RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-12-01 Thread Etts, Russell
Hi there There are some drawbacks to clusters: 1) They are more difficult to administer 2) Memory fragmentation 3) Extra steps when setting up a front end/ back end configuration 4) Cannot support SRS 5) MS now only recommends Active/ Passive (Some PSS techs have gone as far as saying Active/

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-12-01 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments Hi there There are some drawbacks to clusters: 1) They are more difficult to administer 2) Memory fragmentation 3) Extra

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-26 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
I believe that clusters, whether active-active or active-passive, provide poor business value. I truly believe that clusters actually reduce availability for most users; the posts in this form help confirm that. The reported list of problems are long but the list of those who believe a cluster

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-25 Thread Brian Davies
Jason, We have been running one of our Exchange servers as an E2K3/W2K3 cluster for a few months now and will be going live with all our Exchange servers on clusters in a few months as soon as Sophos release a cluster-aware version of Mailmonitor. Virus protection is all that has stopped us

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-25 Thread Erik Sojka
Word 2003 clusters are a definite improvement. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments Word is that Exchange 2003 clusters better

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
What Exchange version? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments OK, I know the majority of this list is against

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-24 Thread Jason Clishe
PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments What Exchange version? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for anti

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-24 Thread John Strongosky
: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments Well I meant this as more of a general discussion as opposed to tied to a specific version, but for the sake of argument lets says Exchange 2003

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
Word is that Exchange 2003 clusters better than ever. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments Well I meant

Re: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

2003-11-24 Thread Dean Cunningham
First answer the questions of why you would think you would want to cluster.e.g avoiding flood/famine/911/virus/missing meeting embarrasment..etcetcetc That is - what is the business trying to achieve by clustering? Clusters will not protect you from the above (except if you have them in