Thanks Ed.
Apologies for not finding that one myself. Must brush up my search
techniques.
Cheers, Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 March 2003 02:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Org Forms Languages
I gather from
Post your config file.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion Group
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 7:02 AM
To: Exchange
At the risk of seeming stupid, what config file are you referring to?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager stopping
Post your config file.
Talk them into using a proxy server to publish their front-end server
to the Internet.
Benefits:
1. You can make the non-clustered FE server the first server in site
without, as Ed points out, having SRS in the DMZ.
2. Much easier to secure a dedicated proxy in a DMZ (one port in, one
out)
3.
Exchange 5.5 - SP4
W2K - SP3
I guess it's not possible to hide a mailbox and still be able to access it
by another user??
How do you handle a situation where, for example, you are replacing an
employee so you are going to have a mailbox set up to receive responses to
an advertisement. But you
John,
Create it add it to the users outlook, then hide it. User will be able to
access it but no one will 'see' it in the GAL.
Cheers
Paul
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2003 14:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HIdden Mailboxes
Set it up for the user first; then hide it. Or use a public folder, and
assign permissions.
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HIdden Mailboxes
Exchange 5.5 - SP4
W2K - SP3
I guess it's
you can usually hide the mailbox and use SMTP address to send and receive
emails. probably outlook express or outlook with SMTP addr
Santhosh.H
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange
Public Folder
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HIdden Mailboxes
Exchange 5.5 - SP4
W2K - SP3
I guess it's not possible to hide a mailbox and still be able to access it
by another user??
I really like the public folder idea, but I should have said that the boss
needs to access the mailbox from home. I don't have OWA setup so I need to
use POP3 access.
John
Technology Department
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003
one of my information stores has a crazy file size:
the EDB file is 21.5GB, the STM file is 8.1GB
ESM reports that the mail data is 6.7GB plus 2.2GB for the items kept in retention
area.
After the online defrag, the event log reports that the store has 1.6GB of free space.
So I have 19.1GB of
He could use IMAP.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Orban
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi all
Does anyone know if this method work?
to move an exchange2000 to a new hardware and keep the same name
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289
any comments?
thanks,
_
List posting FAQ:
Hi
I'm searching on documentation on how to configure the ISA server to
let OL 11 connect to exchange 2003 server.
We have installed Titanium and want to test the Ex2003 feature
allowing OL 11 on XP to access an ex2003 server over http
JF
I didn't find the answer right away; I pursued it because I was
interesed in the answer myself.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
So Microsoft regularly posts techniques in KB articles that don't work?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange
Isn't there a file that you point it to in order to specify which mailboxes
should be cleaned, or which ones should be skipped? That's the file.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original
Option 4 - Squid proxy running on your choice of freeware OS (I'd recommend
OpenBSD). It can also function as the SSL accelerator.
We're doing it here for OWA for Ex 5.5, but no reason it wouldn't work for
E2k.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
In E2K you can control that by using a recipient policy.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, March
No, this is done via recipient policy. I've removed and recreated the
policies. I've used the FIND NOW on the modify tab and all the mailboxes
come up; the policies are each against a single DB, ie SERVER1 SG1 DB1,
Server1 SG2 DB2, ..DB3, ..DB4.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Hey ya all,
I'm trying to load a lab using VMWare. Have 1 DC with win2k advanced
server with sp3 loaded and a domain called sdccd.local,dns server on the dc,
1 windows advanced server sp3 server that I installed exchange2k on. I've
did the command's setup /forestprep and setup /domainprep on
Seems like it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello Everyone!
Can some one suggest a good Intrusion Detection Software that is easy to
work with and learn? Thanks!
Rama
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Something free and simple:
http://www.smoothwall.org
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:15 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Intrusion Detection Software
Subject: Intrusion Detection Software
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4
I am receiving the following error messages when trying to access a inbox or
calendar using File; Open ; Other user's folders...
Unable to display the folder. Cannot open the mailbox for this user because
the user does not have a server
We have been running it for the last six months or so with no problems. It
has worked even better than 4.51 SP6a which was good as well. Why not go to
sp6a?
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Chris
What are the hardware and software requirements to run IDS? Also where do
you run IDS at? Can this be run in conjunction with the firewall module, or
does it require running before the firewall? Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
There is a patch that needs to be installed on the client PC.
This was the link:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q331320
But its gone.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange
Its slightly better than nothing!
-Original Message-
From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5
Hello All,
We are running GroupShield 4.5 SP 1 on Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 SP 5. We
Sounds like it's time for you to test your DR procedure. I haven't done
this for 2K however this was my standard for 5.5 server upgrades.
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Public,
Monday, March 10, 2003, 12:31:24 PM, you typed:
Something free and simple:
www.kerio.com Kerio Personal Firewall. ICSA approved.
Free, simple and secure. They have commercial stuff available.
---
Cheers,
joeluser
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack
Sanjeev,
Monday, March 10, 2003, 1:22:26 PM, you typed:
What are the hardware and software requirements to run IDS? Also where do
you run IDS at? Can this be run in conjunction with the firewall module, or
does it require running before the firewall? Thanks!
varies from product to product.
Have you tried deleting and recreating the profile?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003
Sounds to me like the domain doesn't recognize you. Have you tried
rebooting and carefully typing in your username/password at the login?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original
Yes. I delete and adding the profile twice.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Are they trying to tell me something?
Have you tried deleting and recreating the profile?
Ed
yes. I have booted.. An I know I entered my password and UID correct
because
I have access to the system.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Are they trying to tell me something?
I've moved all our mailboxes off of three old servers onto our new mailbox
server, so far so good.
I've changed our directory replication connectors, and the site connector
bridgeheads, and I've followed the KB article to remove the last server in
the site (or at least to replicate the roles to
Below is a quote from a another list that I subscribe too describing this
list.you guys and gals aren't that badI don't know about you all but
I don't wear a cup just a saucer
But..heed the warning. Do not post questions that you could/should
have been able to answer yourself.
Yep. That's the word on the streets. I heard that too when I joined.
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Below is a quote from a another list that I subscribe too describing this
list.you
That's exactly the same message I got when trying to open a hidden mailbox.
When I unhide the mailbox it opens. I am administrator with permissions on
the mailbox, but doesn't do any good either.
John Orban
System Administrator
The Country School
www.countryschool.org
-Original Message-
I ran into a bunch of this when we moved mailboxes from a 5.5 server to
an E2K server.
The most common symptom we saw was an extremely long hour class followed
by an error message when the user clicked on the other user's
mailbox/calendar/contacts. Our case was more of Admin Assistant's who
Ok Much Headway has been made I have set up a new server as a testing
server. I experienced the same problems as below So I set up a new
Routing Group and a Routing Group Connector
Now the users on the New Server are able to e-mail everyone on the old
Server and Each other but the people on the
Ill stick with the ribbing
I need the kick in the head once in a while
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: wear a cup if you plan on posting questions
Yep. That's the word on the
Sorry, I didn't read your original message clearly enough. Some of our
users, especially on older OS like Win98, would see similar behavior if they
mistyped their password the first time they tried to log in; it rejected and
asked them to reenter so they'd reenter their password correctly the
That's it. Get your cup on!!! :)
Actually, Martin have you tried it or are you just going by what you may
have heard? NAI used to have some well deserved criticisms but this version
is actually pretty good.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360)
How about if you log in to the PC as Administrator and log into OL. Open
your mailbox by following FileOpen...other user'setc
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Are they
I do not see this has a bad thing.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: wear a cup if you plan on posting questions
Below is a quote from a another list that I subscribe too
We are running a mix of Cisco IDS and also NetIQ IDS
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Intrusion Detection Software
Hello Everyone!
Can some one suggest a good Intrusion Detection Software that
Sometimes those with a little experience are not so tolerant of those with less.
Newbie pointers to the archives and knowledge base tend to come with a lot of colorful
hazing. The odd thing is that those that have been hazed and complained mightily
about it, frequently appear a year or two
The odd thing is that those that have been hazed and complained
mightily about it, frequently appear a year or two later as some of the
harshest slammers of newbies.
This is true in a variety of settings where hazing occurs.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's kind of like being a sophomore in High School.
-Patrick R. Sweeney
http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html
- Original Message -
From: Dupler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:58 PM
Subject: RE: wear a cup if
And how's their tech support these days?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5
That's it. Get your cup on!!! :)
Actually, Martin have you
Pretty good. I have never had to wait on hold for more than 2 minutes and
they have always stayed with it until the issue was resolved. We have
Connect Support I don't know about others.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
I think our problem with NAI was that we never sprang for phone support, and by the
time we bailed 1.5 years ago their email support had sunk to the level of a response
maybe within a month. Of course that first response always asked you to restate the
problem.
I think I may have a lifelong
I used the 4.x version until my company got ravaged by a virus it should
have caught. That's enough reason for me. 99% good isn't good enough.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I was reading an article by Tony Redmond
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/articles/print.cfm?articleID=8743 which seems
to indicate that is was possible to move servers between Administrative
Groups in RC1, yet according to everything else I've read, including Ed,
this is no longer possible in E2K
Trying to remember. But I think it has to do with if your in Ad Native
mode or not and or in a mixed Exchange environment or not.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann
McCallum
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Info I've seen says that regardless of whether you are in native or mixed,
you still cannot move E2K servers betwixt AG's. You can however, move
mailboxes between AG's in native.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2003 3:08 p.m.
To:
Well I remember this coming up a while back. You might want to check the
archives. When I get to work tomorrow, one of MS's Exchange gurus will
be in. I'll ask him.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann
McCallum
Sent: Monday, March 10,
Released today - who wants to be the first to apply? :-)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;813840
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I've put it up on 3 mailbox servers and three bridgeheads. It fixed
public folder replication problems I was having between some of the
routing groups.
It works for me.
John M.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:27 PM
Martin,
Good reason for me too. If I could have bailed at Groupshield 4.03 I would
have in a heartbeat and never looked back!! Man, that one
S*CKED!
I never had the luxury of even being allowed to look at Trend, Sybari, etc.
McAfee finally started getting it somewhat right by
Moving servers between admin groups was something they attempted in the
betas but coul dnot make work. Even with Exchange 2000 in native mode,
all objects have a legacyExchangeDN associated with them. If I remember
correctly, this was the reason that the decided it was going to be too
Hi Gurus!
I have a new setup test email server - Exchange 2000. I am managed to
send outbound emails and internally to domain users but not receiving any
of them from the external domain.
Any issues that I need to take care of??
I have a configured Virtual SMTP Server and MX record is
Thanks Jim,
We do want to collapse all our sites into one AG, but we can only achieve
this by using a 2-hop method as Ed has mentioned in a previous post a few
weeks back. Install E2K in each site, remove 5.5, switch to native, install
E2K into desired AG and move mailboxes from original site.
If you follow these guidelines:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You'll never get flamed. Not even on high tech Linux lists..
I've seen way to much questions which one could have answered easy by using
google, alltheweb or norhernlight. And within less time then to way for an
66 matches
Mail list logo
