Excuse me. Symantec said they weren't aware of any virus that can put dummy
addresses in the To and From fields? I find that hard to believe since the
Klez virus, among others, does this very thing and they are certainly aware
of that virus.
As for your original issue about the spam delete the m
rprised if the spammers find
a way around it.
Bye
Ali
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Kulsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Op
Let me answer my own question. Those spammers were using authentication to
logon to SMTP server of our Exchange. Once we saw what user account was
being used and disabled it, problem went away. (Due to POP3 users, we have
to allow routing thru authentication.)
Jay Kulsh
Please visit http://www.ca
Thanks for all your help!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other
people's sy
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other
people's systems if they are using dnsbl's.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a bud
Bad experiences with dns based blacklists is that we are frequently
refused to send mails because our ISP appears on a number of blacklists.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Renberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 31 oktober 2003 14:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM
Hi,
I'm using a small free Exchange EventSink program called ORFilter.
http://martijnjongen.com/eng/orfilter/default.htm
ORFilter only checks the senders IP-adress against DNS-based blacklists
but that seems to get rid of most of the spam for us and it's
free...
The software can be configure
We love and use the setup described here:
http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html
It can be daunting for someone unfamiliar with nix type os's. But it's free
software and runs great on old hardware. For us, it filters out 1200-1500
spams per day with about a %94 success rate.
-Wayne
> -Origin
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Weathersby, Bryce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2003 16:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
>
>
> We are also using GFI MailEssentials 9. I have so far only activated
> black/whit
Technology
Voice:409-839-2040
Fax: 409-839-2931
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lit.edu
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I doubt the accuracy of these
ocent).
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
>
>
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
>
>
> Here is how w
There are win32 versions of spam assassin as well.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a
My advice would be to find someone who does know Linux (a student, maybe?)
and have them assist you in setting up a Linux/SpamAssassin box. There are
many, many guides available on the Internet to do this sort of thing.
___
If you are a pure Micr
www.antespam.com
$25/month for an entire site. Works great and it is hosted somewhere
else so you don't have to worry about maintaining the hardware. It's
based on SpamAssassin.
-Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Plaht
Try Logsat's Spamfilter at www.logsat.com
You can try it for as long as you want and if you want to register, it is
USD 400.- per server
Freddie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky
Sent: Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2003 17:22
To: E
I had a budget to work with, did all kinds of research until I found out we
had the Enterprise License for SAV products... This meant that I was already
licensed for SAV for SMTP Gateways, which does SPAM, Attachaments, virus
scanning, subject blocking and DNSBL's too. My point being that maybe you
I hear IMGate is really good.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget
Hello
I'll also chime in and suggest spamassassin, I've used both this and Xwall
and they are both excellent products.
I should stress that I haven't used its bayes functionallity, but Xwall is a
very nice product for the money, in fact I still use it as a gateway between
our LAN and our DMZ, but I st
The ones at the top right = ]
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Well, we have
Well, we have had 3 of the products listed and its pretty accurate for
those.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm[MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Those
: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing
though, call em.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Plahtinsky
Sent: Tuesday
::pats MailFrontier box::
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
Here is how well they work in
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing
though, call em.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Plahtinsky
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 11:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about
> Linux so that's out of the question.
"Running Linux" - $32
"Linux Administration Handbook" - $45
Getting an anti-spam solution that works, for free - Priceles
While I use a custom SpamAssassin/Linux setup here, we looked at GFI
MailEssentials. For our setup (~400 mailboxes), it was only $950.
My advice would be to find someone who does know Linux (a student, maybe?)
and have them assist you in setting up a Linux/SpamAssassin box. There are
many, many
http://www.gfi.com/news/en/msec8freeware.htm
GFI has a free virusscanner with some content scanning ability. I
haven't really looked at it (cuz we've been using Trend), but it might
be useful for you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesda
:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
We've been using Spamassassin for several months now. For being free it
really does help out. We haven't updated to the latest version and I'm sure
that has limited its effectiveness. It really isn't h
We've been using Spamassassin for several months now. For being free it
really does help out. We haven't updated to the latest version and I'm sure
that has limited its effectiveness. It really isn't hard to configure and
there is some excellent documentation available on the web.
-Original Me
If you could accept a *n?x solution, I'd recommend taking a look at
Mailscanner, which integrates Spamassassin, Razor, Pyzor, DCC and virus
scanning in a relatively easy to configure setup. Support is excellent via
the Mailscanner mailing list.
You can find it at http://www.mailscanner.info
I'm
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold
Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses
that you are getting spammed with there. Acts as a blackhole, eating up
junk and never gives
!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME
>From exce
I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to block SPAMMERS
a response for those mails which bounce back to them because of a wrong e-mail address
spelling or mail bound for someone who no more exists with my company. As I wrote
we'll manually monitor those mails (as we
GFI ME8
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spam: False Positives
What are you using as your spam filter app?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
What are you using as your spam filter app?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam: False Positives
I'm curious how people on the list are address the is
E55 is a sweet car.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Product
Are you using it with
Is this a Windows version product?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Kikta -
iLand Internet Solutions Corp.
Sent: Saturday, 30 August 2003 1:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Product
IMGATE
http://imgate.meiway.com
MailMarshall
MailSweeper
Trend - spam prevention services
spam assasin
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/09/2003 5:36:40 a.m. >>>
Hello Guys,
I know this probably has been asked before.
But
Any recommendations for some good, in house, Anti Email Spam software for
Exchange 2k?
*
Thanks Ed I'll look into the software package
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spam Software for Exchange 2k
MailMarshall from NetIQ.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Interne
MailMarshall from NetIQ.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Manzano
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Di
're discussing here? Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Product
The cost is per user. We got a huge discount for holding out for a
while. I can tell you
IMGATE
http://imgate.meiway.com/
Its a free anit-spam product. All it will cost you is a computer we ran 80k emails
through it a day on a 900 celeron. Works like a charm and the user group is awsome.
_
List posting FAQ: http:/
Are you using it with E55 or E2K?
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Product
Karen, here you go...
john
We just purchased MailFrontier and I have to say this is the most
2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Product
The cost is per user. We got a huge discount for holding out for a
while. I can tell you it is much much cheaper than some others we
looked at. Its well worth the money if you are wanting to stop SPAM
dead. They claim they can block 95
Message-
From: Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SPAM Product
Whats the cost? Is it per account and how much?
Thanx
_
List posting FAQ: http
Whats the cost? Is it per account and how much?
Thanx
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubsc
Discussions
> Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00)
> ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
>
>
> I was wondering how long it would take you to read that. [1]
>
> [1] I run fast.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
lol.
Thats ok. Ive got a MessageOne TechEd shirt.
Nothing can phase me.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:33 PM
Subject: ** SPAM (6.80/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
FWIW, I disa
I was wondering how long it would take you to read that. [1]
[1] I run fast.
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: ** SPAM (6.00
dy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00)
> ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
>
>
> Move on to what?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "R
Move on to what?
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN
in Ex55
>
TECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
>
>
> Well, I wish they would make up their minds!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PR
Well, I wish they would make up their minds!
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:48 AM
Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
> Actually, they actively recommend a
gt; From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:43 AM
> Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM
> (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM
(6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change
liam Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:49 AM
> Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM
> (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
>
>
> What are
I'll put $100.00 on domain.loc
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** S
100:1?
(we all know how often they happen)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM
(6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
What are
TECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN
in Ex55
> They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
and thus my internal email server would not
be able to be some lonely kids relay
toy or spam generator.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00
From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN
in Ex55
> They won't authenicate through the real
They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
What prevents them from doing that with any real domain name?
- Original Message -
From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
> It looks good on p
saging/DNS Administrator
www.pse.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 9:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
>
> > I recommend qmail, whi
ngs
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 March 2003 13:06
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations...
Discussions
Subject: Re: SPAM blockin software recommendations. [bcc]
It seems the idiots are getting better all the time :-)..
I don't run Postfix myself so I can't really comment on the paper you refer
to.
Take a look at www.postfix.org too, I personally check several sources to
Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. [bcc]
> At 17:47 23-03-2003 +, you wrote:
> > > I recommend qmail, which is not only highly secure - it has
> > > NEVER had a s
r the spamassassin filtering?
regards
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "B. van Ouwerkerk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. [bcc]
&
At 17:47 23-03-2003 +, you wrote:
> I recommend qmail, which is not only highly secure - it has
> NEVER had a security breach - but is also at least 4-5 times
> as fast as Sendmail, and much, much easier to set up and configure.
I know this question always stirs up a bit of a hornets nest among
> I recommend qmail, which is not only highly secure - it has
> NEVER had a security breach - but is also at least 4-5 times
> as fast as Sendmail, and much, much easier to set up and configure.
I know this question always stirs up a bit of a hornets nest amongst *nix
users, but which distro wou
ee!
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
> Seielstad Sent: Monday, March 17, 20
; Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
> Seielstad Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussion
Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
Hell, many Exchange administrators aren't involved with e-mail judging
from the SMTP and DNS questions I see!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Back
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
No kidding. But then again, not all Windows sysadmins are involved with
email
--
lstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization), Windows
sysadmins don't know crap
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
>
> Well they should - mail uses it.
>
> Erik L. Vesneski
> Sr. Systems Specialist
> www.pmigroup.com
> Ph#: 925-685-6161
> mailto:[EMAI
Well they should - mail uses it.
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
>
> The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators
> without completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it
>
alyst
Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
www.pse.com
-Original Message-
From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 3/14/2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommenda
Amen. I'm a regular attendee of that school...
-Original Message-
From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administr
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without REALLY
understanding DNS. Which I do.
That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else. I me
Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
>
> I'd disagree with both your assessment of sendmail. It took
> about an hour to
> configure
On 3/14/03 12:07, "B. van Ouwerkerk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point! But not clever in a business enviroment.
No doubt!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://w
At 10:17 14-03-2003 -0500, you wrote:
I guess we're kind of lucky. Our ISP filters all our mail before
delivering it to our Exchange server AND he doesn't charge us for it
(makes sense if you think about it - he's saving bandwidth as much as we
are). I don't know of all the rules he uses but there
ator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:47 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
>
> Sendmail isn't easy to setup, or administrator. We
department.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
&g
I have issues with anyone blocking my mail for me unless I have access to
that blocked mail. Too many chances for a false positive.
As an example, we forced reverse lookups on our mail server once. That is
until we figured out our most important client could no longer email us. Now
we cant very wel
I guess we're kind of lucky. Our ISP filters all our mail before
delivering it to our Exchange server AND he doesn't charge us for it
(makes sense if you think about it - he's saving bandwidth as much as we
are). I don't know of all the rules he uses but there are two: reverse
DNS lookup and check
We use Mail Marshall too - good product !
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
The best one I use was MailMarshall which was picked up
At 10:46 13-03-2003 -0800, you wrote:
Sendmail isn't easy to setup, or administrator. We ran Sendmail for years
out in the DMZ, so I speak from much experience. If you must run
Sendmail, then I recommend the commercially supported Sendmail Switch,
which will run on Windows 2000, and is availab
much, much easier to
set up and configure.
Jesse Wendel
Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
www.pse.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
eielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
>
> What level of time is involved from the admin side with that?
> 10k messages a
> week, say 5 seconds e
I am having good luck with MailEssentials. Out of the gate it is pretty
strong, but toned down a bit, it does well. Still experimenting tho...
Brian
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
03 5:48 PM
Posted To: Swynk
Conversation: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
The best one I use was MailMarshall which was picked up by NetIQ. The
app was awesome. Very good.
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.co
, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
I think you should check into TrendMicros' IMSS product if you're using
Trend eManager. I think Messaglabs skyscan is one of the best service
out there to catch spam, but it's costly and
I think you should check into TrendMicros' IMSS product if you're using
Trend eManager. I think Messaglabs skyscan is one of the best service
out there to catch spam, but it's costly and it catches too much until
you customize it fit into your environment.
I am implementing IMSS now, but I think
bject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
How hard is it to set up Sendmail ? I had a hard enough time figuring
out Exchange!
Jim H
Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> Out in the dmz we use qmail with a loop to spamassassin, for inbound
> traffic to our internal Exchange organizati
don't
cause us a problem).
regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2003 21:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. [bcc]
Anyone tried Xwall?
http://www.dataenter.at/products
Postfix, baby!
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Helfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>
> How hard is it to set u
Anyone tried Xwall?
http://www.dataenter.at/products/xwall.htm
Comments please.
Thanks,
Kevin
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
-
>> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 2:21 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
>>
>>
>> There are lists of them at http://www.slipstick.com and
>> http://w
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
