How to Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup

[Sanjeev Sharma]

One of our users mistakenly deleted his past Friday's calendar information
through his PDA.  We do have a backup of our Exchange server data for this
past weekend.  My question is there any utility in exchange which will let
me restore only his calendar information from the backup?   Any assistance
would be much appreciated.  Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2K Logging question

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Michael - 

Thank you very much for the assistance today.  I finally found the
problem:

I was looking in the SMTP logs in %windir%\system32\logfiles, not in
correct place of 
C:\Program Files\Exchsrv\server.log directory.  

Once looking in the correct log, I found the outgoing email.  

This of course led to another issue in that the email was going to a
Contact, but it didn't go to the Primary SMTP address of that contact,
it went to a secondary address listed in the Addresses tab of the
Contacts properties.  The contact had two SMTP addresses set up.  The
email was sent to the one that was NOT set as the primary address (and
was NOT listed as the address in the general page of the Contacts
properties).  

When I tried to delete the non-primary address, I received an error
message "This is the home e-mail address of the recipient.  It cannot be
removed."

I worked around this by deleting the entire contact, then creating two
contacts, one each with the SMTP address.  

Anyone with idea why this happened?

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael A.
Brown
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Logging question


Hello,
I have an E2K SP3 system and am having some trouble with emails being
sent and not arriving at their external destinations.  I've turned up
logging on the Virtual SMTP Server, and chose all options in the
Advanced Properties page.  Going through the log, I seem to only see
incoming emails, not outgoing.  I can see the emails in the users Sent
Items, but need to trace it from there. Any suggestions? (By the way - I
am posting this for Jeff Dubyn so I'll refer wisecracks, condescension
and flames back to him!!#$!!)

Thanks,
Mike Brown

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?

[Johnny Martinez]

tech? sheesh whats the name of the person at the front desk?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
how bout the cfo? [EMAIL PROTECTED]? do you address each other like:
secretary: good morning tech.
tech: thank you, good morning to you too secretary. have you seen manager
around?
secretary: yes, he is having coffee with scientist

hehehe sorry...its friday

-Original Message-
From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?


The answer was with the Public Folders, no sooner had I written "tried every
such criteria" as my brain said no you have not.

It was a sysadmin folder with an alias of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

All is well, have a good weekend.

Cheers,

Nathna

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of tech
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail Address Already Exists?


Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account.  I was
trying to send e-mail from an external address and it was giving an NDR that
did not help.  I have deleted this account and tried to recreate it but it
will not give me the original SMTP address.  When I try creating the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP it claims it already exists.

I have followed the KB280765 telling me to go through system manager,
recipents, All Address Lists etc. but I do not find the address having tried
every such criteria.

Any ideas why I can not create the address seeing as Exchange doesn't agree
with itself?

Exchange 2000 SP2
2000 AD SP2

Cheers,

Nathan


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Mellott, Bill]

Note: on this solution...You will need to load the E-fax client software
also read their aggrement..I seem to remember it has some features to it...


2 cents
 bill

-Original Message-
From: Nunez, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try

www.efax.com

You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used
it for over a year without issue) and affordable.

Regards,

Danny


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?

[tech]

The answer was with the Public Folders, no sooner had I written "tried every
such criteria" as my brain said no you have not.

It was a sysadmin folder with an alias of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

All is well, have a good weekend.

Cheers,

Nathna

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of tech
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail Address Already Exists?


Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account.  I was
trying to send e-mail from an external address and it was giving an NDR that
did not help.  I have deleted this account and tried to recreate it but it
will not give me the original SMTP address.  When I try creating the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP it claims it already exists.

I have followed the KB280765 telling me to go through system manager,
recipents, All Address Lists etc. but I do not find the address having tried
every such criteria.

Any ideas why I can not create the address seeing as Exchange doesn't agree
with itself?

Exchange 2000 SP2
2000 AD SP2

Cheers,

Nathan


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA access problems

[Ed Crowley]

Make sure that the default recipient policy has an entry for all the
domains.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Albert Charron
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA access problems


Hi.

I don't know if this is by design or if it's a misconfiguration on my
server.  We host 3 domains on our Exchange 2000 server (SP3).  Only
users on 1 of these domains are able to use OWA.  All users are able to
log through Outlook 2000, this situation occurs only with OWA.

Example:

DomainA
DomainB
DomainC

All users using an e-mail address of this form as primary e-mail
address: users@DomainA are able to log on OWA.  Other users can't log
(system request for password 3 times then show an "Access is denied"
error message).

Is there a way all my users can log to OWA?

Thanks for your help.
 
Albert Charron 
Administrateur système - Trisotech Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?

[Charles Marriott]

Update RUS.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tech
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail Address Already Exists?


Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account.  I was
trying to send e-mail from an external address and it was giving an NDR that
did not help.  I have deleted this account and tried to recreate it but it
will not give me the original SMTP address.  When I try creating the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP it claims it already exists.

I have followed the KB280765 telling me to go through system manager,
recipents, All Address Lists etc. but I do not find the address having tried
every such criteria.

Any ideas why I can not create the address seeing as Exchange doesn't agree
with itself?

Exchange 2000 SP2
2000 AD SP2

Cheers,

Nathan


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

E-mail Address Already Exists?

[tech]

Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account.  I was
trying to send e-mail from an external address and it was giving an NDR that
did not help.  I have deleted this account and tried to recreate it but it
will not give me the original SMTP address.  When I try creating the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP it claims it already exists.

I have followed the KB280765 telling me to go through system manager,
recipents, All Address Lists etc. but I do not find the address having tried
every such criteria.

Any ideas why I can not create the address seeing as Exchange doesn't agree
with itself?

Exchange 2000 SP2
2000 AD SP2

Cheers,

Nathan


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Abwesen.tsnotiz: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Johnny Martinez]

Ok thanks!

-Original Message-
From: "Luck, Sönke" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Johnny Martinez
Subject: Abwesent.snotiz: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Ich bin bis zum 6. Februar 2003 nicht im Büro. In dringenden Fällen wenden
Sie sich bitte an Krzysztof Wietrak.

I'm out of of.fice until February 6th 2003. In urgent cases please contact
Krzysztof Wietrak.

Krzysztof Wietrak: +49 30 2068-4374, Mail intern: 



Mit freundlichen Grüßen
With kind regards

Sönke Luck

KPMG Germany - Exchange Messaging


--
Die Information in dieser eMail ist vertraulich und kann dem Berufsgeheimnis
unterliegen. Sie ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jeglicher
Zugriff auf diese eMail durch andere Personen als den Adressaten ist
untersagt. Sollten Sie nicht der fuer diese eMail bestimmte Adressat sein,
ist Ihnen jede Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe wie auch
das Ergreifen oder Unterlassen von Massnahmen im Vertrauen auf erlangte
Information untersagt. In dieser eMail enthaltene Meinungen oder
Empfehlungen unterliegen den Bedingungen des jeweiligen
Mandatsverhaeltnisses mit dem Adressaten.

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing KPMG client engagement letter.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Johnny Martinez]

This topic should be on the FAQ's. I see it a few times a month.  I've even
asked it before hehe. The same folks say the same thing too (thanks for
sharing btw.)

J

-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:45 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Any Exchange-connected fax product can receive faxes and forward them to a
designated Exchange mailbox.  I don't know if WinFax Pro has this ability or
not. 

We use Faxination (www.faxination.com).  GFI's Faxmaker would work also and
is probably less expensive.  With each you also have the ability to send
faxes from client machines.  That may not be one of your requirements but it
is an significant productivity booster.  I have Visioneer Strobe scanners on
each desktop and being able to scan and send saves a lot of time for the
users.  All sending and receiving is handled through Outlook.

 
Roger Wright
Southern Commerce Bank
___
 
 

Too much of everything is just enough.


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:44 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron

--
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%



___
NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message is considered
privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 456.057 and 395.3025.  It
is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  If the reader
is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this
message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.  



--
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

--
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA access problems

[Tony Hlabse]

yes

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Albert Charron
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA access problems


Hi.

I don't know if this is by design or if it's a misconfiguration on my
server.  We host 3 domains on our Exchange 2000 server (SP3).  Only
users on 1 of these domains are able to use OWA.  All users are able to
log through Outlook 2000, this situation occurs only with OWA.

Example:

DomainA
DomainB
DomainC

All users using an e-mail address of this form as primary e-mail
address: users@DomainA are able to log on OWA.  Other users can't log
(system request for password 3 times then show an "Access is denied"
error message).

Is there a way all my users can log to OWA?

Thanks for your help.
 
Albert Charron 
Administrateur système - Trisotech Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA access problems

[Albert Charron]

Hi.

I don't know if this is by design or if it's a misconfiguration on my server.  We host 
3 domains on our Exchange 2000 server (SP3).  Only users on 1 of these domains are 
able to use OWA.  All users are able to log through Outlook 2000, this situation 
occurs only with OWA.

Example:

DomainA
DomainB
DomainC

All users using an e-mail address of this form as primary e-mail address: 
users@DomainA are able to log on OWA.  Other users can't log (system request for 
password 3 times then show an "Access is denied" error message).

Is there a way all my users can log to OWA?

Thanks for your help.
 
Albert Charron 
Administrateur système - Trisotech Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Nunez, Danny]

If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try

www.efax.com

You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used
it for over a year without issue) and affordable.

Regards,

Danny


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archives - Buy yours today.

[Nunez, Danny]

Was that Exchange or MSMail?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Archives - Buy yours today.


Sorry Chris, I have my own, starting from '95.

/Peter


- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: Archives - Buy yours today.


> I'm looking to make more money off of my www.swinc.com affiliate account
so
> here's my blatant advertisement:
>
> The 4th Quarter 2002 SWYNK archives have been added to the archive CD. Now
> you too can have copies of the mailing list from 1999 - 2002. Relive all
of
> the exciting moments when FAQ questions were asked for the _very first
> time_. Watch in wonder as the history of Paul plays itself out.
>
> Get your copy of this amazing archive CD with 10s of thousands of Exchange
> solutions lovingly prepared for your viewing pleasure.
>
> How much would you expect to pay for an amazing resource like this?
>
> $2499? No!
> $1999? No!
>
> The folks at Simpler-Webb have gone absolutely crazy. For a limited time,
> you can have this amazing CD for as low as only $10 US. But hurry, and
order
> now because supplies are limited.
>
> That's right. For only $10 you too can have an amazing Exchange resource
at
> your finger tips. Just think of the pride your family will feel knowing
that
> people aren't answering your questions with FAQ!!! or RTFM.
>
>
> So hurry, operators are standing by to take your call. So don't delay.
>
> - Payment Details ---
>
> We will need pre-payment of $10 (US) cash or check, $11 (US) for credit
> card.  In-state customers please add 8.25% tax.
>
> We WILL NOT reply to any posts to the mailing list on this topic.
> We accept Visa, MasterCard, and American Express - feel free to call at
> 512-322-0071 to order via credit card.
>
> The address is:
>
> Exchange List CD
> Simpler-Webb, Inc.
> 1214 W. Sixth Street, Suite 209
> Austin, TX 78703
>
> If you are overseas, please be kind enough to visit http://ircalc.usps.gov
> and add a reasonable airmail cost to your order.
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2K Logging question

[Andrey Fyodorov]

If the SMTP logs don't show any outgoing records, then maybe the Virtual SMTP server 
is not even trying to send them?

-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Logging question


Hello,
I have an E2K SP3 system and am having some trouble with emails being sent
and not arriving at their external destinations.  I've turned up logging on
the Virtual SMTP Server, and chose all options in the Advanced Properties
page.  Going through the log, I seem to only see incoming emails, not
outgoing.  I can see the emails in the users Sent Items, but need to trace
it from there. Any suggestions? (By the way - I am posting this for Jeff
Dubyn so I'll refer wisecracks, condescension and flames back to him!!#$!!)

Thanks,
Mike Brown

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

[Ed Crowley]

Y = Yeah and R = Right.  The rest is left as an exercise for the reader.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


YFR


You Friendly Republican?

Hmmm

=;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


So you really expect that someone reading this will go run the CIW to
find the answer to your question?  YFR.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


I have set up a custom installation of Office 2000 using the Office 2000
resource kit. I ran the Custom Installation Wizard to create an MST file
to specify options for Outlook. I then create a GPO that assigns the msi
file for Office modified with the MST. What I want to have happen is
that Outlook opens, the setup wizard doesn't start, and the Exchange
mode is chosen, along with the server I specify, and with the correct
mailbox.

In the Custom Installation Wizard (CIW), part 14 (for Outlook), what
should be the options I choose? In the Exchange Settings section, I
enter the name of the server, but that doesn't seem to effect anything.
At the moment, the Outlook Setup Wizard runs the first time Outlook is
started, if I choose to use MS Exchange Server, the correct mailbox is
filled in, but the server textbox is empty. Can I use the CIW to avoid
the setup wizard?

Thanks,
Erick


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

[Erick Thompson]

Not at all, it's hard enough just finding the CIW.

Let me rephrase the question, how I can get Outlook to not use the setup
wizard when it starts, and instead just start with the correct settings? I
had assumed creating an MST would be the answer, but I can't seem to get it
to work.

As a background, I am trying to get my network set up so that when a system
is reimaged via RIS, the user can just log in and start using it, no
configuration needed.

Thanks,
Erick

- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


> So you really expect that someone reading this will go run the CIW to
> find the answer to your question?  YFR.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup
>
>
> I have set up a custom installation of Office 2000 using the Office 2000
> resource kit. I ran the Custom Installation Wizard to create an MST file
> to specify options for Outlook. I then create a GPO that assigns the msi
> file for Office modified with the MST. What I want to have happen is
> that Outlook opens, the setup wizard doesn't start, and the Exchange
> mode is chosen, along with the server I specify, and with the correct
> mailbox.
>
> In the Custom Installation Wizard (CIW), part 14 (for Outlook), what
> should be the options I choose? In the Exchange Settings section, I
> enter the name of the server, but that doesn't seem to effect anything.
> At the moment, the Outlook Setup Wizard runs the first time Outlook is
> started, if I choose to use MS Exchange Server, the correct mailbox is
> filled in, but the server textbox is empty. Can I use the CIW to avoid
> the setup wizard?
>
> Thanks,
> Erick
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA at base URL? - simple question.

[Joshua R. Morgan]

It is possible 
See:   http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319878





Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA at base URL? - simple question.



Is it possible to move OWA to the base URL so users don't have to go to: 
http(s)://servername/exchange ?

-Yanek.

- 
This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or 
privileged.  The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and 
use by any other party is not authorized.  If you are not the intended recipient (or 
otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is 
prohibited.  If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.  
Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or 
indirectly from the use of this email or its contents.  Thank You.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA at base URL? - simple question.

[Yanek Korff]

Is it possible to move OWA to the base URL so users don't have to go to:
http(s)://servername/exchange
?

-Yanek.

- 
This electronic message transmission contains information that may be
confidential or privileged.  The information contained herein is intended
solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized.  If
you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this
message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of the information is prohibited.  If you have received
this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by
reply email and delete all copies of this message.  Cigital, Inc. accepts no
responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from
the use of this email or its contents.  Thank You.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email distribution load leveling

[Hutchins, Mike]

Yeah, I was kinda thinking the same thing. Just was wondering if anyone
knew of a cheap (relative term, I know) prefab solution.

Well, I will let this linger out there a bit longer and see what pops.

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email distribution load leveling


Script it?






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email distribution load leveling


Can anyone think of a way to distribute mail from an smtp address to
multiple recipients in a round robin sort of way?

I am running Exchange 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email distribution load leveling

[Joshua R. Morgan]

Script it?






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email distribution load leveling


Can anyone think of a way to distribute mail from an smtp address to multiple 
recipients in a round robin sort of way?

I am running Exchange 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

[Hutchins, Mike]

YFR


You Friendly Republican?

Hmmm

=;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


So you really expect that someone reading this will go run the CIW to
find the answer to your question?  YFR.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


I have set up a custom installation of Office 2000 using the Office 2000
resource kit. I ran the Custom Installation Wizard to create an MST file
to specify options for Outlook. I then create a GPO that assigns the msi
file for Office modified with the MST. What I want to have happen is
that Outlook opens, the setup wizard doesn't start, and the Exchange
mode is chosen, along with the server I specify, and with the correct
mailbox.

In the Custom Installation Wizard (CIW), part 14 (for Outlook), what
should be the options I choose? In the Exchange Settings section, I
enter the name of the server, but that doesn't seem to effect anything.
At the moment, the Outlook Setup Wizard runs the first time Outlook is
started, if I choose to use MS Exchange Server, the correct mailbox is
filled in, but the server textbox is empty. Can I use the CIW to avoid
the setup wizard?

Thanks,
Erick


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

[Ed Crowley]

So you really expect that someone reading this will go run the CIW to
find the answer to your question?  YFR.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup


I have set up a custom installation of Office 2000 using the Office 2000
resource kit. I ran the Custom Installation Wizard to create an MST file
to specify options for Outlook. I then create a GPO that assigns the msi
file for Office modified with the MST. What I want to have happen is
that Outlook opens, the setup wizard doesn't start, and the Exchange
mode is chosen, along with the server I specify, and with the correct
mailbox.

In the Custom Installation Wizard (CIW), part 14 (for Outlook), what
should be the options I choose? In the Exchange Settings section, I
enter the name of the server, but that doesn't seem to effect anything.
At the moment, the Outlook Setup Wizard runs the first time Outlook is
started, if I choose to use MS Exchange Server, the correct mailbox is
filled in, but the server textbox is empty. Can I use the CIW to avoid
the setup wizard?

Thanks,
Erick


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Email distribution load leveling

[Hutchins, Mike]

Can anyone think of a way to distribute mail from an smtp address to
multiple recipients in a round robin sort of way?

I am running Exchange 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

[Erick Thompson]

I have set up a custom installation of Office 2000 using the Office 2000
resource kit. I ran the Custom Installation Wizard to create an MST file to
specify options for Outlook. I then create a GPO that assigns the msi file
for Office modified with the MST. What I want to have happen is that Outlook
opens, the setup wizard doesn't start, and the Exchange mode is chosen,
along with the server I specify, and with the correct mailbox.

In the Custom Installation Wizard (CIW), part 14 (for Outlook), what should
be the options I choose? In the Exchange Settings section, I enter the name
of the server, but that doesn't seem to effect anything. At the moment, the
Outlook Setup Wizard runs the first time Outlook is started, if I choose to
use MS Exchange Server, the correct mailbox is filled in, but the server
textbox is empty. Can I use the CIW to avoid the setup wizard?

Thanks,
Erick


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: outlook script config

[Ed Crowley]

The Microsoft Office (Outlook) Custom Installation Wizard is the
supported method of doing what you ask.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Santhosh. H
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook script config


Does any body know some way to automate the configurations such as
delivery, auto archive in outlook etc Please let me know


Regards
Santhosh.H
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP

[John Strongosky]

You've reached the limit on the number of Contacts  a PDL can have which I
think is 165

   ___
   \\  - -  //
(--@-@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_// 
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, 
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
we are all Downwinder's...


-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP


test

-Original Message-
From: Imran Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP



Please help, I am trying to create a large Personnal Distribution List
on Outlook 2002 and am getting the following error message.

"The distribution list has reached the maximum size for your network
e-mail server.  No new members could be added."

I can't find any information on this error on the Microsoft site or any
settings that I can change.  Has anyone had this before and if so how do
you fix it.

Thanks


Imran

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Masquerading

[knighTslayer]

IIS in the bin.

Ok.  I'm working on RedHat 8.0 and SENDMAIL at the moment.  Clunky but
getting there.  Are there any NT based, cheep/freeware MTA's that can
totally modify the header and envelope?


Thanks

K

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger
Seielstad
Sent: 31 January 2003 11:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Masquerading

Absolutely nothing is wrong.

Sendmail (and a few other *nix mta's) offer the ability to completely
destroy the integrity of the message headers. 

Not to mention, the from address isn't only stored in the header, its
stored
in the message body most of the time too.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Masquerading
> 
> 
> What's the deal with masquerading?  I'm about to take my 5ft sword to
> this damn server if it doesn't behave soon...
> 
> For mail sent to a certain domain, it pops off to my IIS5.0 
> server where
> I have an SMTP relay that masquerades the email domain to another
> address.  This works a treat and when the mail arrives in the
> destination mail box it appears to have come from the changed domain
> name.
> 
> i.e.  Mail comes from exchange server where the addressing pattern is
> '@domain.com' and the destination @hotmail.com so forward to 
> relay where
> masquerade changes address to @change.domain.com.  It gets there with
> address @change.domain.com.  This is okay.
> 
> BUT
> 
> In the header, the FROM field says [EMAIL PROTECTED], even though the
> return path, the display and everything else says
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The display says [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> What's wrong with this piece of cra. ???
> 
> TIA
> K
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Arcserve 2000 and MSX 5.5

[Scoles, Damian]

I totally agree with Ed.  Exclude these from your backup routines.
  For DR of our Exchange box, I just make sure that I use the Exchange
agent from Arcserve to backup Exchange part of the box (in Arcserve).
Then I make a duplicate server (down to the name, SP, and all) and
restore just the Exchange data via the agent.  Worked flawlessly three
different times in 2 years (scheduled testing every 6 months).


Damian
MCSE+I, CCNP
Senior Technical Analyst

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Arcserve 2000 and MSX 5.5


Well, I would highly suggest that you test and practice that!

You should exclude the \exchsrvr\*data directories from any file-based
backup.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Arcserve 2000 and MSX 5.5


I guess my concern is that I haven't had to do a full recovery of a
server with Arcserve and am not 100% sure the exchange agent saves all
the transaction logs before purging them.  I am afraid if a drive fails
I will not have all the logs necessary to get back to current.

Does everyone else simply exclude the entire DSADATA and MDBDATA folders
from their backups?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Martin Blackstone]

No I don't, but enjoy one from time to time.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


He drives a Hummer too


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron
Brasslett
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


You buy expensive fax machines!  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine.
I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email
address on my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing
folk to fax from their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance
that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single
email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Martin Blackstone]

Same with ours. A single lost fax could cost us thousands of dollars. 

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do.
Ive got 2 DID trunks(120 numbers), 16 analog lines into the fax server
stand alone fax machines well over 25

2 fax machines for 100 people..wow it would seem like too few to me.
then do yourself the favor buy the best unit you can casue when one fails
your capacity is down 50%

in uor business that would cost us huge..


bill

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70
users. They are always all busy.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


You buy expensive fax machines!  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAI

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Tony Hlabse]

He drives a Hummer too


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron
Brasslett
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


You buy expensive fax machines!  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine.
I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email
address on my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing
folk to fax from their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance
that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single
email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Mellott, Bill]

Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do.
Ive got 2 DID trunks(120 numbers), 16 analog lines into the fax server
stand alone fax machines well over 25

2 fax machines for 100 people..wow it would seem like too few to me.
then do yourself the favor buy the best unit you can casue when one fails
your capacity is down 50%

in uor business that would cost us huge..


bill

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70
users. They are always all busy.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


You buy expensive fax machines!  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EM

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

Thanks.  I still planned to keep our main fax.  We currently have two.  One
is dedicated to incoming and the other is for sending and overflow incoming.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a
good fax machine.


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Thanks Bill.  Good info.  Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm
going to check out Panafax.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax.
But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like
850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for...

You better research this a bit more.
Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable.
First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work
reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2
channel cheapest is like 500.00

then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something
up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i
forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago).

Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of
it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...)

bill

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:   

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Martin Blackstone]

We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70
users. They are always all busy.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


You buy expensive fax machines!  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Mellott, Bill]

P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a
good fax machine.


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Thanks Bill.  Good info.  Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax.
I'm going to check out Panafax.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax.
But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like
850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for...

You better research this a bit more.
Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable.
First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work
reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2
channel cheapest is like 500.00

then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something
up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i
forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago).

Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of
it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...)

bill

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

Thanks Bill.  Good info.  Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax.
I'm going to check out Panafax.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax.
But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like
850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for...

You better research this a bit more.
Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable.
First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work
reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2
channel cheapest is like 500.00

then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something
up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i
forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago).

Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of
it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...)

bill

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Mellott, Bill]

then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax.
But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like
850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for...

You better research this a bit more.
Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable.
First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work
reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2
channel cheapest is like 500.00

then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something
up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i
forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago).

Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of
it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...)

bill

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine.
I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

You buy expensive fax machines!  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll
have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Martin Blackstone]

That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine.
I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

I've got about 100 users.  We need to replace our incoming fax machine.
I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax.

$1000 would be my limit.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Martin Blackstone]

$20

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Mellott, Bill]

maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much 
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

5.5

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Are you running Exchange 2000  or Exchange 5.5






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Joshua R. Morgan]

Are you running Exchange 2000  or Exchange 5.5






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in finding a 
simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 
server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC.  Ideally, I 
would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward 
it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me 
know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

Checked into that one... Unfortunately it either forwards as a property
format and a viewer needs to be installed, or it forwards as a self-viewing
file (exe) which outlook and Antigen both choke on.  I would like the faxes
to be TIF or even better, PDF.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think.  Not sure if it
automatically will forward it however.  If not I am sure it wouldn't take
much to write a program to do it for you.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Brett Wesoloski]

Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think.  Not sure if it automatically will 
forward it however.  If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to write a program to do 
it for you.

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Joshua R. Morgan]

Not an appliance but a good product


http://www.gfi.com/






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance


Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in finding a 
simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 
server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC.  Ideally, I 
would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward 
it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me 
know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance

[Aaron Brasslett]

Hi All,

We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less.  I am interested in
finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on
my Exchange 5.5 server.  We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from
their PC.  Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for
us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address.

If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions,
please let me know.

TIA,

Aaron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5

[Durkee, Peter]

You can also help performance, if any of the problem servers have IMCs, by turning off 
outbound SMTP scanning.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: BBC Exchange 55 List Server Public Folder
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5


Also have you tried setting it to Max Performance mode with only one
scanner selected? This will help.

If your servers were already busy before installing Antigen then it can
cause performance problems.  Take a good look at the performance counters
for disk queues, CPU, etc and see where the bottleneck lies.  We found a
few servers needed extra memory to counter some disk queue issues after
installing both Antigen and a monitoring agent.

Sybari Tech support may also point you to some hotfixes to improve the way
it handles certain messages - e.g. zipped attachments.

rgrds

Mark

> I had some performance issues on an earlier build when I goofed and didn't follow 
>their recommended upgrade procedure of unhooking Antigen from Exchange before doing 
>the update. This was on an Exch 5.5 sp4 and Win 2K sp3 server. The sp1 version's 
>working very well here, however.
> 
> I'd agree, though, that you should give Sybari tech support a call. They're pretty 
>responsive.
> 
> -Peter
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lawson, Ann F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 13:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and
> if so, what was the fix?
> 
> I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers.  Three out of 13 servers
> are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to
> send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site,
> or to move a message from one folder to another.  
> 
> I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0
> My priv.edb size is 50GB
> There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Ann

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

E2K Logging question

[Michael A. Brown]

Hello,
I have an E2K SP3 system and am having some trouble with emails being sent
and not arriving at their external destinations.  I've turned up logging on
the Virtual SMTP Server, and chose all options in the Advanced Properties
page.  Going through the log, I seem to only see incoming emails, not
outgoing.  I can see the emails in the users Sent Items, but need to trace
it from there. Any suggestions? (By the way - I am posting this for Jeff
Dubyn so I'll refer wisecracks, condescension and flames back to him!!#$!!)

Thanks,
Mike Brown

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Post SP4 Patches

[McCready, Robert]

Anybody searched for Post SP4 Patches for Exchange 5.5 lately?
I USED to be able to go to Microsofts site, select Downloads - Exchange 5.5,
and select Post SP4 patches, and it would allow me to sort by date blah blah
blah.

Doesn't work anymore.

Thanks.

Robert

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tentative meeting requests

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exch2k sp3

When on e of our users receives a meeting request, it does not get put
on his calendar automatically as tentative.  He doesn't have any rules
that moves meeting requests.  I ran a free busy update, but no go.  Any
ideas?  He is using Mac Outlook, but this happens if I open his mail on
a Windows PC also.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA

[Tony Nguyen]

I want to Thank You everyone for the helping me with the setup of IIS5 and
OWA. This is the best listing I have. Again Thank You. I got it to work
great now. I used the Exchange 5.5 CD to install OWA. My question now is
what is the next version of OWA should I need to get beside the Exchange
2000.

Tony

-Original Message-
From: Santhosh. H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA


Hi
I have two sites in a exch 5.5 environment. I want make one OWA server and
connect this server to the two sites so that people can access their mailbox
form the  OWA irrespective of the site he belong to.
I don't want to setup 2 OWA one each for each site

Regards
 
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA


Thank I found something on technet

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA


Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff.
Did I forget a bolt?

Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something.



- Original Message - 
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: OWA


> I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get 
> 
> Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8)
> Object required: 'Application(...)'
> /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12
> 
> Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack?
> 
> Tony
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange2003

[Alverson, Tom]

You forgot to edit out where Tony Hlabse said "B_st_rds" (see below)

Tom (trying not to offend Mr. Trend)

-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange2003


Thanks, Tom.  I realized that I sounded like a newb asking that, but I only 
recently began administering Windows and so never ordered anything from
them.

What did I say to offend the content filter at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?

Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Allison M. Wittstock
Subject = Re: Exchange2003
Delivery Time = January 30, 2003 (Thursday) 06:44:31
Policy = Sexual Discrimination
Action on this mail = Quarantine message

Warning message from administrator:
Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.



On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:12 pm, Alverson, Tom wrote:
> No catch, no survey.  I just had to pay for the shipping (about $10 
> ??) with a credit card.  Not sure if they ship everywhere.  Check it 
> out at:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp   where you can
> download Exchange 2003 but not Outlook
>
> http://microsoft.order-5.com/exchangetitaniumbeta/routing.asp?type=1  
> Link on the above page to order the CD with both exchange2003 and 
> outlook 11 (link is not working right now).
>
> Tom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange2003
>
>
> Do you know if they will ship anywhere in the world? I am in Berlin. 
> Also, is there a catch? Like having to fill out a survey, and if you 
> don't they will charge you $100?
>
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:11 pm, you wrote:
> > I just got an email that my "free" CD shipped yesterday with an 
> > Airborne tracking number.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange2003
> >
> >
> > Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bxstxrds
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey 
> > Fyodorov
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange2003


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA Contacts Public Folder problem

[Dan Bartley]

It seems that if we do a Find from OWA, E2k, SP2 in a Contacts Public
Folder it only searches fields until it finds an entry and then stops
searching on that contact. 

SharePoint 2001 E2k Public Folder content indexing has the same problem,
but that makes sense since it uses the OWA to index it.

Specifically, if there is a first and last name entered as well as a
company name and you search for the company name, it will not find the
contact. It will only find it if you search on the first or last name
entered. If there is no name entered it will find the contact based on
company name.

Has anyone encountered this? Is there a way around it?

TIA


Best Regards,
Dan Bartley


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Haiku Friday

[Reed, Alexander]

Everybody knows,
a turkey and some potatoes can,
Makes you sleepy. :)

Or

Ugly job market,
I need to find something better soon,
They will miss me. ;P

-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday



Very heavy snow,
disaster recovery project
and few users.


Tim


-- 
Tim Gowen  
RAF Museum
IT Dept.

 

Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you
must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone;
please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.

Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the
knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium.
We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when
e-mailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are
actually virus free.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange2003

[Hurst, Paul]

Allison,

You probably mentioned 'Microsoft' 'catch' 'Charge' '$' in the same sentence
;-)

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2003 12:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange2003


Thanks, Tom.  I realized that I sounded like a newb asking that, but I only 
recently began administering Windows and so never ordered anything from
them.

What did I say to offend the content filter at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?

Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Allison M. Wittstock
Subject = Re: Exchange2003
Delivery Time = January 30, 2003 (Thursday) 06:44:31
Policy = Sexual Discrimination
Action on this mail = Quarantine message

Warning message from administrator:
Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.



On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:12 pm, Alverson, Tom wrote:
> No catch, no survey.  I just had to pay for the shipping (about $10 ??)
> with a credit card.  Not sure if they ship everywhere.  Check it out at:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp   where you can
> download Exchange 2003 but not Outlook
>
> http://microsoft.order-5.com/exchangetitaniumbeta/routing.asp?type=1  Link
> on the above page to order the CD with both exchange2003 and outlook 11
> (link is not working right now).
>
> Tom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange2003
>
>
> Do you know if they will ship anywhere in the world? I am in Berlin. Also,
> is there a catch? Like having to fill out a survey, and if you don't
> they will charge you $100?
>
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:11 pm, you wrote:
> > I just got an email that my "free" CD shipped yesterday with an
> > Airborne tracking number.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange2003
> >
> >
> > Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bxstxrds
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
> > Fyodorov
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange2003


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any 
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this 
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The 
views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of 
Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited.
(05)
***


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Haiku Friday

[Tim Gowen]

Very heavy snow,
disaster recovery project
and few users.


Tim


-- 
Tim Gowen  
RAF Museum
IT Dept.

 

Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you
must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone;
please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.

Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the
knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium.
We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when
e-mailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are
actually virus free.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange2003

[Allison M. Wittstock]

Thanks, Tom.  I realized that I sounded like a newb asking that, but I only 
recently began administering Windows and so never ordered anything from them.

What did I say to offend the content filter at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?

Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Allison M. Wittstock
Subject = Re: Exchange2003
Delivery Time = January 30, 2003 (Thursday) 06:44:31
Policy = Sexual Discrimination
Action on this mail = Quarantine message

Warning message from administrator:
Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.



On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:12 pm, Alverson, Tom wrote:
> No catch, no survey.  I just had to pay for the shipping (about $10 ??)
> with a credit card.  Not sure if they ship everywhere.  Check it out at:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp   where you can
> download Exchange 2003 but not Outlook
>
> http://microsoft.order-5.com/exchangetitaniumbeta/routing.asp?type=1  Link
> on the above page to order the CD with both exchange2003 and outlook 11
> (link is not working right now).
>
> Tom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange2003
>
>
> Do you know if they will ship anywhere in the world? I am in Berlin. Also,
> is there a catch? Like having to fill out a survey, and if you don't
> they will charge you $100?
>
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:11 pm, you wrote:
> > I just got an email that my "free" CD shipped yesterday with an
> > Airborne tracking number.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange2003
> >
> >
> > Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bxstxrds
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
> > Fyodorov
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange2003


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5

[BBC Exchange 55 List Server Public Folder]

Also have you tried setting it to Max Performance mode with only one
scanner selected? This will help.

If your servers were already busy before installing Antigen then it can
cause performance problems.  Take a good look at the performance counters
for disk queues, CPU, etc and see where the bottleneck lies.  We found a
few servers needed extra memory to counter some disk queue issues after
installing both Antigen and a monitoring agent.

Sybari Tech support may also point you to some hotfixes to improve the way
it handles certain messages - e.g. zipped attachments.

rgrds

Mark

> I had some performance issues on an earlier build when I goofed and didn't follow 
>their recommended upgrade procedure of unhooking Antigen from Exchange before doing 
>the update. This was on an Exch 5.5 sp4 and Win 2K sp3 server. The sp1 version's 
>working very well here, however.
> 
> I'd agree, though, that you should give Sybari tech support a call. They're pretty 
>responsive.
> 
> -Peter
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lawson, Ann F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 13:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and
> if so, what was the fix?
> 
> I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers.  Three out of 13 servers
> are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to
> send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site,
> or to move a message from one folder to another.  
> 
> I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0
> My priv.edb size is 50GB
> There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Ann

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA and Voice Mail

[Roger Seielstad]

Why not build a round robin DNS entry for a few GC's, and set the TTL to
something insanely short, like 1 minute? If you're able to specify the
server by name, there's no reason you can't overcome that limitation.

That being said, there is still a high degree of old school mentality in the
telecom arena, and this sounds like yet another example.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: prontomail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OWA and Voice Mail
> 
> 
> GC!. That's THE keyword. GC. It depends heavily on ONE GC. It 
> does NOT know
> how to seek and use other available GC for its lookups. It has to be
> hard-wired to just one. This would be fine for a one-site, 
> small network.
> But, in my Multi-Site, multi-GC, Multi-network environment, 
> this has been
> nothing but a PITA.
> 
> That's my primary gripe. Recovery from failure is an exercise 
> in voodooism..
> Of course, your experience may vary.
> 
> Deji
> - Original Message -
> From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:12 PM
> Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail
> 
> 
> > We are currently using Unified Messenger 4.1 in our Exchange 5.5
> environment
> > and fixing to migrate to Exchange 2000 in two weeks.  This 
> means that
> > Unified messenger will have to utilize the GC instead of 
> Exchange 5.5
> > Directory.  Sounds like you are having problems with 
> thisanything I
> > should know?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: prontomail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:04 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: OWA and Voice Mail
> >
> >
> >  And it's crappy . at least in my environment. 
> Barfs really loud
> > anytime I have to do any maintenance on my GC. Does not 
> know HOW to look
> for
> > other available GC. Really clumsy to recover from. I'll stop here.
> >
> > Deji
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:25 PM
> > Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail
> >
> >
> > > Its called Octel Unified Messenger, and is currently sold 
> by Avaya,
> > > who
> > has
> > > the old Lucent (and before that AT&T) PBX hardware business.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > > Atlanta, GA
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:51 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I saw something similar that worked with Outlook (not OWA),
> > > > developed by a third party for Expanets, who took over 
> the sales end
> > > > of Lucent Technologies. You might want to check with 
> Expanets about
> > > > that. I can't
> > > > remember the company who developed it now, but when I called
> > > > them directly
> > > > they refered me back to the reseller.
> > > >
> > > > John Orban
> > > > System Administrator
> > > > The Country School
> > > > www.countryschool.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: OWA and Voice Mail
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I
> > > > went to a Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA 
> they had this
> > > > media tool that
> > > > played voice messages on the web page itself.  You just
> > > > clicked a button to
> > > > download and install.
> > > >
> > > > I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot 
> find anything
> > > > like that in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty 
> or something
> > > > that you download
> > > > separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up?
> > > >
> > > > 
> _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:   
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > 
> _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
>http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > > 

RE: Masquerading

[Roger Seielstad]

Absolutely nothing is wrong.

Sendmail (and a few other *nix mta's) offer the ability to completely
destroy the integrity of the message headers. 

Not to mention, the from address isn't only stored in the header, its stored
in the message body most of the time too.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Masquerading
> 
> 
> What's the deal with masquerading?  I'm about to take my 5ft sword to
> this damn server if it doesn't behave soon...
> 
> For mail sent to a certain domain, it pops off to my IIS5.0 
> server where
> I have an SMTP relay that masquerades the email domain to another
> address.  This works a treat and when the mail arrives in the
> destination mail box it appears to have come from the changed domain
> name.
> 
> i.e.  Mail comes from exchange server where the addressing pattern is
> '@domain.com' and the destination @hotmail.com so forward to 
> relay where
> masquerade changes address to @change.domain.com.  It gets there with
> address @change.domain.com.  This is okay.
> 
> BUT
> 
> In the header, the FROM field says [EMAIL PROTECTED], even though the
> return path, the display and everything else says
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The display says [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> What's wrong with this piece of cra. ???
> 
> TIA
> K
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA and Voice Mail

[William Lefkovics]

 
Kinda like Exchange2000 pre-sp1. ;o)
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of prontomail
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

GC!. That's THE keyword. GC. It depends heavily on ONE GC. It does NOT
know
how to seek and use other available GC for its lookups. It has to be
hard-wired to just one. This would be fine for a one-site, small
network.
But, in my Multi-Site, multi-GC, Multi-network environment, this has
been
nothing but a PITA.

That's my primary gripe. Recovery from failure is an exercise in
voodooism..
Of course, your experience may vary.

Deji
- Original Message -
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail


> We are currently using Unified Messenger 4.1 in our Exchange 5.5
environment
> and fixing to migrate to Exchange 2000 in two weeks.  This means that
> Unified messenger will have to utilize the GC instead of Exchange 5.5
> Directory.  Sounds like you are having problems with thisanything
I
> should know?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: prontomail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OWA and Voice Mail
>
>
>  And it's crappy . at least in my environment. Barfs really
loud
> anytime I have to do any maintenance on my GC. Does not know HOW to
look
for
> other available GC. Really clumsy to recover from. I'll stop here.
>
> Deji
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:25 PM
> Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail
>
>
> > Its called Octel Unified Messenger, and is currently sold by Avaya,
> > who
> has
> > the old Lucent (and before that AT&T) PBX hardware business.
> >
> > --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > Atlanta, GA
> >


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

[Roger Seielstad]

Literally.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> 
> 
> Beers on me! 
> 
> 
> -- Original Message --
> From: Ed Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:47:07 -0800
> 
> >I've seen him with limes in my eyes and I agree.
> >
> >Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> >Tech Consultant
> >hp Services
> >Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
> >Blackstone
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:22 PM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >
> >
> >I have personally seen him after a few too many beers. He does look
> >better.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:23 PM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >
> >
> > 
> >He's so modest... what with that wicked sense of humour and charm...
> >he's dead sexy...
> >
> >... or so I'm told...
> > 
> > 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jacob Jeong
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:10 PM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >
> >You are "sick".
> >
> >Jake
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 PM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >
> >lol
> >I look much better after a few beers, or with lime juice in my eyes.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Jacob Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:19 PM
> >Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >
> >
> >> They probably hadn't seen you in person or picture  What's up?
> >>
> >> Jake
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Andy David
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:53 PM
> >> To: Exchange Discussions
> >> Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >>
> >> Yea, they told me I was handsome.
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:49 PM
> >> Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >>
> >>
> >> > They'll tell you anything to sell you a box.
> >> >
> >> > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> >> > Tech Consultant
> >> > hp Services
> >> > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp,
> >Dennis M.
> >> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM
> >> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >> > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > That was the word I got at MEC.
> >> >
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM
> >> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >> > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago.
> >Things
> >> > may have changed since then.
> >> >
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM
> >> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >> > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split. 
>  No need to
> >
> >> > stop and restart the services.
> >> >
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >___

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

[Roger Seielstad]

No, he looks better after the viewer's had a few beers (or preferably
something stronger).

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> 
> 
> I have personally seen him after a few too many beers. He 
> does look better.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> 
> 
>  
> He's so modest... what with that wicked sense of humour and charm...
> he's dead sexy...
> 
> ... or so I'm told...
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jacob Jeong
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> You are "sick".
> 
> Jake
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> 
> lol
> I look much better after a few beers, or with lime juice in my eyes.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jacob Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> 
> 
> > They probably hadn't seen you in person or picture  What's up?
> >
> > Jake
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:53 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >
> > Yea, they told me I was handsome.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:49 PM
> > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> >
> >
> > > They'll tell you anything to sell you a box.
> > >
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > hp Services
> > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp,
> Dennis M.
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> > >
> > >
> > > That was the word I got at MEC.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> > >
> > >
> > > That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago.
> Things
> > > may have changed since then.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
> > >
> > >
> > > According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split.  
> No need to
> > > stop and restart the services.
> > >
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA and Voice Mail

[prontomail]

GC!. That's THE keyword. GC. It depends heavily on ONE GC. It does NOT know
how to seek and use other available GC for its lookups. It has to be
hard-wired to just one. This would be fine for a one-site, small network.
But, in my Multi-Site, multi-GC, Multi-network environment, this has been
nothing but a PITA.

That's my primary gripe. Recovery from failure is an exercise in voodooism..
Of course, your experience may vary.

Deji
- Original Message -
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail


> We are currently using Unified Messenger 4.1 in our Exchange 5.5
environment
> and fixing to migrate to Exchange 2000 in two weeks.  This means that
> Unified messenger will have to utilize the GC instead of Exchange 5.5
> Directory.  Sounds like you are having problems with thisanything I
> should know?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: prontomail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OWA and Voice Mail
>
>
>  And it's crappy . at least in my environment. Barfs really loud
> anytime I have to do any maintenance on my GC. Does not know HOW to look
for
> other available GC. Really clumsy to recover from. I'll stop here.
>
> Deji
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:25 PM
> Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail
>
>
> > Its called Octel Unified Messenger, and is currently sold by Avaya,
> > who
> has
> > the old Lucent (and before that AT&T) PBX hardware business.
> >
> > --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > Atlanta, GA
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:51 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail
> > >
> > >
> > > I saw something similar that worked with Outlook (not OWA),
> > > developed by a third party for Expanets, who took over the sales end
> > > of Lucent Technologies. You might want to check with Expanets about
> > > that. I can't
> > > remember the company who developed it now, but when I called
> > > them directly
> > > they refered me back to the reseller.
> > >
> > > John Orban
> > > System Administrator
> > > The Country School
> > > www.countryschool.org
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:45 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: OWA and Voice Mail
> > >
> > >
> > > Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I
> > > went to a Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this
> > > media tool that
> > > played voice messages on the web page itself.  You just
> > > clicked a button to
> > > download and install.
> > >
> > > I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot find anything
> > > like that in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty or something
> > > that you download
> > > separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up?
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List post

RE: OWA

[Santhosh. H]

Hi
I have two sites in a exch 5.5 environment. I want make one OWA server and
connect this server to the two sites so that people can access their mailbox
form the  OWA irrespective of the site he belong to.
I don't want to setup 2 OWA one each for each site

Regards
 
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA


Thank I found something on technet

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA


Hey that turbine blew out on takeoff.
Did I forget a bolt?

Try looking in Technet for 0x800A01A8 and see if you can find something.



- Original Message - 
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: OWA


> I have just install OWA on W2K and when I try to open OWA I get 
> 
> Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8)
> Object required: 'Application(...)'
> /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12
> 
> Can someone where to start? Did I miss a service pack?
> 
> Tony
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not?

[Wassink, Mw. A.]

Thanks Ed!

With Exchange System Manager installed on the DC it works fine now for the
helpdesk.

Annemieke

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van:  Ed Crowley 
> Verzonden:donderdag 30 januari 2003 18:03
> Aan:  Exchange Discussions
> Onderwerp:RE: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not?
> 
> Your argument against is accurate.
> 
> Additional arguments against:
> 
> - A dual-role system will have to work harder.  This isn't an issue if
> your peak user load is well below what the machine can handle.
> - Even if you choose to install Exchange on a DC, you'll still want to
> have at least one other DC for the domain.
> 
> Your argument for is irrelevant.  The helpdesk can connect to any
> machine that has Active Directory Users and Computer and the Exchange
> System Manager installed on it and is a member of the forest.
> 
> The primary argument against is:
> 
> - Cost.  However, a DC can usually be on a comparatively inexpensive
> system.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wassink, Mw. A.
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:45 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not?
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can some of you give me some advice whether or not to setup an Exchange
> 2000 server as a DC? We are building up a totally new forest consisting
> of a single domain and containing one Ex2000 machine.
> 
> Sofar we have the following arguments:
> An argument for NOT making the Ex2000 machine a DC is that in case of
> disaster recovery the machine is easier to be recovered. An argument for
> making it a DC is that the helpdesk can manage mailboxes by connecting
> via whatever DC.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Annemieke
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

outlook script config

[Santhosh. H]

Does any body know some way to automate the configurations such as delivery,
auto archive in outlook etc
Please let me know


Regards
Santhosh.H
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup

[Santhosh. H]

it will be in the deleted item folder
If he has emptied the deleted item
Try recovering from the tools->recover deleted item

Regards
Santhosh.H
Systems Administrator
Timken Engineering and Research India Pvt. Ltd.
Bangalore, India. 
Phone: +91-80-5536113 / Ext 1049; Fax: +91-80-5529544 
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup
Importance: High


One of our users mistakenly deleted his past Friday's calendar information
through his PDA.  We do have a backup of our Exchange server data for this
past weekend.  My question is there any utility in exchange which will let
me restore only his calendar information from the backup.   Any assistance
would be much appreciated.  Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]