a bogus contact of undisclosed recipients with some bogus
address and place it in the to line. Or if he wants to be professional, have
him use mail merge.
On 4/3/03 9:36, Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a user who has just moved into a new office and wants to
Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing
Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a number
of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at KMS.
Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a solution
IIRC.. No. Slipstick might have a more authoritative answer.
On 4/3/03 16:41, Nikki Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Outlook 2002: The Admpack.exe download from the Office Resource Kit is
the latest version. The kit, a self-extracting file, contains the
Outlooksecurity.oft form template.
A decentralized PGP implementation (a generally bad idea... and imperfect at
best ) doesn't particularly does it?
On 4/3/03 18:36, William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator.
- Original Message -
From: Chris
? No.
Are you requiring inbound email to be encrypted as well?
I can also capture keystrokes of remote computers of unsuspecting users
among other lame methods.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April
LDSU and SimpleSync don't require trusts.
On 4/2/03 0:01, Chakravarty, Sakti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We want to automate GAL synchronization between separate Exchange
organisations:
- OrgA (Exchange 5.5, NT4 domain)
- OrgB (Exchange 2000, W2K mixed-mode domain).
We are not allowed to
Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Unable to display the folder...
I
They need to be restored to a parallel Exchange installation and then
exported/imported.
RE: retention space.. IIRC elsewhere in the thread you said your current DIR
is 7 days, your DIR for 30 days will ~= 4x the space currently used.
On 4/2/03 13:53, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discussions
Subject: RE: Feedback - Migrating Versus Database Copy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, since E2K3 has now gone RTM
Ummm, you mean Win2K3 right?
Jason
Intrasite communications[1] between servers in E2K is substantially less
chatty. Routing groups don't have the same intense high bandwidth
requirements one generally saw imposed with Exchange 5.5.
[1] Or more properly intr-routing group.
On 4/2/03 10:56, ml.exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
this
information as well.
On 4/2/03 14:19, Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, but how do I find out how much of that space is dumpster space?
I currently only have like 7 or 8 IT people on that box, with about 400
more to go in next week.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
IIRC, no. But it's been a while since I had to restore individual PFs, so I
could be mistaken.
On 4/2/03 14:34, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
If I have a second Exchange Server in the same site can I restore to
it if I do not have replication turned on?
: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Restore
IIRC, no. But it's been a while since I had to restore individual PFs,
so I could be mistaken.
On 4/2/03 14:34, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED
Or when RPC connectivity does not exist. But in either case (and Ed will
agree here) changing the ASP scripts which run Exchange are unlikely to
resolve the issues without some spectacular hacking.
On 3/31/03 21:23, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is not my experience. The problem
I didn't see anyone mention that this interval is configurable and covered
in the FAQ. But both are true.
On 4/1/03 9:42, Smith Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should have thought to Stop/Start the services...
Thanks for being kind to a dunce.
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Yes. You need to either deploy a FE server or expose both servers to the
internet.
On 4/1/03 15:58, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 2 Exchange Servers,
Only 1 is available to the internet for OWA, when I browse to it and
enter user credentials that is on the second server I
Well, I certainly wouldn't be installing Exchange 5.5 onto an NT 4.0 server
ever again if I could help it.
Active directory is a complex beast for larger organizations, but it needs
to be implemented if Windows is going to remain your primary authentication
method and maintaining supportability
Then, quick grab an Outlook client and discover that any Outlook user can
open the mailbox of any other user in the organization. Sounds like someone
has granted receive as rights to the information store to a group containing
the users in question. Check the properties of the private information
Which Jet Errors? There are a number of them.
On 3/29/03 18:55, Ted Mosher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange question for anyone who may have tried this...
Can you restore an Exchange 5.5 server that was backed up with Backup
Exec with the Exchange Option from an NT4.0 server to a copy of
section of the
RFC822 From header, irregardless of ResolveP2.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mailbox Hacked
Whether that is the case or not depends on the server's
: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Question
Which Jet Errors? There are a number of them.
On 3/29/03 18:55, Ted Mosher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange question
Your understanding appears to be correct. I believe your colleague is in
error.
On 3/31/03 20:24, Chakravarty, Sakti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know this has been discussed before on this list but please bear with me ...
From my experience, the whitepapers and articles I have
Sounds like you've tried most of the recommended solutions (does your SSL
certificate match the server's FQDN BTW?). The only KB article which dealt
with Exchange also appears to have been pulled, so if you call into PSS on
this one, I thin you'd have a 80% change of having the issue be
purchasing 3rd party software.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:27 PM
To:Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Second SMTP
What article is this? There are a number of 3rd party products which provide
disclaimers
201 - 300 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
