What DNS are you using? If you're using Win2K or NT4.0 DNS take a look
at Q295933. This would cause the behavior you are seeing.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
I would also be looking at ComVault Galaxy.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS Exchange Archiving Software
Hi,
I wanted to find out if anyone has used any software
Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Thanks Thomas. Seems like that might be the cause of the problem. I am
running a Win2K DNS server.
I'm going to update the SP to fix this problem and check if that
resolves
the issue.
Will report back on the results.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
Q174045
-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: rules wizard stops working
User has about 15 - 20 rules. A few days ago they all stopped running
automatically. Apparently he had recently
A Google search using pst password (without the quotes) yields a
number of results you might like.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin, Bernie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lost Password for Outlook .pst file
Hi,
: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Ao thomas shed some light and tell me what your exchange environment
is...if you dont mind
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8
back?
But you can still be my Exchange buddy!
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Kanee, if you want to get into a pissing contest with folks
!
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Kanee, if you want to get into a pissing contest with folks on this list
about the size of environments, you're
Squeal like a pig?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
Well, they need two people for Dueling Banjos. I cant imagine what
they
want the 3rd guy to do.
-Original
Q290499
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocked Outlook attachments
Some of our new users got the latest Office SR-2 release with the
latest
Microsoft security fixes (pain in
That's right! Why do things the easy way when you can screw them up with
so much style! Go on, do your BLB's. Hell, while you're at it, why not
have your users copy the contents of their mailboxes into PSTs and store
them in their home-directories just in case your BLB's fail! That's a
good plan.
No...It would stand for Idiots. As in Idiots, Boneheads, and Morons.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I'll bet 'I' is for Intel..
why? one of
To the best of my knowledge, if you install using Terminal Services, a
reboot is required. From the console, it should not be required.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
Friggin' Lyris!
Great to have you back Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
I think we agree, more or less. I don't believe that
e-mail administrators are the best ones to
If they're paying to send you to MEC, they're not wasting their money.
Therefore you don't need to tell them.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
Yeah, sure
Did you try the hotfixes yet?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
I tried disabling the DNS client but it did not help
-Original Message-
Sarcasm is the word you need to become familiar with.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
pardon me for sounding so partonizing, but the M drive is the
Another tip... Don't snip the thread from your emails. It make is kind
of difficult to tell who your response is for.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
oh,
Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just
prefer to have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the
What is ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.
If you don't like it,
down. Too many people were getting the flu from
all
the hugging.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
Your solution can be found at the bottom of your
Are you using ISA as a firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Hi all.
I have two Win2K AD DNS servers. Recently they have been acting up: all
of
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
No ISA. We have an access list with all the necessary ports open. The
DNS
servers have no problem communicating with root hints at the beginning.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May
on it.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Have you run a netmon to see what the box is doing when it gets hosed?
Are there any errors in the logs? Is it still
-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
just the external resources
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:55 PM
the external resources
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Does the DNS stop resolving everything, including internal resources, or
is it just a problem
You must be kidding
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the resource kit
Yes!
Fsck! New from Hershey!
The commercials are like the Make 7-UP yours! one's; only different.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
It is a candy bar.
Serdar
I resemble that remark!
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of perverts, in case you were
somehow unaware of this fact.
SM's...is that a new candy?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Why should he fish when others can
There is no excuse There is only Zuel.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
And that's an excuse ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: John
Sounds like a consulting engagement to me...
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
info?
I'm new to Exchange 2K and I'm
Nope it's a secret. Don't mention a word of this to anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Found out how to create an exchange mailbox!
Sensitivity: Confidential
So we shouldn't
That being the case, you might consider letting us know what you have
tried, what research you have done, and what the results were. :)
I'm presuming, based on the sparse information that you gave, that you
have two separate Forests with two Exchange Orgs that you are trying to
replicate
When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow
connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments
after OL is already up?
If it's attachments, try Q300904.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
, slow connecting to other mailboxes.
Opening other users folders is slow even on same server.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
When you say slow connecting to the server
multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening
other users folders is slow even on same server.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
When you say slow
users get Outlook XP, there are problems. Outlook
2000
was much better
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK, you need it irrespective
That won't work - CD's are read only. You need R/W access to the PST.
You might be able to do it with an RW disk though (I haven't tried it).
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re
/oxpauiu.aspx
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK, you need it irrespective of OS.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto
The three movies you don't want to hear (in the order they were given)
are:
You've got Mail
Gone with the Wind - note that the reason given was something other
than the burning of Atlanta.
And ... the remake of Three Men and a Baby.
Those three answers, unheeded, resulted in a wall-licking
file and print etc.. Not as secure as the PIX solution... I'd
go with that.
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 05:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Small business server
ISA works fine as long as you know how
Did your network guys stick a sniffer out there? What did the sniff
show?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Right, sorry.
When stopping
ISA works fine as long as you know how to configure it.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Small business server
Yes go with the PIX. I have had lots of problem is ISA.
Keep in mind that MSFT doesn't support deployments that are made without
the use of Sysprep. Best to use it even if you think it's not necessary.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are you getting any other errors? 1330, 9215, 1722...
Are all the servers on the same build (SP, hotfixes, etc.)? What SP?
Have you looked at Q279537 and Q303156?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:07 PM
To:
http://www.officerecovery.com
-Original Message-
From: brenda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 7:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: please some1 tell me that there is anyway to recver from an ost
file
hello.
i know that i am stupid.
but my problem is:
i
What version of the scan engine are you running? I had this issue a
while ago. In my case, it was resolved with a newer version of the
engine.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Greg (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I don't know how you can say that. I just did a search in TechNet using
just interorg and found a pile of stuff ranging from configuration to
troubleshooting replication issues. TechNet is your friend; use it.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: javier villalpando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Take a look in TechNet for information on the InterOrg Synchronization
Tool.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using Exchange 5.5 in different Orgs.
How can I configure
Did you follow Q296051?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Migration Groups
I established the Native-Mode domain to host the Universal Group and
created a CA to
I'd be looking for a network issue first. Have you checked to make sure
the affected client machines, the Exchange server, and the switches are
not configured for auto-sense? Any unusual network traffic happening at
the point you see the issue?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey
Shows how much I'm paying attention today; responding to this again,
after we already beat it into the ground two weeks ago. *sigh*
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC
I'd be looking
If you want POP access after 4/24 you have to pay. They sent out a
notice a while ago. You can check the notice on the POP Access and
Forwarding section.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:37 PM
To: Exchange
Why you no answer my question!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Instant Messaging ???
Sensitivity: Private
Sometimes it's best to lead by example. :)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr,
Read these articles carefully. One notable vendor is trying to tell some
of my customers that these articles mean MSFT now supports NAS. I don't
see how that conclusion can be drawn from the language in the articles.
Until a NAS device is WHQL, you need to go to your NAS vendor if your
database
If there ever was a fast way to get on a kill list, you just found it.
You haven't been here long, and with comments like that (particularly to
Andy), you won't be staying long.
Plunk.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002
Why you no answer my question!
-Original Message-
From: Amit Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
helo mr hummert,
my gurl friend say she want to give me good hummert
job. i no B sure what she B talking
He's talking about moving the mailbox between servers.
T.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox
When moving a mailbox. Could you define why you would move a mailbox?
I am stuck in hell
My customers do not know
What the hell they want
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Couldn't stay awake
No cookies after pizza
On to happy hour
, wait.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
CIO is roach
Turn on light and crush
Ten more will come now
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday 1st Attempt be nice :)
Cannot migrate now
Why explain the obvious
Die CIO die
Mmm. Beer.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange with 2 domains
I could use a beer.
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March
Have you looked in the FAQ yet?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Queues
Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or
IMC
queue has in Originator
No, we can make fun of you first. :)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Contacts
Oh come onyou have to help first and then make fun of me later
-Chris
Are you running E2K?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What is this?
I get this from the list when I try to send a message to it. I'm using
plain text. It has always worked fine
Good movie. One of Billy Crystal's better one's. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is this?
Im running scared.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto
I fixed the problem with disabling sending both plain text and html in
global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy
for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after
that.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This should have read:
I fixed the problem by disabling sending both plain text and html in
global settings/IMF and then configuring either a CR or a domain policy
for internet.com forcing everything to plain text. No more issues after
that.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC
Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it
is.
I'm just trying to save the guy some money!
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
No, the other thing. That.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Transaction Logs
it
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't
disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart
] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
if any of you guys
knew
how before I started a very long and tedious process of manually
collecting
the information.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Forms Assessment
Q279106
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Digital Signatures and Custom Forms
Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms? We've been asked
to implement a form for an
Home Edition will work fine.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Blouin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP Home Edition
I have a dialup user who needs to run Outlook at home and is connecting
to
Exchange 5.5 server.
This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace
to confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the
problem in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for
registry changes to tune the length of time that will pass before the
message box is
The InterOrg Synchronization Tool and the InterOrg Replication Utility
are the tools you need.
Search TechNet for interorg and you'll find everything you need.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Minero Hector B DLVA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:06 AM
To:
The space was freed up within the database. The database won't reduce in
size without compacting it.
You might want to review the list archives. We've covered this at least
two times in the last week.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Toates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Mailbox Manager.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Venkatesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to delete all users sent item folder once a week
All,
I want to set up a script .so that it will clean up all exchange user's
I'll agree with the or something part.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange
You talk like a girl or something.
-Original Message-
Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Evil OST files.
Why make life difficult?
I repeat: Take his machine offline and open Outlook offline.
Create
profile ... (possibly tied to the user's SID? or the
name of the profile?)
jeff e.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Evil OST files.
I would not draw that conclusion from my post
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
