To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my management team wants
Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Yes
This isnt enough?
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/ex2003intro.asp
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:52 AM
Subject: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Good point , what is the business case for email now?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But
Exchange won't be the expensive bit - AD will.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my
The last I heard, mainstream support for 5.5 ends on Dec 31st 2003, so
that may be a good enough reason. You should have stuck with MSMail -
no need for that expensive Exchange rubbish! :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 June 2003
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my management team wants
to know why I want to spend all of this money for Exchange
2003/Outlook 2003. I
great reply
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
everyone else work out the bugs :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003
:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my management
-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Exchange2003 RC1 has proven to be more stable at Microsoft that
Exchange2000 sp3
From a session at TechEd.
All
, June 09, 2003 10:25 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Yes, that may be true. But my E2K server is very stable itself, and the
benefits of upgrading don't seem much
11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
I agree, especially with the Road Warriors comment.
Unfortunately, we don't have any road warriors for the City,
as we allow OWA to be used, and the connection speed for that
is just
-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
- AVAPI 2.5.
It allows the AV vendors to actually delete messages containing viruses
It's the recovery storage group I like.
And Volume Shadow Copy Service.
Granted I don't need an 8-node cluster
OWA is just fluff.
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:25 AM
Subject: RE: Why
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Exchange2003 RC1 has
All on the same PII, 128 Meg, 9.1 GB IDE, Dell OptiPlex. [1]
[1] What is this MEC you speak of?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Why would I want to go to Exchange
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:09 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Subject: Re: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
It's the recovery storage group I like.
And Volume Shadow Copy
: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Exchange2003 RC1 has proven to be more stable at Microsoft that
Exchange2000 sp3
From a session at TechEd.
All but 1
-
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
All on the same PII, 128 Meg, 9.1 GB IDE, Dell OptiPlex. [1]
[1] What is this MEC you speak of?
- Original
]
--
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
I was told I could choose from Miller Lite or Shiner Bock.
-Original Message
I missed it the first time but a little fairy pointed out to me that the
From: address appears to be malformed.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for looking into this issue.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:27 AM
Subject: RE: Why is this coming up???
I missed it the first time but a little fairy pointed out to me that the
From: address
:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Why is this coming up???
This stupid domain name (IM_DOM1) is going to kill me when I go to
Active
Directory and E2K, isn't it. This is the domain I took over the Net
Admin
job with. I told myself and the Mgr of the dept that it wasn't/isn't a
FQDN
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 4:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Why is this coming up???
This stupid domain name (IM_DOM1) is going to kill me when I go
An understanding of how SMTP works would tell you that the machine
responsible for receiving mail for vtext.com (208.220.171.140) claims to
have a problem with the sender's address. 99.9% of the time this is because
the pointer record for your mail outbound mail server is not resolved by the
Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002
correctly.
Thanks again.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 10:55 AM
Subject: RE: Why is this coming up???
Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp
-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Why is this coming up???
Thanks everyone. I will look into all three areas.
I send to three different web enabled phones and of the three this is
the only one
Do you have a failover for your CTO?
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why move to E2K
I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend
$2.00 as result of the
: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Why go to E2k
My justifications:
Information store can be split a different HDs. thus corruption doesnot
mean probable loss of all of the days' emails or downtime for everyone.
Exchange 2000 with Microsoft
We don't know anything about how your organization uses Exchange, so
there's no way to offer any constructive information about the ROI of
upgrading.
Certainly having an additional $20K to overcome will make the return
harder to achieve.
===
Perhaps the contacts are marked private.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ostrowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would a user on my LAN be unable to edit a contacts folder
someone shared with her when
Do you have a Cisco firewall with the command fixup protocol smtp 25
that's what killed me
-Original Message-
From: Stidley, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Why would an email?
Are you doing any
preference = 10, mail exchanger = ais.smtp.ssfhs.org
Joel Stidley
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would an email?
Or a lack of MX records... Some mail server out there can still
Because the universe is not in synch??
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would an email?
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
I have a user that claims they are not
Have a look at the times in the headers to see where the delay is occurring.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would an email?
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
I know an excellent administrator in Indiana who could solve all of your
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would an email?
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
offended anyone but it was one of those things.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would an email?
I know an excellent administrator in Indiana who could solve all of your
problems
MX record pointing to your mail server possibly. I had this exact problem
only I was trying to send to an organization. Some mail would go through,
some mail would fail. Turned out my ISP DNS servers had two MX records for
the recipient and one of them was wrong. It only happened on this one
Well I have a YAHOO account as well, sometimes a delay happens but as you
mentioned, it works. I hate to ask but you did ensure (since it is only 1
person) that there is no filtering rule on the client, sending e-mail from
this outside user to oblivion?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell
, 18 June, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why would an email?
Well I have a YAHOO account as well, sometimes a delay happens but as you
mentioned, it works. I hate to ask but you did ensure (since it is only 1
person) that there is no filtering rule on the client, sending e
Heck, nothing offends me!
I would have the admin of the external site check his/her queues/DNS/Have
them telnet into your mail server etc...
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
info?
Oops...sorry about thathe said:
Sounds like a consulting engagement to me...
Arch
Sounds like a consulting engagement to me...
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
info?
I'm new to Exchange 2K and I'm
That was not the answer I was hoping forG!
Arch
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
info?
That was not the answer I was hoping forG!
Arch
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Oops...sorry about thathe said:
Sounds like a consulting engagement to me...
Arch
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
information between. Is that accurate?
What are you trying to accomplish...exactly?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why won't two Ex 2k servers connect and replicate directory
info
You will need to learn how to build and run a metadirectory service
such as Microsofts' or Compaq\HP LDSU etc.
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why won't
Thanks for the kind reply.
There is no manually created connector as they are both in the same site.
This should work without an IMS as it is intersite communication.
Yes I can send email from the E2k server to the e5.5 server.
Regards
Leo
What kind of connector do you have for the two servers to talk to
each other? You could setup an internet mail connector between
both servers for communication. Other than that I would check the
addressing between the two. Sounds like what is being delivered is
not what the receiving server is
Sounds like a DNS or DDNS error. Can't happen with DHCP, so . . .
maybe the static address is associated with something else?
maybe the name you like is misspelled?
else
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:42 PM
Why ask why?
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why?
Hi have been sending questions to the list but I have not seen my question
nor the answer. What's going on?
The question with the descriptive title Exchange? It was answered.
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why?
Hi have been sending questions to the list but I have not
Human Electric? Cool, so the Matrix is true! Humans running on
electricity sorry got carried away here. So what was the question
again?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
There's more than one way to skin a cat as well as corrupt a DB. The type of
data corruption might lend itself to determining a possible root cause...
What was the reported error? (e.g. -1018 = Hardware)
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't
Forgot one step...
After Advanced, you have to click the Add-In Manager... button.
I have a similar setup here. Running WinXP/OfficeXP/NAV CE and already had
the Server Scripting option turned off, and I still get that message
occasionally. I believe it has something to do with OutlookXP.
Jim
will want to do a network trace to see where it is failing.
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why Outlook stating retrieving Data from Exchange Server
abcd e?
Forgot
The answer is simple: It is by design.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phillip Yan
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:56 PM
To: Exchange
Virus?
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exchange
servers
This is the output from netstat -a. Why Outlook opens so many
Public folders
- Original Message -
From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exch
ange servers
Virus?
-Original Message-
From
.
-Original Message-
From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 6:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why you don't like disclaimers...
Depends on what it is disclaiming. For example, I have a
disclaimer in
the personal sig I use when
Subject: Re: Why you don't like disclaimers...
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Kuminda Chandimith wrote:
I don't like disclaimers more than any of you do... But I want to show him
why a disclaimer is such a useless idea.
Depends on what it is disclaiming. For example, I have a disclaimer in
the personal
What I would do is first ask if this disclaimer has been viewed by the
company attorneys, and what they think of doing this.
Chances are this manager you speak of has just pulled the disclaimer
from his butt and decided it should be used.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
65 matches
Mail list logo
