We are currently having an issue where our OAB and Free/Busy time are
not updating properly. Everything I have found says to reset the system
folders by changing the GUID. Has anyone done this before and did it
work? We are EX2000 SP3.
Thanks,
Alex
Why? How does that solve the problem I have today? I only have 150 users and do not
anticipate the store will grow over 16 gigs again.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
I think what Ed is saying is that the server lockups are caused by the
short amount of space you have available, and you may even be running
out of space and that is causing the lockups.
If you got the Enterprise edition you could bypass the limit of the
16GB.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS,
I have remained steady at 11.4 gigs for a week. I was not locking up at all as I got
closer and closer to 16 gigs before last week. That doesn't make sense.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It solves the problem you have because it allows you to go over 16Gb.
As you didn't say you are planning to enforce limits to keep you store below, that is
the natural thing to assume.
On the other hand check WINS/DNS - I have seen slow responses from E2k when these have
been incorrect, well
Does any one know if there is a command line switch of third party tool
for outlook that I could use, to invoke outlook and cause it to perform
a full Send/Receive.
I know you can set outlook to perform a send/receive every time it opens
but that would cause negative effects.
Tools - Options - Mail Setup - Send/Receive - Check the box that allows
what you want.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange
I did state that I specifically cannot use the outlook GUI settings to
perform a send/receive every time outlook opens
I need to perform this from a command line
Is this possible?
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From:
me..I might/I do have mailbox limits thus..I dont get to the problem your
having...
I would do what I did and set mailbox limits thus protecting the system.
You'll be unpopular..or at least I am here...but I feel it's one less system
thing to worry about..
and the system just run's, the user
Let me help out a bit more by saying
I am trying to write a script that will:
Connect to VPN
Open outlook
Perform send/receive
Close outlook
Disconnect from VPN
Rob Weatherly
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 x122
-Original
How far have you gotten?
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches
Let me help out a bit more by saying
I
Cool, thanks for your insights Ed. The more I was looking at it yesterday after I
asked the question, the more I was thinking the same thing. I can see no
reason for us to have more than one admin group unless we go an buy another company or
four, and that sure doesn't look to be in the cards.
Also what OS ?
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line switches
Let me help out a bit more by saying
I am trying
I can do everything except the outlook send/receive
In other words I can connect and disconnect the VPN via command line (or
script)
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I am using Windows XP with office XP
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 cmd line
30 day's worth seems to be ~40% of my store, so just slightly less than
you've seen.
One of the nightly (or weekly, can't remember) maintenance processes shows
the byte count for tombstoned objects, which would be the closest estimation
of the extent to which Deleted Item Retension impacts your
There are other better ways to do this;
- Easiest and best for long term management: DHCP.
- Logon script - keep the old WINS Servers up so that the workstations can
still find the DCs and netlogon folders; After a while (maybe your tenth
time, remove the old WINS server, remove the entry from
You should be able to use VBScript to open an instance of Outlook and then
call the send/receive via an api. Which API, I can't help you with.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original
Maybe a little verbose Ed.
But it started out as a simple question.just got lost somewhere in the haze of
detail.
The long and short of the answer is that it cannot be done without spending on more
software. (because I have exchange!)
Why? I guess Microsoft and it's
lol
On 4/2/03 23:01, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear your complex question.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Diagnosing the cause of the server lockups should be done using perfmon
looking at things like CPU utilization, RPC requests and disk I/O as a first
line of troubleshooting.
On 4/3/03 7:34, Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? How does that solve the problem I have today? I only have 150
IIRC using VBSCRIPT and CDO you can create a MAPI session to log in
using the outlook model do a send/receive and then have it
disconnect I'm looking for a code example now.
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
What's the problem that you are trying to solve by using this script?
On 4/3/03 8:11, Weatherly, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me help out a bit more by saying
I am trying to write a script that will:
Connect to VPN
Open outlook
Perform send/receive
Close outlook
Disconnect from VPN
Thanks
I really appreciate it
I am looking for some right now also
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I am trying to create a program/script for our field users
They have to perform this send/receive over dial up and sometime is can
take hours.
I am trying to write this script and then call it as a scheduled task
Or have it as a simple double-click and forget.
I also have 2 other programs that
So you're looking for something like this?
http://www.mrtweaks.com/mail25.htm
On 4/3/03 8:45, Weatherly, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to create a program/script for our field users
They have to perform this send/receive over dial up and sometime is can
take hours.
I am trying
Yes I think so
Will this work for outlook 2002
I have not done anything with VB
I have done a little with VBS
For the script I am writing now I am using KiX
Rob Weatherly
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Dunno... Code looks similar to the O2K version.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=201434
On 4/3/03 9:05, Weatherly, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I think so
Will this work for outlook 2002
I have not done anything with VB
I have done a little with VBS
For the script I am writing now I
I have a question which I am hoping someone has run into, it is a bit perplexing to
me, and is causing me no end of grief.
Scenario:
I have an exchange 2000 server running in native mode, it is part of a multi
site/server setup with locations on the ends of t1/e1/adsl connections. When
We have a user who has just moved into a new office and wants to send an
email to everyone in his contact list, but he doesn't want each
recipient to see the others that got the mail. A reasonable request.
If he creates a Dist. List and sends it, the names are displayed.
He could use a BCC, but I
Try reducing the maximum number of connections the SMTP connectors being
used have to work with and dedicating specific connectors to the task. The
IIS SMTP service is quite efficient and if given enough connections could
easily consume a significant portion of ones bandwidth.
A peer of mine
Have him create a bogus contact of undisclosed recipients with some bogus
address and place it in the to line. Or if he wants to be professional, have
him use mail merge.
On 4/3/03 9:36, Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a user who has just moved into a new office and wants to
I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3. I rebooted the
server last night at 8:00pm EST and the current time is 11:26am EST. My
problem is the Information Store service says it is still starting.
Everything seems to be running just fine, but I have never seen the
Store service take
What events do you see in the Event Logs? System and Application.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Gregory Householder
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2003 10:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Information Store Service Starting
Can one place a Public Folders contact list under Global Address List Area?
Regards,
Orin
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Depends...does it have to be directly under the GAL?
I have a PF contact list for our parent company. If people want to see it
in Outlook, they have to add the Outlook Address Book first. Then they go
find the PF contact list, right-click and go to Properties | Outlook
Address Book tab and
Is this a one-time send or would it be worthwhile to set up a distribution
list on the server?
Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
503-675-5510
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 08:30 AM
I went ahead and rebooted again. Looks like two services were stuck
together at the same time. I'm still looking into it but for now I'm in
good shape.
Thanks,
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03,
One time deal. Plus I would need to use his personal contact list. Not
sure how I would add them
-Original Message-
From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Email to Multiple people
Is this a
All,
2 quick questions:
Background: we currently have 65 Exchange5.5 Sites, and each local office
Administrator has Permissions Admin on the Site container within their
respective Site. We are now in the process of moving to AD and Exchange2K,
and will require the same level of access for
Released today ... hopefully you are all happy with it. The Exchange 2000
System Management Tools can now be installed on Windows XP after running a
Windows XP Patch.
This patch resolves problems that were found in the Exchange 2000 System
Management Tools install on Windows XP.
(note: this link
How are you going to find an exchange server if your WINS settings are
wrong?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11
Ben T
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Script execution via e-mail?
For me my question is why would I do it manually when I could have my DHCP
server do it for me and for everyone..
very interesting...different systems and all...
bill
-Original Message-
From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:36 PM
To:
Have a correct DNS or hosts entry instead.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick R. Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Script execution via e-mail?
How are you going to find an exchange server if your
The old WINS servers are still up and running.
I was actually using the WINS script as more of an example of the concept
I'm trying to explore.
Thanks.
Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks for the info, guys. I'm using it to convince my IT director to go
with NETIQ. This will hopefully help.
Jonathan,
I have deployed both products, and personally like NetIQ a heck of a lot
better.
Essentially both products can perform the same levels of monitoring and
reporting,
Although I haven't used that anti-virus software, standard procedure if
you're having problems with getting the store up, uninstall the anti-virus
software. Then work on getting the store up. Once you get the store
running, you can put the anti-virus back up. It's easier to troubleshoot
the
We got this resolved: Trend provided a patch that updated eManager from
5.1 to 5.11.
The high CPU utilization and Outlook slowness went away upon installation.
Thought all should know.
Thanks!
-Juancho
_
List posting FAQ:
Thanks. That works great.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H
Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high
security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even
the admin couldn't see their e-mails.
Regards,
Orin
_
List posting FAQ:
For Outlook 2002: The Admpack.exe download from the Office Resource Kit is
the latest version. The kit, a self-extracting file, contains the
Outlooksecurity.oft form template.
My Question: Is the “Outlooksecurity.oft” form template in the current
Office Resource kit the same as the one from
If you can't trust your admin, get one you can trust.
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: High Security for Exchange
Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or
Find one that you can trust?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: High Security for Exchange
Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software
You might want to read through some stuff at the NSA.gov website for
securing your Exchange Server or buy Paul Robichaux book.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Or are you looking for an email encryption solution?
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange
If you can't trust your admin, get one you can
http://www.rsasecurity.com/products/keon/datasheets/dssecure-email.html
--- William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or are you looking for an email encryption solution?
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get HR and upper mgmt to write a policy?
--- Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or
software add-ons for high
security internal situations? Our certain department
would love it if even
the admin couldn't see their e-mails.
Regards,
Orin
I am the admin. They don't trust ANYbody.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
-Original Message-
From:
Mix mode environment, one 5.5 server (first server in site) and two E2K
systems.
When performing the steps below I only get one server listed in the drop
down box. Why? Is there anyway around this?
MORE INFORMATION
Changing the Routing Calculation Server
The routing calculation server is
Have you told them that when they send mail out over the net, that it's
transmitted in plain text? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Security
Oh well.
They shouldn't put anything in an email they wouldn't want the whole world
to read anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: High Security for Exchange
I
Agreed. Its funny how they essentially don't trust anyone to do their jobs.
I would think there is something fishy going on around there.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Oh well.
Why does the E2K system still deliver outbound messages (external domains)
to the E 5.5 system through MTA?
I changed the routing claculation sever to the E2K box. Do I Need to delete
the connectors on the 5.5 system or Choose a server in the site to be the
new routing calculation server?
-
Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing
Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a number
of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at KMS.
Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a solution
IIRC.. No. Slipstick might have a more authoritative answer.
On 4/3/03 16:41, Nikki Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Outlook 2002: The Admpack.exe download from the Office Resource Kit is
the latest version. The kit, a self-extracting file, contains the
Outlooksecurity.oft form template.
Yes. Both DC's and all Exchange boxes are in the same subnet (test lab).
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DSAccess doesn't see all my DC's
Are both in the same
I've seen all sorts of newsgroup posts about people having problems
logging off OWA, but I've never been able to find a resolution. I'm
wondering if someone here can help me.
I've got 2 Exchange mailbox servers and 2 front end boxes. All are E2K
SP3. When users click Log Off, one of 3 things will
All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange
Start with the NSA
ya you are right. unfortunately, the thing is they didn't stop
the AV service but copied the priv and pub out from the box
and replaced with new one. hence it complicate the whole thing.
not sure why after repair of the 2 files it still prompt me
the above error. very strange, after running
A decentralized PGP implementation (a generally bad idea... and imperfect at
best ) doesn't particularly does it?
On 4/3/03 18:36, William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator.
- Original Message -
From: Chris
Particularly? No.
Are you requiring inbound email to be encrypted as well?
I can also capture keystrokes of remote computers of unsuspecting users
among other lame methods.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
You are preaching to the choir William. Data which requires the highest
levels of security should be administered by admins who have the requisite
clearance levels and who are kept in cages during their off hours.
On 4/3/03 18:57, William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Particularly? No.
Woohoo!
High-5!
Yo're looking great today, by the way.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange
You are preaching to the choir William. Data
You need to include part of the message you are replying to so that
people know what the heck you are talking about.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:35 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: The Microsoft
And you should include your name so people know who the heck they are
talking to.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Public Folder:
Exchange
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You need to include
75 matches
Mail list logo
