What OS is this running on?
There are some issues with that much RAM on standard NT4, and the large
memory tuning support (/3GT boot.ini swich) supposededly helps.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Sy
You can't automatically receive mail at the exchange server as user@ip.
Fix DNS and try it again.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message
t; Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> All your base are belong to us.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger
> Seielstad
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:04 AM
> To: Excha
What
I've got that many running quite fine on 512MB, with a 30+GB store size.
Its all in hardware tuning.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Origina
We started 'Ricky' other admins for it.
Ricky - (v.) Modify the desktop theme as much as possible to an outlandish
shrine to someone the admin finds revolting (i.e. Ricky Martin)
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Per
I seem to recall that the password change requires the current password to
be entered before changing. Makes your suggestion a little hard to
implement.
Personally, I would have taken a screenshot of the desktop, as is. Set the
screenshot as the wallpaper, hide the taskbar, and move all icons off
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
>
>
> Of course, generally we see you long before you see us.
>
> Andy
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EM
They are marked at private by User A. The only way to see them is to log in
with User rights on User A's calendar. Everyone should see the time marked
as busy (on the Free/Busy info) if the appointment is marked as busy.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
Start the Outlook executable from a command line, with /cleanfreebusy after
it.
Search technet for /cleanfreebusy and there are complete instructions
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
ht
Same sites going to pretty much kill anything easy.
You'll have to statically map the Exchange services ports, for which the FAQ
has a link to a technet article. That article doesn't, however, tell you how
to statically map the MTA, which was covered on the list a few months ago
(August, probably
Because in your message, you asked Kelly, a Sybari employee, for information
comparing two of her company's competitors products to each other.
I would suggest going to Norton and Trend Micro and asking them the
question.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
Yes you can.
As ICB[1] mentioned, search technet for DumpsterAlwaysOn and make sure you
have Deleted Item Retention enabled.
Scared the crap out of one of my desktop engineers who thought he could hide
something from me in email.
--
Roger D. S
Depending on their client, it should be possible for them to access the GAL
via LDAP, however they will have to be online to do it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.
Not entirely true, at least on the SMTP (port 25) side.
You could set the IMS to only accept connections from your firewall, and
have the firewall proxy (rather than just filter) mail. Unfortunately, many
firewalls won't proxy SMTP.
--
Roger D.
"characteristics"
That's 4 syllables longer than Hanji can handle. 'salesperson', 'statement'
and 'comparing' are also probably pushing it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.p
>
> That was the first thing I checked. The appointments are
> also marked as
> busy. I tried setting them to free, saving, and then setting
> back to busy,
> but that made no difference.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
he called me a "he". I am so not a he.
> ~
> -K.Borndale
> Network Administrator
> Sybari Software
> 631.630.8569 -direct dial
> 631.439.0689 -fax
> http://www.sybari.com
> "One man's ceiling is another man's floor&qu
I believe that hotfix -l will also show what's there.
Then there's qcheck.exe
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowle
Its not exactly what you want, since Ex 5.5 can't really do what you're
looking for, but you could set a per domain size restriction of 0kb (on the
Internet Mail tab) for the domains you want to reject.
Alternately, use a third party MTA
--
Rog
Sure looks like an issue on your end.
Sue has a few nice articles on the site about Outlook2002 patches and Nimda
protection.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
Sue's might, however, since IIRC correctly the site is hosted, and most
hosting companies don't care for ICMP traffic on their networks.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.pereg
You do that well on your own, Bridgeboy...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
Not entirely true. That was an old version that munged stuff that way.
Our P*x* d*n* d* *hat t** o*t*n, *u* h*ve *o** oth*r i*su*s.
Seriously, the newer code bases are the ones that cause dupes, because they
selectively drop packets that have ESMTP commands in them.
--Original Message-
> From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: host unreachable
>
>
> Is there a way to dumb down exchange and not send ESMTP commands?
> 5.5 sp4
>
>
>
-Original Message-
> From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: host unreachable
>
>
> Is there a way to dumb down exchange and not send ESMTP commands?
> 5.5 sp4
&
> We are all over-worked. Just because you are the only one isnt any
> excuse for failing to test and plan a roll out. You need to make the
> case to your boss about help. Like they say here in the US
> "Ignorance of
> the law is no excuse."
Personally, I like a former coworker's comment:
"If w
You have complete control, in a fully documented way, to control whether the
Outlook Security Patch (also included in Office 2000 SP2, IIRC) 'blocks'
attachments or not.
Again, this is hardly Microsoft's fault, unless you want to blame them for
developing functionality that a lot of their custome
Someone else on this list used to post the peoples names on the main
Intranet page. It only took one major outbreak to fix that behavior.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://ww
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following
> potentially unsafe
>
>
> Conformity by humiliation. Works like a champ.
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-
There is an updated FE/BE whitepaper available at Microsoft that covers all
of this.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From
It can be done, but it can get really ugly.
I tend to prefer avoiding upgrades whenever possible. Usually that's always.
If you can get a big enough box to host Exchange temporarily, you can move
everyone to it, rebuilt the current box to how you want it, then move
everyone back. Use the move se
> The only reference I found was to an Exchange 5.5 whitepaper on MS's
> website.
That IS the definitive resource for Exchange Backup and Restore. And the
list archives can fill in most gaps that you might have.
Not to mention the FAQ has an excellent technique to avoid doing most
restores.
Rog
You have a file system antivirus scanner hitting that directory. Stop it
from doing that and bounce the IMC and you'll be fine
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 7:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: It's not Microsoft's fault because
>
>
> Who are these customers that demanded such code features that
> could create
> destructive
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Chris Scharff wrote:
> > No.. I have customers who utilize scripti
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
>
>
> The issue is not scripting per se, but the fact that MS
> Outlook and MSIE
> have a l
Sounds like there is a configuration error at one end of that x.400
connector.
My guess is that either the X.400 standards settings (version/year, two way
alternate, etc) are set wrong, or there is a name resolution issue between
the servers. Make sure the X.400's are using IP addresses, not FQDN
I'll do this one better.
Nimda would not have effected UNPATCHED servers, had proper security
techniques been followed.
Nimda required the IUSR_ account to have read access into the
\WinNT tree. A properly secured server would have that directory (and ALL
directories outside Inetpub\www) explici
I use it on my connector and IMC servers, but only when that's all they do.
Since nothing is stored in the databases there, there is no issue with
losing one.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
I guess I don't have a shred of credibility, eh Ben..
I'll have to remember that next time you call me for help[1]
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
[1] B
t;
>
> Darcy Adams, MOS
> Sr. Exchange Administrator
> Getty Images
>
> 601 N. 34th Street
> Seattle, WA 98103
> Tel 206-925-6617
> Cell 206-255-0169
>
> http://www.gettyimages.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seiels
What business goal are you actually trying to accomplish here?
Going on the assumption you want in inbound only (no outbound) or outbound
only (no inbound) connector. Technically it probably can be done, but it
isn't going to be very clean.
For inbound only, you should be able to put a delivery
Because its obnoxious to add that, as it breaks thread sorting capabilities
of some clients.
HINT: If you're not going to follow the best method (subscribe a public
folder for the mail and your personal account with the NOMAIL option), set
the rule up to move all mail sent TO "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
m OE to Outlook to Entourage to Netscape to
> Mozilla on the Mac/PC. Or Pine or Evolution or Netscape or Mozilla on
> Linux. This list and the Outlook-Dev list are the only ones out of the
> 30 or so I subscribe to that dont prefix the subjects.
>
> Mike
>
> ---
Personally, I love the "Support 10,000 users on a single server"
I can do that with Exchange. Assuming everyone has a 5MB mailbox size and
uses POP3 for client access. Just like that friggin Linux on S/390 scales
better than Exchange fiasco on SlashDot a few months ago.
-
Overall, this reads like a comparison to Exchange 4.0 Beta 2 - half their
statements about Exchange are either too vague to be used as a point of
comparison, or outright lies...
Gotta love marketing departments.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Make sure you ask how much more the clustering support costs...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EM
Um, F7 fires off the speel chuker in any version of Outlook.
Hire better educated users if you think all email has to have proper
grammer.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.pe
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:07 AM
> To: Roger Seielstad
> Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found
> and action
> taken.
>
>
> Tre
>From http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6276284.html
"But after Thursday's price changes, the enterprise edition of the 9i
database will cost a uniform $40,000 per processor, while the standard
edition will cost $15,000 per processor. In the next few days, Oracle will
release to existing custo
They don't need to know how to spell. I don't. The Speel chuker exists in
Outlook
They do need to understand the rules of grammar, however.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.p
CA, CKWSE
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Roger Seielstad
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:13 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found an
All Outlook versions (at least =>98) use the Word dictionary
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAI
gt; or infected by a virus; and a machine autographed picture of
> Larry shaking
> hands with Elvis Smitticamp.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:17 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
ervers within the
> same site - 5.5
> & 2000), where would you find that connection information
> between the two
> server to be able to change it?
>
> Kevin Fletcher
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
That's really a consulting question - much more in depth that you're going
to get out of a mailing list like this.
I can recommend some very good folks, depending on where you are located.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Adminis
Nah. Why spend that much when they can spend what they do now (NOTHING) and
us QMail? (Which is what they use)
THe Oracle product only makes sense if you can piggyback the installation on
top of an existing database server.
Roger
--
Roger D. Se
l, it does tend to whine and demand
> being fed on a
> regular basis, but it also gets the job done. For the right
> price I might be
> willing to rent you the tool (price includes my small
> management fee of
> course).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger
Need a little more information.
How EXACTLY is sendmail handling mail for synxis.com, and what are the
entries in the Routing tab of your IMC in Exchange?
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atl
that.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger
&
ot;fvcking
> contractor" to
> "fvcking employee" last year. It still requires the MGD even
> number bolt on
> adaptor though.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:57 AM
&
Yes, there is a registry key.
Its in the HKLM\CCS\Services\MSExchangeIS hive, but I can't remember the
specifics right now, and I can't find the article that discussed it.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Pere
--Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Best solution for merging EX servers??
>
>
> We're still talking about Exchange here right?
>
>
> -
> (404) 239 - 2981
>
> With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Best solution for
That's like saying you're the King of uucp...
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
First thing would be rerun the performance optimizer. Don't change any
settings, but just rerun it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message---
Ahh, the joys of "Inbound Only" and "Outbound Only" IMCs...
A few issues here. First, as you've found, the Inbound Only setting doesn't
do a whole lot of anything. Its a strange bug that never seemed to get
fixed, but the work arounds are simple.
Second, since you're dealing with site routing (m
Quick search returns Q183400, which shows which tests to run to try to fix
the errors (you don't have to run alltests to do it).
There is something else going on, though. My gut would be that you have a
filesystem antivirus package hitting \exchsrvr\mdbdata, which could cause
this.
Make sure tha
The source was generated by your server in response to a message that it
received from somwhere, with the Reply-To address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], to which your server cannot complete delivery
of the NDR.
Elementary, my dear Watson.
--
Roger D. S
Doesn't indicate anything having to do with relaying.
Most likely, it was spam addressed to invalid addresses at your domain, and
the reply-to address is invalid as well.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine S
It all depends on what functionality you want. There are at least a few
front ends available for IMAP servers that would do basic mail handling, but
OWA is the only one that would cut the groupware features.
TWIG seems pretty cool from an IMAP viewer.
I don't think you would want (nor would it work to have) two AV products on
the Exchange servers.
The approach we use is to have a mail relay running Trend's InterScan
VirusWall scanning everything between the Internet and Exchange. Works like
a dream...
-
Most products like Outlook that get bashed by the media are bashed by people
who don't have experience administering them in real life.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregr
Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits UDP from the current
server's IP address.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's pumping the
praise for NetScreen and Norton..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Mess
Doing this gives the secretary full access to the entire mailbox, as well as
the ability to "Send As" her boss. Doesn't sound like it meets the desired
criteria.
Jennifer Baker posted the best method for this.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
S
Watch all sorts of hell break out after doing it too...
Been there, done that, got the T-Shirt, and I'm still finding issues a YEAR
after migrating people with that option on.
Far better is to migrate the rules to a PST from the client side, then
reimport them following migration.
Outlook has a wide variety of import features. I suggest using Outlook 2000
or later, since they improved the import a lot there.
For specifics, http://www.slipstick.com
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine
gt; works use it,
> if it fails try something else.
>
> Interested to find out why the Outlook client does export
> this information
> correctly but according to you it fails with Exmerge?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Seielstad
.com/sjvn.html
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ban Outlook?
>
> Not at all. Look over his artic
I don't believe it can be done.
Actually, in retrospect, it could be done, but it would be ugly. Very ugly.
By default, Public Folders officially live in the default Recipients
container, but there is an option to change that (can't remember where, but
its there). Theoretically, you could make a
could change the container of an object once it was
> created. I know you could change the Home Server on a PF, but the
> container? Can anyone verify this one way or the other?
>
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
>
> > --
> > From: Roger Seielstad
> >
DIsabling rerouting mail should work, unless you're doing something funky
with mail routing. With it disabled, the IMC will do a directory lookup of
all addresses that it knows, and if it doesn't find the address it will
reject it.
What entries are in your routing table in the IMS? How is the MX
Its only an open relay if reroute incoming mail is enabled. If not, I don't
believe its an open relay.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message
Sure sounds like the box has lost access to all global catalog servers, but
that's just a guess.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
Set default to contributor, which is post only (can't read). Alternately,
set default to none, and set the people who should be able to send these
messages as contributor.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine S
Check CDOLive.com for info on CDO stuff - if its not there, it probably
isn't published anywhere.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
Because there are no other clients that do the following wel;"
-calendaring (especially shared)
-Task Management
-Offline emulation of online mode
IMAP is nice, but you have to be online for it to work.
POP3 sucks no matter what you do with it.
What did you have in mind?
search technet for 'cleansweep' and run it against the boss' mailbox.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: gaby [mailto:[EMAIL
Won't work, because it was most likely set as a delegate, not a rule.
Gotta use cleansweep
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Yep. Its covered in the FAQ, but you can set static ports (at least in 5.5)
for the IS, DS, SA, and MTA.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Messa
Not directly in Exchange.
With E2k, you could write a protocol sink[1] that intercepts the HELO and
MAIL FROM commands, but I haven't seen anyone pushing forward with this type
of solution (at least not publicly), since it requires coding in C/C++ or
Delphi.
Ideally, I'd love to see someone writ
Before you go hog wild with this, we've enabled this functionality (with our
Unix relays, not Exchange) more than once.
I would estimate that 20-30% of the mail hosts that try to pass mail have
misconfigured DNS, and depending on how strict the option is, that means
that 20-30% of your inbound ma
For the scenario you describe, MSW is definitely the way to go.
Rehome all public folders off the boxes to be migrated. Do an arseload of
backups, and pull the trigger. Only changing the site isn't that big a deal,
frankly.
--
Roger D. Seielsta
Nope
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:19 PM
bash-2.04$ whois bayareabioinformatics.com
Whois Server Version 1.3
Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.
No match for "BAYAREABIOINFORMATICS.COM".
>>> Last update
What the heck is that data?!?!?
Anyway, you should be able to format it in such a way that you can import it
into Outlook - take a look at Slipstick.com and see what Sue has as
reference. MSDN might have something too.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - M
you will lose the dates, however, because they are new messages at that
point.
You could also drop a properly formatted message into the IMC queues, which
might keep the dates, but its hit or miss, and I can't remember the exact
format it needs to be in.
-
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 November 2001 16:06
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migration of mail data
>
>
> What the heck is that data?!?!?
>
> Anyway, you should be able to format it
st
> of your mail comes from a core group of customers, no big
> deal. But it
> WILL slow down your SMTP services.
>
> -tom
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 09:56 AM
101 - 200 of 1092 matches
Mail list logo
