NT Replication

2002-05-16 Thread Darren Ash
People Does anyone know of a list like this one that talks NT4 ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN

RE: NT Replication

2002-05-16 Thread Kim Schotanus
swynk has one or two -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Replication People Does anyone know of a list like this one that talks NT4 ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London

RE: Moving Exchange servers to a different domain

2002-05-16 Thread Hurst, Paul
Victoria, Please note, if your service account is in it's own domain (say admin domain/user domain) and you are just moving the exchange servers from a resource domain to 'a n other' domain then make sure the users log out as the server doesn't appear to stop for the Outlook clients, but will

RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery

2002-05-16 Thread Frank Labule
Yeah thanks guys. I'm trying to follow this to the letter and try and restore just a single mailbox. Frank -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Read this:

RE: How about this as an option?

2002-05-16 Thread Leo
Thanks Chris, I wont call you Shirley again, If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down, there are no other routes for the mailbox server to choose. So a mailbox server can not see bridgehead servers outside of its routing group? Correct? This is a shame especially as

Smtp connector gone mad?

2002-05-16 Thread Leo
We have an exchange 2000 server that we joined to the Exchange 5.5 org/site. When I setup an smtp connector on the exchange 2000 server (including adding all the domain names I want, mail from the exchange 5.5 server directed to the exchange 2000 users gets picked up by the smtp connector and

RE: Bulk Import

2002-05-16 Thread Mark Harford
We found it useful to keep a record of the dlists that such marked-for-deletion users are a member of, so you could copy them to a custom attribute at the same time (and perhaps do the same for the SMTP addresses). Then if they return to the company the re-enabling process is that much easier.

RE: NT Replication

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
Google is your friend, perchance? -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 08:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Replication People Does anyone know of a list like this one that talks NT4 ??? Coolchain Ltd

RE: Conference Board Calendar

2002-05-16 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old

MS Mail mjgration

2002-05-16 Thread Caisley, Simon (EDS)
Hi, I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some description they can pass on. Best

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Waters, Jeff
track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a

RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders

2002-05-16 Thread Couch, Nate
You might try removing the Outlook Preferences file (usually located under System Folder - Preferences) on the Mac and see if that will do it. Nate -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Jorge Cardenas
I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ??

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Michael Michael
No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT

ADC with 2nd site in domain

2002-05-16 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.
In my org. I have two sites in exchange. I setup a connection agreement with my site to populate the AD. The users in the 2nd site can no longer see public folders or even appear in the GAL. In order for this to work do I need to setup a connection agreement in my ADC for this site? Only on

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Lanee Hicks
You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ??

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
KMA. No part of what I wrote is either (a) rude (OK, so clue 4 is borderline on that one), or (b) incorrect. Further more, the answer to his question is contained completely within the first clue that I pointed out. Or did you not bother to check? -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Waters, Jeff
Exchange Administrator...Tools...Track Message. Welcome to exchange, get yourself a few good books, I would recommend Exchange Server 5.5 Unleashed as a good starting point. The online help is great as well. Read the FAQ's here. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Clark, John A (FUSA)
Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP

RE: How about this as an option?

2002-05-16 Thread Leo
Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so I have one last question...;¬) Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using routing group connectors) and a link to the internet (will use smtp connector). What we want to be able to do use the internet

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Orr, Dale
This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Wrong side of The Pond... -Original Message- From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original

Re: RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Jerzy Setmajer
Must have :=( And it's not even Friday. Gary, relax, it's ok, go for a smoke or something. Lay off the coffee :=) Jerzy From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/16 Thu AM 10:15:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Andy David
Gary is a frog? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Wrong side of The Pond... -Original Message- From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: How about this as an option?

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
Presentation issue handled offline. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How about this as an option? Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so I have one last

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Greg Heywood
Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible

RE: Anything else after restore

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
Crowley's method would have applied. -Original Message- From: Paul Done [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anything else after restore I just finished the restore when I moved mailboxes from one server/domain to

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Richard Serafin
Agreed. Maybe he should play in another pond. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Gary is a frog? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Event LOG

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
I believe this question has been answered in the last 48 hours on this list. -Original Message- From: Vijayakumar, T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event LOG Hi All, Iam working with Exchange server 2000 with

RE: How about this as an option?

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
Thanks Chris, I wont call you Shirley again, If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down, there are no other routes for the mailbox server to choose. So a mailbox server can not see bridgehead servers outside of its routing group? Correct? Well, whether it can

RE: pop3 mailboxes

2002-05-16 Thread Tom Meunier
Your phrasing of the question indicates a misunderstanding of the way mail works. You don't have a POP3 mailbox; you couldn't, as there is no such thing. You have a mailbox that you retrieve mail from using the POP3 protocol. It is placed *into* the mailbox using the specific routing mechanism

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Robert Moir
-Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about

RE: How about this as an option?

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
-Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Presentation issue handled offline. Thanks Gary. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using routing group connectors) and a

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! I am great! -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood

RE: MS Mail mjgration

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. -Original Message- From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
No, other way around, actually. Now go look up what an MVP is. And then consider who you've just addressed yourself to, and what he's done compared to what you've done. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:56 To:

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Robert Moir
-Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! Not on a first date I don't -- This e-mail is intended for

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Bob Sadler
When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ,

RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery

2002-05-16 Thread WILLIAMS,JESSICA D
You can't restore a single mailbox from an online backup, you have to restore the entire directory. Jessica -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Yeah

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
*yawn* I believe this argument and every possible variant thereof can be found in the archives... Since only 3 ppl decided to purchase a copy of the archives last quarter that means most of you will just have to take my word for it. If y'all can't find more original arguments I'm afraid I'm

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Greg Heywood
Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time

RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery

2002-05-16 Thread Andy David
I think however he is referring to the procedure that is described in the DR Paper on how to do this. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Clark, John A (FUSA)
MVP??? WOW... This is getting REALLY interesting now... -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No, other way around, actually. Now go look up what an MVP

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Yeah... That not the point I was making. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No, other way around, actually. Now go look up what an MVP is. And then

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Chinnery Paul
ROFLMAO I also subscribe to a listserv that relates to HIPAA issues (hippalive). And it is s dull and some of the posts from some users are more in the nature of see much I know. Besides the excellent support and advice I get (when I remember to pose the question properly including all

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Andy David
Ok, but please, not the face. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY *yawn* I believe this argument and every possible variant thereof can be found in

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Robert Moir
Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. Why not just answer the freaking question as well, which he actually did. -- This e-mail is

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
The attitude has always been part of the character of the list. Personally, I rather like it that way. Anyone who doesn't like the character of this list is quite free to go elsewhere. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Bob Sadler
Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Woodruff, Michael
True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Greg Heywood
Yep, I have been on worse lists. But then those were not work related. It just surprises me that's all... (Last I am going to say on it as well!) -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Orr, Dale
Can you change it to a haiku passphrase? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original

Bounce Problem

2002-05-16 Thread Rob Moore
Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Bob Sadler
Read the FAQ, search technet, read the archives. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To:

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Chinnery Paul
Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Martin Blackstone
You want it in the usual place? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Ok, but please, not the face. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Bob Sadler
I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter,

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Orr, Dale
Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the urgent flag. This triggers an immediate site visit from The Queen of England, who has recently completed her MCSE (some people say she used braindumps). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Erik Sojka
We actually do award points over at the Secret Cabal [1] for funniest posts. [1] Which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
There is no Cabal. Please remember that Erik. I'd hate for something nasty to happen. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We actually do award points over at the

RE: Bounce Problem

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any GAL entries you might have for them. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bounce

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
I did not use braindumps for my MCSE. And anyway, I'm Welsh! Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Chinnery Paul
Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Robert Moir
-Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Doesn't

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Andy David
I wish Citi would go Windows 98! ;) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Durkee, Peter
Getting back to the problem, I think you should use Outlook to look at the Internet headers of one of the messages that had its attachment stripped. You should be able to see in there the ip address of the sending PC. -Peter -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
Might be on that E2K list, but I haven't heard from him in quite awhile. Especially not on the Secret Cabal List. [1] [1] There is no cabal. [2] [3] [2] If there was, he'd be in it. [3] Is there? -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16,

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
g -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Bob Sadler
IF they ever do, would you mind if I dropped in on the day you start your conversion process? I would like to see the things a big corporation has to go through to get their mailboxes over. I only had 200 mailboxes, and just did them by saving them to PST, then reloading them on the server

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold?

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
Actually most of them are NT. They don't know how to work it, but there it is. It takes them 20 minutes to boot up because of all the errors they have to F1 past, click OK on, etc. Bios errors, driver errors, they don't care. The bulk of the company Citi bought when they bought us (now known

RE: Bounce Problem

2002-05-16 Thread Rob Moore
Good question. I'll check. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
Well, 90% of Citi is on Openmail, so I plan to recommend that they call Andy Webb to help them with that! The Exchange sites were all purchased through company buyouts and so far (touch my touchstone) they are leaving us alone. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Jim Helfer
The proper response to your question is of course, Why do you assume that managing the character of this list is under your purview? Why do you assume that your advice is wanted or apreciated It's a very active list and has many members. Obviously your opinion that there is an atitude

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

2002-05-16 Thread Stephen Mynhier
TINSB [1] [1] There is no Secret Cabal [2] [2] Which does not exist -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

2002-05-16 Thread Stephen Mynhier
You have an SMTP conenctor why? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? Subject: Smtp connector gone mad? We have an exchange 2000 server that we joined

Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on

RE: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5

2002-05-16 Thread Stephen Mynhier
Change switches... Check large packet pings... Etc -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:13 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5 Subject: Problems with emails on

RE: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a

2002-05-16 Thread Stephen Mynhier
Upgrade Exchange SP2 to SP4 Upgrade NT SP4 to SP6a Problem should disappear -Original Message- From: Neil Luczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:52 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Subject: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Martin Blackstone
The Ms Exchange 2000 is a hottie! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Christopher Hummert
OWA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield : Exchange Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Chris Scharff
CTRL-ALT-DEL -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Slinger, Gary
Set her authentication type to None instead of Password. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Hunter, Lori
er, lock the workstation? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7

Re: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Tony Hlabse
What's wrong with using OWA? I am not familiar with Zetafax. Does it require an Outlook client up and running? - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: Securing Outlook

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Steve Evans
Then anyone can go in and change it back. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Set her authentication

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Neil Hobson
You misheard. He just swore. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 May 2002 16:48 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Virus Attack ?? Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original

Re: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Tony Hlabse
Ditto on the separate PC - Original Message - From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:10 PM Subject: RE: Securing Outlook -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley)
We use Zetafax, but have all the faxes being received by a public folder. The folder is then seen as a 'virtual' fax machine ie if you are waiting on a fax, look in the folder. If you see faxes for someone else, distribute. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Virus Attack ??

2002-05-16 Thread Les Bessant
You might be right. I still haven't had that cheque -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You misheard. He just swore. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
Sorry, Zetafax doesn't need outlook, it can use it, but we're using the Zetafax client Its just a matter of being logged on with her username so the Zetafax client will pick up all faxes (all incoming faxes go to her username) I want to stop anyone being able to open Outlook which will, by

  1   2   >