RE: Outlook driving my users crazy
Is that happen the same way on different clients (computers) or only on one? I've seen that before, it was solved by our help desk by re installing the common ghost version -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook driving my users crazy Yeah, but there is no filter. Plus all the messages are displayed as soon as they are sorted -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook driving my users crazy It almost sounds like you have a filter on the view. Check in View, Customize Current View and check if the Filters say off. If they don't, then this will restrict what you see. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Groupwise Connector for Exchange 5.5
We have been trying to figure out how to get the GWISE connector to work with exchange. We understand that it is IPX based but we tried to by-pass it by installing the Netware client onto Exchange so it logs into both the NT and Novell domains. Anyway the docs that come with the connector are pretty vague. If anyone out there has successfully gotten GWISE to work with exchange please let me know how!!! Thanks!!! Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support. Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits. No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbox management set to delete mail from the deleted items every seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who had over 10 megs of stuff in there. So users need more training. Easier said than done. So I had a discussion with the CFO about this. His analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail build up on your table until it breaks. Do people do this? And if they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the money on raises but on more computer hardware/software. Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact IT and then to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business problems. You have presented no cases that justify any limits. You've actually presented some pretty good cases for not having limits. Your company is small, probably to get away from the large staffs and stay innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways available and very easy for them to use. In a perfect world. I only wish I had the time, resources and energy to do what you say. You are right that we want to stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much stagnation as in a big company. I am a scientist (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug development research. Now I am a computer geek and I understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing research. I have been on both sides and still am. But computers like any scientific instrument require a certain amount of maintenance etc. Too often users feel computers are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning. As much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business. So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life. Sure I can tell management that I told you so when things break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. So maybe I am just whining, and should just get over it. So the bottom line is it is OK to use exchange as a database and not worry about it. Jim -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas I agree as long as there is money to support it. But keep in mind that having a large IS means that there is that much more stuff for lawyers or the FDA (we do drug development) to go after. And if you are going to have an unlimited store it ahs to be managed. Those tools are not free. I man IT shop and unless I get an open ended budget I have to make some decisions. My request for journal/archive software is going unanswered. So all I can do is tell management that both myself and our legal counsel made suggestions. Then I just do my job. And I imagine some of this is due to the fact I come from having used a VAX account that had pretty strict limits (I still use it. Either you managed it or it would lock you out. I know times have changed. Jim -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas Why do you pretend to be arrogant enough to be able to dictate the needs of others? You don't seem to have any business drivers to justify your actions. And who is to say that getting additional disk drives for the user email storage isn't out of the question? And as to storage, it has nothing to do with processor and RAM. And most importantly, just because you don't restrict the users storage, doesn't mean that you will run out of space. That's absolutely hogwash, a justification of why many IT shops get such a bad reputation. Your job is to SUPPORT your users, not be a dictator. In the whole scheme of things, a few thousand dollars for some disk space and maybe an upgrade in Exchange editions is petty cash. The BUSINESS driver should not be an IT limit. Exchange really is able to support most business drivers with little difficulty. In the limitation of storage, that should be
RE: Unlimited Quotas
With the dumpster, recovery isn't usually a big deal, until users call after a file has been deleted for weeks (and it has passed out of the dumpster).In my organization the expectation was that it was on tape. I don't have the person-hours, disk space or spare servers to do that kind of recovery. My management has been presented repeatedly with those types of options; but balk at the cost (particularly when our file servers have a working backup system and tape rotation system that already provides the type of retention that my user community seems to want). So in my environment, I find it better to educate set expectations up-front. This helps provide the services that my community needs, and keep costs down as well - which is something I get hammered with all the time. This is a business need too! What everyone is saying about supporting business needs is fine and true; however sometimes the business doesn't have the money to pay for every option... Just my 2 cents. Flames offline please... Arron === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 10:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas Why is recovery so difficult? If you've got the dumpster turned on, then recovery is something the user can do without fairly easily. Never a need for brick backup. -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:33 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas One I have used with some success is the use of Exchange as a file server. The larger their quota is, the more important things tend to wind up there. If they start using it as a file server, and want something restored they are hosed. (unless you are doing a coughbrick-level backup/cough, or can take the time/find the space to restore the entire store...) Good Luck! === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Front-End DC
All, I have read and heard some conflicting information (surprise). We are having a problem with our Exchange servers contacting our DCs. All of the servers are on the same LAN connected using 3com switches, we are using VLANs, but again all servers are on the same VLAN. We get numerous messages in the event logs that state the DC or the GC could not be contacted, but I can reach them through other network services, it seems only the exchange services can't. The real question is whether or not I should make one of our front-end (OWA) exchange servers a DC? Is there any harm in doing this? I have read white papers that say you should have at least one Exchange-DC and others that say never make an Exchange server a DC. Any ideas or experience with Exchange/DC hybrids? rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendars
Here: Exchange / Outlook 2K Problem: I have a 'Public' Company calendar. Everyone can see it. I want it to update everyone's private calendar, but not vice versa. Can anyone help me get this done? Please... TIA -- Reed L. O'Brien VisionOnline, Inc. 10511 Braddock Road, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22032 703-425-4800 703-425-6885 fax www.visiononline.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --last line of the author's message-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front-End DC
I've never seen a white paper that says either. For ease of disaster recovery, I'd leave them separate if you have the hardware. You'll want to fix your problem, rather than sweeping it under a rug. In ESM, in the properties pages of your server, Directory Access tab, are all the servers correct? Use DSADIAG to find out what controllers are available; that'll help you troubleshoot. It'll be worth your while to actually find out what's going on and fix it. -Original Message- From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:02 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Front-End DC Subject: Front-End DC All, I have read and heard some conflicting information (surprise). We are having a problem with our Exchange servers contacting our DCs. All of the servers are on the same LAN connected using 3com switches, we are using VLANs, but again all servers are on the same VLAN. We get numerous messages in the event logs that state the DC or the GC could not be contacted, but I can reach them through other network services, it seems only the exchange services can't. The real question is whether or not I should make one of our front-end (OWA) exchange servers a DC? Is there any harm in doing this? I have read white papers that say you should have at least one Exchange-DC and others that say never make an Exchange server a DC. Any ideas or experience with Exchange/DC hybrids? rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, at 10:47pm, Woodrick, Ed wrote: And as to disk drives, I can speak pretty knowledgeably in this situation, there is virtually no storage limitations within Exchange that impacts the per user storage. Yah, and what about when you run out of physical disk space, or tape space, or backup time? Buy more/better equipment, you say, but have you ever worked in small company environment, where investing money in IT can sometimes require something close to an act of Congress? And as to users keeping things forever, that's pretty much hogwash. You don't have our customers, then. We've got several people in several different organizations that have over one *gigabyte* of saved mail data. And we are by no means a large company. That means that even something as small as a TB requires well over 1,000 users. The fact that your regard one terabyte as small indicates that you don't really understand the small business situation, where we often have to beg and plead with the customer to buy a 20 GB tape backup drive. Quote policy is something that should be done on a case-by-case basis. Blanket statements about what is applicable are bogus. However, not having any policy at all is almost sure to cause headaches down the road. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KLEZ or Sleaze
Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject is Mortgage Rates Have Never Been Lower. Email body is legitimate-looking ad. Is this KLEZ or an incredibly underhanded advertiser? TIA, Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Notes connector
This probably sounds a daft question, but its part of a much larger problem that I'd confuse myself attempting to explain! The Notes connector in e2k creates a mailbox used to deliver mail to before being processed by the connector. Mail is sent to the connector mailbox using SMTP. Could anyone tell me where in the AD the SMTP Addresses for this mailbox are stored? It doesn't appear to be on the connector object itself in the config naming context. Any help would be much appreciated!! Thanks, Darren. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KLEZ or Sleaze
Interesting I've been seeing the same thing. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject is Mortgage Rates Have Never Been Lower. Email body is legitimate-looking ad. Is this KLEZ or an incredibly underhanded advertiser? TIA, Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar issue
Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KLEZ or Sleaze
Probably a sleazy spammer (sorry, that's redundant). It's quite common to forge the from address. If your antivirus isn't going off you can know for sure. -- be - MOS You can't have everything. Where would you put it? -- Steven Wright -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject is Mortgage Rates Have Never Been Lower. Email body is legitimate-looking ad. Is this KLEZ or an incredibly underhanded advertiser? TIA, Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Virus?
Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front-End DC
Hi there If the Front End server is in same site, make sure that it is in the same subnet. If it FE server is not in the same subnet, then you need to specify the subnet in sites and services. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front-End DC All, I have read and heard some conflicting information (surprise). We are having a problem with our Exchange servers contacting our DCs. All of the servers are on the same LAN connected using 3com switches, we are using VLANs, but again all servers are on the same VLAN. We get numerous messages in the event logs that state the DC or the GC could not be contacted, but I can reach them through other network services, it seems only the exchange services can't. The real question is whether or not I should make one of our front-end (OWA) exchange servers a DC? Is there any harm in doing this? I have read white papers that say you should have at least one Exchange-DC and others that say never make an Exchange server a DC. Any ideas or experience with Exchange/DC hybrids? rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KLEZ or Sleaze
We've gotten a couple of these as well... Looks like it comes from another user at your own org... Pretty neat trick, confused a couple people here, but it's just another underhanded spammer... Grab the originating IP address off the header and head to www.dnsstuff.com and pop it into their spam database lookup to see how many of the spam and blackhole lists have the server in their database. Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject is Mortgage Rates Have Never Been Lower. Email body is legitimate-looking ad. Is this KLEZ or an incredibly underhanded advertiser? TIA, Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Sybari has it covered also. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Mmmm hm -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
I block everything but zip, pictures, and office docs. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Virus? Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Yes, I do. I was just joking with Kevin. But I guess he didn't see that. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Virus? Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
And I use Martin's list to block...blow Martin Blow...It's a good horn to blow Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
The genome thingie?? Hahahaha.. They are running mixed mode 5.5 and 2k.. They have a cluster fusk for email wink --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Virus? Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
That's what I always say.[1] Having said that, we did have an instance of http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which, rather than sending itself to the address indicated by our MX records (which all point at Messagelabs), came straight to our gateway (which has no public DNS records pointing to it). It was caught by our internal AV software, but it had us worried for a while. We have since tightened up the gateway[2] so that *only* Messagelabs can connect on port 25, so that particular problem shouldn't recur. Interesting behaviour from the virus, though. My guess is that it looks into message headers on the infected machine for originating IP addresses to send itself to rather than using DNS, but if anyone has any other explanations, I'd be interested in hearing them... [1] http://www.messagelabs.com [2] Please insert standard remarks concerning stable doors, horses, etc.[3] [3] And throw in a mutter or two for good measure Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! - The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
So we just have to send your users nasties in zip files? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? I block everything but zip, pictures, and office docs. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
There's no answer to that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Ditto. Who cares if a user wants to get an AVI file from home. I say kill em all. -- From: Kevin Miller Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 8, 2002 10:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Virus? I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Metallica!! -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Ditto. Who cares if a user wants to get an AVI file from home. I say kill em all. -- From: Kevin Miller Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 8, 2002 10:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Virus? I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
If I could do that, I'd never leave the house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
I try to blow my horn once if not twice a day. It makes you feel good. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? If I could do that, I'd never leave the house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
I was wrong. There *was* an answer to that -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? If I could do that, I'd never leave the house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. -- be - MOS If God didn't mean for us to juggle, tennis balls wouldn't come three to a can. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Ditto. Who cares if a user wants to get an AVI file from home. I say kill em all. -- From: Kevin Miller Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 8, 2002 10:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: New Virus? I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Trend has it covered -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Hi, Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that is the report I have received. Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
course there is - lucky guy G -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? There's no answer to that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KLEZ or Sleaze
What I've seen is they are not using the helo/ehelo part of sendmail.this is what im getting in my sendmail logsauthentication-warning: [203.42.219.114] didn't use helo protocol john -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject is Mortgage Rates Have Never Been Lower. Email body is legitimate-looking ad. Is this KLEZ or an incredibly underhanded advertiser? TIA, Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
LOL! -Original Message- From: HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? course there is - lucky guy G -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? There's no answer to that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly
Public folder permission
A resource calendar was created and permission was assigned to a group. But it didn't propagate correctly as a result of deleting the Distribution List and creating a new Security Group with the same name or shortly after. I deleted that group over the weekend, waited about 20 minutes and then recreated it... Permission now do appears to pass in the public folder... However, I get NT Users: ## account in those public folders client permission tab. Furthermore, I am unable to modify the folder from neither OL nor ESM. I get 80040102 with ESM and Modified permisson cannot be saved in OL... Q31 appears to be pointing me towards the right direction, but we didn't modify any ExIFS... The only permission modification we did was either via OL or ESM. Anyone else with a better solution? Suggestion? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
That's absolutely correct. If business is presented with the situation, then they get to make the decision. If they don't think that it's worth the cost, then that, as many other things just don't get done. -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:59 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas With the dumpster, recovery isn't usually a big deal, until users call after a file has been deleted for weeks (and it has passed out of the dumpster).In my organization the expectation was that it was on tape. I don't have the person-hours, disk space or spare servers to do that kind of recovery. My management has been presented repeatedly with those types of options; but balk at the cost (particularly when our file servers have a working backup system and tape rotation system that already provides the type of retention that my user community seems to want). So in my environment, I find it better to educate set expectations up-front. This helps provide the services that my community needs, and keep costs down as well - which is something I get hammered with all the time. This is a business need too! What everyone is saying about supporting business needs is fine and true; however sometimes the business doesn't have the money to pay for every option... Just my 2 cents. Flames offline please... Arron === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
-Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:27 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support. Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits. No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbox management set to delete mail from the deleted items every seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who had over 10 megs of stuff in there. So users need more training. Easier said than done. So I had a discussion with the CFO about this. His analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail build up on your table until it breaks. Do people do this? And if they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the money on raises but on more computer hardware/software. _ 10MB of information in the deleted items really isn't a big deal. Some people don't empty their trash cans on purpose, others think that it's automatically deleted. It's a user education thing. I know that I was recently working on a report and would throw old copies of the document in the real trashcan. Folks knew not to empty my trashcan until the report was handed in. I was using the trash can as a temporary archive. And while he's the CFO, he is mistaken with his analogy. A trashcan is a trashcan, it's not the Inbox. And yes, there are people who will let their desktop fill up with junk mail. Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact IT and then to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business problems. You have presented no cases that justify any limits. You've actually presented some pretty good cases for not having limits. Your company is small, probably to get away from the large staffs and stay innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways available and very easy for them to use. In a perfect world. I only wish I had the time, resources and energy to do what you say. You are right that we want to stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much stagnation as in a big company. I am a scientist (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug development research. Now I am a computer geek and I understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing research. I have been on both sides and still am. But computers like any scientific instrument require a certain amount of maintenance etc. Too often users feel computers are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning. As much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business. So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life. Sure I can tell management that I told you so when things break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. So maybe I am just whining, and should just get over it. So the bottom line is it is OK to use exchange as a database and not worry about it. __ Yes it's okay to use Exchange/Outlook as a database. That's part of the positioning from Microsoft. It's part of the knowledge management stuff. As to not worrying about it, I can't say that. It's always IT's job to worry about everything. But it doesn't need to be high on the radar screen. When your storage reaches 75% capacity, it's probably time to start raising a flag, either more storage or less to store. The most important part would probably be to make sure that your organization has a good solid document retention policy. You might scuff and say that's a lawyer type of thing, but wait and see how much crap you have to do it you get subpoenaed! You want to make sure that you are following the rules of the retention policy all along and that you aren't caught doing an Enron! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
Yes I've worked in small companies. And I've sold to small companies. I dare say that I understand the dynamics fairly well. Disk space, tape space, and backup time are all simple issues, present them to the purse strings and let them make the decision. 1GB of saved email? You aren't even in the big leagues here. I'd say that well over 50% of the users on this list have one ore more mailboxes with 1GB storage. Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually taking up on your server? 1GB? Not with single instance storage! And as I said, the 90%-10% rule goes to work. No, my regards of a TB as small doesn't mean that I don't know the small business environment, it only means that I work with a large range of customers. But I also know that 1TB isn't that expensive anymore. That's only seven 160GB drives. I've known many small companies with seven drive servers. When 4GB drives were common, it wasn't that odd to have that many drives. Yes, I know that you often have to beg and plead with a customer to get a tape backup. So? That's what I'm saying. The customer (aka business drivers) get to make the decisions. Don't assume that they always want everything. Don't assume that they want nothing. I've seen too many situations where IT people say that management doesn't want to do something and then someone puts together a quick business case and it goes through unhampered. But the most important thing here is to make believable and knowledgeable recommendations to the business drivers. Make sure that your recommendations are prudent. Understand what levels of spending the business drivers are making. Know what to recommend and when to recommend it. It's a big deal making sure that you are forecasting your needs correctly and getting them into the budget cycle. Make longer term, comprehensive plans. Do you have your email storage charted out for the next 5 years? Do you have growth projections and timelines that new servers or disks will have to come online? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:11 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, at 10:47pm, Woodrick, Ed wrote: And as to disk drives, I can speak pretty knowledgeably in this situation, there is virtually no storage limitations within Exchange that impacts the per user storage. Yah, and what about when you run out of physical disk space, or tape space, or backup time? Buy more/better equipment, you say, but have you ever worked in small company environment, where investing money in IT can sometimes require something close to an act of Congress? And as to users keeping things forever, that's pretty much hogwash. You don't have our customers, then. We've got several people in several different organizations that have over one *gigabyte* of saved mail data. And we are by no means a large company. That means that even something as small as a TB requires well over 1,000 users. The fact that your regard one terabyte as small indicates that you don't really understand the small business situation, where we often have to beg and plead with the customer to buy a 20 GB tape backup drive. Quote policy is something that should be done on a case-by-case basis. Blanket statements about what is applicable are bogus. However, not having any policy at all is almost sure to cause headaches down the road. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Just block *.* and you shouldn't have any problems. Who needs attachments anyways :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Not to blow my own horn... http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good dewd!! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus? Nope. I block both those extensions. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus? Hi, There is a new virus supposedly in the wild: Attachment: LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe Anyone seen it yet? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 with OWA
Currently running E2K/Ex.5.5 in mixed mode. Want to install a front-end server (e2k) to go along with the OWA for ex5.5 mailboxes. That way I can test e2k OWA before removing my last ex5.5 server. OWA for 5.5 can access both 5.5 e2k mailboxes. E2k OWA can only access E2k mailboxes. Can they co-exist? Or, once I tell the back-end servers the virtual server name for the front-end will it remove 5.5 OWA access to the mailboxes? Has anyone tied the Network Load Balancing - ie 2 front-end servers with multiple back-ends.? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTA Error in Event Log.
An RPC Communications error occured. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table Index; 49. Windows 2000 MTA error code:1753 Comms Error Code. Bind Error 0. Remote Server Name This error is appearing on a new exchange 2000 server. It has the ADC connector installed as well as a SMTP connector. This service is published on my ISA server. SMTP messages are not being passed through the ISA server. I do not know if this is related to the error message. I have added my Exchange 2K server name to the hosts file on the 2K server. Any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks, Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 with OWA
They can certainly coexist. But as you mentioned, the FrontEnd server with Exchange2000 will only be able to access the Exchange2000 mailboxes. The 5.5 OWA is like a MAPI client. MAPI-by-proxy if you will. They can coexist fine. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 with OWA Currently running E2K/Ex.5.5 in mixed mode. Want to install a front-end server (e2k) to go along with the OWA for ex5.5 mailboxes. That way I can test e2k OWA before removing my last ex5.5 server. OWA for 5.5 can access both 5.5 e2k mailboxes. E2k OWA can only access E2k mailboxes. Can they co-exist? Or, once I tell the back-end servers the virtual server name for the front-end will it remove 5.5 OWA access to the mailboxes? Has anyone tied the Network Load Balancing - ie 2 front-end servers with multiple back-ends.? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MFC Mapi
Does anyone have any experience with a tool from MS PSS called MFCMAPI? I am trying to restore a deleted PF tree. I do not get an error but no success message either . . . anyone ever use? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MFC Mapi
If you called PSS to get the util you should be able to call back and reference the same call to get help.. Or is this another issue? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MFC Mapi Does anyone have any experience with a tool from MS PSS called MFCMAPI? I am trying to restore a deleted PF tree. I do not get an error but no success message either . . . anyone ever use? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 with OWA
Thanks for the reply... Ron -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 with OWA They can certainly coexist. But as you mentioned, the FrontEnd server with Exchange2000 will only be able to access the Exchange2000 mailboxes. The 5.5 OWA is like a MAPI client. MAPI-by-proxy if you will. They can coexist fine. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 with OWA Currently running E2K/Ex.5.5 in mixed mode. Want to install a front-end server (e2k) to go along with the OWA for ex5.5 mailboxes. That way I can test e2k OWA before removing my last ex5.5 server. OWA for 5.5 can access both 5.5 e2k mailboxes. E2k OWA can only access E2k mailboxes. Can they co-exist? Or, once I tell the back-end servers the virtual server name for the front-end will it remove 5.5 OWA access to the mailboxes? Has anyone tied the Network Load Balancing - ie 2 front-end servers with multiple back-ends.? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA Error in Event Log.
Try adding it to LMHOSTS. If that fixes the problem, then you know that you should fix or install WINS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Error in Event Log. An RPC Communications error occured. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table Index; 49. Windows 2000 MTA error code:1753 Comms Error Code. Bind Error 0. Remote Server Name This error is appearing on a new exchange 2000 server. It has the ADC connector installed as well as a SMTP connector. This service is published on my ISA server. SMTP messages are not being passed through the ISA server. I do not know if this is related to the error message. I have added my Exchange 2K server name to the hosts file on the 2K server. Any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks, Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
Like the other Ed is telling you, it shouldn't be your job to make their business decisions. You explain the ramifications of having no quotas currently, what it will mean in the future, and the costs to change things. That is, you present options to management. You should be positioning your job as a service provider, a helper. Do your best to leave the policeman role to those best equipped to handle it, i.e., management. Your customers, the users, will love you more in the morning that way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support. Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits. No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbox management set to delete mail from the deleted items every seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who had over 10 megs of stuff in there. So users need more training. Easier said than done. So I had a discussion with the CFO about this. His analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail build up on your table until it breaks. Do people do this? And if they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the money on raises but on more computer hardware/software. Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact IT and then to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business problems. You have presented no cases that justify any limits. You've actually presented some pretty good cases for not having limits. Your company is small, probably to get away from the large staffs and stay innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways available and very easy for them to use. In a perfect world. I only wish I had the time, resources and energy to do what you say. You are right that we want to stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much stagnation as in a big company. I am a scientist (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug development research. Now I am a computer geek and I understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing research. I have been on both sides and still am. But computers like any scientific instrument require a certain amount of maintenance etc. Too often users feel computers are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning. As much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business. So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life. Sure I can tell management that I told you so when things break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. So maybe I am just whining, and should just get over it. So the bottom line is it is OK to use exchange as a database and not worry about it. Jim -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas I agree as long as there is money to support it. But keep in mind that having a large IS means that there is that much more stuff for lawyers or the FDA (we do drug development) to go after. And if you are going to have an unlimited store it ahs to be managed. Those tools are not free. I man IT shop and unless I get an open ended budget I have to make some decisions. My request for journal/archive software is going unanswered. So all I can do is tell management that both myself and our legal counsel made suggestions. Then I just do my job. And I imagine some of this is due to the fact I come from having used a VAX account that had pretty strict limits (I still use it. Either you managed it or it would lock you out. I know times have changed. Jim -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas Why do you pretend to be arrogant enough to be able to dictate the needs of others? You don't seem to have any business
RE: Calendar issue
In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy data to publish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issue Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendars
You could write an application. There's nothing standard in Exchange or Outlook that does that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Reed OBrien Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendars Here: Exchange / Outlook 2K Problem: I have a 'Public' Company calendar. Everyone can see it. I want it to update everyone's private calendar, but not vice versa. Can anyone help me get this done? Please... TIA -- Reed L. O'Brien VisionOnline, Inc. 10511 Braddock Road, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22032 703-425-4800 703-425-6885 fax www.visiononline.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --last line of the author's message-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
I am finally getting management to make some decisions. But they have a habit of putting things off until we are in a crisis situation. I hate to have to wait until all hell breaks loose and then both management AND the users are throwing a fit. Jim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas Like the other Ed is telling you, it shouldn't be your job to make their business decisions. You explain the ramifications of having no quotas currently, what it will mean in the future, and the costs to change things. That is, you present options to management. You should be positioning your job as a service provider, a helper. Do your best to leave the policeman role to those best equipped to handle it, i.e., management. Your customers, the users, will love you more in the morning that way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support. Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits. No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbox management set to delete mail from the deleted items every seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who had over 10 megs of stuff in there. So users need more training. Easier said than done. So I had a discussion with the CFO about this. His analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail build up on your table until it breaks. Do people do this? And if they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the money on raises but on more computer hardware/software. Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact IT and then to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business problems. You have presented no cases that justify any limits. You've actually presented some pretty good cases for not having limits. Your company is small, probably to get away from the large staffs and stay innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways available and very easy for them to use. In a perfect world. I only wish I had the time, resources and energy to do what you say. You are right that we want to stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much stagnation as in a big company. I am a scientist (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug development research. Now I am a computer geek and I understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing research. I have been on both sides and still am. But computers like any scientific instrument require a certain amount of maintenance etc. Too often users feel computers are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning. As much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business. So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life. Sure I can tell management that I told you so when things break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. So maybe I am just whining, and should just get over it. So the bottom line is it is OK to use exchange as a database and not worry about it. Jim -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas I agree as long as there is money to support it. But keep in mind that having a large IS means that there is that much more stuff for lawyers or the FDA (we do drug development) to go after. And if you are going to have an unlimited store it ahs to be managed. Those tools are not free. I man IT shop and unless I get an open ended budget I have to make some decisions. My request for journal/archive software is going unanswered. So all I can do is tell management that both myself and our legal counsel made
RE: Unlimited Quotas
It is possible that your best option is to do as I suggest and give them the options well in advance of a crisis and then let the crisis happen. You can even warn them along the way if you want. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas I am finally getting management to make some decisions. But they have a habit of putting things off until we are in a crisis situation. I hate to have to wait until all hell breaks loose and then both management AND the users are throwing a fit. Jim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas Like the other Ed is telling you, it shouldn't be your job to make their business decisions. You explain the ramifications of having no quotas currently, what it will mean in the future, and the costs to change things. That is, you present options to management. You should be positioning your job as a service provider, a helper. Do your best to leave the policeman role to those best equipped to handle it, i.e., management. Your customers, the users, will love you more in the morning that way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support. Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits. No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbox management set to delete mail from the deleted items every seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who had over 10 megs of stuff in there. So users need more training. Easier said than done. So I had a discussion with the CFO about this. His analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail build up on your table until it breaks. Do people do this? And if they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the money on raises but on more computer hardware/software. Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact IT and then to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business problems. You have presented no cases that justify any limits. You've actually presented some pretty good cases for not having limits. Your company is small, probably to get away from the large staffs and stay innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways available and very easy for them to use. In a perfect world. I only wish I had the time, resources and energy to do what you say. You are right that we want to stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much stagnation as in a big company. I am a scientist (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug development research. Now I am a computer geek and I understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing research. I have been on both sides and still am. But computers like any scientific instrument require a certain amount of maintenance etc. Too often users feel computers are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning. As much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business. So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life. Sure I can tell management that I told you so when things break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. So maybe I am just whining, and should just get over it. So the bottom line is it is OK to use exchange as a database and not worry about it. Jim -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas I agree as long as there is money to support it.
RE: MTA Error in Event Log.
Just added that Ed, and the same error is appearing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MFC Mapi
same issue but the PSS person I am talking to seems to have limited knowledge of this tool . . . . - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:59 PM Subject: RE: MFC Mapi If you called PSS to get the util you should be able to call back and reference the same call to get help.. Or is this another issue? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MFC Mapi Does anyone have any experience with a tool from MS PSS called MFCMAPI? I am trying to restore a deleted PF tree. I do not get an error but no success message either . . . anyone ever use? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RUS not updating
Hi all, added a new user today and discovered that after 2 hours, the email address had not been automatically entered into the (mailbox enabled) account. I believe this has something to do with the RUS, correct? Found one reference to it in the KB - Q317654. It says this may happen without any message in the event log, which is the case here. they also say it is likely a permissions issue and the solution would be to run Setup.exe /domainprep which kind of frightens me. I can't imagine how the permissions would have gotten fouled up and when i eyeballed them, they seemed ok. has anyone had anything like this happen before, and is it cool to re-run domainprep on an otherwise functional machine? Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA and IIS Security
Hi Everyone, Lately I've been noticing a number of attempts to hack one of our Exchange Servers. Our network is behind a Pix firewall and I've closed all unnecessary ports and have it fairly tightly locked down. However I have Port 80, 25 and 110 open for Exchange. My main concern is IIS. I am considering the possibility of disabling IIS and OWA on the Exchange server to minimize attacks. I have all the latest NT4 security patches (that I know of) but the hackers are still attempting to do mischief. There are two things I'd like to know: - 1. Is there a means of making IIS bullet proof with a patch or 3rd party tool? 2. Is it possible to install the OWA component on a server that is running IIS but not Exchange? The reason I ask this is because we have a web server that's running IIS. I thought it may reduce the risk of attack if I remove IIS from the Exchange server and use our web server for OWA? I know this is probably a dumb question but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I've checked out the FAQ but couldn't find anything on this particular scenario. The Exchange server in question is running Exchange 5.5 and Nt4 (SP6). The web server is running W2K (SP2). I'd greatly appreciate feedback re this. Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Ltd Auckland New Zealand Ph:64 09 522 5909 Fax:64 09 522 5901 Mob: 021 703035 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus?
Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP;mixed mode. Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem ? TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading from 5.0 to 5.5
I'm running 5.0 std on an NT server that's about maxed out. I've got another server available to upgrade to 5.5, however, when I try to install the server software and connect to the existing server (VS1) I get the following error message: VS1 is licensed for stand alone use only. Install Microsoft Exchange Server Connector on VS1 if you want to join it's site What is it? Where can I get it? Question 2: How much unused drive space do I need to just run the upgrade on the current machine? Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox manager instances
During the learning curve on Exch2K, I started multiple instances of Mailbox Manager, all of which run consecutively every week. The first does its task but the others run anyway. It's not a serious issue, but I can't find anything in Technet or the archives which would indicate where I could find that those jobs are scheduled, and be able to delete all but the first instance. Can that be done, or should I just delete that policy altogether and start a new one? David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issue
Thanks for the pointer Ed, everything looks OK there, however the time zone in Calendar options is off by an hour( it is spooky), The exchange server, XP client are all on CST with daylight savings enabled, the time on the time zone in calendar options is set to the same (CST with daylight enabled, but is ahead by an hour) Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy data to publish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issue Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and IIS Security
1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but Microsoft has a security tool that sets perms for an IIS server running OWA to minimize risk. Search for the IIS security tool or something like that. 2) Yes you can run OWA on a different server. I do that. I have a cheapo ex-desktop that runs IIS and OWA and that is it. But I don't have very many users on it either. Be aware that if you have the IIS server in a DMZ then you may have to open more holes in your firewall than you would like. Some folks recommend keeping the OWA server inside the firewall so you don't have to open more than 2 ports to it. This has been discussed on the list in the past. People can get somewhat passionate about their view on the subject. You might want to check the archives although I don't know how well the search feature is working right now. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and IIS Security Hi Everyone, Lately I've been noticing a number of attempts to hack one of our Exchange Servers. Our network is behind a Pix firewall and I've closed all unnecessary ports and have it fairly tightly locked down. However I have Port 80, 25 and 110 open for Exchange. My main concern is IIS. I am considering the possibility of disabling IIS and OWA on the Exchange server to minimize attacks. I have all the latest NT4 security patches (that I know of) but the hackers are still attempting to do mischief. There are two things I'd like to know: - 1. Is there a means of making IIS bullet proof with a patch or 3rd party tool? 2. Is it possible to install the OWA component on a server that is running IIS but not Exchange? The reason I ask this is because we have a web server that's running IIS. I thought it may reduce the risk of attack if I remove IIS from the Exchange server and use our web server for OWA? I know this is probably a dumb question but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I've checked out the FAQ but couldn't find anything on this particular scenario. The Exchange server in question is running Exchange 5.5 and Nt4 (SP6). The web server is running W2K (SP2). I'd greatly appreciate feedback re this. Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Ltd Auckland New Zealand Ph:64 09 522 5909 Fax:64 09 522 5901 Mob: 021 703035 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and IIS Security
Thanks for the info. I'll have a go at installing OWA on the web server I think. I see IIS as a necessary evil. We're basically a Microsoft environment here so since I have to use IIS for the web server I may as well install OWA on it as well. Do I just install the OWA component from SP4? Any other Exchange components required? Regards Tony -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 8:49 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security 1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but Microsoft has a security tool that sets perms for an IIS server running OWA to minimize risk. Search for the IIS security tool or something like that. 2) Yes you can run OWA on a different server. I do that. I have a cheapo ex-desktop that runs IIS and OWA and that is it. But I don't have very many users on it either. Be aware that if you have the IIS server in a DMZ then you may have to open more holes in your firewall than you would like. Some folks recommend keeping the OWA server inside the firewall so you don't have to open more than 2 ports to it. This has been discussed on the list in the past. People can get somewhat passionate about their view on the subject. You might want to check the archives although I don't know how well the search feature is working right now. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and IIS Security Hi Everyone, Lately I've been noticing a number of attempts to hack one of our Exchange Servers. Our network is behind a Pix firewall and I've closed all unnecessary ports and have it fairly tightly locked down. However I have Port 80, 25 and 110 open for Exchange. My main concern is IIS. I am considering the possibility of disabling IIS and OWA on the Exchange server to minimize attacks. I have all the latest NT4 security patches (that I know of) but the hackers are still attempting to do mischief. There are two things I'd like to know: - 1. Is there a means of making IIS bullet proof with a patch or 3rd party tool? 2. Is it possible to install the OWA component on a server that is running IIS but not Exchange? The reason I ask this is because we have a web server that's running IIS. I thought it may reduce the risk of attack if I remove IIS from the Exchange server and use our web server for OWA? I know this is probably a dumb question but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I've checked out the FAQ but couldn't find anything on this particular scenario. The Exchange server in question is running Exchange 5.5 and Nt4 (SP6). The web server is running W2K (SP2). I'd greatly appreciate feedback re this. Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Ltd Auckland New Zealand Ph:64 09 522 5909 Fax:64 09 522 5901 Mob: 021 703035 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Client Locking
Hello All- I periodically (currently) have users with W2k Pro SP2 + HF O2k SR2* Dell GX240 1.8G 256RAM that have a locking problems when they logon to their email. I have eliminated network problems, the server seems intact (W2k Server SP2 + all hotfixes per HFNETCHK). What happens is they open their email client, wait a moment, then they can open two messages or so and Outlook locks the whole computer. Task manager lets them out and they can go through the process again. Some people who have this problem wait a day and it magically goes away. This is maddening, does anyone have any further insight or other troubleshooting techniques? Paul Done * The latest problem I have updated to SR2, but the problem is for all levels (unpatched to SR1a, etc) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and IIS Security
You need to start with the Exchange install cd and then apply SP4 as far as I know (I had to do that but we were only on SP3 at that point). I thought there was something in the FAQ about this too? In one of the appendices maybe? Yup, here it is: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxg.htm Ronni -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security Thanks for the info. I'll have a go at installing OWA on the web server I think. I see IIS as a necessary evil. We're basically a Microsoft environment here so since I have to use IIS for the web server I may as well install OWA on it as well. Do I just install the OWA component from SP4? Any other Exchange components required? Regards Tony -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 8:49 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security 1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but Microsoft has a security tool that sets perms for an IIS server running OWA to minimize risk. Search for the IIS security tool or something like that. 2) Yes you can run OWA on a different server. I do that. I have a cheapo ex-desktop that runs IIS and OWA and that is it. But I don't have very many users on it either. Be aware that if you have the IIS server in a DMZ then you may have to open more holes in your firewall than you would like. Some folks recommend keeping the OWA server inside the firewall so you don't have to open more than 2 ports to it. This has been discussed on the list in the past. People can get somewhat passionate about their view on the subject. You might want to check the archives although I don't know how well the search feature is working right now. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and IIS Security Hi Everyone, Lately I've been noticing a number of attempts to hack one of our Exchange Servers. Our network is behind a Pix firewall and I've closed all unnecessary ports and have it fairly tightly locked down. However I have Port 80, 25 and 110 open for Exchange. My main concern is IIS. I am considering the possibility of disabling IIS and OWA on the Exchange server to minimize attacks. I have all the latest NT4 security patches (that I know of) but the hackers are still attempting to do mischief. There are two things I'd like to know: - 1. Is there a means of making IIS bullet proof with a patch or 3rd party tool? 2. Is it possible to install the OWA component on a server that is running IIS but not Exchange? The reason I ask this is because we have a web server that's running IIS. I thought it may reduce the risk of attack if I remove IIS from the Exchange server and use our web server for OWA? I know this is probably a dumb question but I thought I'd ask it anyway. I've checked out the FAQ but couldn't find anything on this particular scenario. The Exchange server in question is running Exchange 5.5 and Nt4 (SP6). The web server is running W2K (SP2). I'd greatly appreciate feedback re this. Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Ltd Auckland New Zealand Ph:64 09 522 5909 Fax:64 09 522 5901 Mob: 021 703035 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issue
Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue Thanks for the pointer Ed, everything looks OK there, however the time zone in Calendar options is off by an hour( it is spooky), The exchange server, XP client are all on CST with daylight savings enabled, the time on the time zone in calendar options is set to the same (CST with daylight enabled, but is ahead by an hour) Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy data to publish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issue Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar issue
I did that, also with the resetfolders switch. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue Thanks for the pointer Ed, everything looks OK there, however the time zone in Calendar options is off by an hour( it is spooky), The exchange server, XP client are all on CST with daylight savings enabled, the time on the time zone in calendar options is set to the same (CST with daylight enabled, but is ahead by an hour) Raj -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar issue In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy data to publish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar issue Good day All, Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP; Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be scheduled with the user though. Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem. TIA Raj **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed
RE: PST as an archive?
Ed's discussion in the FAQ is excellent. I would add one item to the two goods. If you are providing Exchange Server services to non-employees, they may be receiving some mail which is not the property of the enterprise. This could also be true for employees, but you need to clarify exactly who owns what and how the law of bailments applies. A good example of mail which you do not want to mix into your store is mail that is sent to an on-site customer or vendor representative that is proprietary and perhaps even limited to that customer or vendor. If you have a situation in which you are delivering mail and you are not charging for ISP storage services, then you do not want that mail to be stored on your servers after it is deemed to have been delivered. PST's are the logical solution in such situations. This fact does nothing to address the inherent weaknesses in PST's. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unlimited Quotas
And then when the users come yelling, just point the finger to the direction where blame goes. It's rather amazing how people won't go complaining to a CEO or other decision maker level person. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:14 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Unlimited Quotas Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas It is possible that your best option is to do as I suggest and give them the options well in advance of a crisis and then let the crisis happen. You can even warn them along the way if you want. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas I am finally getting management to make some decisions. But they have a habit of putting things off until we are in a crisis situation. I hate to have to wait until all hell breaks loose and then both management AND the users are throwing a fit. Jim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas Like the other Ed is telling you, it shouldn't be your job to make their business decisions. You explain the ramifications of having no quotas currently, what it will mean in the future, and the costs to change things. That is, you present options to management. You should be positioning your job as a service provider, a helper. Do your best to leave the policeman role to those best equipped to handle it, i.e., management. Your customers, the users, will love you more in the morning that way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to support. Has management told you to put limits? When the email or file system was presented to them, did you say that there were going to be limits. No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbox management set to delete mail from the deleted items every seven days. Looking at the recent run shows a few users who had over 10 megs of stuff in there. So users need more training. Easier said than done. So I had a discussion with the CFO about this. His analogy is that never emptying the trash is like letting junk mail build up on your table until it breaks. Do people do this? And if they want to then the decision will be made to not spend the money on raises but on more computer hardware/software. Your job is to keep people from doing really stupid (not what you think is stupid, I mean really stupid) things that impact IT and then to respond to, or be proactive in creating solutions to business problems. You have presented no cases that justify any limits. You've actually presented some pretty good cases for not having limits. Your company is small, probably to get away from the large staffs and stay innovative. This means that you really shouldn't be stifling innovation, don't get in people's way, HELP them do their job. If you see something that they are doing and there is a better way, help them learn a better way. If they need to store 2 GB in the mail server, let them. If they are keeping a backup of their disk, then advise them that there are better ways, but more importantly, make those better ways available and very easy for them to use. In a perfect world. I only wish I had the time, resources and energy to do what you say. You are right that we want to stay innovative, but let me tell you that there is as much stagnation as in a big company. I am a scientist (pharmacologist) by training and spent many years doing drug development research. Now I am a computer geek and I understand the importance of computers as a tool for doing research. I have been on both sides and still am. But computers like any scientific instrument require a certain amount of maintenance etc. Too often users feel computers are not like other tools and need no maintenance/tuning. As much as I try to make a case to management to pay for more training, tools etc. they decide to spend money on other things, even though we are a bioinformatics driven business. So I have to do things that help me maintain my sanity/life. Sure I can tell management that I told you so when things break but all they want to hear is how soon will it be fixed. So maybe I am just whining,
RE: PST as an archive?
But only to the extent that the company's document retention policy allows. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:11 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: PST as an archive? Subject: RE: PST as an archive? PSTs are horrible as regular mailboxes, but as a filetype for archiving purposes it's really the only way to go. -Peter -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST as an archive? On another list I am on it is suggested that outlook mail be archived to .pst files and burned to cd's Is there any good reason to do this? My understanding is that this is not a wise idea and that there are better ways to archive mail stores. It seems that at least once a week someone on this list is trying to deal with a corrupt pst file. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Developer Edition
Can anyone tell me or provide a ref to the differences between Exchange 2000 Developer Edition and Exchange 2000 standard edition? I've searched the entire MS site, including KB, TechNet, and MSDN, and cannot find any info on this. TIA. Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
