Guys,
I have a server runing W2K SP3 + Exchange 2000 SP3. The exchange
server is running imap for remote mail, the issue I'm having is that in
outlook (any version) some mail folders have different viewing settings
to others, in properties under general, some of the folders show as IMAP
I have an IMAP user on another network connecting to an Exchange 5.5 server.
I want them to be able to use the same server to send mail as well. I have
configured the IMC (5.5/sp4) with the accept connections (authenticate) and
only from users homed on this server. their mailboxes
I am trying to test authenication on a IMAP connection of a E2K server in a
front-end back-end topology.
When I telnet to the port I enter LOGIN or AUTHENTICATE, and I get a bad
statement error.
Is there a pre authenication statement I ma missing?
It's not helo.
- John Q Jr
on a IMAP connection of a E2K server in a
front-end back-end topology.
When I telnet to the port I enter LOGIN or AUTHENTICATE, and I get a bad
statement error.
Is there a pre authenication statement I ma missing?
It's not helo.
- John Q Jr
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Fay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 IMAP
Previous versions bypassed the prohibit send as well IIRC.
On 1/18/03 14:09, Fay, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients
a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients with MB limits. Obviously this will go BUST
on me and I need to change the design for OWA only, MAPI won't be supported.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;247126
The summary of the article is POP3 and IMAP clients
an NDR.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: POP3 IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
Previous versions bypassed the prohibit send as well IIRC.
On 1/18/03 14:09, Fay, Mark
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients with MB limits. Obviously this will go BUST
on me and I need to change the design for OWA only, MAPI won't be supported
? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients with MB limits. Obviously this will go BUST
on me and I need to change the design for OWA only, MAPI won't be supported.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid
Your message implies that this feature did NOT work on 5.5 for POP IMAP
clients?
They used the IS for their protocols, please explain your answer.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
I cant.
Im just not aware of any mechanism in any version of Exchange that would prevent a
pop3 or imap user from sending email if they were over their sending limit.
-- Original Message --
From: Fay, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
Let me clarify. Prior to E2K the Information Store was responsible for
MAPI, POP3, IMAP, etc. In Exchange 2000 Microsoft has broken out POP3 and
IMAP4 protocols away from the Information Store. They now run as separate
services. If you chose to you could stop and disable whichever one you
In Exchange 2000, IMAP and POP is handled by IIS. Nevertheless, all
messages are processed by the PHATCAT.DLL (Fat cat)which is the
categorizer. All messages in Exchange 2000 must be categorized which
includes checking for mailbox restrictions, etc. Even though MAPI
clients still communicate
Yes, Exchange 5.5 supports these protocols natively. I dont know if I would quite say
the Information Store was responsible for
MAPI, POP3, IMAP, etc. as you phrase it.
But nonetheless, why should it have worked in 5.5?
Both Pop3 and imap use SMTP to send mail yes?
What mechanism is in the IMS
Do you have the iisadmpwd virtual directory in your IIS configured? IIS5.0
does not install this virtual by default.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SSL for Exchange IMAP and OWA
Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
kindly wrote:
Do you have the iisadmpwd virtual directory in your IIS configured? IIS5.0
does not install this virtual by default.
I did not, and added it in per Q301428. Still no joy,
but I must be closer now. Thank you.
Dave Moore == [EMAIL
of these fixes is relevant to IMAP clients,
which are also not being able to change the password.
I appreciate your help though, this too gets me a little closer
to the fix.
Dave Moore == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http
-
From: Dave Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: RE: SSL for Exchange IMAP and OWA
Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] kindly wrote:
When you connect via MS Explorer and use OWA access via the proper URL.
I am using
My users need to be able to change passwords
via the Web and IMAP clients, such as Eudora.
I obtained IMAP and WWW certificates from
FreeSSL.com, and installed them using the
Key Manager, which reports that they are
complete and usable.
Nevertheless, when I try to change password
via Eudora, I
]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 10:47 PM
Subject: SSL for Exchange IMAP and OWA
My users need to be able to change passwords
via the Web and IMAP clients, such as Eudora.
I obtained IMAP and WWW certificates from
FreeSSL.com, and installed them using the
Key
Hi All,
In Q182504 MS make out it's really easy to turn POP3 and IMAP logging on and
off using a change to the Registry. They say that the next session will
activate the Registry change. Well, yes and no. On one server I can get the
file handle on all but one log file released, on another I only
to archive share
close filename
delete filename
return
- Original Message -
From: McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:19 AM
Subject: IMAP POP3 logging on Exch5.5
Hi All,
In Q182504 MS make out it's
You should be able to *view* contacts from Outlook as long as Use
microsoft rich text format is checked on the IMAP virtual server
properties. You won't be able to make updates to them or add new ones
however. It will still display as an email folder, but once the items in
it are fully
Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server for a user
through IMAP? I tried adding the contacts folder as a subscribed IMAP
folder but that just displayed it as an email folder.
Thanks,
Mike
_
List posting FAQ
There is if you use Ximian Evolution.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMAP Contacts
Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server
for a user through
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMAP and Relaying issues
We'll they do access the Internet and certain apps on the
Intranet. They will send email internally all day no problem
is sending out to the Internet
We are currently looking into a wireless solution that will utilize IMAP4. We
currently have open relaying shut off on our SMTP Server. The devices are not able to
send email via the SMTP server with it shut off. The devices don't have static IP
addresses so I can't add them to the allowed
Turn on relaying, but require authentication. Hopefully, the wireless devices can
authenticate.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMAP and Relaying issues
We are currently
have cables like
spaghetti on the floor and things only
connect when you swear at them, your
network is perfectly normal. - James Gaskin
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMAP
a way to have these units authenticate to the SMTP
server so that could send out to the Internet.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMAP and Relaying issues
Are these devices
Oh, I'm sorry. Did you mention you had Ex5.5?
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 16:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
That only seems to work with Exch2K, not Exch55 (nothing shows up on the
knowledge base
Yes. It's called Exchange 2000. Setting up a POP/IMAP proxy allows for that
sort of thing.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brady, James
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3/IMAP access
So the box needs to be a linux one huh? That reduces the possibilities a
bit. I understood the how, I'm still unclear as to the why.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/20/2002 10:28 PM
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
Well, the notion is to have POP3
That's a novel thought! So, yeah ... I guess I could just add an Exchange
POP3/IMAP only box in the DMZ, requiring everyone to hit that server for
POP3/IMAP requests, but that won't work with multiple exchange mailbox
servers behind the firewall, right?
-Original Message-
From: Great
yeah, it will.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
That's a novel thought! So, yeah ... I guess I could just add an Exchange
POP3/IMAP only box in the DMZ
Umm ... Well, the smtp relays svrs are linux running qmail, so I'd like to
just use them for this also. I guess I could just throw up a POP3/IMAP only
exchange server in the dmz also, but will this redirect pop3/imap requests
to multiple exchange mailbox servers behind the firewall? My
know you can perfwiz a server for pop3 only, so I guess it can
be done. Running Exch55, sp4.
-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
yeah, it will.
-Original
Something like a front-end server setup perhaps?
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 14:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
That's a novel thought! So, yeah ... I guess I could just add an Exchange
POP3/IMAP only
That only seems to work with Exch2K, not Exch55 (nothing shows up on the
knowledge base except Exch2k references).
-Original Message-
From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
Correct.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
That only seems to work with Exch2K, not Exch55 (nothing
shows up on the knowledge base except Exch2k
In that case, E2K with a FE/BE server is probably the best solution.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
Umm ... Well, the smtp relays svrs are linux
It will with an E2K FE server.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
That's a novel thought! So, yeah ... I guess I could just
add an Exchange POP3
Bummer ...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
Correct.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brady, James
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3/IMAP access
Bummer ...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:08 AM
Is there a product out there that allows for POP3 or IMAP access to exchange
server mailboxes from a dedicated (relay) box (in DMZ?) w/o directly hitting
the exchange server?
Thanks,
Jim Brady
Email Administrator
Enterprise Information Services
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
310 423-4653 Direct
With the objective being?
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/20/2002 1:24 PM
Subject: POP3/IMAP access
Is there a product out there that allows for POP3 or IMAP access to
exchange
server mailboxes from a dedicated (relay) box (in DMZ?) w/o directly
Discussions
Subject:RE: POP3/IMAP access
With the objective being?
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/20/2002 1:24 PM
Subject: POP3/IMAP access
Is there a product out there that allows for POP3 or IMAP access to
exchange
server mailboxes from
the error I am getting:
log onto incoming mail server (POP3): unable to logon to incoming mail
server (POP3) verify settings
I do get an e-mail stating the test is sucessful in my mailbox.
_
List posting FAQ:
]]
Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:17 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: pop3/imap access question
Subject: RE: pop3/imap access question
the error I am getting:
log onto incoming mail server (POP3): unable to logon to incoming mail
server (POP3) verify settings
I do get an e
eschange 5.5 sp4 environment. I am trying to get users dial in to their
isp and tried to setup outlook 2000 or outlook express to access their
mailbox. when i setup outlook, is there anything special i need for the
server name (outlook web access works and users know how to get mail thru
the
is there anything special i need for the server name
Well, the server name.
Is it not working?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: pop3/imap access question
, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pop3/imap access question
is there anything special i need for the server name
Well, the server name.
Is it not working?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Thursday, August 01
multipart/signed messages are converted to plain text when retrieved from a
5.5 server via IMAP. If the same message is sent to a sendmail server and
retrieved via IMAP the content type is preserved. Does anyone know of a way
to fix or workaround this so that the header is preserved when
I have found a similar problem to this in the past and that your alias and
nt account name need to be the same.
-Original Message-
From: frank ralston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 June 2002 14:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Imap settings for exchange server
I have
Have you tried the format NTDomain\NTUserAccount\MailboxAlias?
-Original Message-
From: Drummy, Allan
Sent: 01 July 2002 09:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Imap settings for exchange server
I have found a similar problem to this in the past and that your alias and
nt account
]] On Behalf Of Drummy, Allan
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Imap settings for exchange server
I have found a similar problem to this in the past and that your alias
and nt account name need to be the same.
-Original Message-
From: frank ralston
, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Imap settings for exchange server
I am trying to use my outlook express clients (mac and Pc) as IMAP
accounts. I keep getting access denied messages...
Access is denied.
Configuration:
Account: 10.0.0.5
Server: 10.0.0.5
User name: frank
I am trying to use my outlook express clients (mac and Pc) as IMAP
accounts. I keep getting access denied messages...
Access is denied.
Configuration:
Account: 10.0.0.5
Server: 10.0.0.5
User name: frank ralston
Protocol: IMAP
Port: 143
Secure(SSL): 0
Code: 800cccd1
What
Perfect, thanks,
I didn't get that one using header.exe, is there a more comprehensive list somewhere?
Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2002 15:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script
, June 21, 2002 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script
Perfect, thanks,
I didn't get that one using header.exe, is there a more comprehensive
list somewhere? Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
When I run in raw mode you can see my schema as well!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script
Running Admin in raw mode you can look
Put that thing away Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script
When I run in raw mode you can see my schema as well!
-Original
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script
When I run in raw mode you can see my schema as well!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:31
Hi,
First, let me apologize if this message has appeared multiple times. I've
had some problems getting this message accepted by the list server.
I'm having a problem with Exchange 2000 (SP2) adding and changing the
headers of mail messages when a user moves a message from one IMAP mailbox
Hi,
I'm having a problem with Exchange 2000 (SP2) adding and changing the
headers of mail messages when a user moves a message from one IMAP mailbox
to another. Message headers in the IMAP Inbox are correct, but they change
when moved to a different mailbox.
Some examples -- Exchange 2000
Hello,
I am having a vexing problem with my Exchange 2000 Server changing the
headers to messages if I move a message from my main IMAP Inbox to another
IMAP folder in my account.
If I receive a message that lands in my IMAP Inbox, the headers are exactly
as I would expect. If I transfer
I'm trying to configure the IMAP protocol to only accept connections over
SSL. I have obtained an SSL certificate from Verisign and imported it into
the certificate store. I know that it works because I can connect to OWA
over https without errors or warnings.
In the exchange administrator I
XIMS: Troubleshooting POP3/IMAP 13002 Errors w. SSL on Exchange [Q251097]
My experience was getting a certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't permit getting
mail over [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example. You'd need to set DNS up for one dns name only,
which should be ok since you're using different
Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5-W2k and IMAP/SSL
XIMS: Troubleshooting POP3/IMAP 13002 Errors w. SSL on Exchange [Q251097]
My experience was getting a certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED
You can give them OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Using IMAP to connect to Exchange 2000 Server.
I am the administrator of an organization which have three
IMAP or POP access is good if the user is not using different workstations
all the time.
Otherwise:
XGEN: Setting Up Outlook Express to Access an Exchange 2000 Server (Q229801)
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q229801
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original
I am the administrator of an organization which have three Exchange 2000
Server on different locations.
I am configuring Outlook Express for a user to be able to check his
e-mail at home. I try to connect using the IMAP protocol.
The Exchange installation is still default, we did not change
Does anyone know a good way to allow IMAP access while restricting SMTP
relay?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMAP and SMTP relay restrictions
Does anyone know a good way to allow IMAP access while restricting SMTP
relay?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
Go look at the profile for the client [mailboxname]. See
what's funny -
ie. They're hitting the mailbox using MAPI and IMAP within the same
profile, with both trying to deliver to PST... Don't just fix it -
delete it and build it properly from scratch using only the
services you
need
All of a sudden, we are seeing quite a few occurences of download failure
involving IMAP 4 clients (servers are all Ex5.5SP4 on NT4SP6a, running Norton
AV 2.17)
The MSExchange IMAP4 Interface logs an error with ID 13000 and text:
An error (0x7da) occurred while rendering a message
Go look at the profile for the client [mailboxname]. See what's funny -
ie. They're hitting the mailbox using MAPI and IMAP within the same
profile, with both trying to deliver to PST... Don't just fix it -
delete it and build it properly from scratch using only the services you
need
Is it possible to change the default banners in Exchange 5.5? A search
through MS turns up zip, but with Exch. 2000 there are a few solutions,
including How to Modify the POP or IMAP Banner (Q303513).
However, this article does state that it is for 2000 only and contains the
fateful words
: Exchange 5.5 - POP IMAP banners?
Is it possible to change the default banners in Exchange 5.5?
A search through MS turns up zip, but with Exch. 2000 there
are a few solutions, including How to Modify the POP or IMAP
Banner (Q303513).
However, this article does state
I don't think that is accessible in Exchange5.x.
William
-Original Message-
From: Ed Smits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - POP IMAP banners?
Is it possible to change the default banners in Exchange
Your surmise that it is not possible in 2K is correct.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - POP IMAP banners?
Is it possible to change the default banners
Anyone know of where I can get the basics on IMAP and SSL?
-John Q
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Need info for IMAP
, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Need info for IMAP
Anyone know
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy.
I could go
Hmmm...neither are good. IMAP w/SSL w/b much better.
OWA on IIS, ewww. Nimda, Code Red, RDS exploits, I could go on. Even
SSL won't save you much.
My .02
- Original Message -
From: WebMeister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001
OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy.
I could go on.
Yes, please go on.
William
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
Hmmm
Lazy to have had a problem with it, mostly. I assume there are exceptions.
Yes, I'd enjoy your OWA/IIS rant, I'm certain.
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP
Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express
and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access
Exchange 2000 through the firewall?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993).
And is WebMeister your real name? ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http
WebMeister MeisterBurger
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA.
If using
m
Portobello Mushrooms...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA
It's a feature.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMAP
Yep
Subject: IMAP
OK, I setup my Exchange box to do IMAP for my remote users
temporarily until I get some other stuff straight. When I run
Outlook on my home PC, email works fine, but my Contacts look
jacked. They look like emails with nothing in them. Why? Is
there anything I can do about
OK, I setup my Exchange box to do IMAP for my remote users temporarily
until I get some other stuff straight.
When I run Outlook on my home PC, email works fine, but my Contacts look
jacked. They look like emails with nothing in them. Why? Is there
anything I can do about this?
Martin Blackstone
IMAP only groks e-mails. Not contacts. I use LDAP to get to the GAL and I
exported my Contacts folder to a pst and imported them into my Outlook at
home.
Not perfect, but it works
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Carlson
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3/IMAP
Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I
could free some resources.
Thanks,
Mike
Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I
could free some resources.
Thanks,
Mike
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³
§ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\
©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
Yes, you may...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3/IMAP
Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I
could free some resources.
Thanks,
Mike
.+--x
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
