Beside the obvious (check client permissions on the folder for that user), I
have a similar problem with some (not all) contacts created with outlook 2K
who can't be opened by old OL97. Apparently all the properties can be viewed
in table view if appropriate columns are added, but the contact
Yes. Tell the people who are complaining to read the headers.
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith
Yeah I like Promodag, but it collects the tracking logs so slow.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting
Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.
If you can I'd disable the external mail interface for the time being, until you've
manage to cleanup internally... and avoid the wrath of your customers.
Regards
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 12:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the
exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Works fine here.
Got Name Resolution?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP
Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the
exchange server? 5.5
Of course:-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Works fine here.
Got Name Resolution?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I have noticed a difference between Office 2000 and Office XP.
XP is slow when retrieving mail from Exchange 2000 SP2 server.
I feel your pain!!
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:32 AM
Ex5.5 Enterprise cannot be upgraded to E2k Std. You have 3 basic
choices:
1. ExMerge all mailboxes to PSTs
2. Install an E5.5 Std and move mailboxes then inplace upgrade that
server
3. Purchase the E2k Enterprise version
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL
I second Office Space, two thumbs up.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
Office Space
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL
Mark,
Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ?
Regards,
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Of course:-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
Oops ... should read ... Mike :)
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian
Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Mark,
Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ?
Regards,
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Who's Mark? I do have it enabled yes.
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Mark,
Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ?
Regards,
Mylo
-Original Message-
From:
That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his
install.
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Oops ... should read ... Mike :)
-Original
we have seen no difference moving to XP from 98.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP
Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the
exchange
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has
Office XP SP1, not Exchange!
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 13:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue.
And Outlook 2002 SP1 too? - I think that's where the issue was fixed; IIRC
it's a client issue not a server one.
Yeah, we are running SP1.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Office XP SP1, not Exchange!
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
OK, well...I'm running Office XP SP-1 also.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Office XP SP1, not Exchange!
-Original Message-
Outlook XP Version (10.3513-3501) SP-1
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Yeah, we are running SP1.
-Original Message-
10.3513.3501 not a - (sorry)
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Outlook XP Version (10.3513-3501) SP-1
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original
Are you both running in native mode Win2k and Ex2K ?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 14:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Yeah, we are running SP1.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
Running Native for Windows, Mixed for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Are you both running in native mode Win2k and Ex2K ?
-Original Message-
From:
Mixed. (Just haven't pulled the plug)
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Running Native for Windows, Mixed for Exchange.
OlXP1 didn't seem to fix that issue for me. I still see a greater delay than
I had with Ol2k
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello:
I noticed that when you have it set to allow for working
offline,
Outlook XP is very slow. I suppose because it's always copying
everything locally as well as on the server. It just seems a lot
slower then previous versions.
When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow
connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments
after OL is already up?
If it's attachments, try Q300904.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Not just attachments for me...new emails and stuff. When I switch from
folders to folders, I get a delay.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
There's a technet article on this but you might want to try and turn off AutoComplete
and removing items from the Outlook name cache. This affects startup speed.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 16:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Well it's pretty much all around slow. Slow opening attachments, slow
selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening
other users folders is slow even on same server.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03,
I have a user that recieved an email with attachments. When the user goes
to print the message the attachment icons dont show up in the printed out
copy. Some messages however do show the attached icons in the message. Is
there a way to enable this? i couldnt find anything on the web.
Rich
OK, I applied that patch...all I can say..
YESMUCH BETTER.
Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have)
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
A beer at MEC will be fine. :)
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
OK, I applied that patch...all I can say..
YESMUCH BETTER.
Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have)
Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need this update.
Im on XP here. What O/S are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
OK, I applied
Plenty of beer there.
Tech Ed this year they ran out. Pissed a lot of folks off.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
A beer at MEC
Its about 75% faster.
Every little bit helps.
Still not as fast as OK2000 was on this XP box, but much better than
what it was prior to the patch.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello:
I tried to apply SP1 to my WinXP Pro b0x3n and is says the files
were already updated by another patch (gnomes I guess) and then it
kicks me out of the update.
Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
Heritage Building Group, Inc.
Flamed? I hope you continue to report on how it's going. Lotsa interest in
non-Windows clients.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ximian Exchange 2000
Hoping I
It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK, you need it irrespective of OS.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need
Hi,
We have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 Server that has an it's IMS on a dmz. I've had
several users complaining that when they send an email to a particular
person, that person keeps getting that message over and over with the same
date and time. And they also receive duplicate messages when the person
Every time one of my users get Outlook XP, there are problems. Outlook 2000
was much better
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK,
Melia Cameo
NetIQ
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting
I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org. Any good ones out
Hi all,
Guys, I got a lot of technical/knowledgebase type messages I have compiled
over the last couple of years I wana archive these and have them accessible
on self-contained CD-ROM. So, when I require access to these messages, I can
just use the CD without the need for outlook personal
I have found Outlook XP to be substantially better.
Have you applied SP1 and the hotfix I mentioned?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Every time one of my
would this help?
http://www.wickett.net/WNMailKeeper/
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri AM 11:15:36 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re Personal Mail Archiving
Hi all,
Guys, I got a lot of technical/knowledgebase type messages I
I did not give any specific details.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
Yeah, I know a guy who knows a guy who broke his NDA. Since he's
therefore proven can't be
Exchange beta program is my source
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
Sheesh!! Let's call the whole thing off...
Do either of you have sources for your dates? No?
Not if you create a redirect rule, I think
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward email in Exchange 2000
I suppose he could always go the ugly way and enable forwards to the
As far as I kow, Outlook requires Full Read/Write to any .pst file. Since
CD-Media will not allow this, you are SOL. I'm not sure if Re-writable CD's
will work considering the much slower access time.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May
Why not use OWA?
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 03:07:42 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ximian Exchange 2000
Hoping I don't get flamed for this, but here goes.
I've got a shop with numerous Linux users, but we also use exchange.
I'm
That won't work - CD's are read only. You need R/W access to the PST.
You might be able to do it with an RW disk though (I haven't tried it).
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re
which patch?
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
OK, I applied that patch...all I can say..
YESMUCH BETTER.
Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have)
Thank you,
IIS, I don't want to have to patch every day and a half.
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 11:10, Jerzy Setmajer wrote:
Why not use OWA?
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 03:07:42 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ximian Exchange 2000
Hoping I don't
Not according the website:
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/oxpauiu.aspx
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
It's an Office XP (OL02) update. AFAIK, you
It doesnt change the fact that its a bad idea.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward email in Exchange 2000
Not if you create a redirect rule, I think
-Original
Very curious. Everywhere else only says OL2002. Hm
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
Not according the website:
This one.
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/oxpauiu.aspx
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP
which patch?
-Original
In a hosting business, EVERY customer wants to forward mail to some other
place. I am trying to fight it off as much as I can. I don't want to pollute
our AD with someone else's contacts.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:39 AM
Thanks a lot guys. I do appreciate. However, what I am after really is
something similar to what Jerzy has suggested. Because, I wana be able to
run the files from the CDROM itself as a self-contained mail archive system
of some sort. I don't necessarily want to use outlook to view those
My suggestion wont work offline sorry just tried it and it doesnt work
unless your online.
rich
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Personal Mail Archiving
Thanks a lot guys.
This is a silly thing, a user would like their reminders in the form of a
email rather then a reminder popup on a paticular appointment. The
appointment contains other people and also some people need to attend that
don't have calendar(pop clients).
Is it possible to automate a reminder email
Yes Exchange 2000. I think I didn't explain this too well. I WANT to disable an
account because the user left the firm. I DON'T want to delete the account and
mailbox for 30 to 60 days just in case someone needs to access it. But once I disable
the account, the damn errors pop up
I didn't see a response to my earlier post, so I'll ask a quick
question now...
Is the MS Mail Connector compatible with Exchange 2000, or do I
need an Exchange 5.5 server with the MS Mail Connector and ADC to
Exchange 2000?
- Karen
I'm using Evolution fine in IMAP mode with my EX 5.5 (SP4) server. Doesn't help with
EX2k, I know, but.. What I can't get to work is checking my LDAP on my 5.5 server
as I do with my Outlook Express clients that are using that solution (in authorised
only mode. No anonymous access to
You explained it perfectly. I responded with what I thought was a
perfectly clear solution, which is also explained in the text of the
event log error message. Go create another, active account named Zaphod
Beeblebrox and associate that mailbox with it. Note that it doesn't
have to be named
Very, very strange. After about 48 hours, this problem resolved itself!
There must have been a deletion from AD (perhaps the orphaned public
store record mentioned in Q316349) that took a while to propagate or
something. I'm not going to tempt fate by digging any deeper...
-Original
There is a calendar reminder script in the sample code library of
cdolive.com. You can tweak that to your needs.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reminder question
Put it on a ZIP drive.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Personal Mail Archiving
That won't work - CD's are read only. You need R/W access to the PST. You
Mustafa,
I believe this product is what you are looking for:
http://www.smtechnologies.com/prod13.htm
ArchivER is an Outlook(r) utility that is used to archive Outlook(r) Folder
data to individual files in common file formats instead of an archive PST
file. Why do this? How long will
I am trying to setup SSL for SMTP traffic on our exchange server which is
running on a Windows 2000 server. With no key manager as we have on nt 4 I
am lost as to how to set the same type of SSL for Exchange 5.5.
Any help would save some sanity.
Thanks
Warren
This e-mail message and all
You need to check out the Certificate snap-in, which replaces key
manager.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:17 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL
Subject: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL
I am
SSL for SMTP? Why on earth would you do that?
- Original Message -
From: Bennett, Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL
I am trying to setup SSL for SMTP traffic on our exchange server
I see the Certificates snap-in but that provides no obvious way to assign
the ssl cert to smtp. I assume that is the one you are referring to.
Warren J. Bennett
Internal Systems-Peachtree Software
BackOffice Infrastructure Architect
phone: 770.724.4008
fax: 770.724.2989
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well that kind of sucks. That's what I was hoping you weren't saying :P
Crud... what's the point of disabling an account if you have to create a temp account
to associate with the old mailbox? Since you can only have one account associated
with a mailbox, I will have to create a lot of
Do I need to install the Certificate Services component? I assumed that it
was not needed if you were not issuing your own certs.
Warren J. Bennett
Internal Systems-Peachtree Software
BackOffice Infrastructure Architect
phone: 770.724.4008
fax: 770.724.2989
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Well, the other way is to NOT disable those account, but put a VERY
difficult password on the account, (there are plenty of free tools on
the web that you can get to random generate a password for you). Then,
you can hide the account from the GAL.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original
Set the account to expire after a certain date (like today). That way
no one can use the account but it doesn't cause the same problems as
disabling the account.
Steve Evans
Computing Services
SDSU Foundation
619 594-0653
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL
Well, I've only used when migrating a web site from an older machine
with Internet Information Server. I had to load my certificate backup
(.pfx) files into Certificate snap-in, and then assign them to web sites
in IIS manager. I assume it works in a similar fasion for SMTP, but I'm
not sure.
Hey Warren -
Look up the topic Use TLS Encryption and SMTP encryption in Exchange
2000 System Manager help. It seems that MS is implementing the IETF
specification TLS, which is a superset of (and compatible with) SSL 3.0.
(SSL is a proprietary Netscape specification, but a de-facto standard.)
I have done some intense searching for info on how this is done but no one
seems to have the answer.
Warren J. Bennett
Internal Systems-Peachtree Software
BackOffice Infrastructure Architect
phone: 770.724.4008
fax: 770.724.2989
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ryan
Just three more minutes
And my intense searching will
be over for two days
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL
I have done some intense searching for info on
I did a lot of searching to get an answer to
my questionso your responses are very much
appreciated!
...
I have done some intense searching for info on
how this is done but no one seems to have the answer.
Everyone's harping
On much unfruitful searching
Is Google broken?
Friday blues, once more...
Nice day, no concentration
Need to go home early.
To be young again...
Thoughts of summer vacation
running through your head.
Hanging out with friends...
Fishing down on the river,
Barefoot in the grass.
If you could combine
lazy days of summer youth
with older
Gotta love the StIcK
Best tool you can ever pick
For your daily kick
Serdar Soysal
PS: This haiku sucks, but I'm gonna post it anyways. Just to piss all of
you off.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange
Cliff Claven
Impressive use of haiku meter.
/Cliff Claven
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q319267
I am confused whether you are dealing with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange
2000, as Exchange5.5 uses IMS/IMC instead of SMTP, but since you kept
referencing SMTP, I assume you are using Exchange 2000. Then the above
link is what
Lovely,
I was wondering what was the delay, Expected someone to start around lunch :=)
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 04:04:47 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Haiku Friday
Friday blues, once more...
Nice day, no
I found the answer. IIS 5 no longer provides a button to the key manager but
it is on the server. In the system32 folder you will find an INETSRV folder.
In that is the file keyring.exe. Same interface from IIS 4.
Warren J. Bennett
Internal Systems-Peachtree Software
BackOffice Infrastructure
Once you got the messages onto CD; most usually via a .pst file, you wouldnt
be able to read them from the CD. The files get marked as read only once
burned onto disk. You could archive off your mailbox, put them to CD and
then copy from CD to your hard drive whenever you wish to view them.
E2k has an MSMail connector ewww
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:10 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail
Subject: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail
I didn't see a response
My c: drive filled up by and the MTA stopped, I cleaned up the problem but I
have ton of these files and do not know what to do with them?
Thank You,
Robert Williams
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363
Melia is a wonderful program, but unfortunately it doesn't support
Exchange 2000 :(
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: sexta-feira, 3
What OS, version of Exchange, and SP on both? (Not that it matters,
really, since those aren't Exchange files)
Where are they located?
What else is running on that server?
What's the date? What else was happening on that date?
You get the picture.
-Original Message-
From: Robert
We have added a New Ex2k server to and existing site that has one 5.5
server. We are able to receive mail between the two servers, internal mail.
We are able to send mail Outbound from the new server but inbound mail is
not being relayed from the 5.5 server. We see the mail hitting the inbound
95 matches
Mail list logo
