PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403, but the idea
of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen
needed for 'clean fuel
.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, at 8:29pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the shipping company uses hydrogen fuel cells?
Oh my God. The humanity. The humanity.
Fun fact of the day: Most of the people who were died in the Hindenburg
disaster (30 or so) were killed when they hit the ground after
people really take into accountabout stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I
Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved
in health care, patient information is not a priority. Nice that it is
in your organization, but yours is the exception rather than the rule I
assure you. Think
, 2003 8:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
I work for a Insurance company. One of our biggest priorities is the
protection of patient information. Don't generalize a whole industry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
All your trying to do is to start another flame war.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Very hard to accept
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved
in health care, patient information is not a priority
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved
in health care, patient
Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
I work for a Insurance company. One of our biggest priorities
is the protection of patient information
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
I
Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
All your trying to do is to start another flame war.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
On 2/26/03 11:30, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just my opinion on why it happened. From what I understand a few
bad apples had some mishaps with patient information, the media gets a
hold of this, blows it out of proportion,
Blows what out of proportion? Insufficient
Chris Im curious how do you figure this statement? Next thing you'll drag in
Hybrids ...
It's the same problem you have with cars
today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could
move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the
infrastructure isn't there.
While I
much the first thing I could google up here:
http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level
] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Chris Im curious how do you figure this statement? Next thing you'll
drag in Hybrids ...
It's the same problem you have with cars
today. Gasoline
25, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403, but the idea
of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen
needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224
/8484283.html
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i
25, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403, but the
idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of
hydrogen needed
Is the waist generated from a nuclear power plant worse than a beer
belly???
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Well the ideal pipe
22 matches
Mail list logo
