Hi,
You should not install a modem to dial in, use PTPP. Go to network
neighborhood properties and install PTPP tunneling on the server. This is
much fast than a modem. Another thing you will have to install on the
client is the VPN adapter which is also found under network
I've had the same problem ever since I installed Office XP (running on W2k
Prof.). I have to encrypt/decrypt using the clipboard. *Very* annoying.
Haven't found a solution yet. I'm using version 7.0.3.
Bob Germain
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
By product design. It doesn't work for PF contacts w/o the use of a 3rd
party tool. Check www.slipstick.com for mention of such a tool.
-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/16/2001 11:00 PM
Subject: 'Contacts' - Searching for activities
Hi gang,
This works okay for me
Is the activity folder a journal folder? If not, try creating a journal
public folder and see if you can specify it as the activity folder.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:01 AM
I see...
D
If you had to identify, in one word, the reason why the human race has not
achieved, and never will achieve, its full potential, that word would be
meetings. -- Dave Barry
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:49
Don't forget to be blocking those VBS attachments friends!
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:28 AM
To: Windows Security Issues
Subject: Fw: Sophos Anti-Virus IDE alert: VBS/Grate-B
Anyone see this yet ?
-
All these issues just makes me think there is a security policy in XP that
is causing trouble. I had to disable a security policy just to get my
system onto the domain.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Germain, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:20 AM
To:
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4
I have a user that is asking the following and I haven't a clue where to
begin:
Original Work history couldn't find how to change the default, although I
know that my default for this is busy.
Debbie called to inquire when scheduling an all day
Take a look at Q179346 article. I had same problem a while back and it
was fixed after following this article.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sabre A
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 3:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Anyone know how to fix this. I am running Exchange Server 5.5 sp4 on NT 4.0
sp 6.a. If you go to the sent items folder in OWA, the default view shows
who the message is from. It would make more sense to show who the message
was sent to. I could use the view control at the top and select sent
The default for my all day events has always been free.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4
Scenario:
I would like to setup a Distribution List that contains about 500-1000
people. These people would not Exchange email accounts, but just regular
SMTP accounts. I figured I could just create 500 custom recipient email
accounts and add all those accounts to a DL, which works, but, then
Add them to the DL, then Hide them. Works great.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Custom recipients in a DL?
Scenario:
I would like to setup a Distribution List that contains about
Add them to the DL first, then hide them!!
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 December 2001 16:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Custom recipients in a DL?
Scenario:
I would like to setup a Distribution List that contains about 500-1000
people.
chicken and the egg scenario
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 December 2001 16:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Custom recipients in a DL?
How about adding them to the DL first then hiding them?
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom recipients in a DL?
chicken and the egg scenario
Regards
Mr Louis
Hello,
Right now we have SSL on our Outlook Web Access Server with a CA that I made
in Windows 2000. There is one issue with it; it is not compatible with the
latest version of IE for the MAC. Which SSL's do you all use for your
Outlook Web Access Servers??? I know Verisign makes them. Could
Verisign, $175.
-Original Message-
From: Grewal, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SSL and Outlook Web Access
Hello,
Right now we have SSL on our Outlook Web Access Server with a CA that I
made
in Windows 2000.
How did you validate this problem. Is there a knowledge base article
somewhere that describes this issue. Just wondering if this is a known
issue or not?
-Original Message-
From: Grewal, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cheers Aaron. I created a journal folder and the 'activity' search worked.
However, I had to create a shortcut for each email item in the email folder
that I had created.
I obviously don't want to do this each time, so can I email directly to the
journal or get a copy of the email in there
I've been trying to hide for a few weeks but they always find me...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Custom recipients in a DL?
First add to the DL, then Hide.
-
It would help if you'd stop running around in just the thong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom recipients in a DL?
I've been trying to hide for a few weeks but they
It does raise interesting questions...
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom recipients in a DL?
It would help if you'd stop running around in just the thong.
-Original
the whole chicken and the egg question...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom recipients in a DL?
It does raise interesting questions...
-Original Message-
From:
Hi, I have a small domain consisting of One Server as Follows:
Windows 2000 with SP2
Exchange 2000 with SP2
Domain Controller
Norton Anti virus for 2k
Norton Anti virus for Exchange 2k
Connected to 256k Lease line to internet and around 30 clients on the LAN.
The server has been fully working
Is there any possibility someone is using you as a mail relay. I ask this
cause you say it gets better after turning off the SMTP service. And if
someone tried to pump some spam to a few hundred thousand people, that would
for sure slow everything down.
-Original Message-
From: roger
Greetings All
I have a user that is receiving spam to an address that does not appear to
be in our exchange system. For example.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is receiving spam, but there is no smtp address
with the domain nomoreadomain.com. We have change our domain a while ago.
Where in exchange
Well, urgent issues really need to be taken up with PSS, but is it possible that
the NIC card on your server has gone bad and is brewin' up a broadcast storm?
I'd call PSS, and while you're on hold, switch out the NIC card.
-- Drew
Visit
I cant see it being the NIC as when i disable SMTP all becomes ok, how can
i check if i've been spammed.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Hello,
Does anyone know how to extract the list of domains that are configured in
the IMS - Connections - Accept Connections - Message Filtering? I want to be
able to document what domains we are blocking without manually writing the
list out, or capturing screen shots of the windows.
Thank
Log the SMTP Interface Events?
-Original Message-
From: roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Help Needed smtp causing srv to slow right down
I cant see it being the NIC as when i disable SMTP all becomes
Double check your relaying settings in the IMC; sometimes when you change
things (like domains) the settings may have gotten off kilter and you may
have become an open relay.
David
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:06 PM
To:
Perhaps a DNS or default gateway configuration issue?
-Original Message-
From: roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Urgent Help Needed smtp causing srv to slow right down
Hi, I have a small domain consisting
Bcc
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help: User recieving SPAM
Greetings
I believe Ecora's Configuration Auditor for Exchange will capture this
information along with a lot of other useful data.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Also, this sounds like a more serious problem being that users cannot access
the internet and/or send/receive mail. Maybe a bad network card. Can you
ping your default gateway? Can you ping an outside internet address?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
I tried this on the exchange 2000 list and got very little information.
I have a setup as follows:
Pix Firewall--Proxy serv/IIS server--internal network containing
exchange. We have had exchange 5.5 and OWA running in this config for
some time. We have recently upgraded to Exchange2000 and
Can you log in via OWA on the internal network?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users
to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works
even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record
exchange server address to the server?
Also...
How many valid static
Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user enters
exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy. Proxy is set up to
redirect any requests for this address to the internal exchange address.
This is as per M$.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If they do http://server/exchange internally it works though?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Exchange
Hi Everyone,
I recently added an Exchange 2000 server to my site and moved over all my users,
Public folders, and created a new SMTP connector. I am now getting about 200 NDR
messages a day. They are mostly spam sent old addresses. The last lines read
The e-mail account does not exist at
check to see if they have logon locally rights
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
If they do http://server/exchange internally it works though?
Chris
--
Chris
Yes I forgot to say if they do that internally it works
Also I have open tcp and udp any any on the firewall to se if it was a
port issue and it had the same result. Thanks so much guys. I'm almost
ready to cal M$ but then, no one learns anything.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Authenticated users have log on locally. Domain users do not.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Tillett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
check to see if they have logon locally rights
-Original
All day EVENT or all day APPOINTMENT? What are they clicking to come to
this conclusion?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
Good afternoon,
Outlook
Their heels?
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
All day EVENT or all day APPOINTMENT? What are they clicking to come to
this conclusion?
6 inch ones even?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
Their heels?
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Perhaps. If I can get past Missy's laughter over my new disclaimer...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
6 inch ones even?
-Original
OK, I think I know the answer to this, but I told a customer I'd ask.
I have a customer that wants to limit users from receiving email from the
internet. No problem, remove the SMTP address and they won't be able to
send/receive SMTP mail. However, now they have a requirement for these users
to
m dissemination
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
Perhaps. If I can get past Missy's laughter over my new disclaimer...
Andy,
Very professional disclaimer, but shouldn't there be a mention of the actual
phone or fax number to call? ;o)
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify
Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete
the message.
-Original
Yea, It should. I never read the darn thing until someone pointed it out. :(
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue
Andy,
Very professional
I'm wondering if you could give them an invalid SMTP address, that
wouldn't route externally. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something.
Works with Exchange 2000 but you didn't mention if you were using E2k or
5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Does anyone have some sort of hack tool that will allow you to change the
local admin password on a workstation and get into the OS? We took a machine
off the domain but didn't realize that the local admin password was not set
to the company default password.
Also is there is way to just load
I agree with Joe. Go get ERD Commander now and it will save you gobs of
time in the future... it is priced quite reasonable.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: off topic -
Who is M$?
D
Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the
street. -Elbert Hubbard
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah sorry. My
Again I ask, who is this M$ you speak of?
D
Idiocy: Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. -
- http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Yes. Dunno about Exc 2k but you can enable the option that states Allow
mail from these recipients only!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not
Interesting idea. I'm still able to send, but I (obviously?) can't receive
from the outside and that may be good enough. BTW, I'm on EX5.5
Thanks,
-Walden
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516)627-3800 x11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
As stated earlier...validate your MX record and dns records.
Install version 6.0 of the PIX IOS.
Setup a static route like this:
static (inside,outside) tcp (external_ip) www (internal_ip) www netmask
255.255.255.255
With a corresponding Access-list entry:
access-list 100 permit tcp any host
Hmm. Well there is an option on each mailbox that you can setup the mailbox
so that they only receive mail from internal users. I thought this was what
you were requesting.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:59 PM
To:
I believe it is a veiled reference to Microsoft. The $ is perhaps a subtle
dig at the alleged wealth and influence this company has.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 11:33 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I guess the fact that we make $ off of them as well is moot?? I make a good
living on MS products. So I guess our employers could say the same.
-Original Message-
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is there an issue with recreating the ADC's after your environment is up?
The DC that is hosting the ADC needs to be rebuilt but I'm wondering if this
will cause issues if I recreate them on another server?
Thanks,
Wilson
David,
We all know what M$ means. Don made a suble (at least he tried ;))
refference that we don't like that moniker here.
/P
- Original Message -
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject:
Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the
ms reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly
frustrating. It SHOULD work.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:52 PM
To:
Administrative share on the M:\ drive.
Duh. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Who is M$?
D
Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the
Got a problem with dir.edb here, need to see if anyone has a solution.
Mail server (5.5 on NT sp 6) went down hard. Brought it back up and now the directory
service won't start.
I ran the eseutil program against dir, pub, and priv and only dir cam back as
inconsistent.
So I went to run
Just run eseutil /r d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\dir.ebd and you should be fine.
D
The most certain test by which we can judge whether a country is really
free is the amount of security enjoyed by minorities. -Lord Acton
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
You keep saying that while you collect your cushy little salary due to the
fact that their products are the most widely used in the world. I don't
think you want to have this discussion...
D
It's good to shut up sometimes. -Marcel Marceau
-Original Message-
From: David Grimstone
Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch the traffic? What do the
logs say (both Proxy and the PIX)? My money says your issue resides in
there.
D
It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to
something. -Ornette Coleman
-Original Message-
From: Ronald
I think I said that I tried opening tcp and udp any any on the pix and
it had no effect. I would believe this would eliminate the pix.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Ronald,
If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you
have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your
proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http.
period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but
I think you should turn up the logging on the PIX and prove it to me. I've
had PIX's, I've seen the headaches they can cause. You can either try it
and prove me wrong or you can not try it and be stuck in your current
position. I would also look at the Proxy logs to make sure the traffic is
That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange
occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic correctly. Not always,
but I've seen it.
D
Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together
when no one has any idea where they're going. - -
Can you post the details of the eventID 5004?
It makes a difference as to the cause of the problem.
Also, what is the exact text of the popup error window when you try to manually
generate the offline address book?
-Original Message-
From: Sabre A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hi,
Some virus infected mails get sstripped by Trend scanmail, but
users'Outlook crashes when they have the preview pane open, how can I
stop this?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
hello,
In my office their are about 300 users.
sometimes mail containing huge attachments are sent to each user using a
comman mailing id.
this leads to a lot of load to the server.
does anybody has got any clue to this problem?
I dont want to limit the size off attachments.
thanx in advance
ak
Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg
server was playing up.
We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal.
The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again
and since then all the services start up without a
We have been ordered by our parent company in the US that we all should
use their e-mail suffix as well as we should be in their GAL.
Today our companies have their own suffix (country specific) and they are
connected to our Europian HQ where they are syncronized in the Europian
GAL.
Is there a
Gents,
I'm trying to find a way of moving mailboxes between recipient
containers in a single site. I'm running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 SP6... I do
not want to just create a view
_
http:\\www.isc.co.uk
Julian Lovell Technical Services Executive
Integrated Solutions
When I move a mail box from one exchange site server to another exchange
site server I loose the capability of deleting or moving mail in OWA. All
other mail clients work fine. Both servers are running exchange 5.5 and SP4.
OWA also has updated SPs. Mail box Limits are not a problem. Technet's
Can't open some Word / Excel attachments from internet???
I need to know if this could be a problem with my Exchange 5.5 sp4
database files/a setting set wrong on my exchange server to handle certain
formats of attachments/or what?
I can view the Word Document attachments using Quick View Plus
When I move a mail box from one exchange site server to another exchange
site server I loose the capability of deleting or moving mail in OWA. All
other mail clients work fine. Both servers are running exchange 5.5 and
SP4. OWA also has updated SPs. Mail box Limits are not a problem.
Technet's
When I move a mail box from one exchange site server to another exchange
site server I loose the capability of deleting or moving mail in OWA. All
other mail clients work fine. Both servers are running exchange 5.5 and
SP4. OWA also has updated SPs. Mail box Limits are not a problem.
Technet's
Thanks for your comments - where I can I find either of these options?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's filling my mailbox
It's set on the SMTP virtual server.
Also it
Out of Off. Asst. Is there a way to turn this on for
Eudora pop clients? This is a setting at the mailbox level is it not?
Could you not use an ADSI editor to flip a switch or something? This is
for Exchange 5.5.
_
List posting
Don,
I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix ,
but never heard of any with http.
Ronald,
The easiet way to make sure is not the pix, connect your laptop to the
segment bethwin the pix and your proxy and try to connect to OWA. If it is
working, call Ci$co.
There is no M: Drive
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Administrative share on the M:\ drive.
Duh. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Well, that is just the way it is when people in the office don't know how to
use Email.
Lets say I have a hundred users and I have a 15MB file I need them to see.
Well, I can send it to the whole company and the mail server goes to its
knees, and everything sucks.
Now try it like this;
I take
Rob,
You HAD a mail loop, 50 MB Priv. store? My server at home has a priv.edb
biger than 1GB.
BTW: walk away from the server, get a professional to fix it and get
yourself a good exchange book. Read it, read it again and then maybe you are
alowed back to the server.
/Peter
- Original
You do have backups, right?
/P
- Original Message -
From: Rob Yeldon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files,
If you moved mailboxes from your 5.5 to 2000, then you probably lost your
single instance of all the attachments.. that could be a reason for your
increase in DB size. Also during mailbox moves, a lot of log files are
created, I turned on circular logging during the mailbox move process so it
I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the
PIX would to funny things to the network traffic as it passed in either
direction. Tended to time things out and make stuff not work.
D
The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we
behave
Wilson,
He would have the highest SIS in history. Greater than 1:100 G
/P
- Original Message -
From: Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
If you
Don,
I don't want to disagree with you, as I sad, I have little experience on
hand with pix, and I wouldn't put one on my network.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:07 PM
Subject: RE:
AV version? Server version and SP?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/17/2001 7:32 AM
Subject: stripping attachments
Hi,
Some virus infected mails get sstripped by Trend scanmail, but
users'Outlook crashes when they have the preview pane open, how
To what end?
-Original Message-
From: Julian Lovell
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/17/2001 8:23 AM
Subject: Moving mailboxes between recipient containers
Gents,
I'm trying to find a way of moving mailboxes between
recipient
containers in a single site. I'm running
Well at the moment I'm unable to access an Exchange 2000 admin program to
pinpoint the answer to your questions... but the null sender message
filtering option is is under whatever the top object is in the admin (Global
Settings?) on a message filtering tab I believe. The other option is found
on
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
