Bill,
In the UK you now cannot speak directly with Trend Tech support anymore, you
have to go through a distributor :-(
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December
Happy Holiday to everyone!
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!
From Manila Philippines
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
And a happy new year too!
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 December 2002 10:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Happy Holiday!
Happy Holiday to everyone!
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!
From Manila Philippines
Have a stunning Saturnalia!
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 December 2002 10:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Happy Holiday!
And a happy new year too!
-Original Message-
From:
Everybody Wang Chung tonight!
- Original Message -
From: Chris Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:22 AM
Subject: RE: Happy Holiday!
Have a stunning Saturnalia!
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
I am desperately trying to get rid of EventID 8213 System Attendant
Service failed to create session for virtual machine. KB 296151 is of no
use since there is no \SERVICES\MSExchangeFBPublish key in the registry on
my server.
So I decided to try a brute force approach (on a lab server of
Trend is still the most responsive full range AV company I've dealt with.
And, in 2 years of running both Symantec and Trend together, I've not come
across anything that Trend didn't catch first. Maybe I'm just lucky then.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
And a hoopy Human Rights Day!!1!!
(sorry, 10 days late on that one. I was undecorating my Human Rights Day
boxwood.)
--
be - MOS
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Happy
Before they moved to the US they were known in the UK as Huang Chung, but
the record company made them change to make the pronunciation obvious to
those outside whatever Chinatown you are closest to.
On the edge of oblivion
All the world is Babylon!
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
routers and firewalls
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unable to reply or forward to email in OWA, Exchange 2000
Exchange 2000 in a native mode child domain.
OWA server setup
Oh my!
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to reply or forward to email in OWA, Exchange 2000
routers and firewalls
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson
thanks for the reply's
Martin Yes I just updated the scan engine with the latest patch.
Details: I had found that a test IIS server had been hacked...a person drop
this IRC Trojan on it...
NAI missed it totally...since Ive been testing Symantec and Trend. I loaded
up the symantec..and it
Setup - MS Exchange 5.5 SP4 to MS Exchange 2000 SP3 migration
Currently we have migrated two out of five sites and for the most part
everything is working fine. However, we do have one issue that is giving me
a headache. We have roughly a dozen DG's (setup as Universal Distribution
Groups)
Anyway, most AV products have flaws and holes in theor detection process.
We use Trend's products on Exchange, ISA Desktop side and F-secure on
Servers mail relay side.
We think 2 products will cover holes flaws of each other.
Rgds
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill
true i agree...if my budget was much more flexable...
Id do Antigen on my exchange server and then something else for the other
stuff
-Original Message-
From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: could use
TEA? FECK!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jackson,
Siobhan (ATG)
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter
Now come on Father, what would you say to a nice cup of tea?
OK, hold on. What Trend product are you using? Since you are posting to an
Exch group, the assumption here is ScanMail, but it sounds like you are
messing with OfficeScan or Server protect.
What is it? Also, do you have it configured to scan ALL files, or just
certain ones? The default I believe
Hurry, while the moon is yet gibbous!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Happy Holiday!
Everybody Wang Chung tonight!
- Original Message
true I have not loaded up the exch piece yet...
I was trolling more for opinions/experiences on/with trends support..etc..
Im looking to do their whole Neatsuite (exch, desktop, server,
smtp-interscan)
MY Config. Office on desktop, all viruses, latest scan engine and
pattern..412..
I tried scan
Hello Tom and Everyone else,
I forgot to ask one more question in my previous post. After I create the
new GAL with the new attributes, how can I go about replacing the Default
One (that they don't allow you to delete) with the one I just created - so
on the Outlook Clients, when they click the
I was wondering what everyone used to monitor the disk utilization on your Exchange
Servers.
Thank you,
Alex
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Right-click your new GAL, give permissions.
Right-click the original GAL, take away permissions.
Make sure you leave permissions for yourself any other admins. Lots
of people lose access to the GAL and then ask I denied everyone perms
to my GAL, how do I do that? And then people tease you and
By the way, getting an Out of Office reply that says, Out of Office: FECK!
is priceless. I encourage everyone who hates OOF messages to post to this
thread. You'll love the ones you get here.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great
Go awn, go awn, go awn.
You will, you will, you will.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 December 2002 14:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FECK!
TEA? FECK!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I just check the backup logs every now and again. Knowing how long it takes
to backup a database of a certain size, I can guess at how the databases are
growing by seeing how much longer it takes to do a backup.
Most places will bounce the servers once a month. You can check file sizes
then, as
DINNNK!
(Current watching: Flight into Terror... it's a joke phone!)
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hanna, Keith
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FECK!
Go awn, go awn, go
:)
My favourite is 'Speed III'
:)
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 December 2002 16:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FECK!
DINNNK!
(Current watching: Flight into Terror... it's a joke phone!)
(:=
-Original
me eyeballs.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Exchange Disk Utilization utilities
I was wondering what everyone used to monitor the disk utilization on your
Exchange
Heh. Say, that reminds me, I need to secure a large quantity of rabbits...
know where I could find some?
Meanwhile, everyone outside of Ireland is likely scratching his or her
head(s). To them, I say: FECK!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
I got one today informing me that someone was out of the office between 22nd
23rd of August!
As a side note, does anyone know how to identify an OOF programatically
using CDO other than looking at the message subject - I have a VB program
that monitors my inbox for new messages, then reads the
Go down to the pub and ask for Warren
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 December 2002 16:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FECK!
Heh. Say, that reminds me, I need to secure a large
What, for the split second between the 22nd and 23rd that is neither
day?
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December
There's a guy named Hefner that raises them(bunnies that is...). I would post the link
but it would be bounced by most filters.
rp
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FECK!
Thanks Tom,
I actually came to that conclusion in the interim, but with no success. Now
if would be so kind, can you give me a brief overview of the permissions
process, and what needs to be there at a bare minimum, in order for a
regular authenticated user to see the Global Address List? This
There are only 2 files.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Disk Utilization utilities
me eyeballs.
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I got this one program that presents a graphic representation of free drive
space. At 50% or more, it shows an attractive lady in a state of partial
undress. As the drive free space decreases, the picture changes. Same
attractive lady, but with more clothing.
When she's got two parkas, mittens, a
Where can we get this hehe
Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.profit-lab.com
http://ncontrol.info
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi,
We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 750 users with Outlook 2000. We have 30
branches, all of which have their own domain controllers. We have about 35 domain
controllers total.
I'm having a problem when I change users' mailbox size limit. After I change it, it
takes up to an hour
I apologize I meant activity utilization like read write utilization.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20,
Abwesenheitsnotiz: FECK! was another OOF I got which I found quite
enjoyable.
Anyway, the problem is that those messages are actual mail messages, not
some silly little delivery or read receipts. Therefore, they're
indistinguishable from other messages if one causally glances at their
headers.
I know one guy who's trained reptiles to keep an eye on his servers.
Don't tell me you've never heard of monitor lizards...
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange
Sounds delicious...
Maybe we need to post Haikus to keep on topic...
Chill wind, relatives
Endless O. O. O. replies
I hate holidays
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange
Oh...
Performance Monitor
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Disk Utilization utilities
I apologize I meant activity utilization like read write utilization.
Thank
Sunken R'yleh consulting. They're in the local yellow pages.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL
I use a distributed network of hundreds of hypersensitive sensors which
alert me of even the most picayune performance issues with my systems,
filtered through a small set of filters, using fuzzy logic and artificial
intelligence programming, resulting in only real issues being brought to my
Move the server further north. It will have less angular velocity the
further away from the equator it is. Less angular velocity means time will
pass more quickly in that new location. Should cut down the time from an
hour to 59.999 minutes or so.
Directory
I got a great app for that, as well, but with a much less appealing GUI.
Performance Monitor. Read all about it!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
How much are you willing to pay?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Disk Utilization utilities
Where can we get this hehe
The GUI on my monitoring application cycles through 5 or 6 different looks.
Some are significantly more attractive than others, but they all convey the
message pretty well.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly
That would really add up over 10,000 years. Should give him time for
Titanium to be released.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 December 2002 17:03
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change
Subject:
I am running into the issue Invalid Window Handle ID no: 80040102 Exchange
System Manager.
So I found the technet 270905 but I must be dumb as a rock because I can not
find the public folder using explorer. Specifically it is called Corporate
Calendar. Or is there an alternative fix?
Jim
set permissions
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help with creating a GAL
Hello Tom and Everyone else,
I forgot to ask one more question in my previous post. After I
Oh I know to use perfmon but which one under physical disk should I use.
I used read/write time and it goes to like 2000. I am trying to find
out something that will show a real percentage between 0 and 100 in 0-20
second intervals. I am willing to look at something third party but
obviously it
What do you mean, percentages? You mean, What percent of the time is my
system accessing the disk?
If it's handling an SMTP queue, then probably a lot of the time. If it's
hosting a few web pages and has a ton of RAM, probably not all that
frequently. Why is disk utilization over time important?
Hi all,
I have a problem sending email using CDONTS. Digging around on TechNet
didn't help and Google indicated that this is a common problem but I found
no solutions.
Configuration is
NT 4.0 SP6a
IIS 4.0
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are trying to send email via CDONTS on the same server as Exchange.
The disks get very busy and keep up with the load that our users put on
the box. RAM is good Processor is good but the lights on the drives
sometimes don't even blink the disks are so busy. I need to put that
percentage of utilization in to a report to take to Management to get
better equipment.
Look at the Disk Queue Length counters on the PhysicalDisk object. Values
for these should be zero or very low on a sustained basis. Higher numbers
indicate that the disk subsystem can't keep up with the I/O requests.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok well its generally around 10 but it has spiked to 100. But that
doesn't last more than a second. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Look at the Disk Queue Length counters on
It is my impression that the SiteFolderServer is supposed to be a server (the first
server) in an Administrative Group. (please correct me if I am wrong)
So if I install a new server into a new administrative group, the SiteFolderServer
should be set up to reflect the name that new server,
Ok, now my patience is wearing thin with replication if that is the problem. I changed
a size limit on a mailbox at 8:12 am. It is now 11:10 am and the change has not taken
effect. What's going on!?!?!?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Outlook will be slow for a variety of reasons. Disk usage on the server is
frequently NOT the issue, unless things on the server are freakishly bad.
Consider processor queue lengths. You can have lovely-looking processor
utilization percentages, but Exchange can spawn some threads that hog the
10 means that at that time, there are 10 operations pending disk
availability. The goal is 2.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From:
Do you mean the change is not evident at all domain controllers, or that the
person still has too much email in his box?
If the latter, the owner has to clear it out manually. If the former, then
you're looking at event logs and network traces to get more information on
the dir-rep issue.
(:=
We hired consultants and I have to now rebuild every box they built. I
am not going into details on that. As far as processor queue length, I
don't see the option. I see DPC's queued. Is that what you mean?
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To find the folder in Explorer, go to the M: drive of the Exchange
server. Under the M: drive you will find your organization domain name
like COMPANY.COM. Under that you will see a folder called PUBLIC
FOLDERS. Underneath that will be your public folder tree. Let me know if
this helps.
I am
It's under System... Processor Queue Lengths. One for each processor.
And as far as consultants go, you just have to make sure you hire the
*right* ones. You didn't hire me or any of my associates, for instance...
But that's another topic and there's no need to get into that on the list.
(:=
I was wondering if anyone else is having issues sending and receiving
emails with China (.cn) addresses. We have had several addresses over
the last 4-6 months that we cannot send/receive email with. I watch it
leave my server with no issues, we receive no errors, but the recipient
never
I would probably be looking for a ORB or RBL that is likely involved some where
along the way.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail in to China
I was wondering if anyone
We do extensive business in China and mail gets lost all the time. It just
never gets there. Keep in mind that the Chinese gov't blocks lots of stuff.
I gave up trying to find a pattern. Of course I also then get blamed for
there being something wrong on my end.
Jim
-Original Message-
I have been checking several of them and so far have not found them
listed.
-Ryan
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott
Personally I block anything with a .cn on it. Since I don't know anyone
ther it matters not to me, and typically anything I do get is just more spam
to kill.
--
From: Akerlund, Scott
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 13:49
To:
Glad to hear that I am not the only one that has been coming to that
conclusion. After checking the RBLS that is what I started to think was
to blame, but as you said it is always a configuration problem on our
end. :)
-Ryan
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated
A few weeks ago I created some test appt.s in the corporate calendar for next
week. I can not delete them. They show as read-only. I made myself owner
of the folder and even tried to delete them as admin in outlook. How can I
get rid of these?
Jim Liddil
Just don't do anything on that M: Drive other than READ, OK? Nothing else,
got that?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Q270905
To find the
Well we just hit 10. Hehe.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's under System... Processor Queue Lengths. One for each processor.
And as far as consultants go, you just have to
Please confirm or deny...
Your Windows 2000 and Active Directory are in native mode, correct? I know
that you say that you are using Universal Distribution Groups, which
indicates native mode, but I need to confirm.
Setup - MS Exchange 5.5 SP4 to MS Exchange 2000 SP3 migration
Currently we
Export the calendar to a CSV, edit the CSV to eliminate the offending
appointments, import the calendar to a new corporate calendar, verify the
events are gone, delete the old calendar, rename the new one to match up
with the name of the old one.
That, or log on with the system administrator
I keep getting spammed about bicycles from an address that's over quota in
China. Mail flow to China is just fine, dammit.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan Fennema
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I logged on to the admin account on exchange via outlook and they still show
as read only.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting Calendar Event
Export the
On processor queue lengths? What's the average over a period of a few
minutes? Sometimes it'll spike, but it's when the average stays above 2 for
a long time that you have the Bad ThingsT happen to your server.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Mixed mode domains can have universal distribution groups. Mixed mode
domains can't have universal SECURITY groups.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem sending mail to
And you said that you've made yourself the Owner of this calendar
correct? Cause that should let you do anything on that calendar.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Hitting 10 is looking pretty rare. The average is .5
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's under System... Processor Queue Lengths. One for each processor.
And as far as
That's correct. I double checked everything. And when I check the
permissions on the .eml file it shows me as owner.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting Calendar Event
Use the gw client from the 4.5 backoffice kit.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting Calendar Event
That's correct. I double checked everything. And when I check the
The change is evident on the domain controllers, but the person still can't send mail
because he gets the error that his mailbox is too full. If you look at the size of his
mailbox, it is 61 meg. If you look at the limits on his user, they are set to 100 meg.
Aaron
-Original Message-
Hey, this is america, buddy. We use feet and inches here :P
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Disk Utilization utilities
The disks get very busy and keep up
Except drug dealers, they tend to be fluent in metric.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Disk Utilization utilities
Hey, this is america, buddy. We use feet and
Well, try getting 60MB of that mailbox cleared out, test if he can
send/recieve, then move the stuff back in and see what happens.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange
OK, probably not an issue. Good. Now you only have 20 other things to check.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Disk Utilization
OK, then. CSV and delete time!
Be sure to have a full, validated backup of your databases before
proceeding.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Tried it. It works once you move the stuff out and doesn't when you move it back in.
It's like his mailbox is stuck at his old limit.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
OK. Good info...
Is the Exchange server also a DC? If not, what is the closest one? Run
LDP.exe and see what it says is that guy's mailbox limit.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:41 PM
ot: lol!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Happy Holiday!
Everybody Wang Chung tonight!
- Original Message -
From: Chris Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
We are not running in Native Mode - we still have 3 sites to migrate. My
understanding is that you can create Universal Distribution Groups in Mixed
mode, but not Universal Security Groups until you go to Native mode.
--
From: Greg Deckler
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears to work. But once I go back in the stuff is still there.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting Calendar Event
Use the gw client from the 4.5
That is correct.
- Original Message -
From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: Problem sending mail to migrated DG.
We are not running in Native Mode - we still have 3 sites to migrate. My
makes note: never work at American Tower
If it isn't in writing, I don't go there. If there's a lawsuit, I have that
permission in writing.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
A very wise man once said you can't hurry Exchange.
Why, I think it was you!
:)
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change
Move the server further
I had a similar problem sending mail to an ISP just recently, similar in the
sense that the email was sent but never received and no error message on my
end. I was able to find the problem by using a packet scanning/capture
utility called Ethereal (http://www.ethereal.com/). This allowed me to
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
