A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to
the list (been
monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I
have always
wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I
would hate to
insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage.
Hi all.
I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit
size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment.
Have you told them of the joys of winzip?
_
List posting FAQ:
No. Not me at all.
I'm just visualising an alternative version of Ivor the Engine, where
instead of Jones the Steam (there he is, look) we have Jones the
Tentacle.
-Original Message-
From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 23:04
To: Exchange
Heh heh. Trouble? Cthulhu's no trouble at all, unless.
Oh.
You may have a problem.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 08:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Ray,
Are you trying to destroy the world
Bah!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2002 00:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Did you hear Sheep in the Back ground?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original
Aunt Bessie says hi, and when are you going to visit?
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2002 03:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
We're related, yes.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I thought it was Cuth Lah, as in the thing (cuthlah) that trapped Angel in the 3rd
Buffy series.
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2002 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
A humble question to the Great
Sacrilege!
Robert Moir
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0
0 rows returned
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2002 11:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu
So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost
in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic?
What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically
recalc the routing to the ex2000 server?
-Original Message-
Eric,
Active Directory is a requirement for Exchange 2000. If you have no plans to move to
AD, then I would go with Ex 5.5.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:51 PM
To:
We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for
some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got
caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it
killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that
Sweet shamblin' shoggoths, NO!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Exchange.ListServe
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
I thought it was Cuth Lah, as in the thing
I'm real busy this aeon. Tell her I'll try and be by for the next syzygy.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Les Bessant
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Aunt Bessie
Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when
you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to
stranded/lost mail).
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM
Posted To: List
Another alternative: educate people about FTP. You know, the *other*
Transfer Protocol. SMTP is for simple messages. FTP is for files.
There ya go. Tell 'em CJ sent ya.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate
Sent: Friday,
Still, a good laugh, thinking of all those lawyers going ape because they
can't read the PST which has the files they desperately need for the
{tobacco, gun safety, SUV tire, asbestos, silicone implant, fen-phen, etc.}
case they're trying.
Ooooh! I think I found a new punishment for legal
What was the size limit on the individual mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for
some
Prior to this incident it was 200MB. After the incident we set the
following
IW - 40MB
PS - 50MB
PSR - 200MB
Note: We had informed the customer of these issues prior to the incident
with their server. It was only after the crash that they believed us.
--
Exchange 2000 Server SP3 Native Mode
Windows 2000 Server SP3
When an user sends a message with the Request a delivery receipt for
all messages I send flag activated, he receives a delivery receipt
confirmation with my name (I'm the administrator of Exchange).
Is it possible to change it, to, for
I know you can change this in exchange 5.5 under Internet mail service
properties but you would probably have to make a mailbox with the desired
diplay name.
RGDS
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Cabezas, Manuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:35 AM
To:
try to jiggle it by moving the user's mailbox from one information store to another or
from one server to another
also try exporting the mailbox to a PST file with Outlook, deleting the mailbox, then
importing back
try same with ExMerge
Andrey Fyodorov
founder of the Scientific
My guess would be forwarding. Another evil feature that many of my customers insist on
having.
Then when the server crawls they all complain and blame me, my company, Exchange,
Microsoft, Bill Gates, etc.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Hello. Recently I had to add another email domain to my exchange in =
order
to receive email from our new domain that reflects our recent name =
change.
I have the Recipient policy set up to recie4ve email from both the new =
and
old domains. What I would like to know is if there is a way I can
You'll find that with large messages of that size, you may be fielding calls
from remote users who can't understand why, when they dial in, their email
takes a couple hours to download. Explaining to them that they have several
large attachments waiting for them usually sufficiently frustrates
I'm replacing one of my Exchange 5.5 smtp servers in the next couple of
weeks. This server is also running a Site Connector which is used by our
Tokyo branch. We will be replacing it with an Windows 2000 box runninng
Exchange 5.5. Is there any documentation or suggestions on the best way to
do
I totally agree here. We told them sneding large files via FTP would be far
better.
--
From: Great Cthulhu Jones
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2002 07:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
Another
Customer
::blank stare::
/Customer
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
I totally agree here. We told them sneding large files via FTP would be far
better.
Hello,
I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running
out of room on the second partition where my information store is located.
The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it
is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I
Hi All,
I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different
levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange
5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all
the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message
Do your have the Don't Delete Until Backup option selected in the information store?
Will
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Exchange Delete
Hello,
I
Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank
space
(white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the
space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available
for use.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
no it is not selected, if i select this will it delete all the space that i
previous deleted after the backup tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Will Pawlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Delete
My opinion would be it depends
IF it is say a graphics design firm...then 10MB could likely not be big
enough...or maybe and engineering design firm use Acad..etc...large files
I do not know that there is a hard fast rule on this..it depends on your
environment, bandwidth connections etc...
Ronald,
Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any
potential problems that can occur during the process.
Thanks
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain
according to your
settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted
items.
--
From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 06
no we dont use retension.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Delete
What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain
according to your
Thus, if u check your server properties, highlight server, then expand to
the private store,
then select properties, your retension time should be shown.
David
What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain
according to your
settings. Here for instance we
Then guess a defrag would be your way forward, or a move of one of the
stores somewhere else.
Unless u wait until an online defrag runs...to see if that makes any
kind of impact.
David
--
From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Heh. Sneding.
I would also suggest considering setting the send limit (either global
in ex2k or mailbox level ex 5.5) to whatever your IMC limit is.
We had some [user] try to send a 285MB attachment, and it bounced around
the MTA's for a while before I found it and deleted it.
We have a 4MB
Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time.
Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will
take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need
temp
space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites
Keep in mind that when you look in the Event Viewer, if the online defrag
does not show an enormous amount of space regained (10GB+), I would not even
do the offline defrag. Most of the time EV comes back with only MB of space
recoverable. I think it is only feasible when you can reclaim a
You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the
offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another
server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many
with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to
Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of
the selected
mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool
out there that
will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked
hard and couldn't
find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document.
I'd
Oucch,
Thanks for the info guys, by the way the online backup is freeing up about
72mb 2-3 times a day.
RGDS
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Delete
Sorry! Meant to say 8:00 p.m. EST, Friday night through 6:00 a.m. EST,
Monday morning. If you meant your online defrag is only showing 72MB that
will be freed, then FAI. It would take too much time and resources to do
it.
Just my .02¢
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Tener,
If you have others available, choose a different server (re-home it).
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:01 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Site Connector
Subject: Site Connector
I'm replacing
What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the
ex5.5 server?
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Yes but if you don't
Exchange5.5
WinNT4 sp6
Inoculate IT
I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software
I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base
on the header, body text, or words.
Thank
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If you only have 72MB free, then that is all you will gain by an offline defrag.
1. Increase the size of the drive it's on.
2. Decrease the amount of mail your users have (lower mailbox limits).
3. Install a second server and split your users in half.
-Original Message-
From: Dale
Before? It's posted daily.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: filtering e-mail
Exchange5.5
WinNT4 sp6
Inoculate IT
I know this have been posted before but can someone
The white space will be available after an online defrag is run, it simply
won't show up as space on the disk itself.
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange
Actually at this point a form could be made for this answer.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: filtering e-mail
Before? It's posted daily.
- Original Message -
I think that the FAQ might just cover this one... :)
- Original Message -
From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: filtering e-mail
Actually at this point a form could be made for this
Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can
point me to?
I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000
server.
Thanks and happy Friday.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Last modified version is 5/31/2002
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can
Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had deliberately
disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K re-allows them. Investigating
further we found that the EVERYBODY group had been allowed to provide Create Public
Folder and the box was greyed out. Anybody
That's what I thought might be the driving force... One issue related to
this strategy is that if messages were sent via Bcc or to a DL it might not
be possible to determine from a single PST file which mailbox contained the
data in question.
I recently spent a boatload of time exploring
Why?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folders
Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had
deliberately disallowed these
You mean like disabling the creation of top-level public folders?
Look at:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q256131
Neil
- Original Message -
From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:33 PM
You need to lock down top-level PF creation. Q256131
- Original Message -
From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: Public Folders
Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had
A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear
out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has
someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the
5MB number an off the cuff statistic?
-Original Message-
Too little information to provide a consise answer. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Communication
Okay, I am getting knee deep into a conversion from Exchange
Right, wouldn't want to follow any of those best practices in the FAQ. The
answer to this particular question is detailed extensively in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a
long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I
have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to
be the limit (with exceptions, of course).
Geoff...
5Mb was quite large in MSMail days! :-)
Looks rather small these days, IMHO.
Neil
- Original Message -
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: need ammo
IIRC, the 5MB limit comes
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Last modified version is 5/31/2002
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL
At my last gig we routinely received e-mail messages which were 200MB+.
5-10MB limits would have been laughed at.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
I guess the best answer would be business-related. What is the standard
size of attachments that are sent to a company? I would say that if your
company were an advertising agency, then you would need larger limits, due
to the graphic file, etc. If your company was a law firm, you would need
HI
If a DNS has 2 MX record, when exactly the 2nd (higher cost) one will be used ?
When the first one do not respond to a SMTP session or when the 1st
one does not existe (respond to a ping request )
Basically I'm moving my customer mail to a new ADSL link, and I was
wondering if today I ask
Yeah, which makes it difficult in the case of a hosting company where
multiple customers have different business needs. Might be an area in which
a 3rd party content filtering gateway with the capacity to delay the
delivery of oversized messages could add value.
-Original Message-
Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195?
Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
Thanks. One thing about this company Bosch. They probably are the largest
all MS Exchange Email setup world wide. Somewhere in the range of 200K
users, 50+ sites and about 200+ email servers in about 43 countries. Talk
about seeing it all.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Yes it is.. Go to suppport.micosoft.com and look for I love you in
that virus Q you will find the directions and the tools.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready,
Is there any way, to search the information store for a particular E-mail?
Lets say that I wanted to search the entire server, looking for any E-mail
that
contained the word Threat in it. Is this possible?
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a.
It's a long shot, but I had to try. Thanks!
Robert
You can search under subject and or attachment but not individual word in
the body. No tool known of from MS unless you go a 3rd party or upgrade to
Exchange 2000 and rollout full index searching.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix
over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync
(higher cost and lower bandwidth).
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work:
Just leave the email on the server for the TS session.. You dont need a
pst or Ost.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002
Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do
this too.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
I would
They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a
TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all.
I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the
email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at
all. No PST no
Are you trying to create the OST file for when you don't have access to
Citrix? Then the users laptop with Outlook would have access to the
OST? Isn't there an issue when Outlook tries to access an OST that was
created with a instance? Do you have your citrix drives remapped or is
the remote
Remember...with Citrix/TS you are running a remote session...nothing (to
speak of) is taking place on the users machine running the ICA/TS
clientexcept..for Video/Keyboard/Mouse, the local machine is basically a
dumb terminal...
SO to my knowledge there is no way to get the Outlook info from
We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline
(in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office
when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the
Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland
The server drives are re-mapped. TS users see their local drives as
\\Client\c$, etc.
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL
That is a perfect scenario for using a VPN. Since you already have the
Internet access, you are half way towards a VPN.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
That makes more sense.. They want to be able to work with no connection
but then connect to TS and have the mail be the same on the laptop and
on the server.
Could you setup a separate client that ran IMAP just for the offline
sessions to catch up on email?
Voicestream wireless Cellphone dialup
About every 15 minutes my Exchange 2000 SP2 server has this in the event log
(application):
=
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSExchangeSA
Event Category: General
Event ID: 9188
Date: 8/19/2002
Time: 2:36:44 PM
User:
VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc.
while offline (in meetings, on
Try this
Rich
Event ID: 9188
Source MSExchangeSA
Type Error
Description Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the
membership of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=your domain'.
Error code '80072030'.
Please check whether the local computer is a member of the group.
Thanks, but as I indicated in my original question the local computer IS a member of
the group, and has been the entire time.
Tom Gray, Network Engineer
All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATT Net:
This is an interesting situation we just encountered that I thought others
would be interested in.
In our test environment, we recently upgraded one of the E2K servers to SP3.
Afterwards, for various reasons, we needed to go back to an SP2 version of
the database, so we tried to restore the
Some hotfixes can have this effect as well, which underscores the need for
well documented change control.
-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Backups and Service Packs
Hi All,
I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different
levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange
5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all
the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message
Anybody have moderated folders quit working correctly after adding SP3? One of our
moderated folders (meaning posted items are forwarded first to a moderator, auto
message generated for the sender, previewed, and then OK'ed for the public folder) no
longer works. The moderator does not get the
This article does not mention about configuring the smtp connector on the
2000 Server.Do I need to create a new smtp connector on my 2000 Server?
My 2 exchange servers(5.5 and 2000) are sitting behind an smtp
server(Interscan viruswall)which sends and receives mail from the Internet
and a PIX
Hello,
I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain
address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host
unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue
on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have
What's the domain name???
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: host unreachable
Hello,
I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain
address (domain
certain address (domain ppco.com)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: host unreachable
What's the domain name???
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
ppco.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: host unreachable
What's the domain name???
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I had the same problem with this domain. PPCO is Philips Petroleum.
They do reverse lookups of your mail server. I didn't have a reverse
DNS entry and for testing purposes I had the admin add my server to his
hosts file. That fixed the problem. I have since added the reverse DNS
entry.
thank you I thought it was that just wanted to verify.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: host unreachable
I had the same problem with this domain. PPCO is Philips
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
