what's a .rm file? Scanmail is going ballistic blocking those
extensions...
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
RealMovie/RealAudio www.real.com
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 April 2002 11:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: rm files
what's a .rm file? Scanmail is going ballistic blocking those
extensions...
Kim
Clue. You've either got it, or you think all your helpdesk staff need to log
into everyone's account every time theres an email trouble ticket.
--
Robert Moir, MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer,
Luton Sixth Form College
Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings
-Original
Hello,
In Which Directory the Event Log file will be there for
Exchange server 2000.I have registered one event sink for
OnDelete,i want to see the event log file.
If anyone knows about this pls let me know.
regards
Kumar
_
List
And probably a cigarette afterwards.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round.
-Original
I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the administrator I cannot
delete any items from this mailbox. This is on an exchange 2000 SP2 environment. I
get the following error The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or
already deleted, or access was denied.
try 'shift-del'
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox
I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the
Sure.. Give me a few minutes.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM
To:
Yes, that worked. Thanks!
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox over limit but
I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange
2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so
the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet
accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet
wherever they are.
VPN.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to
Exchange
2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a
Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I
think we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002
IP issues?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:16:43 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen
right now. I
think we have some political and
Intellectual Property.
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
IP issues?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr
The times I have seen this is when you have AV software running. What I do
is simply open the email(s) and let the AV software scan it(them). When it
has done so then I can move the emails fine.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Edgington, Jeffrey
Reply To: Exchange
How is this affected by using a VPN?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:27:30 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intellectual Property.
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
You have a few options:
VPN (MAPI)
OWA
POP
IMAP
Or poke a ton of holes in the FW (Im glad you have a security guy to stop
that).
That is basically what you have.weigh the pros and cons, and choose.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc...
You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix.
bill
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Remote Access
I was wondering what others
Here is the error I get when I try to click on a public folder in OWA2k.
The hierarchy is there like it should be, but I get this damn 404 error. It
works fine under Outlook. I looked in the kb, but no help. Any ideas?
Thanks.
The page cannot be found
The page you are looking for might
One more thing. I looked at the M: drive and under public folders there
aren't any. Would there be if I don't have any homed on the exch2k server?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange
How about an 800 number for direct dial-in?
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc...
You could use TS (terminal services)
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and
know that the giraffe label shirt will match it.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
My
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe
label pants
Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have Exchange 5.5 sp4
running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am also running Trend Micro virus
scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues
with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about
The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
Has anyone installed MOM on their
I'm concerned with the agent and the overhead.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
The agent or the application and databases and
I've had it running in a test situation on some scratch production network
boxes. The agent doesn't do much loading of the server, but MOM really isn't
designed for an Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 environment. It's forte is
remote/automated/centralized management of a Win2K/E2K environment.
John
Installing the agents should be ok, the load isnt really that large.
Installing the MOM server on your Exchange box is a big no no. MOM is a
resource hog, the same as Exchange.
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
ROFLMAO!!! Oh, jeez. . . that's an image I won't forget for a while.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original
Hello,
I have a public folder with contact information in it. I need
everyone to see changes made by anyone. The problem i have is when someone
opens a contact and makes a change in catagories only the person who makes
that change can see it. I gave everyone owner rights to the folder
How can I change a permission on a top level folder,
and have the permissions trickle down to all the lower level folders?
I changed the top level folder and none of the lower level folders have
changed?
Anything that I obvious that I am missing?
Phil
go to exchange admin and open the properties of the pb then click on
permissions its all in there.
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions
How can I change a
There is a setting in the public folders to have everyone view new...
Cant remember where it is.. Keep looking you will find it.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
actually its in the general tab of the pb
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions
go to exchange admin and open the properties of the pb then click on
permissions its all in there.
got it thanks
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pulic folder address
There is a setting in the public folders to have everyone view new...
Cant remember where it is.. Keep
I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another and it failed but now there is
two mailboxes for this user plus it is rendering the mailbox inaccessible for both the
user and the administrator account. In the Active directory it still thinks the
mailbox is on the source server not the
I've seen this, try waiting a few hours and try again (unless you
already have)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible
Q274119
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:11:27 -0400
From: Sabo, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an
inaccessible mailbox
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another
I put the self account as describe in q278966.
Why would there be two mailboxes for this user one of the source server and one of the
destination server (the mailbox has an red x through it), do you think it is moved and
just needs to be synchronized in the active directory?
Eric Sabo
NT
Roger.. you're keeping secrets. I didn't know you worked for Zoo Atlanta in
your off hours.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To
All,
I'm trying to add an address list. What I'm trying to do is basically
create an address list (Departmental lists) and when you click on that
department, all the lists for that dept appear in the address book view.
But when I go to select which lists I want under a certain address list.
I
Groupshield stopped it cold.
Be aware.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
You may want to look at the pfadmin tool. It's a command line utility, but
is very useful.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions
How can I change
I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to
15MB. What limit are you using?
Thanks,
Jim Moore
Systems Engineer / DBA
Saint Luke's Hospital
Voice: 816.932.6990
_
List posting FAQ:
I can't drive 55.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:21:50 -0500
From: Moore, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMTP message size limits
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP
message limits to
15MB. What limit are
15MB...
I think that is an ideal size. But you need to base it on your companies
needs. As an example at a multimedia company, 15MB may be way too small.
But here, 15MB is just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM
ummm thats a person thing.
But I'll tell you...I set ours for 5MB...but now of course all of a sudden
ive got financial types sending 5.5MB spreadsheets. and getting rejected
Personally I agree with mail size restriction...but like many things it's a
give and take. You'll take the grief for
I'm using 5MB.tell youir managers to be glad they get 15 and to quit
having their friends send them porn via E-mail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Moore, Jim
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Other people's limits shouldn't really have anything to do with what you're
being asked to implement. What you need to do is to analyze your message
flow and determine the limit that will have the least amount of impact on
your business critical messages. Also, consult with your peers at the
The Olds still in the shop?
Jim, check the archives. This topic has been hammered to death. Short answer
is, have you management set the business requirement of how large they need
to get and design to that.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
I put it in place after a user tried to email a 500MB SQL dump file home and
it bounced. Nothing like a gig of email traffic flying all over...
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS.
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP message size limits
I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to
15MB. What limit are
That dump file was almost as big as your whole store.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:29:01 -0700
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I put it in place after a user tried to email a
Umm I curious about that one 10 on the MTA and 15 IMS.
Since Im not an exchange guru..and have NOT looked at message flow in exch..
Doesn't the MTA process the mail after the IMS accepts it on its way to the
user mailbox?
IMS MTA USER
wouldnt the 14.5 bounce out at the MTA?
-Original
5Mb on IMS and 10Mb on MTA
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: SMTP message size limits
Umm I curious about that one 10 on the MTA and 15 IMS.
Since Im not an
Not here, at another company.
BTW. Its up to 5GB now.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits
That dump file was almost as big as your whole store.
What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and
14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
cuz SMTP blows up the size of the message probably...
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits
What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between
Pfft. At my GF's company (former company) They sent around an email telling
everyone to try to keep atachments down to 50Megs or less...
They do a lot of Powerpoint Excel files with lots of clipart/pictures in
them. She was on a dialup 28K and has gotten a 25Meg email before.
And numerous 5 Meg
Among other things ;o)
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
We have some engineers on one of our customers so we have it
MTA 35MB
IMS 45MB
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Mellott, Bill
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:34
To: Exchange Discussions
We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are
debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information
contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. It
is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
Your best bet would be to have your companies attorney research this.
We have debated this countless times. But have never heard of the disclaimer
actually saving a companies ass.
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:43 AM
if you're a multinational company, you probably have lawyers. They would be
able to provide you with legal answers that are better suited to your
company, the countries you deal with, etc.
My personal opinion?
Meh...
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Their pretty stupid in my opinion. Cause you have to read them and go
all the way to the bottom of the message to see the disclaimer. It's
kind of opening a bottle of some disease and having to read in to the
bottom to pull out a piece of paper that says don't open this bottle.
-Original
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security
oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under
any circumstance...
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519
How about a VPN??
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security
oriented person is really willing to do. You'd
Ok, what is $hid$ $yet$ $see$ $thelight$ $3$ ?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Umm true I do punch the Citrix port in the firewall.
1 port...the citrix client has security. 56 des...it will go to 128 if you
would like.
true the TS port might be less secure...I mean I trust M$ dont you?
I guess I could get crazy fun...VPN and allow only the Citrix client port
;-)
Try deleting the mailbox from that user in AD. Run mailbox cleanup agent on
each store the mailbox is in with ESM, then try reconnecting one of them.
If one connects then delete the other one and try moving it again. This has
worked for me in the past.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I never had a limit nor had a problem. But we were sending lots of graphics
files. As Martin said, it's a company-by-company decision.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange
10,14,36?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:30:21 -0700
From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS.
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL
I get the feeling that a VPN might be a good idea. :-)
I think the tide is turning in that direction.
Thanks for your advice.
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:07 PM
To:
Being a Securities company, by SEC law, we have to archive and review all
internet mail to a non-re-writeable media (it falls under the client
correspondance part of the requirement). Our system that we currently use
is out of date.
We also want to get pst's off of the network into a better
What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!!
L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT!
I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes
in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least
able to sleep at night.
Send a 10M message from the mta to the IMS. When the message reaches the
IMS it is ~13M, right? If someone from the outside sends a 14M message via
the IMS it gets bounced by the MTA. What would you do:
A. Increase the MTA Limit
B. Decrease the IMS Limit
See the dilemma?
-Original
No, I don't trust MS (please don't use M$, I and a lot other people here
really hate that), not ever. ;o)
I just don't like punching holes in my FW when there are appliances out
there to do the job I need without punching holes in the FW.
Don Ely
Hee hee. I do the same thing! Cisco VPN running paralel to the FW. IPSec
client on the desktops.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
What kind of VPN solution are we
You also have to take into consideration the limits imposed by the receiving
end. Example, Microsoft.com usually only allows 2MByte messages. Hotmail;
500Kbytes.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No
I would eat a fish taco and not think about it
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits
Send a 10M message from the mta to the IMS. When the message
Disclaimers are pretty much worthless but a lot of legal types like to
include them just to CYA.
- Original Message -
From: Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: E-mail disclaimer
We are a
What type of VPN is up to him and depends on the hardware that he has, or the software
if he wants to go that way. I do use a Cisco PIX for mine with IPSEC clients, but
that may not be what he wants. To each their own :)
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Of course, it comes with its own headaches, but they could be a lot worse
than they are...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, at 1:43pm, Gagrani, Kishore wrote:
We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are
debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The
information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in
confidence.
Ask a lawyer.
We've tended to go the other way - I think currently its 10 IMS and 20 MTA.
We've got more internal bandwidth than ISP bandwidth, so we are more open to
it there.
Then again, we've also had someone try to send a 250MB zip file of MPEG
movies (our commercials, so at least they were business
Hi,
Getting ready to install E2k. Have two Domain controllers. One running DNS
and one running DHCP. Both machines were installed with Administrator logon.
When I installed my NT/Exchange 5.5 I used Administrator as the service
account admin. Bad move. I want to do it right with E2k. What is the
True...
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
We use the content filtering software (MMS) from Tumbleweed. It works, but
it is buggy and their tech support is pretty much useless. Tumbleweed does
focus on Finance industry, so the support you would receive may be better
than ours.
I can't comment on their archive product itself, but I
I see your point. It's really hard to tell because different attachment
types expand at different ratios.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message size
We have 4 PF servers. 2 primary, and 2 replica partners respectively
(13,000 pfs total). I'm losing what hair I have left over message conflic
errors generated due to the following problem: Users are editing calendar
or general PF data on different pf servers rather than just the
primary...when
Have you never been mellow?
Have you never tried?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It
! Please treat this as Incorrect.
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
If the message composed in Outlook is marked private, the
This is the most powerful solution. ha?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
You also have to remove View | BCC from the menu and
Anyone know of a way to block a domain from attempting to send email to my
exchange server, such as a known spam site withing exchange 2000 ?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will
suspect first?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt
By creating the necessary records.
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DNS
Ben, how can I solve this.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Here is the error in the Application log that we started getting on
Exchange 2000 machine in the 5.5 organization.
Event ID: 290
Source: MSExchangeMTA
A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code
unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A=
I couldn't agree more about the pst's. In fact, we are intending on doing
a registry push so users can't create pst's. Unfortunately, the network
group won't ban pst's from the network as we requested/suggested.
Thanks for the Tumbleweed comments.
Don Ely?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will
suspect first?
-Original Message-
From:
Just imposed a 20 meg limit (was none) on ours [1]. I wanted to go to 10
meg, but the powers that be said that was too small. At least at 20 meg the
system doesn't choke to death, so I couldn't complain too much.
[1] After the system came to a virtual halt with the third 50+ meg file that
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
