Sorry.. I was being flippant re: Hotmail.. more to highlight a reluctance to use POP3
(through a firewall) than any desire to use Hotmail... The comment about OWA was
regards having to wrap a session with SSL to get around the basic authentication
requirement/clear text password limitation of
All of that aside, it is a variable in the constant.inc file called
iDefaultNumRows.
Tris
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it is.
I'm just trying to save the guy some money!
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 00:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC
Tony,
Great news. Have a good day!
PBB.
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 01:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)
Hi Paul,
Thanks very much for the advice. I did what
Are your users in the DMZ as well ?
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 March 2002 02:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ
So what the heck is on the internal LAN? You've moved every piece of
sensitive
when I do local resolving it gives me these:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D
Prolongation
Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL
I also get these:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: good morning
Sent: 20-Mar-02 9:58 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
Tiberiu Baraboi (E-mail) on 20-Mar-02 9:58 AM
Your mail system could not find
have you checked with who hosts your DNS servers?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 10:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) II
I also get
That worked.
Cheers Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Harford
Sent: 19 March 2002 15:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief
Are you able to install Exchange System Manager by itself? If so,
I was all for it, the first time you asked.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:33
How do you feel about it now?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Groups and such
I was all for it, the first time you asked.
First guess, Ben, is that they are set to deny relaying, but I would guess
incorrrectly.
IIRC, that's RFC compliant behavior for denying relaying - as long as it
tanks before giving a valid response to the 354 section.
Roger
--
Roger D.
I'm not so sure.
I am sure that us experienced Exchange admins feel very strongly about
someone posting the same question 10 times in 1 hour.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original
He was nesting questions!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Groups and such
I'm not so sure.
I am sure that us experienced Exchange admins feel very strongly about
someone
Lori, did this problem lead to a policy change at that company? What became
of the incident? I am trying to avoid this exact scenario and would
appreciate any advice.
Thanks,
Steve Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
You will have nothing but problems.
You have spent a lot of money on a fantastic email system. Why hobble it
like this? Use SMTP, and let it do its job.
-Original Message-
From: kedar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3
Stop wasting your time.
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
-Original Message-
From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Netbackup Datacentre v3.41
Dear all,
Netbackup Datacenter Master Server runs on Windows 2000
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
For some unknown reasons meeting requests that contain attachments no longer
work if they contain an attachament. They worked fine in the past and now if
there is an attachment added to the meeting request we get the following
error:
The operation failed. Unable to
How did you find this place?
Where did you learn how to talk?
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
For
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
For some unknown reasons meeting requests that contain attachments no
longer
work if they contain an attachament. They worked fine in the past and now
if
there is an attachment added to the meeting request we get the following
error:
The operation failed. Unable
Thanks for your enlightened response.
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 09:37
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
How did you find this place?
Anyone have experience with:
XWEB: Suddenly and Permanently Unable to Reach Inbox Using Outlook Web
Access (Q248081)
I can get him logged in if he enters first name last name in the box instead
of his alias, but then he is screwed using our extranet as the NT Domain
login passes the username
What the h--- kind of a response is that? Go get some coffee or something.
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an
Hmmm the meeting room that is the resource has a full mailbox from all
the attachments sent to it in the past and it's hit your mailbox limit? Just
a WAG...
- Original Message -
From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002
I checked that and it happens for all the meeting rooms not just one of
them. They are all under the limit.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 09:44
Subject: Re: Meeting requests
?
Got any servers to crash?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 14:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
He can't. He's on a sinking ship.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A.
Christensen
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
What the
BLB's?
I fart in your general direction.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Netbackup Datacentre v3.41
Dear all,
It's the preferred way to manage Very Large Lists.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Groups and such
Yes nesting DL's
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori
All it led to was another buyout (Citi). So far none of them have gained
access to my server. The admin in question fled for the hills like a sissy
when Citi bought us all out because they (Dallas) would no longer be the Big
Kahuna.
Ultimately I removed all his forms from the server but we
WTF is that supposed to mean?
I understood it just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
How did you find this
Is there a limitation on the size of message that the resource will accept?
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
I checked that
You forget, Tener speaks his own language. None of us are privvy to it.
And we're grateful.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an
Read 'The Billy Goats Gruff' and you will have some idea about it.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 15:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do
It is set much higher than 45KB which is the size of the attachment I tested
with...
I think I am going to have to call Microsoft directly.
- Original Message -
From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:09
Subject:
Just for the heck of it, remove all limits from one of them and try it.
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
It is set much
Perhaps you should try the exchangecode script on one resource and see if it
recurs? It's quick, easy, and best of all it's free.
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do
no luck.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:15
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
Just for the heck of it, remove all limits from one of them
Here all users have Reviewer rights. Only myself and one more person have
higher rights to the Org Forms folder. If someone wants to develop their
own form, I tell them to do it at their own risk on their own PC. When they
feel it's ready, they send it to our group as an .oft file for
You could set them up to mirror you company's org chart.
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
Cell: 817-999-7703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Just for the heck of it, remove Tener and try it.
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
no luck.
- Original Message -
From past posts I have seen from Mr. Tener I have taken note that he always
drills people on their spelling and grammar usage. Must be from his heydays
as a spelling bee queen.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent:
The performance slider is at fewer than 100,000 hits per day.
But nothing has changed performance tuning -wise. OWA ran fine for more than
a year until SP2
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4.
I have a user getting the following errors. I do not know where to begin to
look.
This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange server.
PLEASE HELP.
Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com
No I was quoting from the yahoo commercial you guys never say that one with
the dolphin and the fat guy on the deserted island.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests
What a Dick! [1]
[1] Just quoting Jeff Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgemont High
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
You're contradicting yourself, and I quote:
It is necessary for our users have access to this information from where
ever they may be.
We really don't want this info scattered about our clients networks.
Even if you accomplish what you want, NOTHING is stopping your users from
printing the
Where's the puctuation? Is that English?
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
No I was quoting from the
Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall.
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Good morning,
Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4.
I have a user
Make a new resource as the old. Does it fail also? Maybe that resource got
trashed or something.
- Original Message -
From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they
Phil try reinstalling SP4 I thinks SP3 had a fix for this/
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
No I was quoting from the yahoo commercial you
Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can.
I would greatly appreciate it.
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL
Does anyone have experience with the C2C Compression Utility for Exchange? Are there
any other compression utilites that are better?
Louanne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Have you set the client read timeout to a high figure?
Andrew Toon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Netbackup Datacentre v3.41
Stop wasting your time.
I didn't want him to spend money unnecessarily either. I just wanted him
to have all the information I had.
Anyway, it'll probably be something silly like having auto-negotiation
enabled on the switch. :)
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Here's another related question...anyone know of way to identify forms that
are in public folders but not registered in the Eforms Library without
looking at each and every public folder one by one. Pfinfo does not show
forms
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL
Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow.
Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems.
Yes we sit behind a firewall.. Please share any information you can.
I would greatly appreciate it.
Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno
What do you want to compress or for that matter why?
Does anyone have experience with the C2C Compression Utility for Exchange?
Are there any other compression utilites that are better?
Louanne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List
Try looking at Q189654. Does someone else have a first or last name
that conflicts with his alias. Name resolution works a little differently
in OWA. Entering SMTP address should work but I don't know if this helps
your situation.
Ray Desjardins MCSE NT4.0/Win2k
Manager of Systems
Hello,
I've some trouble here :(
NT4, EX5.5 sp4, 3 servers in site, one of them with a IMS configured to
forward everything to another host (sendmail box).
The IMS just started to die without reason, no log anywhere. When restarted
it does work for some seconds to die again even before the
auto-neg - work of the devil!!
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 16:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC
I didn't want him to spend money unnecessarily either. I just wanted him to
have all the
It really is a client and a server product.
The server product (which is better run on its own server) can be configured
to select attachments with a bunch of rules, and replace them with a
compressed (zip) version, while preserving SIS.
The client side will decompress received attachments
We use it. It works well. I think most of our users still use our older
DataBeam servers, as the URLs for them are more widely known.
What we are really trying to figure out is how to get to a single MCU
system: one that does both the virtual meeting function for NetMeeting and
the voice
I am on the phone with PSS right now.
NOT MUCH HELP! They are recreating the steps I already took, but I
understand that.
Before I called PSS, I had extensively worked w/ the Network Engineer on the
network layout/connections.
Just to be safe we connected the E2K box both DC's and 1 client, to
Hi,
I have a mailbox on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 WinNT 4.0 SP6a server that is being
stubborn. It has a rule in it to redirect messages to certain people. I have
given owner permissions to 3 people at the mailbox level and at the inbox
level. They are running Outlook 2000. If they click file, open,
What kind of attachment? What is the version number in OLK? Does this happen
only to already existing meetings or New meeting too?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting
Wishing you luck John.
PBB
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 18:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC
I am on the phone with PSS right now.
NOT MUCH HELP! They are recreating the steps I already took, but I
Dear Group,
Can you change the standard message exchange sends out? E.g.
when can not find e-mail address or when user mail box is full?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended
Do you see any problem with me running these now and then running the actual
setup in a few months? I want to test the PF replication and some other
stuff as well. Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ:
No problem at all.. Just remember that you ran them so you dont do it
again.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent:
There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no
mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR's (was content)
when I do
Chim-Chimie-ry Chim-Chimie-ry Chim-Chim-Churoo
No mx, no mx, no mx for you.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
There ain't no mx records for
From my experience, if Outlook forms are put together by a responsible
person with basic knowledge of vbscripting, the forms can simplify a lot
of tasks and be used in variety of productive ways.
I do not believe they have a high impact on processing other than being
usually larger than regular
Anyone know what happens to emails that are being sent to an account that is
in a dismounted store?
I tested this out, but the emails just vanished.
I created a test store, and moved a test mailbox to it. I then sent test
emails which delivered fine. I then dismounted the store, and sent
Actually instead of hiding, I prefer to just move them to a public folder
called Form Archives that only I have access to. I also have another
public folder called Form Backups. I copy the existing form to there
before replacing the production form with an upgraded version. So if
something
FAQ - follow the link at the bottom!
-Original Message-
From: Rifat Kiamil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing messages
Dear Group,
Can you change the standard message exchange sends out? E.g.
when can
Are you sure you don't have an error in the application log referencing a
BAD message? The error appears just like that - with BAD in caps.
-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HELP
When doing a restore (online) ex.5.5 sp4, does the restore put the restore
in process entry in the regristy for
DS and IS? Are we suspose to delete those entries and then restort the
services
Ron
_
List posting FAQ:
Not that I'm aware of, but with a quote for $120k I would think it should.
Was just pointed to Hyena (systemtools.com), that is looking really nice.
Combines User, Server, Exchange managers (and some other stuff I haven't
check out yet) into a single Explorer type shell. Suppose to also have a
What browser and OS is he using to connect?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 14:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Getting OWA INBOX Problem
Anyone have experience
Who are these requests being sent to? They dont have any delegates with a
limit on do they?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 15:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting
Try it with no limit set first of all.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 15:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?
This was discussed yesterday. The subject line was near identical as well.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 16:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from
You should not have to touch the registry to complete a restore.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: Wednesday,
We are getting ready to hit our head on the 16Gb limit of our Exchange
Server (5.5, SP4). How difficult is it to upgrade to the Enterprise
version? Also, how strongly should we consider taking this opportunity to
upgrade to 2000 Enterprise directly from 5.5 Standard? (We're not currently
Upgrading to 5.5 Enterprise is as simple as installing Enterprise over
the current implementation. I would never consider this an opportunity
to move to E2K, which requires much careful thought, planning, and
testing.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Russell Hopkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have to have a two way connnection agreement from 5.5 to AD to run
Exch2k?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
No problem at all.. Just
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just like a MAPI
session, you should be able
What would the fun be in that.. I was trying to get the guy all worried
= ]
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent:
Nope... You can build that at any time.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:36 PM
To:
You should also go through the FAQ. You can get to them by following the
link at the bottom of the message.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original
Have you granted user permission to this mailbox (from Exchange admin) for
all the users who will be logging in?
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox
interesting. If you try viewing ths page with Opera Microsof says
There was a problem rendering the requested content. Please retry your
request.
URL: http://support.microsoft.com/support/misc/unsupported.asp
Too many automatic redirections attempted.
But if you set Opera to report as IE
Umm ...there's away to sync via OWA to say another machine? at all?
I thought OWA was stricktly a browser thing'y
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST
Would you mind explaining this a bit further? I don't have a PIX for our
firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this.
Thanks in advance for any information.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002
Hi Everyone,
I'm having an odd thing happen. Posts to one of our public folders will
show up twice. This does not happen consistently. There may be one or
half a dozen duplicates on one day then no duplicates for several days.
This doesn't look like any sort of user error. I haven't found
If anyone is interested, I was sent this offline and it is absolutely
perfect for what I am doing...
We use Script Director from MicroEye http://www.microeye.com/ . Highly
recommended.
-
Ken Hatley, MCSE
Messaging Consolidation
972.997.9261
page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
Ok now I'm feeling REALLY stupid... User permission from exchange admin... I
know where to change it from within Outlook, but where do you change it in
Exchange Administor?
Thanks,
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:00
At one time I had a URL that would take me to a location where I could
download white papers... anyone know what if this is still available and
what the link is... I've looked all over www.microsoft.com/exchange and
TechNet... I found the HTML version of the whitepaper (tried to just
copy it to
It's a no-brainer to upgrade to Enterprise. Seriously. Just put the CD in
and answer the questions appropriately. Other then the requisite downtime
it's not even a blip on operations.
- Original Message -
From: Russell Hopkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
